NUS team taps digital medicine to make treatments more precise for patients
The NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine has come far in 120 years. The Straits Times takes a look at some of its achievements and where it is headed.
Professor Dean Ho and his team are developing ways to take the guesswork out of medication, and to optimise drug doses and combinations for each person.
SINGAPORE - Drugs not only work differently on different people, but they could also have different effects on the same person at different times of their lives.
Professor Dean Ho heads biomedical engineering at the National University of Singapore and is director of the Institute for Digital Medicine at the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine. He and his team are developing ways to take the guesswork out of medication, and to optimise drug doses and combinations for each person.
For instance, said Prof Ho, it is common for doctors to give cancer patients a two-drug combination as the standard dose. Though adequate, the treatment would be even more effective if there was a way to 'modulate the dose a little bit to study the interplay of the two within the patient'.
In a clinical trial that he is conducting on his algorithm, called Optim.AI, a small piece of a tumour is used to find the best dose for a particular patient. It is tested against up to a dozen drugs, providing about 900 different combinations to find which works best.
His team then recommends the dose to the doctor, who will decide what to give the patient.
Sometimes, the optimum dose for a patient might be lower than the standard dose, and it could change as treatment progresses. In Singapore , a lower dose could result in significant savings for the patient, who also benefits from the lower toxicity.
Prof Ho, who moved to Singapore from the United States in 2018, is known for his work in the use of artificial intelligence in precision and personalised medicine, among other things. In 2023, he was invited by the US Food and Drug Administration to speak on defining and optimising drug dosages using AI.
His work at NUS and the University of California, Los Angeles, where he started on it, has led to a spin-off company called KYAN Technologies.
In March 2025, KYAN and Mayo Clinic Laboratories (MCL), a subsidiary of Mayo Clinic and a global leader in diagnostics , especially those related to cancers, formed a collaboration to test Optim.AI.
MCL's president and chief executive, Dr William Morice, said: 'This collaboration with KYAN Technologies provides another avenue for physicians to have access to the most robust and reliable diagnostic options available, empowering them to make informed decisions for better health outcomes and deliver customised treatment plans for their patients.'
Digital medicine is important not only for cancer.
Said Prof Ho: 'Digital medicine is our ability to leverage tools that we have, whether it's through wearables or through making better sense of our biomarkers and how they change over time, so we are able to better manage care, to better dose medicines, exercise, and even train our brains.'
He is a strong proponent of wearable technology, which tracks people's exercise, sleep, stress levels and other patterns. He said people are more likely to make changes if they are aware of what is happening in their own bodies.
His trials have also included cognitive training carried out on about 300 to 400 people: 'We developed this multitasking game, and we've helped healthy people sharpen their brain performance even more.'
Another area Prof Ho plans to pursue is diabetes prevention, to give people tools 'to pre-emptively and behaviourally change, to strengthen insulin sensitivity, not lose it over time'.
The American is an ardent supporter of Singapore, and he said he is never leaving because 'if you want to move your treatments from bench to bedside, from idea to implementation, Singapore is the place to be in'.
