
Zuckerberg's AI dream team is all built by immigrants: Will visa walls break Silicon Valley's AI backbone?
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Mark Zuckerberg's newly announced AI Superintelligence Lab tells the story emphatically: Eleven scientists, eleven immigrants, not a single US-born engineer in sight.
What is striking is not that America depends on immigrants: It is how profoundly that dependency is knitted into the architecture of its future. Their names are not etched on billboards. Their accents may differ. But from Princeton to Peking University, from IIT Kanpur to Carnegie Mellon, these minds are carrying the bastion of artificial intelligence for the Silicon Valley.
The global minds behind American machines
Meta's all-immigrant dream team reads like a map of intellectual migration. Trapit Bansal, an alumnus from IIT Kanpur, honed his brilliance at UMass Amherst and OpenAI. Shuchao Bi, born in China, gave GPT-4o its voice. Huiwen Chang invented architectures that made machines 'see.' Ji Lin made AI cheaper and faster.
The journeys trace their roots back to overcrowded classrooms in Beijing, Delhi, or Pretoria, survived the crucible of elite admissions, and culminated in a foreign land where visa renewals were as stressful as debugging code.
They trained in the US, built foundational models, and are now constructing the scaffolding of AI's future.
This isn't an exception. It is the rule. From Google's Bard to OpenAI's GPT-4, from Microsoft's Azure to Amazon's Alexa, the architects of American AI are more likely to have roots in Chennai than Chicago, in Wuhan than Washington.
Silicon Valley's immigrant skeleton
America's tech economy has always run on imported intellect. Over 70% of H-1B visas are granted to Indian nationals alone, according to data shared by USCIS.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Some years, the number has crossed 75%. And it's not just engineering cubicles. Sundar Pichai (Google), Satya Nadella (Microsoft), and Arvind Krishna (IBM), the corner office is increasingly accentuated.
The journey started in the 1990s when coders flocked the Silicon Valley, which has now translated into an artery system of AI architects, cloud infrastructure pioneers, and cybersecurity leaders. They do not just solve technical problems; they set the global agenda for what AI is and what it has become.
And yet, these very professionals are being subjected to a political climate that casts suspicion on foreign workers, tightening visa controls, and erecting bureaucratic minefields that threaten to break the very backbone of American tech.
Visa battles and broken promises
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received over 780,000 applications for just 85,000 H-1B slots in FY 2024, according to USCIS data. The odds are absurd, the process increasingly punitive.
A proposed beneficiary-based lottery model aims to curb mass applications, but it also risks shutting out legitimate talent.
Add to that the rising wage thresholds, compliance red tape, and anti-immigrant rhetoric that predictably peaks during election years, and you begin to see why America's AI future is hanging by a bureaucratic thread.
The tightening immigration policies might cast a shadow on the tech progress that America is witnessing right now.
The Indian engine of the AI age
The effect of this reliance is more pronounced in India. Post-liberalisation, our country developed an obsession with engineering, catalysed by the IITs and fuelled by social aspiration, creating a goldmine of global tech workers.
Over the years down the line, India has lost its talent to offshore and, in a way, contributed enormously to building the American tech empire. The irony deepens: Indian engineering graduates built apps for the world, but couldn't find jobs at home.
Their futures, and sometimes their families' fortunes, hinged not on innovation but immigration.
A tectonic shift or a temporary snag?
Today, that engine is sputtering. Visa regimes are unstable. The H-1B system is outdated. International students, once America's intellectual capital in waiting, now live under a cloud of uncertainty.
And as Meta's immigrant-only team shines bright, the tech juggernaut is exposed well enough. If tomorrow, the gates narrow further, or worse, if talent stops navigating to the country, the US will not only lose developers, but with them the crucial direction as well.
Already, there are numerous murmurs among graduates about staying back. Startup India, AI missions, and semiconductor initiatives, the incentives are growing. With the right policy push, India could convert its brain drain into a brain return. Maybe, the global tech power can be rescripted, this time from Bengaluru and not Boston.
Innovation is not a nationality
The American edge in AI owes a lot to the passports that have flown from distant countries with a utopian vision of building a future.
They showed up with foreign degrees, accents that were often mocked, and dreams that carried enough weight.
