PTI slams 'death cell' detention of Imran
Addressing a news conference on Thursday, PTI Central Secretary for Information Sheikh Waqas Akram alleged that Khan was confined to a solitary detention for 22 hours daily, denied access to newspapers, television, books, and barred from meeting his legal team and close associates.
Akram said the conditions amount to psychological torture and a blatant violation of basic human rights. "Imran Khan is effectively cut off from the world. His fundamental right to meet six designated individuals is being denied despite explicit court orders, which constitutes contempt of court."
He added that similar restrictions have been imposed on Khan's wife, Bushra Bibi, who is allegedly being denied family visits, while Khan's sister, Aleema Khan, has also been prevented from seeing him.
Calling on the chief justice of Pakistan to intervene, Akram urged the judiciary to restore its "dwindling credibility and independence" in the face of what he termed the executive's open defiance of court rulings. "The violation of judicial orders is not just an insult to the courts but to the entire justice system."
The PTI spokesperson further questioned the recent disqualification of politician Jamshed Dasti, claiming that Article 62(1)(d) of the Constitution has never before been used to unseat public representatives and alleging that constitutional provisions were now being misapplied for political engineering.
Highlighting concerns over the health and treatment of other detained PTI leaders, Akram pointed to the "deteriorating condition" of Shah Mehmood Qureshi, the "systematic violation" of Dr. Yasmin Rashid's rights, and the continued imprisonment of Ejaz Chaudhry despite Supreme Court orders granting him bail.
On economic matters, Akram criticized the federal government over skyrocketing fuel prices, claiming petrol prices have surged by 82% over the past 15 months. "During PTI's term, petrol prices rose by Rs. 51, but the current government scrapped subsidies and pushed the price to Rs. 220 per liter," he said. He also accused the government of orchestrating a Rs. 92 billion sugar scandal, alleging that following the approval to export 765,000 metric tons of sugar, domestic supplies vanished from the market, sending prices soaring to Rs. 200 per kilogram.
Addressing the May 9 cases, Akram claimed that the prosecution's position has collapsed following the withdrawal of a key investigating officer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Virtual assets law: a faulty approach
The emergence of Pakistan's regulatory framework for crypto assets unfolds not through a linear evolution but as a series of abrupt pivots, uncertain mandates, and fragmented institutional posturing. Initial state responses oscillated between prohibition and passive ambiguity, particularly crystallized through the State Bank of Pakistan's 2018 circular barring financial institutions from engaging with crypto-related activity. However, a noteworthy departure has occurred with the promulgation of the Virtual Assets Ordinance, 2025 ('the Ordinance') on July 8, 2025. This Presidential Ordinance, issued under Article 89 of the Constitution becoming effective immediately, defies parliamentary process and oversight as no emergency existed for not presenting it as a Bill before the Parliament. It reveals an institutional attempt to assert authority over a previously unregulated domain. Yet rather than embodying a product of rigorous legislative deliberation, the Ordinance resembles an amalgam of foreign statutes hastily adapted to domestic soil, lacking coherence and structural fidelity to Pakistan's socio-legal ecosystem. The Ordinance introduces a licensing and regulatory regime under which Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) are to operate drawing clear inspiration from frameworks such as the European Union's Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) Regulation, the United Arab Emirates' VARA rulebook, and Singapore's Payment Services Act. For instance, the classification of VASP categories, as outlined in Schedule 1, closely mirrors MiCA's broad taxonomy of crypto-asset services. Inclusion of custody, exchange, and token issuance services under one regulatory umbrella reflects a consolidation seen in Singapore's Monetary Authority guidelines. Furthermore, capital requirements imposed under Schedule 2 strongly resemble United Arab Emirates' licensing prerequisites. Despite these parallels, the Ordinance suffers from superficial mimicry rather than thoughtful transposition. The Ordinance appears to have been drafted in undue haste, attempting to regulate a highly volatile and technically nuanced sector without erecting a solid and reliable institutional or legal foundation. References made to other existing Pakistani laws within the Ordinance, such as Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010, Securities Act, 2015, and Companies Act, 2017, are broadly worded failing to adequately address issues specific to virtual currencies. These laws, originally fashioned for traditional financial instruments and corporate structures, lack definitional clarity and enforcement mechanisms appropriate for digital assets. Moreover, to date, no substantive amendments have been made to these foundational statutes to incorporate the realities and peculiarities of blockchain-based assets. Mere invocation of