logo
A reservoir of gold lies hidden in Earth's core. Scientists say it's leaking

A reservoir of gold lies hidden in Earth's core. Scientists say it's leaking

RNZ News01-06-2025

By
Jacopo Prisco
, CNN
Gold and other precious metals deep beneath the Earth eventually make their way up to the surface during the formation of volcanic islands, a study suggests.
Photo:
123rf
Gold and other precious metals are leaking from Earth's core into the layers above, eventually making their way up to the surface during the formation of volcanic islands like Hawaii, a new study suggests.
The theory results from a three-year analysis of Hawaii's basaltic rocks, which originally formed from plumes of magma, or molten rock, rising from the ocean floor. Clues in the form of heavy metals found in the volcanic rocks could confirm a suspicion long held by geologists - that Earth's molten core is not isolated but likely bleeds into the rocky mantle, the layer between the planet's thin crust and the core.
"About 40 years ago, people first came up with the theory that maybe the core is losing some material into the mantle, but the signals we got so far were really ambiguous," said Nils Messling, a geochemist at the University of Göttingen in Germany and lead author of the report, published 21 May in the journal
Nature
.
"Now, in my opinion, we have the first very strong evidence that some of the core is actually ending up in the mantle."
Scientists already knew that most of the gold on the planet - more than 99.95 percent, according to Messling - lies hidden in the molten core, along with other heavy elements such as platinum.
Basalt sampled from a drill core section from the Kilauea Iki lava lake, which erupted in 1959, is shown. The Hawaiian lava rock contains a small trace of Earth's core, the analysis found.
Photo:
Supplied / CNN / Nils Messling
As meteorites bombarded one another in Earth's early history, a reservoir of these precious metals developed when the core formed about 4.5 billion years ago.
But this study suggests that at least a tiny amount of that gold has escaped to the surface, raising the fascinating prospect that, if the leaking continues, more and more of this precious metal could travel from the centre of Earth to the crust in the future.
"Our findings not only show that the Earth's core is not as isolated as previously assumed. We can now also prove that huge volumes of super-heated mantle material - several hundreds of quadrillion metric tonnes of rock - originate at the core-mantle boundary and rise to the Earth's surface to form ocean islands like Hawaii," said study coauthor Matthias Willbold, a professor at the University of Göttingen, in a statement.
To find evidence of this core-mantle interaction, Messling and his coauthors obtained some samples of Hawaiian volcanic rocks from the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC.
The research team extracts precious metals from samples of Hawaii's volcanic rock.
Photo:
Supplied / CNN / Nils Messling
"Some were taken by a submarine, from a deep sea volcano, but [otherwise] it's basically just very ordinary-looking basaltic rock, very unassuming, that you would find anywhere on Hawaii," he said.
"We started with half a kilogram of rock, we crushed it into a powder, and then we melted it in the oven with some different chemicals, to end up with a sample in liquid form."
From that sample, the team extracted all the elements in the
platinum group
, which includes platinum itself as well as the lesser-known rhodium, palladium, iridium, osmium and ruthenium. The scientists then focused on ruthenium, a silver-grey metal about as rare in Earth's crust as gold.
"The mantle has almost no ruthenium in it," Messling said.
"It's one of the rarest elements on Earth. But Earth is basically made of meteorites that crashed together, and meteorites [contain] ruthenium, which went into the core when the core formed. So the mantle has next to no ruthenium, and the core has all of the ruthenium. The same with gold and platinum."
Earth's core has two layers. A hot, solid metal sphere of iron and nickel is roughly 70 percent the size of the moon, with a radius of about 1221km. A liquid metal outer core is about 2253km thick and extends to about 2897km below the surface, or right up to the mantle.
Photo:
123rf
In contrast, the mantle, which lies between the planet's outer crust and the molten core, is 2897km of mostly solid rock.
To determine whether the extracted ruthenium was originally from the core and not the mantle, the team looked at a specific isotope, or type, of ruthenium that was likely more abundant in Earth's early building materials during the time the core formed billions of years ago.
