
Poland Starts Border Checks With Germany In Anti-migrant Clampdown
Border guards and military police could be seen looking into passing cars and occasionally stopping vehicles for document checks on the bridge connecting the Polish town of Slubice with Frankfurt an der Oder in Germany.
The new checks are a response to growing anti-migrant sentiment on both sides of the border.
Poland says hundreds of migrants, mostly from the Middle East, cross into the Baltic states from Belarus every month, then travel through Poland into Germany.
The issue has become a particularly sensitive one in Polish domestic politics and has led to tensions with Germany.
Warsaw has accused Berlin of sending the irregular migrants it manages to intercept back into Poland.
"The checks being implemented aim to combat illegal migration," Interior Minister Tomasz Siemoniak was quoted as saying by his ministry on X.
Shortly after the new checks came into force on Monday, Polish border guards detained a man for assisting irregular migration.
The Estonian national is accused of transporting four irregular migrants, believed to be from Afghanistan.
Siemoniak said the detention was "proof that these checks are necessary".
Germany, which introduced checks on the border with Poland in 2023, has welcomed the Polish initiative and called for collaboration against a common problem.
Speaking to the daily Rheinische Post, the head of German police union GdP, Andreas Rosskopf, said the two countries needed a "workable procedure".
He warned against Polish and German border guards engaging in a "ping-pong game" with asylum seekers by sending them back and forth.
Representatives of German business associations have also voiced concern.
"We are receiving worrying feedback from the business community," Helena Melnikov, chief executive of the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce (DIHK), told the Handelsblatt newspaper.
"If commuters can no longer get to work reliably and on time at the German-Polish border, there is an increased risk that they will look for work elsewhere on a permanent basis -- with consequences for the shortage of skilled workers in border regions," she said.
Marek Klodnicki, an administrative employee who lives in Slubice but works in Germany, said the re-introduction of border controls was "very sad".
"We have waited so long for open borders," he said, adding that the checks would result in "a disruption in social and economic life".
Business owners, particularly hairdressers and tobacco shops, which get a lot of custom from Germans crossing the border, also voiced concern the checks could disrupt business.
"Ninety percent of our customers are Germans. We may have less traffic, less revenue," Kinga Dziuba, a 29-year-old cigarette vendor, told AFP.
But Dziuba said the checks were "very much needed" to control migration, adding: "Security is more important to me than trade".
The issue of migration was central to June's presidential election in Poland, where nationalist Karol Nawrocki -- who ran on a slogan of "Poland first, Poles first" -- narrowly defeated the candidate backed by pro-European Union Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
The Tusk government is now seeking to outflank its rivals by taking a tougher approach to immigration.
In total, 52 checkpoints have been set up on the border with Germany and 13 with Lithuania, Siemoniak said.
The controls will last from July 7 to August 5 but could be extended.
They will mostly consist of spot inspections, particularly of vehicles carrying several people, officials said.
In June, members of a far-right movement gathered at several points along the border to set up "citizens' patrols", which the government insists are illegal.
In Slubice, Edyta Taryma, a 54-year-old hair salon owner, said her revenues had already dropped by 20 percent after Germany re-imposed border controls.
"A great many people did not come, or came less often, because they were afraid of traffic jams," she said.
