Did Donald Trump's Bombing of Iran Fail? What We Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump has hit back at reports that the strikes he ordered on Iranian nuclear sites were not as effective as he had claimed as questions grow over the success of the attacks.
Trump had said that the U.S. strikes had destroyed Iran's ability to make a nuclear bomb—the stated aim by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he launched Operation Rising Lion on June 13.
But CNN reported it had seen an assessment by the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) that key parts of the nuclear program, including centrifuges, could be restarted.
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace during the NATO Summit 2025 in The Hague, the Netherlands, on June 24, 2025.
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace during the NATO Summit 2025 in The Hague, the Netherlands, on June 24, 2025.
PatrickYossi Alpher, a former official with Israel's intelligence agency, Mossad, told Newsweek Wednesday Netanyahu "can dodge the controversy" over disputes about the damaged Iranian sites and that "everyone is used to Trump's hyperbole."
Meanwhile Trump and the White House have rejected the CNN report and Newsweek has contacted the White House for further comment.
Why It Matters
Trump ordered strikes on three Iranian sites at Natanz, Isfahan and the underground facility at Fordow.
The president said Saturday's attacks had "completely and totally obliterated" the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. But the sentiment from analysts and the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, who helped oversee the operation, was more measured.
CNN's report and Trump's rejection of it add to uncertainty about Iran's nuclear weapons capabilities.
What To Know
The CNN report said early DIA intelligence showed the U.S. strikes did not destroy the core components of Iran's nuclear program and probably only delayed it.
Analysis of the damage is ongoing but this assessment is at odds with statements by Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth that the program had been "obliterated."
Unnamed sources told CNN that centrifuges were mostly intact and enriched uranium vital for making bombs had been shifted from the sites before the strikes, meaning that the operation set Iran's program back "a few months tops."
CNN said it was too early for a complete understanding of the effect of the strikes and as yet, it is not clear if the report chimes with other intelligence agencies' assessments.
Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association (ACA) said in a statement to Newsweek that the U.S. strikes "may temporarily set back Iran's nuclear program" but long-term would be likely to push Tehran to view nuclear weapons as necessary for deterrence.
He also said military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's nuclear knowledge and would strengthen its resolve to reconstitute sensitive nuclear activities, possibly withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and then proceeding to weaponization.
Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, told Newsweek that it was hard to see how much damage was done to Iran's nuclear sites although U.S. and Israeli strikes were likely to have set back the Iranian program.
However, Iran still has hundreds of scientists who can reconstitute the program, Israeli assassinations aside, she said.
U.S. intelligence before the strikes had suggested that Iran was far from having a weaponized nuclear capability and was not racing for a bomb, although whether that calculation changes afterward is hard to say, added Kavanagh.
President Donald Trump addresses the nation, alongside Vice President JD Vance, left, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, second, right, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, right, from the White House in Washington, D.C., on June...
President Donald Trump addresses the nation, alongside Vice President JD Vance, left, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, second, right, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, right, from the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 21, 2025. MoreThe Response From Trump and the White House
The White House has acknowledged the existence of the assessment released by CNN but disagreed with it.
Trump posted on the Truth Social platform: "THE NUCLEAR SITES IN IRAN ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED!" and in a follow up post lambasted "fake news CNN."
The president also told reporters that "the press is very disrespectful to those great geniuses and patriots that flew those planes."
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that reports questioning the effectiveness of the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were an attempt "to demean" Trump, and discredit the mission's pilots.
Israel's assessment of the strikes also found less damage on Fordow than expected, according to CNN, which reported that Israeli officials believe the combination of U.S. and Israeli military action set back the Iranian nuclear program by two years.
What People Are Saying
White House statement: "The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program."
President Donald Trump: "FAKE NEWS CNN, TOGETHER WITH THE FAILING NEW YORK TIMES, HAVE TEAMED UP IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEMEAN ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MILITARY STRIKES IN HISTORY.
"THE NUCLEAR SITES IN IRAN ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED! BOTH THE TIIMES AND CNN ARE GETTING SLAMMED BY THE PUBLIC!"
Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow & director of military analysis, Defense Priorities: "From the point of the Iranian regime, it would be reasonable to think that having a usable nuclear capability is the only safeguard for their security after twice having the rug being pulled out from under them on negotiations."
Yossi Alpher, Israeli analyst and ex-Mossad official to Newsweek: "So far the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) takes a cautious position and Bibi [Netanyahu] can dodge the controversy. Besides, everyone is used to Trump's hyperbole."
What Happens Next
As of Wednesday morning, a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that Trump has boasted about brokering was holding as the assessments into the effectiveness of his strikes on Iran continue.
Meanwhile, Kimball said it is too soon to say how much damage the combined Israeli and U.S. strikes have caused to Iran's nuclear program and the return of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to Iran was necessary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The 1600: America Doesn't Have a Conservative Party
The Insider's Track Good morning, I paid $8 for a black iced coffee yesterday in my neighborhood. Eight. Dollars. Sometimes I think most of the underlying rage you see bubbling up around the country can be attributed to this feeling of just being constantly ripped off wherever you go. Speaking of getting ripped off, Congress is in the process of stitching up the votes on President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" flagship legislation in hopes of getting it to his desk by the Fourth. Following a narrow 51–49 procedural vote over the weekend, the Senate advanced the bill to the debate stage, with Senators Rand Paul and Thom Tillis joining all Democrats in opposition. Targeted by MAGA for his disloyalty, Tillis immediately announced he's not running for re-election, thus putting NC potentially in play for Senate Dems next year (the modern GOP has no room for actual conservatives). So once the Senate passes the bill, it gets kicked back to the House as part of the reconciliation process before going to Trump. I'd put it at extremely likely that this giant turd of a bill becomes law in time for the fireworks on Friday. So what's in this thing? It's mostly an extension of the 2017 tax cuts, with some deep cuts to the welfare state for good measure. The current Senate version raises the debt ceiling $5 trillion. It'll increase the deficit by some $3 trillion over the next decade, per the Congressional Budget Office. (I've seen lots of Trump supporters attack the CBO for its scoring of this bill as some kind of "lefty" organization. Please. The CBO is run by a Bush appointee). The bill uses this well-worn accounting trick to make it look like Republicans are actually reducing the deficit by $508 billion, as Lindsey Graham falsely claimed over the weekend. But that's based on this little gimmick that lets them basically write off the $4 trillion cost of extending the tax cuts. So when you see Republicans tossing around that $508B number this week, it should immediately set off your B.S. detector. Here's some other random little tidbits that caught my eye in the current manifestation of the bill: A huge cut in SNAP benefits and food assistance for the poor, plus another $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare (but mostly Medicaid). Millions will probably lose their coverage. This is the provision that Dems could run with as a winning message for the midterms, if they aren't too busy fighting for trans girls in sports or whatever. A tax on remittances, which is the money that immigrants send home, has been watered down to effectively be meaningless. House Rs passed a 5% tax on remittance, which was cut to 3.5% by the Senate, and then further to 1%. It also doesn't apply to bank transfers. This is one of those things I don't understand. It's a tax on US dollars flowing out of the country. Who is the lobby pushing Senate Rs against this? Western Union? On the energy front, the bill phases out Biden's tax credits for solar and wind—not surprising—while adding an excise tax on new renewable projects that utilize components made in China. At the same time, there's provisions tucked in there to incentivize domestic coal production. Making Coal Great Again, baby. Our children will be ashamed of us. Thankfully, the bill no longer includes Sen. Mike Lee's provision to sell off millions of acres of pristine federal land in the West to developers after an outcry from (actual) conservative voters. Teddy Roosevelt would've been spinning in his grave. The bottom line is that this legislation acts as a giant wealth transfer from the poor to the rich and the young to the old. Younger earners get nothing from the tax cuts, which are all structured to benefit higher-earners. It adds trillions to the national debt, which means higher taxes and mortgage payments for young Americans trying to start or build their families. One nonpartisan analysis suggests a 40-year-old making the median income will lose $7,500 over their lifetime, while a 70-year-old with the same income nets $17,500. The Boomers win, as always. And then we wonder why young voters turn out in record numbers in our most expensive city to elect a socialist. If this is the alternative, why wouldn't they? If this whole charade does anything, it should finally disabuse Americans of this notion that modern-day Republicans are the conservative party. You simply cannot be an actual conservative while voting to increase the debt, adding to the deficit, all while doing precisely nothing to deal with our spending problem. The Rundown A fierce war of words has erupted between Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Donald Trump following recent