A Uniqlo store in Dublin may be "on the agenda"
The store, which is known for selling high quality but affordable basics, already has stores in ten European countries, including England and Scotland, but has not yet revealed the location of the new stores.
Shoppers have repeatedly expressed their desire for the shop to come to Dublin, something which a commercial real estate expert said is 'on the agenda'.
Earnings from Uniqlo's parent company, Fast Retailing, make them world's third biggest clothing manufacturer and retailer after Zara owner Inditex and Sweden's H&M.
Irish fans of the brand can currently only order clothes from Uniqlo online, but for delivery under €70, shipping costs €9.95.
Advertisement
The specialist, who works for a large commercial estate agent, told
The Journal
Uniqlo has 'looked' at opening a Irish branch of the store, but has not yet found a building large enough.
Uniqlo shops stock men's, women's and children clothing, and are generally housed in a two story commercial building.
'I know they've looked, the difficulty is the size of building, I don't know if anything has been agreed on', the expert said.
The brand has over 2,500 location, including flagship stores in London, Amsterdam and Milan.
The commercial estate agent said that Ireland is on the agenda as a capital European city, but it is in a competitive environment with other cities across Europe, many of which have larger populations.
They highlighted that trading out of listed buildings is difficult for retailers as the structural integrity of the building must be maintained.
For this reason they said Uniqlo may not find a suitable space in the General Post Office, if
plans to make the GPO a cultural, retail and office hub
went ahead.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump reaps $50bn tariff haul as world ‘chickens out'
America's trading partners have largely failed to retaliate against Donald Trump 's tariff war , allowing a president taunted for 'always chickening out' to raise nearly $50 billion in extra customs revenues at little cost. Four months since Mr Trump fired the opening salvo of his trade war, only China and Canada have dared to hit back at Washington imposing a minimum 10 per cent global tariff, 50 per cent levies on steel and aluminium, and 25 per cent on autos. At the same time US revenues from customs duties hit a record high of $64 billion in the second quarter – $47 billion more than over the same period last year, according to data published by the US treasury on Friday. China's retaliatory tariffs on American imports, the most sustained and significant of any country, have not had the same effect, with overall income from custom duties only 1.9 per cent higher in May 2025 than the year before. READ MORE Combined with limited retaliation from Canada, which has yet to release second-quarter customs data, the duties imposed on American exports worldwide represent a tiny fraction of the US revenue during the same period. Some other US trading partners decided against responding in kind while negotiating with Mr Trump to avoid even higher threatened tariffs. The European Union , the world's biggest trading bloc, has planned counter-tariffs but has repeatedly deferred implementation, now linking them to Trump's August 1st deadline for talks. The cost of Mr Trump's tariffs are also not falling solely on American consumers, supply chain experts say, as international brands look to spread the impact of cost increases around the globe to minimise the impact on the US market. Simon Geale, executive vice-president at Proxima, a supply chain consultancy owned by Bain & Company, said big brands such as Apple, Adidas and Mercedes would look to mitigate the impact of price increases. 'Global brands can try and swallow some of the tariff cost through smart sourcing and cost savings but the majority will have to be distributed across other markets, because US consumers might swallow a 5 per cent increase, but not 20 or even 40,' Mr Geale said. Despite US tariffs hitting levels not seen since the 1930s, the timidity of the global response to Mr Trump has forestalled a retaliatory spiral of the kind that decimated global trade between the first and second world wars. Economists said the US's dominant position as the world's largest consumer market, coupled with Mr Trump's threats to redouble tariffs on states that defy him, meant that for most countries the decision to 'chicken out' was not cowardice, but economic common sense. Modelling by Capital Economics, a consultancy, found that a high-escalation trade war where the average reciprocal tariff rate reached 24 per cent would cause a 1.3 per cent hit to world GDP over two years, compared with 0.3 per cent in a base case it remained at 10 per cent. 'Unlike the 1930s when countries had more balanced trading relationships, today's world features a hub-and-spoke system with the US at the centre,' said Marta Bengoa, professor of international economics at City University of New York. 