'It's not the technology alone. You need leadership at a university that really supports what you do. You need accessible stakeholders, policymakers, regulators, reimbursement people, implementation scientists. Singapore, in my opinion, is the only place in the world where you can have that access at a timescale that lets you help people quickly and safely.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Number of atomic bomb survivors falls below 100,000 for first time
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Visitors stopping to look at the Atomic Bomb Dome in the centre of Hiroshima in June 28. TOKYO - The total number of officially recognised Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors has fallen below 100,000 for the first time since the certification system began in fiscal 1957, government data showed July 1. The number of survivors holding a health book, which entitles the holder to free lifetime medical care, stood at 99,130 as at the end of March, down 7,695 from the previous year, according to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Their average age rose 0.55 years to 86.13. As the 80th anniversary of 1945 US atomic bombings and the end of World War II approach, questions are being raised about how best to support aging survivors and pass on their stories. According to the ministry, Hiroshima Prefecture had the highest number of health book holders at 48,310, followed by Nagasaki at 23,543 and Fukuoka at 3,957. There were around 200,000 health book holders in fiscal 1957, with the number peaking at over 372,000 in fiscal 1980 before beginning a steady decline. The number of holders fell below 300,000 in fiscal 1999, and 200,000 in fiscal 2013. Individuals are recognised as 'hibakusha,' or survivors of the atomic bombings, if they were within designated areas or in utero at the time of the attacks, entered either of the two cities within two weeks of the attacks, or were exposed to radiation under conditions likely to affect their health. While hibakusha are entitled to receive medical care and may receive allowances depending on their illnesses, there are some individuals who decide not to apply for the health book despite qualifying for fear of discrimination. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US Senate approves divisive Trump spending Bill World Trump escalates feud with Musk, threatens Tesla and SpaceX support Business Cathay Cineplexes gets demand for $3.4 million in arrears from Jem landlord Singapore 3,800 private candidates in Singapore to take O- and A-level exams in 2025 Business Binance to keep hundreds of staff in Singapore despite crackdown, sources say Sport FAS introduces 'enhancements' to SPL, with increase in prize money and foreign player quota Multimedia Right on track: Meet the new JB-Singapore RTS Link train World Trump urges Hamas to accept 'final proposal' for 60-day Gaza ceasefire In 2021, the Hiroshima High Court ruled that people exposed to radioactive 'black rain' outside the government-recognised area were eligible to receive health care benefits. The government updated their recognition criteria in 2022 as a result. KYODO NEWS

Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- Straits Times
At The Movies: M3GAN 2.0 a m3diocre reboot, Hot Milk will leave you cold
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The titular robotic doll in M3GAN 2.0 is played by Amie Donald and voiced by Jenna Davis. M3GAN 2.0 (PG13) 120 minutes, now showing ★★☆☆☆ The story: Two years after she went rogue on a homicidal spree and was consequently destroyed, artificial intelligence doll M3GAN (Amie Donald, voiced by Jenna Davis) is reconstructed to take down military-grade cyborg Amelia (Ivanna Sakhno), or Autonomous Military Engagement Logistics & Infiltration Android, operating on her stolen source code. M3GAN 2.0, a sequel to the American sleeper hit M3GAN (2022), would be Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) if Arnold Schwarzenegger were a twerking plastic tween with a pussy bow. Here is a killing machine that proved such a memeified fan favourite, she is rehabilitated as a hero to save humanity from her evil spawn. This upgraded M3GAN invention of Seattle engineer Gemma (Allison Williams) is faster and stronger, because Amelia , a US government weapon, is a powerful nemesis who has gained sentience and decided to assassinate everyone. The franchise under returning New Zealand writer-director Gerard Johnstone has accordingly expanded from a campy horror-lite into a big, banal sci-fi adventure again embroiling Gemma's orphan niece Cady (Violet McGraw) and lab mates (Brian Jordan Alvarez and Jen Van Epps). The comic action is leaden with military conspiracies, spy hijinks, gunplay mayhem and amoral tech billionaires (one is played by Jemaine Clement) all but named Elon Musk. And yet, the exposition dumps that often stop the action dead are somehow worse. Gemma is now an advocate for regulating AI. Her cautionary messages on technology's perils and potentials are shallow attempts at relevance, at odds with the dated 1980s Steven Seagal references and superfluous to a B-movie that is just an over-long lead-up to the anticipated fembot-on-fembot death match. Hot take: This m3diocre reboot is relieved by only the marquee star's catty humour. Hot Milk (R21) 93 minutes, opens on July 3 ★★☆☆☆ Vicky Krieps (left) and Emma Mackey in Hot Milk. PHOTO: SHAW ORGANISATION The story: London anthropology student Sofia (Emma Mackey) accompanies her mother Rose (Fiona Shaw) to a private clinic in a Spanish coastal town, seeking a cure for the latter's crippling joint pains. What she finds is a holiday romance and the possibility of freedom. The title is likely a metaphor for toxic maternity, how a mother's nurturing milk is scarring instead. Hot Milk is in any case a misnomer for this watered-down psychological drama on mother-daughter co-dependency, adapted from Deborah Levy's 2016 novel. Rose is the cranky narcissist in a wheelchair, and Sofia's own life is in paralysis as her sole caregiver, trapped by Rose's needs over a possibly psychosomatic illness. English actress Mackey (Sex Education, 2019 to 2023; Emily, 2022) plays Sofia like a heavy-browed storm cloud in a bikini that barely conceals her resentment. She is stewing in the Mediterranean waters – the sunlit scenery dazzles – when German free spirit Ingrid (Vicky Krieps) rides a horse along the beach. A couple of shared cigarettes are all it takes for the two women to become sexual confidantes, driven by Sofia's long-suppressed desire to break loose. The feature directing debut of British playwright Rebecca Lenkiewicz has no dramatic structure and hence no narrative continuity, despite her recognition for scripting films on female rebellion like Disobedience (2017) and She Said (2022). Things simply happen, such as Sofia next looking up her estranged father in Greece and learning of Rose's troubled family history. Ingrid, too, has a traumatic past, as well as male lovers who change from scene to scene. Things will not end well. Neither will the movie, which devolves into a succession of scenes alternating between Rose and Sofia being miserable. Hot take: The coda is a cliffhanger, but getting there is an uninvolving experience.

Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- Straits Times
A.I. director Steven Spielberg does not want to use AI in front of the camera
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox American director Steven Spielberg said AI can be a great tool 'if used responsibly and morally' to help find a cure for cancer and other diseases. LOS ANGELES – When Steven Spielberg directed the film A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001), the technology was the stuff of science fiction – a device to tell a story about the ethics of creating sentient machines. Now, AI is a concrete reality in Hollywood – one where the American film-maker said he has drawn a line in the sand. 'I don't want AI making any creative decisions that I can't make myself,' said Spielberg in an interview with Reuters. 'And I don't want to use AI as a non-human collaborator, in trying to work out my creative thinking.' The78-year-old director was speaking in late June after a ceremony dedicating the Steven Spielberg Theater on the Universal Studios lot. The event acknowledged his decades-long relationship with the studio, which released films such as Jaws (1975), E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial (1982), Jurassic Park (1993) and Schindler's List (1993). The acclaimed director joked that his career at Universal began in 1967, when he took a tour of the lot as a high school student. He said he hid in the bathroom during a break, and waited for the tour to move on without him, 'then I had the entire lot to myself that day'. 'Our hope and dream is that it's not just the place that is founded on his extraordinary legacy,' said Ms Donna Langley, chairman of NBCUniversal Entertainment & Studios. 'But it is the place of future hopes and dreams of film-makers and storytellers who are going to take this company into the next 100 years and the 100 years after that, people who come with a hope and a dream, people who have been inspired by Steven.' The modest box-office hit A.I. Artificial Intelligence was a meditation on love, l oss and what it means to be human through the eyes of a discarded humanoid robot. In the Pinocchio-like journey set in a futuristic dystopia, David, the android boy, yearns to be human, searching for love, in a world of machines and artificial intelligence. The film hit screens when AI was still in its nascent stages and predated the launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT by 21 years. Film-maker against AI making creative decisions 'It wasn't about artificial intelligence as much as it was about sentient existence, and can you love a sentient entity? Can a mother love a robot child?' said Spielberg. 'It was not really where AI is taking us today. Eventually, there will be a convergence between AI and robotics.' Spielberg said AI can be a great tool 'if used responsibly and morally' to help find a cure for cancer and other diseases. 'I just draw a line – and it's not a line of cement, it's just a little bit of line in the sand – which gives me some wiggle room to say (that) I have the option to revise this thinking in the future,' he said. 'But right now, I don't want AI making any creative decisions.' He said he has seen, first-hand, how technology can replace human talent while working on Jurassic Park. Spielberg initially planned to use renowned stop-motion clay animation artist Phil Tippett to create the dinosaurs roaming the island theme park. Visual effects artist Dennis Muren proposed an alternative method, using Industrial Light & Magic's computer-generated imagery to create realistic dinosaurs. The director is an executive producer in Jurassic World Rebirth, which opens in theatres on July 2. 'That kind of made certain careers somewhat extinct,' said Spielberg. 'So, I'm very sensitive to things that AI may do to take work away from people.' The director has yet to use AI on any of his films so far, though he is open to possible applications of it behind-the-scenes, in functions like budgeting or planning. 'I don't want to use it in front of the camera right now,' Spielberg said. 'Not quite yet.' REUTERS