U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Khamenei accused Trump of "exaggerating in order to cover up and conceal the truth," directly responding to Trump's claim that the U.S. had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites. Separately, Trump said that he is offering Iran "nothing" and is refusing to engage with Iranian officials, signaling a hardening U.S. stance. Read more. Also happening: US-Canada trade talks: Canada and the United States have resumed trade negotiations after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed to rescind the country's digital services tax on U.S. technology companies. The development follows President Donald Trump's announcement on Friday that he was suspending all trade talks with Canada "effective immediately" over the tax policy. Here's the latest. Week in review: President Donald Trump is coming off what may be his most successful week in office—a landmark Supreme Court ruling, a successful NATO summit, a ceasefire that appears to be holding in the Middle East, another peace deal in Africa, a stock market back to setting records and a key trade breakthrough with China. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)
The Senate is making a final push to advance President Trump's signature legislation with a flurry of last-minute changes that stunned Elon Musk and the already besieged clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels. The controversy surrounding the bill's energy approach is just one front in a frenzied final push with plenty of additional attention on the price tag after a new weekend tally found that bill has grown by nearly $1 trillion since the Senate took it up. Meanwhile a grueling final Senate push to approve the package cleared a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, with consideration continuing and an amendment process expected to take up much of Monday before a final vote later Monday or perhaps Tuesday. The energy provisions of the 900-plus page bill have come in for particular scrutiny after last minute changes phased out clean energy tax credits faster than expected and also added new taxes on wind and solar projects. At the same time, new last minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral when it comes to a government manufacturing credit. "We're doing coal," Trump said in an interview released over the weekend on Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell." The mix left fossil fuel advocates celebrating and clean energy advocates slamming the bill at a new higher volume. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk — who worked in the White House before his dramatic falling out with the president — was perhaps the loudest voice in the latter group. He issued a series of weekend posts calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive [with] handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." The energy changes came as top-line costs of the deal remained a key point of contention. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office tally released over the weekend showed the revised bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt. That assessment, which does not include additional interest costs, comes after a similar analysis of the House package found a $2.4 trillion tab. Trump suggested Republicans look past the deficit implications in one of his weekend posts, urging passage as soon as possible saying he also wants to cut costs but adding to lawmakers: "REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected." He also made a case that White House projections of blockbuster economic growth (dismissed by many economists as fantastical) will make the math add up in the end. The focus on energy comes after weeks of debate over Biden-era energy credits. The initial Senate blueprint had offered a slower rollback of clean energy credits for things like solar panels and electric vehicles but last minute changes to the bill put it more in line with the harder line House version which seeks to eliminate the credits sooner. Some provisions are even more immediate with the Senate version proposing to eliminate EV credits by September 30 of this year. And on top of that, a new tax was unveiled when the bill was released that would not just eliminate government help for renewable energy projects — but add a new cost for wind and solar projects completed after 2027 if a certain amount of supplies came from China. The changes stunned many clean energy advocates — not just Musk — with a statement from the American Clean Power Association saying the effect would be to "strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments." What that could means for consumers down the road — some concluded — are higher utility bills as currently under construction AI data centers are set to increase electricity demand in the years ahead. Some are even projecting double digit price increases in some utility bills by 2029. An analysis from the left-leaning Center for American Progress found that the bill would exacerbate existing upward pressure on utility prices, with Democratic Senator Brian Schatz adding "we are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar." Fossil fuels advocates meanwhile were largely ebullient at the last minute changes which saw existing fossil fuel focused provisions — around issues like permitting, lease sales, and methane emissions fees — joined by some new credits for these producers including for coal. Senate Republicans say the bill will generate over $15 billion in new federal revenue through expanded oil, gas, and coal leasing with leaders with Senator John Barasso of Wyoming saying "America is an energy superpower and once again, we are going to act like it." The bill is also set to be even more expensive after weeks of negotiations