She called the checks "unnecessary". Poland has temporarily reintroduced border controls with its EU neighbours Germany and Lithuania, saying they are needed to counter 'illegal immigration' AFP Polish border guards check drivers at the Polish-German border in Slubice, western Poland AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Issues More Letters To Countries In Push For Tariff Deals
US President Donald Trump released a fresh set of letters to trading partners Wednesday, setting out tariff rates for six countries as Washington pushes to bring about a flurry of trade deals. The letters, addressed to leaders of the Philippines, Brunei, Algeria, Libya, Iraq and Moldova, spelled out duties ranging from 20 percent to 30 percent that would take effect on August 1. Similar to Trump's first batch of documents published Monday, the tariff levels were not too far from those originally threatened in April, although some partners received notably lower rates this time. While the president in April imposed a 10 percent levy on almost all trading partners, he unveiled -- and then held off on -- higher rates for dozens of economies. The deadline for those steeper levels to take effect was meant to be Wednesday, before Trump postponed it further to August 1. Instead, countries who face the threats of elevated duties began receiving letters spelling out US tariff rates on their products. Trump's latest messages were near-identical to those published earlier in the week, and justified the tariffs as a response to trade ties that he says are "far from Reciprocal." They urged countries to manufacture products in the United States instead in order to avoid duties, while threatening further escalation if leaders retaliated to the levies. For now, 20 countries have received Trump's letters, including key US allies Japan and South Korea, as well as Indonesia, Bangladesh and Thailand. If counterparts changed their trade policies, Washington might consider an adjustment to its stance, Trump wrote. Analysts have noted that Asian countries are a major target of the documents so far. But all eyes are on the state of negotiations with major partners who have yet to receive such communications, including the European Union. For now, the Trump administration is under pressure to unveil more trade pacts. So far, Washington has only reached agreements with Britain and Vietnam, alongside a deal to lower tit-for-tat levies with China. Trump on Tuesday said that his government was "probably two days off" from sending the EU a letter with an updated tariff rate for the bloc. "They're very tough, but now they're being very nice to us," he added at a cabinet meeting. An EU spokesman said Wednesday that the bloc wants to strike a deal with the United States "in the coming days," and has shown readiness to reach an agreement in principle. EU diplomats say the European Commission, in charge of trade policy for the 27-country bloc, could continue talks until August 1. The EU expects Trump to keep a 10 percent baseline tariff on its goods, with exemptions for critical sectors such as airplanes, spirits and cosmetics, diplomats told AFP this week. Apart from tariffs targeting goods from different countries, Trump has also rolled out sector-specific duties on steel, aluminum and autos since returning to the White House in January. On Tuesday, Trump said tariffs were incoming on copper and pharmaceuticals. The planned rate for copper is 50 percent, he added, while pharmaceutical products face a levy as high as 200 percent -- but manufacturers would be given time to relocate operations.


DW
6 hours ago
- DW
EU eyes quick trade deal as Trump announces more tariffs – DW – 07/09/2025
The EU says a trade deal with the US could be days away as Trump has threatened fresh tariffs. Several new duties were announced after the US president said he would hit partners like Japan and South Korea from August 1. The European Union said Wednesday it could strike an outline trade deal with the United States within days — just as US President Donald Trump ramped up threats of new tariffs. Trump, widening a trade war that has unsettled the global economy, announced a day earlier he would slap a 50% tariff on imported copper and soon roll out long-threatened levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. Trump issued a fresh round of tariff letters targeting six countries, the White House confirmed Wednesday. The letters call for tariffs of 30% on Algeria, 25% on Brunei, 30% on Iraq, 30% on Libya, 25% on Moldova and 20% on the Philippines. The US president had said that "a minimum of seven" new tariff notices would land Wednesday morning, with more to follow. The latest threat comes a day after he sent tariff letters to 14 trading partners — including major trading partners South Korea and Japan — warning of 25% and higher duties from August 1. Trump said trade talks with China and the EU were going "very well" and promised to reveal the EU's new export rates "probably" within two days. "They treated us very badly until recently, and now they're treating us very nicely. It's like a different world, actually," he said on Tuesday. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic told lawmakers good progress had been made on a framework agreement and a deal might be possible within days. He told EU lawmakers he hoped that EU negotiators could finalize their work soon, with additional time now after the US deadline was extended from July 9 to August 1. "I hope to reach a satisfactory conclusion, potentially even in the coming days," Sefcovic said. However, Italian Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti cautioned that talks remain "very complicated" and could drag on until the last moment. If the new measures go ahead, they would push US tariffs to their highest levels since 1934. Markets shrugged off Trump's latest salvo, while the yen weakened further after Japan was hit with new tariff threats. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video


Local Germany
6 hours ago
- Local Germany
Fact-check: Are immigrants in Germany taking advantage of the welfare state?