'That makes retaliation economically less desirable for most countries, even when it might be politically satisfying.' Alexander Klein, professor of economic history at Sussex University, added that short-term considerations – reducing exposure to tariffs and minimising the risk of inflation – were driving most negotiations with Mr Trump, which gave the White House the upper hand. 'I'd like to think leaders were learning the lessons of history, but I fear that's optimistic. More likely, the EU, Canada and many other governments fear the hit to global supply linkages and inflation from escalation,' he said. 'Trump cares less about that, so is taking advantage.' The US's largest trading partner Mexico did not retaliate after being hit with 25 per cent tariffs in March on exports not covered by the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement. From the beginning of her talks with Mr Trump, President Claudia Sheinbaum said she preferred a deal. The failure of the world to unite and collectively face down Mr Trump's threats has also left the US president more space to pick off individual states. He threatened a 50 per cent tariff on Brazil last week, citing largely political justifications. 'Trump has made it clear that he is prepared to raise tariffs further in the face of retaliation,' said Prof Bengoa of City University of New York. 'Many countries learned from the 2018-19 trade war that retaliation often leads to counter-retaliation rather than negotiated solutions.' Even within unified blocs such as the EU, the competing interests of individual member states, combined with wider fears over whether a confrontation with Mr Trump could undermine US security guarantees to Europe, have bred intense caution. Mr Trump's decision to threaten to increase tariffs to 30 per cent did not provoke a big reaction in Brussels, in part because senior US officials, including treasury secretary Scott Bessent , reached out behind the scenes to counsel caution, according to insiders. An EU official familiar with the talks added that negotiations were not taking place in isolation, at a time when Europe was looking for continued US backing for Ukraine. 'They affect the whole spectrum of US relations including those regarding security,' they said. As a result, unlike China which matched Mr Trump tariff for tariff in April, the EU has repeatedly delayed implementing its packages of retaliatory measures as it seeks to leave space to cut a deal with Mr Trump in advance of August 1st. When the European Commission published its latest list of potential retaliatory targets on €72 billion of goods on Tuesday – including Boeing aircraft, cars and bourbon – it put no specific tariff rates against individual products, in an apparent attempt not to rile Mr Trump further. Even Canada and China have been wary of antagonising Mr Trump despite being the only two countries to impose retaliatory tariffs. US tariffs on China escalated to 145 per cent by mid-April, causing Chinese exports to the US to plummet by a third in May. Both sides quickly stepped back, agreeing a 90-day pause in Geneva in May, cutting the rate down to 30 per cent. In February and March Canada imposed nearly C$155 billion in retaliatory tariffs, including on steel and auto parts. In recent weeks though, it has retreated in the face of US pressure despite election promises by Canadian premier Mark Carney to confront Mr Trump. With US trade accounting for 20 per cent of Canadian GDP – compared with 2 per cent for the US – Mr Carney has calibrated his responses. He ditched a digital services tax under US pressure and did not match Mr Trump's decision last month to double steel tariffs to 50 per cent. 'Carney's 'elbows up' rhetoric worked during the election campaign, but we can't be confrontational with the US,' said Dan Nowlan, an adviser to former Conservative Canadian premier Stephen Harper. 'It's now a much more realist approach.' Diplomats say whether the world will eventually unite to confront Mr Trump will depend in part on where tariff levels settle around the August 1st deadline. Trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said this week that a 30 per cent tariff on EU exports would leave the bloc with nothing to lose since transatlantic trade would be 'almost impossible'. He added the EU was talking with 'like-minded' trading partners about potential joint measures. Longer term, the failure to retaliate would also give US companies a relatively free pass into global supply chains while EU and Asian manufacturers still faced high tariffs into the US, said Creon Butler, head of global economy at Chatham House. 'The calculation is short term versus long term,' he said. 'It makes sense not to retaliate in the short term, but long term, there's a calculation for other countries over the extent to which we are going to fight for global supply chains outside the US.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Here's how much the government says tiny apartments will save