saw expensive compromises on issues like state and local tax (SALT) deductions, more generous business tax credits, and the adjustment of some cost savings around Medicaid. The fullest accounting came over the weekend when the CBO estimated the Senate bill would increase the debt by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. The analysis also found that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the health care provisions — an increase over the findings for the House-passed version that tallied that 10.9 million people would be without health coverage of that version passed. The bill is projected to be even more expensive after things like interest costs are included, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget protecting the current total tally as in the neighborhood of $3.5 to $4.2 trillion over the next decade. "The debt impact could rise as high as $4.5 trillion if various rumored adjustments are made," the group added of potential additional changes still to come. The findings also come as Senate Republicans push forward on a budget gimmick that is set to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink using a "current policy baseline" that Democrats say violated Senate rules but appears set to proceed. Either way the sky-high debt findings could imperil the bill politically, with two GOP senators already likely to vote no and others not yet saying they will back Trump's effort to get this over the line in the coming hours. The bill will also need to be approved by the House if the amended package advances and is then considered by a bloc of fiscal conservatives there who say they barely voted in May for that less expensive version. One initial comment from the House Freedom Caucus was negative, with the group writing that the new tally was above "our agreed budget framework." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans try to get Trump's tax cuts over the line, setting aside cost concerns
By Richard Cowan and Bo Erickson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Senate Republicans on Monday will try to pass President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, despite divisions within the party about its expected $3.3 trillion hit to the nation's debt pile. They were set for a marathon session in which the minority Democrats are allowed to offer an unlimited number of votes, part of the arcane process Republicans are using to bypass Senate rules that normally require 60 of the chamber's 100 members to agree on legislation. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its assessment on Sunday of the bill's hit to the $36.2 trillion debt, figuring that it would add about $800 billion more than the version passed last month in the House of Representatives. Many Republicans dispute that claim, contending that extending existing policy will not add to the debt. Nonetheless, international bond investors see incentives to diversify out of the U.S. Treasury market. Democrats, meanwhile, hope the latest, eye-widening figure could stoke enough anxiety among fiscally minded conservatives to get them to buck their party, which controls both chambers of Congress. 'Republicans are doing something the Senate has never, never done before, deploying fake math and accounting gimmicks to hide the true cost of the bill," Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Sunday. "Republicans are about to pass the single most expensive bill in U.S. history to give tax breaks to billionaires while taking away Medicaid, SNAP benefits and good-paying jobs for millions of people." The Senate narrowly advanced the tax-cut, immigration, border and military spending bill in a procedural vote late on Saturday, voting 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill. One powerful illustration of the Republican divide came on Sunday when Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said he would not seek re-election, after Trump threatened to back a challenger to him in next year's midterm elections over his vote against the bill. Trump on social media has hailed the progress as a "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." In a separate post on Sunday, he said: "We will make it all up, times 10, with GROWTH, more than ever before." Trump wants the bill passed before the July 4 Independence Day holiday. While that deadline is one of choice, lawmakers will face a far more serious deadline later this summer when they must raise the nation's self-imposed debt ceiling or risk a devastating default. If the Senate succeeds in passing the bill, it will then go to the House, where members are also divided, with some angry about its cost and others worried about cuts to the Medicaid program. Republicans can afford to lose no more than three votes in either chamber to pass a bill the Democrats are united in opposition to. HITS TO BENEFITS The legislation was the sole focus of a marathon weekend congressional session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats seek to slow the legislation's path to passage. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, the other Republican "no" vote, opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit by an additional $5 trillion. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Senate Republicans, who reject the CBO's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are set on using an alternative calculation method that does not factor in costs from extending the 2017 tax cuts. Outside tax experts, like Andrew Lautz from the nonpartisan think tank Bipartisan Policy Center, call it a "magic trick." Using this calculation method, the Senate Republicans' budget bill appears to cost substantially less and seems to save $500 billion, according to the BPC analysis. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