However, dreams need visas. And revolutions, especially technological ones, need the freedom to cross borders. The question before America now is simple: Will it remain the world's most powerful magnet for minds? Or will it build walls so high that even superintelligence can't climb over?
If it picks the latter, it may soon find that the AI of tomorrow and the accompanied power may find an abode somewhere else and might not be in America.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump underwater in every key swing state, and now he's slipping in Texas too
US President Donald Trump 's approval ratings are going down again. Apparently, the ratings plummeted even beyond swing states . As the Fourth of July comes and goes, a new poll shows he's now underwater in more than half the country. The president's stronghold, Texas, is starting to look shaky, too. Donald Trump's approval rating is low in 29 U.S. states. Polls show that many people are worried about the economy, tariffs, and immigration policies, which are all hurting his support across the country. What do the polls show? Civiqs' polling, which included 35,929 responses, indicates that while Trump's support rating is positive in some states, it is declining in others. Overall, net positive approval ratings are found in 21 of the 50 states that were studied, while net negative ratings are found in 29. ALSO READ: Mass layoffs in 2025: Microsoft, Meta, and more big names slash jobs — is yours next? Live Events His approval rating is below average in other states. In Maryland, his approval rating is -41, and in Hawaii, it is -47. Trump's approval rating has likewise stayed in the negative range on a national level. Trump had a net approval rating of -14 points, with 40 percent of respondents approving and 54 percent disapproving, according to a YouGov/Economist poll of 1,590 adults taken between June 20 and June 23, as per a report by Newsweek. This was a slight decrease from -13 last week. The margin of error for the survey was +/- 3.5 percent. In the meantime, a Tyson Group survey of 1,027 American adults conducted between June 25 and June 26 revealed that Trump's net approval rating was 6 points lower, with 45 percent of respondents approving and 51 percent disapproving. Where is Donald Trump still popular? Wyoming has the highest approval rating for Trump, with a net rating of +44 percent. With an approval rating of +36 in West Virginia, he is also well-liked there. What's driving his approval ratings down? Trump's first few months in office have seen a range in his popularity. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is in charge of overseeing the cuts that have sparked demonstrations. Trump's immigration policies have been the subject of other rallies, and his tariffs and strikes on Iran have also drawn criticism. On the other hand, the Fourth of July, also known as Independence Day in the United States, honours the Declaration of Independence. Given that it is a day of celebration and patriotism, any decline in Trump's popularity during the festivities would be devastating, as per a report by Newsweek. Protests against the Trump administration have taken place nationwide over the weekend of Independence Day, including rallies and demonstrations. The impact of Trump's policies and national and international events is likely to cause fluctuations in his approval rating. How are experts interpreting the polls? Since April, Donald Trump's approval rating has remained consistent in the mid-40s, indicating a high level of support, according to Richard Johnson, a senior lecturer in U.S. politics and policy at Queen Mary University of London. The economy has had a major impact on Trump's approval ratings, especially since the imposition of tariffs, which has caused a decline in ratings and is anticipated to be the main factor determining his future, an expert weighed in. FAQs In how many states is Trump's approval rating negative? According to Civiqs polling, Trump is losing support in 29 of 50 states, including some key swing states and even Republican stronghold Texas. What is causing the greatest drop in Trump's popularity? Economic uncertainty, tariffs, and controversial immigration and foreign affairs policies are cited as major reasons for the drop in his public support.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Zohran Mamdani's Victory Shows Power Of Ranked Choice Voting. Here's How It Works
Last Updated: The United States ranked choice voting (RCV) system is an electoral method where voters rank candidates by preference rather than selecting just one Zohran Mamdani, the rising star of the American Left, engineered a massive political upset in New York City after he defeated his nearest rival, former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, and won the Democratic primary for mayor by a strong margin. According to a ranked-choice tabulation, the Queens assembly member reached 56 per cent of the vote in the third round of counting, giving him a win over Cuomo and nine other candidates. An article in the Gothamist said the ranked-choice results showed that a campaign asking voters not to rank Cuomo anywhere on their ballots was effective, as Mamdani picked up another 99,069 votes from candidates who were eliminated. So, what is ranked-choice voting? The United States ranked choice voting (RCV) system is an electoral method where voters rank candidates by preference rather than selecting just one. Instead of picking a single candidate, voters list their first, second, third choices, and so