"The vast majority of gold and other precious metals like platinum were likely delivered by massive meteorite impacts during the final stages of Earth's formation - a process known as late accretion," said Pedro Waterton, an assistant professor of geochemistry at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark who was not involved in the study.
The presence of the ruthenium isotope in the basalt samples indicates that at least some of the rock was formed from material coming from the molten metallic core.
That's because there is consensus, Messling said, that the material that coalesced during the early stages of Earth's formation does not exist in the meteorite record anymore.
He added that the isotope signature in rocks from hotspot volcanoes like the ones in Hawaii is entirely different from any other known rock or meteorite.
In other words, the ruthenium isotope Messling found was locked away in the core billions of years ago, so detecting the isotope in volcanic rocks today suggests it comes from the core.
"It's quite a novel and difficult method," Messling said.
"We managed to measure ruthenium in rocks that have next to no ruthenium in them. In half a kilo of rock, it was less than milligrams - a needle in a planet-sized haystack! That's quite exciting - for a geochemist, at least. It was a long but very exciting process."
So what's the connection with gold? It's chemically similar to ruthenium, Messling said, so if the core is leaking ruthenium, it is also leaking gold in similar quantities.
This would be a "minuscule" amount, however. And even if scientists wanted to extract gold directly from the source, the core-mantle boundary, that's much farther down than current technology could drill.
In fact, it's about 236 times deeper than the deepest bore ever drilled - the
Kola Superdeep Borehole
in Russia, which reaches a depth of 12.3km.
The ruthenium isotope signature in rocks from hotspot volcanoes like the ones in Hawaii is entirely different from any other rock or meteorite on record, according to lead study author Nils Messling. geochemist at the University of Göttingen.
Photo:
Supplied / CNN / Nils Messling
Proof that the core isn't isolated is particularly thrilling because the core and the mantle shouldn't interact at all, Messling said.
"Their density is too different, like oil and water, so technically they shouldn't mix. And we still don't have a good mechanism to explain why they do. We don't really know much about the core at all," he said.
The Hawaiian rock samples suggest that the leaking process takes between 500 million and 1 billion years to complete, Messling said.
"It's something that has occurred a while ago, and we suspect that it probably has been going on forever, and it's probably still occurring now," he explained.
According to Messling, if the leaking of precious metals is an ongoing process, it could be that at least some of the gold humans have mined may have come from the core even if the quantity of core material in a single rock is negligible and that the world's supply of gold seems to be replenishing.
"It's a very interesting idea that, although this process is tiny and has zero effect if you look at just one island, if you scale it up to 4.5 billion years it could be that it changes the composition of the Earth," he said.
Researchers who were not involved in the study expressed positive views on the findings.
"We know that the Earth was built from different generations of meteoritic material that were added progressively to the growing planet, and that precious metals from the earliest generations of meteorite material became concentrated into our planet's core while metals from meteorites added in the final stages of the Earth's growth became stranded in our planet's mantle," said Helen Williams, a professor of geochemistry and planetary science at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom.
The study, she added, confirms that the mantle plumes - rising jets of molten rock coming from the core-mantle boundary that create hot spots like Hawaii - do indeed contain material somehow derived from Earth's metallic core, said Williams, adding that the result was "exciting."
Jesse Reimink, an associate professor of geosciences at Pennsylvania State University, agrees.
"This is a very old debate, and new data over the past 10 or so years has reinvigorated the possibility that the core was chemically 'leaking' into the mantle over time," he said.
"This study really does seem to nail the conclusion - the core does contribute some material to the mantle."
The latest research also strengthens the case made in
previous work
that some mantle plumes incorporate material from Earth's core, said the University of Copenhagen's Waterton.
Does that also mean some of the gold in Earth's crust is originally from the core?
"Yes, but probably only a very small amount," he said.
-
CNN