HOW FAR WILL the government's overhaul of regulations for building apartments go in its bid to reduce costs and entice developers? As announced last week , Housing Minister James Browne wants to boost construction in the sector by tweaking requirements for new apartments, in response to warnings about flagging development . They would pare back the minimum apartment size to approximately the size of two and a half parking spaces and scrap rules on the maximum number of one-bedroom and studio apartments in buildings. Fewer windows and balconies would also be required, while a requirement to have indoor communal or cultural facilities has been scrapped. The proposed changes, contained in the Planning Design Standards for Apartments, Guidelines for Planning Authorities (2025) bill, are aiming for a €50,000 to €100,000 reduction in the cost of construction. This is to be achieved by applying savings to the cost of individual apartments and by changes affecting the whole apartment block. Cutting down on floor space The figures, seen by The Journal , were prepared for the government by the Land Development Agency. Some of the biggest savings for each individual apartment in a new build are found by cutting down on floor space – potentially lessening the cost for a developer of between €30,000 to €43,500. Advertisement The costings show that, at €10-15,000, some of the largest savings in an apartment block could come from the removal of requirements for community and cultural spaces for the new building's residents. Further savings on the cost of each apartment could come from the decrease in dual aspect ratios – meaning an apartment has windows on at least two external walls – and could save a builder as much as €20,000 in certain cases. Another potential reduction is outlined by snipping balconies from new developments, with savings of between €11,000 and €22,000 estimated per apartment. In terms of overall prices, the report outlined minimum savings of €47,000 per apartment depending on how the reductions are made by the builder. Maximum savings are estimated at €85,500 per apartment. Across an entire apartment block – meaning changes such as scrapping community facilities or reducing floor space – minimum savings are estimated at €14,000 while maximum savings come in at €25,000. 'Dark shoe boxes' The changes have been criticised by the Opposition since they were unveiled last week. The Journal / YouTube Sinn Féin housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin warned it would mean renters paying higher rents for 'smaller and darker' apartments. Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne said the 'liveability' of apartments in Ireland would be much reduced . Hearne raised the issue with Taoiseach Micheál Martin in the Dáil yesterday. Related Reads Dublin city councillors criticise Minister's plans to downsize apartments Taoiseach: 'Some councils took their eye off the ball, they need to go back to housing' House prices have jumped by up to 19% in some counties over the past year The Taoiseach denied that the smaller units will be 'dark shoe boxes'. These are sensible provisions, he said. The new unit designs will suit 'different people looking for different accommodation at different stages of their lives', concluded Martin. The Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland (RIAI) also raised concerns about the new design rules, stating that while it recognises the pressing challenges raised around the viability and affordability of housing delivery, it is 'deeply concerned' that moves to relax key design safeguards risk undermining the creation of sustainable, high-quality living environments. Such a move could create future long-term challenges for apartment owners and tenants, said the RIAI. The new guidance will allow for development of apartment blocks with single typologies which is completely at odds with the previous work of the Department of Housing to strengthen the sustainable communities approach to delivering homes, the architects group said in a statement. It went on to state that evidence shows the cumulative effects of 'poorly sized and designed homes can contribute to social inequality and reduce overall productivity'. With reporting by Christina Finn Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Extra.ie
2 hours ago
- Extra.ie
An Post on the brink -- but cabinet sources warn there will be NO bailout