these statutes in the Ordinance does not bridge this gap. The use of generic cross-references to legacy financial legislation creates interpretive ambiguity, risking inconsistent application and regulatory arbitrage. The resulting legal uncertainty may inhibit development of a stable and predictable crypto-asset ecosystem. Ordinance's overreliance on non-specific statutory references undermines its credibility as a standalone regulatory framework exposing it to challenge both from a constitutional and administrative perspective. Inclusion of Schedule 1 in the Ordinance categorizing 'Virtual Asset Services' deserves scrutiny. The definitions employed, such as 'broker-dealer services' and 'exchange services', are broadly phrased and lack operational precision. For example, classification of 'broker-dealer services' in clause (c) as including trading on one's own account may inadvertently encompass individuals or businesses engaged in proprietary trading for treasury management purposes, creating overregulation and deterring legitimate activity. The exemption carved out for sole-account dealers is not sufficiently delineated and could be manipulated to escape oversight. Such drafting anomalies reflect a limited understanding of digital asset market dynamics. The category of 'custody services', defined as safekeeping or controlling virtual assets or means of access on behalf of customers, lacks an articulation of technical standards for security, segregation of assets, and recovery protocols in the event of platform insolvency or cyber compromise. In jurisdictions such as Switzerland and Germany, regulations include specific custody protocols and operational audits, with agencies like BaFin requiring compliance with these standards. Absence of these benchmarks in the Ordinance reveals a superficial regulatory posture. The 'exchange services' classification aggregates fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-crypto conversions, as well as matching orders and maintaining order books. However, it provides no indication of technical, operational, or liquidity benchmarks for functioning as an exchange. No clear definition and requirements are laid down regarding prevention of wash trading or liquidity mirroring. The oversight of algorithmic trading and market manipulation risks, well-acknowledged internationally, is glaringly missing. The lack of granularity in these definitions may lead to both overreach and under-enforcement. Inclusion of lending and borrowing services appears forward-thinking, yet the clause fails to distinguish between collateralized, over-collateralized, and algorithmic lending models. Given the global controversies surrounding platforms like Celsius and Terra-Luna, the omission of risk buffers and liquidity thresholds in such definitions may lead to replication of failures within Pakistan's regulatory purview. The provision on derivatives services also lacks clarity on permissible underlying assets, leverage caps, margining, and clearing obligations. The Schedule's provision on fiat-referenced token issuance services, analogous to stablecoin issuance, requires a more robust framework. The Ordinance mandates establishment and administration of reserve assets but fails to define the nature, composition, and auditability of such reserves. This is in stark contrast to frameworks like MiCA, which require regular attestation of reserves, segregation of backing assets, and mandatory redemption rights. Without such safeguards, Pakistani consumers and investors remain exposed to systemic vulnerabilities. The capital requirements prescribed in Schedule 2 amplify the Ordinance's exclusionary tendencies. Imposing a minimum paid-up capital of billion on exchanges and token issuers effectively prohibits startups, SMEs, and even well-established fintechs from entering the market. This figure, though inspired by UAE and EU standards, disregards the local financial and technological environment. The Rs 100 million requirements for broker-dealer services and Rs 200 million for custody services are similarly prohibitive, especially when coupled with compliance, infrastructure, and legal costs. The Ordinance appears designed for incumbents and well-capitalized foreign players, erecting entry barriers that stifle domestic innovation. The economic impact of these high thresholds is likely to be severe. Startups and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) constitute the bulk of Pakistan's fintech and blockchain innovation ecosystem. By mandating paid-up capital far exceeding industry norms within Pakistan's own regulatory infrastructure (e.g., NBFCs, mutual funds), the Ordinance reflects a protectionist rather than enabling character. It renders Pakistan's virtual asset environment an exclusive domain for the privileged, in direct contradiction to the digital financial inclusion objectives articulated in the National Financial Inclusion Strategy (NFIS). The designation of 'Significant Issuers' under sections 26-27 [Schedule-3] and related threshold market capitalization exceeding Rs 5 billion or five million domestic users introduces further complications. Though the intention to impose enhanced governance on systemic actors is commendable, the provision is poorly calibrated. The mandatory requirement for significant issuers to maintain 3% of reserve assets as own funds, capped at Rs. 2 billion, does not