on. Here's how it works. Voters first rank candidates in order of preference on the ballot. If a candidate receives more than 50 per cent of the first-choice votes, they win outright. If no candidate gets a majority, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated. Votes for the eliminated candidate are then redistributed to the remaining candidates based on those voters' next preferences. This process of elimination and redistribution continues until one candidate has a majority. What are the benefits? • Ensures majority support since winners typically have broader support because they must earn more than 50 per cent through ranked preferences. • It reduces the need for runoff elections by consolidating multiple election rounds into one. • Voters can express preferences for more than one candidate without 'wasting" their vote. What are the cons? • Some voters find ranking candidates unfamiliar or complex, especially first-time users. • Tabulation takes longer, particularly in races with many candidates and rounds. • If a voter's ranked choices are all eliminated and no further preferences are marked, their ballot becomes 'exhausted" and stops counting. • To work well, RCV needs strong outreach and explanation, especially in diverse or multilingual communities. What are the other voting systems? Plurality Voting (First-Past-the-Post): Each voter selects one candidate. The candidate with the most votes wins, even if they don't have a majority. The key issues with this system are that a candidate can win with far less than 50 per cent support. Vote-splitting can allow unpopular candidates to win and this often discourages third-party or independent candidates. Runoff Elections: If no candidate gets over 50 per cent of the vote, the top two finishers advance to a second election (a runoff), where voters choose between them. While this guarantees a majority winner, it is costly and time-consuming, often sees lower turnout in the runoff round, and delays results. Approval Voting: Voters can vote for (i.e., 'approve of") as many candidates as they like. The candidate with the most approvals wins. This method is simple to understand and supports consensus candidates. However, it doesn't allow voters to indicate preference order and can lead to strategic voting. Score Voting (Range Voting): Here, voters rate each candidate on a scale (e.g., 0–5 or 0–10). The candidate with the highest average (or total) score wins. This works as voters can show intensity of support but it is more complex to explain and tabulate. How is ranked choice voting different from India's voting system? In India, voters select only one candidate on the ballot. The candidate who receives the most votes wins, even if they don't have more than 50 per cent. This means that in multi-cornered contests, a candidate can win with just 30–40% of the vote, as long as it's more than anyone else. By contrast, in ranked choice voting, voters rank multiple candidates in order of preference (first choice, second choice, and so on). In RCV, if no candidate gets a majority of first-choice votes, the one with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred to the next preferred candidate on those ballots. This process continues in rounds until a candidate crosses the 50 per cent threshold. So, while a majority is not required in India's system, it is essential in RCV, making the result more representative of overall voter support. Additionally, vote redistribution is not part of India's electoral process, but it is central to how RCV works. This makes separate runoff elections unnecessary in RCV, because the 'instant runoff" is built into the counting process. In India, there are no runoffs, and elections are decided in a single round. The spoiler effect—where two similar candidates split the vote, allowing a third, less popular candidate to win—is common in India's system. In RCV, however, this effect is greatly reduced, since votes for eliminated candidates can still help others based on voter preferences. Lastly, strategic voting is often seen in India, where voters may choose a 'winnable" candidate over their genuine preference to avoid 'wasting" their vote. RCV reduces this pressure, allowing voters to honestly rank their favorites without fear of helping elect their least preferred option. How did RCV help Mamdani? In Mamdani's case, his strategic alliances played a crucial role. Candidates like Brad Lander and Adrienne Adams, who were eliminated in earlier rounds, had endorsed Mamdani, encouraging their supporters to rank him as their second choice. This endorsement strategy proved effective, as Mamdani received a substantial number of redistributed votes, propelling him to victory over Cuomo. While Cuomo had strong name recognition and likely led in first-choice votes early on, he failed to gain enough second-choice support from voters whose first-choice candidates were eliminated. His controversial record and more centrist positioning made him a less likely fallback for progressive voters. As the rounds progressed, Mamdani closed the gap and eventually overtook Cuomo as votes were redistributed. Mamdani's campaign focused on grassroots outreach, especially among younger voters, immigrants, and working-class communities—groups that may have felt more energized by RCV. These voters could confidently rank Mamdani first without worrying about 'wasting" their vote, since their ballot would still count toward other candidates if he were eliminated (which he wasn't). About the Author Apoorva Misra Apoorva Misra is News Editor at with over nine years of experience. She is a graduate from Delhi University's Lady Shri Ram College and holds a PG Diploma from Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Andrew Cuomo New York United states Zohran Mamdani Location : New York, United States of America (USA) First Published: July 05, 2025, 17:26 IST News explainers Zohran Mamdani's Victory Shows Power Of Ranked Choice Voting. Here's How It Works

Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Answer engine: How Google's AI Mode is reshaping search
I come from the era of Lycos, Yahoo and AltaVista. And I find it amusing that we have a generation of people who will probably say — what are those? For over two decades, Google search has worked by indexing websites, like a massive library catalog. It scanned and stored pages and then showed you that list of blue links to click. Finding what you want can often be frustrating: it's up to you to sort out relevant and useful links from junk, scams and ads. But it's familiar. With the world busy being transformed by AI, it's only inevitable that search will have to keep up. Already, users turn to ChatGPT instead of 'Googling'. If Google doesn't reimagine its search engine, it could find itself at a huge disadvantage. If you look at the search page, at the extreme left you'll see a new tab — AI Mode. For now it's optional, but in the near future it may not be. This goes beyond just pointing you to sources. Instead, it aims to directly answer your questions, summarise information, and even help you complete tasks, all from the search page itself. This new approach uses advanced AI models from Gemini to understand context, generate natural language responses, and combine information from many sources in real time. The result? You spend less time clicking around and more time getting immediate, conversational answers. It's changing from a search engine to an answer engine. You may have already noticed AI Overviews, a mini version of AI Mode, which appears for certain searches. That gives you a good idea of what the full AI Mode is shaping up to become. Ready or not, here I come But are we ready for this seismic shift in something that we do several times a day? Probably not. In fact, it's going to be a bit of a shock. Even though it sounds good to have some entity do all the hard work of looking through pages and coming up with a neat and quick explanation with no extra clicking, saving us time and effort, it's just not what we're accustomed to. Inevitably, many users will just want to do things the old way. The AI shift raises other questions. Can we still see those linked websites? They're actually still there, but tucked away further down and no longer the first thing we see. For those of us who love to compare different sources and decide for ourselves, this new setup might feel a bit limiting. Another big question concerns the choice of what content is summarised. With the old way, the choice was more or less ours. Now, it's the AI that chooses and we just have to trust it. As AI is notorious for making mistakes and downright hallucinating, the accuracy of the information in summaries we get will be in question. The sources are given, but they will not be so easy to see. When Google's AI picks which pieces of information to highlight first, it is in effect deciding what story gets told. That raises questions of fairness and transparency, and whether we still have the freedom to explore the web on our own terms. On a practical level, some people might love the new mode. If you're asking a simple question like the age of a celebrity or the weather tomorrow it's fast and easy. But for more complicated topics, or when you want to get a feel for different perspectives, you end up doing more work to find the details. Threat to the open internet? There are ripple effects beyond just our own screens. Many websites and publishers rely on us clicking through to survive. If fewer people visit their pages because links are presented differently, these sites may lose ad revenue. Over time, we may see less freely available content, and the open, diverse internet we once took for granted could start to shrink. This doesn't mean it's all doom and gloom. Some people will embrace this new way of searching and appreciate not having to wade through dozens of links. Others will miss the feeling of exploring and stumbling upon unexpected gems. In the end, each user will need to decide how much to rely on these AI summaries and how often we still want to dig deeper. Maybe we'll learn to balance the convenience of a quick answer with the satisfaction of discovering things for ourselves. AI Mode is currently available to users in the US and India, where Google has a massive user base. Feedback from users is needed before the feature is rolled out fully and everywhere. You can be sure Google will have a close eye on the reception. The New Normal: The world is at an inflexion point. Artificial Intelligence is set to be as massive a revolution as the Internet has been. The option to just stay away from AI will not be available to most people, as all the tech we use takes the AI route. This column series introduces AI to the non-techie in an easy and relatable way, aiming to demystify and help a user to actually put the technology to good use in everyday life. Mala Bhargava is most often described as a 'veteran' writer who has contributed to several publications in India since 1995. Her domain is personal tech and she writes to simplify and demystify technology for a non-techie audience.