An Post is facing a 'dire financial situation' with its cash reserves dropping below €1 million for the first time ever, can reveal. Communications Minister Patrick O'Donovan has briefed the Cabinet on the bleak financial realities facing the State's postal service. The Cabinet was told that without the significant once-off revenue generated from election-related posts last year, when general, local and European elections were held, the organisation would have made a 'substantial loss'. Communications Minister Patrick O'Donovan has briefed the Cabinet on the bleak financial realities facing the State's postal service. Pic: Leah Farrell/ Political sources insisted last night that there would be 'no bailout' for An Post despite its deteriorating long-term financial wellbeing. A Coalition row could be brewing, however, with Minister of State and Independent TD, Michael Healy-Rae, who is also a postmaster, advocating for more funding for the network. Postage revenue has collapsed in line with mail services in other countries. A recent analysis by consultancy firm Grant Thornton found that, between 2019 and 2023, the level of mail processed by An Post dropped by 25%. Political sources insisted last night that there would be 'no bailout' for An Post despite its deteriorating long-term financial wellbeing. Pic: Dirk Hudson/Shutterstock Latest company accounts for the company show that cash balances decreased from €45.7million in 2022 to €11.3million in 2023. The boost from the elections masked this with a spokesman for An Post saying their final position was €38million in cash balances. An Post's Annual Report for 2024 will be laid before the Oireachtas tomorrow, having been presented to Cabinet yesterday. One Cabinet minister told that the organisation was facing a 'dire financial situation', which was highlighted by cash reserves dropping below €1million last year. An Post's Annual Report for 2024 will be laid before the Oireachtas tomorrow, having been presented to Cabinet yesterday. Pic: File A separate Government source said last night that 'a decision will have to be made on whether we are willing to fund it or not and what it looks like in a digital age'. New Economy and Recovery Authority (NewERA), who provide financial and commercial advice to Government ministers and departments, have been actively involved with An Post in assessing its financial future. 'They still have a mail infrastructure for an old-style postal service, so that will be subject to review,' one Cabinet source said. An options paper has yet to be provided to Mr O'Donovan, but one is expected 'imminently'. A spokesman for An Post told that their balance sheet is 'strong with little debt', and that small loans from the European Investment Bank and Bank of Ireland are both 'being fully serviced'. Pic: RollingNews A spokesman for An Post told that their balance sheet is 'strong with little debt', and that small loans from the European Investment Bank and Bank of Ireland are both 'being fully serviced'. They added: 'The company has reduced its debt significantly in the past two years – by €48million – including the repayment of a Government loan of €30million from its own resources. 'At December 2024 year end the company had spare cash resources of €38million and undrawn bank facilities of €30million, ensuring it had working capital facilities for its trading operations.' An Post operates as a commercial entity and does not receive State funding. However, the post office network, most of which are privately owned and run by postmasters under contract to An Post, receives a €10million annual subvention from Government. An Post is currently in negotiations with the post office network, with the existing contract between the pair, which sees post office providers paid per transaction, expiring this month. In May, the Irish Postmasters' Union, representing the post office network, made a submission to Government in which it insisted the current €10million in annual funding 'is no longer sufficient'. The submission by Grant Thornton described the postal network as being 'at tipping point' as they sought a €5million increase in their annual funding. 'The current annual Government investment of €10million, while welcome, is no longer sufficient to secure the network,' the report said. Speaking to last night, Seán Martin, president of the Irish Postmasters' Union, said that 'up to 400 post offices' would face closure without the increase in funding. 'Speaking at the Oireachtas Committee on Communications, Minister of State at the Department Charlie McConalogue said that 'we're very committed to continue to support the post office network' through the budgetary process. However, he said this was being done through the €10million allocation. The row has the potential to place the two main Coalition parties on a collision course with the junior coalition partners of Independent TDs. Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture and Independent TD for Kerry, Mr Healy-Rae, told last night that 'the constant delivery, excellent service, outreach, [customers] entitled to a service every day – from a social point of view… we'll be advocating for €15million'. Mr Healy-Rae said that the retention of the existing model of service delivery, which sees post delivered five days a week in addition to other services provided, has support across the political divide. Asked if the Government should support An Post if it was no longer economically viable, Mr Healy-Rae said that he hoped that it could be 'made to be viable by directing more business through it'.