consider market volatility or token model diversity. In the absence of clear stress testing frameworks or audit requirements, such thresholds may inadvertently penalize token issuers experiencing organic growth rather than managing genuine systemic risks. The Ordinance's regulatory philosophy appears inherently conservative, prioritizing compliance and capital buffers over innovation, inclusion, and agility. The pace of technological evolution in the blockchain domain renders such rigid structures counterproductive. The sandbox rules sections, 42-44, lack clear eligibility criteria, transparent evaluation metrics, and defined procedures for transitioning successful innovations to full licensing, creating uncertainty for innovators. The no-action relief mechanism offers limited legal certainty, as relief letters can be withdrawn arbitrarily without safeguards, potentially deterring participation. Enforcement powers granted to the Authority are broad but lack procedural oversight, risking overreach. Penalties, including fines up to Rs 100 million or 5% of turnover, may disproportionately burden firms. The Authority should clarify sandbox participation and exit criteria, strengthen legal certainty around no-action relief, introduce independent oversight of investigatory powers, scale penalties appropriately, define emergency intervention protocols, ensure tribunal independence, and provide detailed transitional guidelines. Additionally, the Ordinance does not distinguish between low-risk innovation (such as community tokens) and high-risk instruments (such as leveraged derivatives), thereby imposing a one-size-fits-all model that is bound to fail. The overarching legal inconsistencies further delegitimize the Ordinance. Although the document cites Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016,Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010, and other laws, they do not specifically address blockchain traceability, private key security, or decentralized finance activities. Similarly, Income Tax Ordinance 2001 is silent on the classification of gains from crypto trading, whether they constitute business income, capital gains, or speculative gains, resulting in tax ambiguities that may lead to litigation and non-compliance. The lack of legislative amendments to the underlying laws renders the Ordinance an isolated and unsupported enactment. This legal vacuum prevents consistent enforcement and frustrates expectations of VASPs seeking certainty. The result is an underdeveloped ecosystem governed by disconnected laws. Provisions related to 'closed ecosystems' or 'closed-loop systems', and critical analysis of definitions e.g., consumer protection, AML-CFT framework, and taxation-related provisions will be analyzed in our coming articles. Failure to integrate the Ordinance with a broader digital economy vision dilutes its impact. The uncoordinated insertion of regulatory obligations, unsupported by infrastructure, legal amendments, or tax clarity, will most likely hinder rather than harness the potential of crypto technologies. Implementation of the Ordinance, in its current form, could entrench systemic challenges, deter foreign direct investment, and exclude domestic talent from participating in the digital asset revolution. The absence of consultative processes and empirical market assessments reveals a policy framework reactive to compliance optics rather than developmental objectives. The government must reconsider its approach by (i) introducing a risk-based, tiered licensing regime; (ii) aligning existing laws through amendments specific to virtual assets; and (iii) developing consultative mechanisms with industry stakeholders and technical experts to ensure adaptive regulation in this dynamic field. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
IESCO reports significant improvements in performance
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) has reported significant improvements in its performance regarding revenue recovery and reduction in transmission and distribution losses during the financial year 2024–25. According to official figures, the IESCO successfully reduced its transmission and distribution losses from 8.75 percent at the end of FY 2023–24 to 8.39 percent by the end of FY 2024–25. In addition, the company achieved 100 percent electricity bill collection during FY 2024–25, up from 98.2 percent the previous year. As a result of improved revenue recovery and reduced line losses, IESCO managed to save a substantial amount of Rs 14.7 billion — a remarkable achievement attributed to the concerted efforts of all departments. During this period, IESCO teams also ensured the timely installation and billing of 200,000 new electricity connections across various consumer categories. IESCO Chairman Dr Tahir Masood, along with the Board of Directors, commended Chief Executive Muhammad Naeem Jan and the entire IESCO staff — especially the field teams — for their outstanding performance. He credited the achievement to effective teamwork, strategic planning, and the dedication of all IESCO formations. Dr Masood also expressed his gratitude to Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif, Federal Minister for Energy (Power Division) Sardar Awais Ahmed Khan Laghari, and their team for their leadership, guidance, and unwavering support, which he said played a crucial role in the company's