What is the General Debate? Among the Bundestag's prominent traditions is the Generaldebatte (general debate)– an open debate held several times a year, and most notably during the budget process. Partly a showcase for the government's policies, the Generaldebatte is also meant to be an opportunity for opposition parties to hold the government to account. The July debate opened on Wednesday and was initially focussed primarily on the budget for 2025. Chancellor Merz of the conservative Christian Democrat (CDU) party said that his government's plans had initiated a turnaround in economic policy and laid the foundation for further investment. Merz stressed that substantial borrowing was necessary in order to invest in defence and major improvements to infrastructure in Germany. AfD opened the debate By convention, the leader of the largest opposition party is invited to open the debate, before handing over to the Chancellor. This meant that Alice Weidel of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party was the first speaker on Wednesday. True to form, she wasted no time in turning to her favourite topic: immigration. To applause from her party members, she suggested that rapes and knife attacks committed by immigrants were an everyday part of life in Germany. According to reporting by Welt, Weidel took aim at Bürgergeld (citizens' allowance), and suggested that immigrants are taking "money that does not belong to them". Advertisement The AfD leader continued with a series of wild claims about how much money immigrants in Germany are collecting. Figures that she stated in her speech were "grossly wrong" according to a report by RTL/ntv . Co-leader of the far-right AfD party, Alice Weidel, gives a speech as Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil (L) look on during the general debate on the German budget. (Photo by Odd ANDERSEN / AFP) The AfD has made Germany's Bürgergeld benefit, and its alleged use by immigrants, a particular focus recently. As we reported last week, the party inquired about the most common first names of Bürgergeld recipients only to find out that Michael, Andreas and Thomas took the top three spots. The Chancellor's response When it was his turn to speak, Chancellor Merz failed to meaningfully challenge Weidel's statements about the burden placed on Germany's welfare statement system by immigrants. Instead, he defended his government's policies on immigration, emphasizing the reduction in asylum applications and promising to reduce "irregular migration" further. In the end, it was Weidel who called Merz a "lying Chancellor" ( Lügenkanzler ), whereas Merz merely spoke about "half-truths, slander, and personal disparagement." Immigrants and welfare debate Merz's failure to correct the AfD leader illustrates an ongoing misrepresentation of the relative financial costs and benefits of migration in German politics and the media. READ ALSO: 'I've never felt welcome' - Why immigrants are leaving Germany This spring, a study by economist Bernd Raffelhüschen made headlines when Bild splashed its findings across its front page under the heading: 'Explosive migration study - this is how much migration really costs us.' The figure cited – €5.8 trillion – was seized on by politicians and commentators as proof that migration is an unsustainable burden. The study was taken wildly out of context, however, as Raffelhüschen himself acknowledged. German media largely failed to report, for example, that the generational accounting method used in his study also labelled new-born Germans as a 'loss-making business' for the welfare state. What's the real cost / benefit of migration? Other economists, whose studies are designed to make sense of the relative costs and benefits of immigration have come to very different conclusions. Martin Werding, a government economic advisor and professor at Ruhr University Bochum, subsequently produced a study in which he estimates that the German state will save around €100 billion per year between now and 2070 because of immigration. Advertisement Werding's findings are echoed in his 2025 report , which says, 'The contributions paid in exceed the benefits claimed…In the long term, immigration is indispensable for the viability of the welfare state.' An investigation carried out by the podcast Einwanderungsland also backs up these findings. Immigration is crucial to the viability of Germany's welfare state The bottom line, according to the best studies on the topic is as follows: Refugees and migrants who aren't immediately integrated into the workforce draw on social benefits in Germany, and cost the state an estimated €30 billion per year. Most migrants come to Germany to work or study, however, and around two-thirds of foreigners in Germany are employed. Also the longer immigrants stay in the country, the more likely they are to have a job. A woman clicks on an online application for Bürgergeld, Germany's long-term unemployment benefit. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Carsten Koall Even among refugees, two-thirds of those who arrived in 2015 are now employed. The fiscal picture improves rapidly as migrants enter the workforce. Highly qualified immigrants, such as engineers, generate substantial tax and social security revenue, and even less qualified workers provide a net benefit. READ ALSO: How generous is Germany's unemployment benefit system? Added to which, immigration is now the sole driver of employment growth in Germany. According to the Federal Employment Agency, the entire increase in jobs subject to social insurance contributions in 2024 was due to foreign workers. Sectors like tourism would collapse completely without them. Advertisement The debate around immigration in Germany will continue, and unfortunately as long as anti-immigration politics remain popular, the debate will likely remain largely misguided. Despite the impression given during today's Generaldebatte , however, the evidence increasingly points to an inescapable truth: the future viability of Germany's welfare state isn't being put at risk by immigrants. On the contrary, it depends on them.