success. He highlighted that the ongoing crackdown on electricity theft and defaulters, timely maintenance of the power distribution system, accurate meter readings, and the efficient use of advanced technology have all contributed to IESCO's current strong performance. Dr Masood reaffirmed IESCO's commitment to further improving services and setting a performance benchmark for other power distribution companies across Pakistan. Meanwhile, IESCO has reported significant damage to its power distribution system across the region following recent heavy rainfall and flash floods, particularly affecting Rawalpindi City Circle, Chakwal Circle, Jhelum Circle, and surrounding areas. The severe weather conditions resulted in the collapse of several HT (High Tension) and LT (Low Tension) poles, leading to broken power lines and transformer failures in multiple locations. In some areas, floodwaters even entered residential homes, prompting IESCO to temporarily suspend electricity supply in accordance with safety codes to prevent any risk to life and infrastructure. According to detailed reports, 43 HT poles and 7 LT poles fell due to flooding and overflowing storm drains. This caused complete power outages on various feeders, including Shahpur Syedan, Basharat, Tharpal, Jhand Khan, Mort Hassnot, New Sanguai, I-14/3, Officer Colony, and Ameer Hamza Colony feeders. Additional faults on feeders, transformers, and individual consumer complaints have also been reported in various localities. IESCO Chief Executive Muhammad Naeem Jan has placed the Operations, Construction, GSO, and GSE formations on high alert and directed all officers to remain in the field with their teams to manage restoration efforts. The central control room in Islamabad is monitoring the power restoration efforts 24/7. He also requested valuable customers to cooperate with IESCO field formations. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Murad inaugurates CBT Lab at SPSC
HYDERABAD: In a significant step towards modernising recruitment processes, Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah inaugurated the newly established Computer-Based Testing (CBT) Lab at the Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC), equipped with 500 tablets, boasting a remarkable daily testing capacity of 2,000 candidates, making SPSC the first institution in the province to implement computer-based testing. This innovative approach aims to enhance transparency, minimise human error, and provide instant results. At the inauguration ceremony, which was hosted by Chairman SPSC Mohammad Waseem and attended by Provincial Ministers Sharjeel Inam Memon and Jam Khan Shoro, the Chief Minister unveiled the plaque and participated in a mock test, achieving an impressive score of 18 out of 20. Senior Minister Sharjeel Inam Memon also took and passed the mock test. The immediate display of the test results underscored the efficiency of the new system. Addressing the inauguration ceremony, Chief Minister Murad Shah commended the SPSC for its commitment to a transparent and merit-based recruitment system, stating, 'SPSC's modern system is exemplary. It is crucial to appoint the most capable individuals to improve our public institutions.' He further praised the initiative to digitise the examination process, describing it as a commendable move towards enhancing recruitment procedures and ensuring meritocracy. Murad Shah also visited the under-construction SPSC Secretariat Complex, where he was briefed on the project's progress by Secretary Works Nawaz Soho. The complex, which has an estimated cost of Rs. 2,517.430 million, has thus far utilised Rs. 2,257.242 million. For the fiscal year 2025-26, an additional Rs. 258.400 million is required, and Shah instructed relevant authorities to release these necessary funds promptly. The new complex will feature a basement, ground floor, and five additional floors, housing various facilities including offices, an auditorium, a library, a cafeteria, and a prayer area. The digital library will accommodate 300 candidates simultaneously, while the dedicated auditorium on the third floor will facilitate examinations, programs, workshops, and training sessions, reducing reliance on external venues. Expressing satisfaction with the construction progress, Shah directed that the project be completed without delay, emphasising that such infrastructure improvements are vital for strengthening institutions and maintaining transparency in recruitment processes. In addition to the inauguration, the Chief Minister received a briefing on SPSC's performance and administrative reforms, noting that over 100 employees have been promoted under the current administration, alongside enhancements in salaries and office decor. He acknowledged the historical challenges faced by SPSC and praised Chairman Mohammad Waseem for his dedication and transparent leadership. 'I want the best officers in every provincial department, and that can only happen through a strong and transparent Commission,' he asserted, directing SPSC to expedite testing for doctors, engineers, and other professionals. Chief Minister Murad Shah, in conclusion, remarked, 'The establishment of the CBT lab is a major step towards transparency and efficiency,' reinforcing his commitment to improving public service recruitment across the province. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