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Operation Midnight Hammer, pilots reveal realities of marathon B-2 bomber missions
After Operation Midnight Hammer, pilots reveal realities of marathon B-2 bomber missions

RNZ News

time19 hours ago

  • RNZ News

After Operation Midnight Hammer, pilots reveal realities of marathon B-2 bomber missions

By Kamin Gock , ABC News A B-2 Stealth Bomber. Photo: AFP / JEROD HARRIS There are very few Americans who know what it's like to fly a B-2 stealth bomber and even fewer that have piloted one for more than 30 hours straight. One of those people is retired Air Force Lieutenant General Steven Basham, who said he was stunned by the "flawless execution" of last weekend's operation , when American pilots conducted a 37-hour non-stop mission targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. Before retiring last year, General Basham flew B-2s in 1999 over Serbia, the bomber's first use in combat, and again in 2003 over Iraq. He gave the ABC an insight into what it takes to prepare and complete such a marathon operation. Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Steven Basham. Photo: AFP / ANDREAS ARNOLD To qualify for his own missions, General Basham needed to complete a 24-hour flight simulation as well as a 24-hour "sortie" mission. The training regime included rehearsing mid-air refuelling, safely landing after being awake for an entire day and managing simulated defences and bomb runs. After years of training, he received the call-up. "I remember the surreal feeling when they said, 'We're actually going to go,' and, of course, my wife doesn't know," he said. "For her, this is like any other night in the last month. I've been going in the evening and coming back home the next morning. It's not lost on me that on this particular occasion, I didn't come back on the next morning." A 31-hour mission awaited him, and it would not be the only one. "I remember not being able to sleep," he said. "Even though we had adjusted our body clocks for many, many weeks prior to the mission, I remember still waking up early and I remember packing my larger than normal lunch." But even with eight sandwiches and some trail mix in hand, General Basham recalls he wasn't very hungry. "You will eat just because it gives you something to do," he said. "My appetite really wasn't there. "Too many butterflies filling up your stomach - no room for any food." He intentionally brought "bland" food to not upset the stomach on such a long journey. Coffee was his main fuel to stay alert along with the occasional catnap, but the adrenaline made it hard to sleep. "You do not want to let down your nation and so you're going to do everything you can to not fail," he said. "That's not going to allow you to sleep." In the air, he and the other pilot ran through each step they would undertake in the hours ahead, while ensuring the weapons were in check and the bomber was continuing to perform as needed. They would also maintain communication with other aircraft, like fuel tankers. Retired Air Force Colonel Melvin Deaile has also piloted the US$2.2 billion (NZ$3.6 billion) aircraft. He took part in the longest ever B-2 bomber mission, flying 44 hours from the US into Afghanistan in 2001. "All my kids were told is: 'Dad's going to work, I don't know when I'll be back,'" he said. "After 9/11 there was a hint that the president may want a response. "We didn't plan on 44 hours. I think the original sortie was 38 to 40 hours." To help him stay awake, Colonel Deaile had been prescribed amphetamines cleared for crew use, known as "pep pills". He said his mission initially involved four bomb runs over different target complexes. But after flying out of Afghanistan, he was directed to go back in and complete another run, which extended his total mission time. "When we went back into the country I dropped some more pep pills," he said. "Because you think the mission's over, you can kind of let down, but then we had to get another tanker, I had to program new bombs and the other guy had to hit the gas." The extreme length of time in the small cockpit also takes a toll on the bladder. The high altitudes and pressurised cockpit mean pilots need to drink a lot of water to stay hydrated. "We calculated we drank a bottle of water an hour which meant we had to go pee once an hour," he said. "We didn't want to fill up the chemical toilet too much. It's not designed to hold 44 hours' worth of pee. "So we made an agreement that we would only use the toilet for number twos and we would use the 'piddle packs' for number ones." He described a piddle pack as like "a zip-lock bag with kitty litter in it ... and the kitty litter combines with it to make it more gel-like so it doesn't leak". During 44 hours locked in the cockpit with very little room to move, Colonel Deaile estimates he and the other pilot produced 80 piddle packs. Both pilots said flying back to base was when the adrenaline started to run thin and the lack of sleep kicked in. Colonel Deaile said, from his experience, the most challenging part of being a bomber pilot was mid-air refuelling. "You have to be within 12 feet (3.7 metres) of another aircraft, and you've got to hold the jet in position I would say probably for roughly 20 to 30 minutes ... because that's how long the boom is," he said. On General Basham's first flight in 1999 there was nowhere to sleep, so he and the other pilot sent a note back as soon as possible and small cots were installed inside all the bombers. "The hardest part of a marathon is not typically the physical part, it's the mental part, and a long duration sortie is like that marathon," he said. After debriefing back at base in Missouri, he returned home from the 31-hour mission, and remembers cracking a beer at 9am, sitting in a recliner and watching TV. That afternoon it was his turn to mow the lawn, and before the sun had set he had returned to normal life. General Basham flew B-2 bombers for about nine years and took part in multiple missions that spanned more than 30 hours. Colonel Deaile flew B-2s from 1998 to 2002 but Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan would be the only long-distance mission he would take part in. "I've never said I want to crawl in the cockpit and be there again for two days," he said. "Once was enough." Last week's mission into Iran involved seven of America's 19 B-2 bombers . Operation Midnight Hammer was shrouded in deception and secrecy. A separate package of decoy bombers was sent west over the Pacific, and were picked up by keen flight trackers and reported by news outlets. But the main strike team headed east undetected, catching even the most experienced aviators off guard. "I almost felt nauseous on Saturday night because I missed this as well," General Basham said. "I should have realised that, no, there was something else going on. "That's how well this was executed." The aircraft unloaded more than a dozen Massive Ordnance Penetrators, also known as bunker busters, on the Iranian nuclear facilities. The weapons, weighing 30,000 pounds (13.6 tonnes), had never been used before in combat. General Basham said he remembers the "clunk" he felt when releasing weapons from the aircraft, but he had never carried a bomb that came even close to that weight. "I look forward to hearing from the pilots one day [about] dropping a 30,000-pound bomb, because that's a significant amount of weight to lose in a short amount of time," he said. There have been questions over the impact the 14 bunker buster bombs had on their targets. CNN and other outlets reported on a leaked early US intelligence assessment that suggested the strikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by a few months. President Donald Trump and his administration have attacked the outlets and journalists who reported on the early assessment, accusing them of insulting the aviators. "I think CNN ought to apologise to the pilots of the B-2s, I think MSNBC ought to apologise. Cable networks are real losers, you're gutless losers," the president said. He has repeatedly said the strikes "obliterated" the desired targets and his defence secretary held a press conference to rebut the reports. Retired now at 59, General Basham said he didn't think the pilots would be bothered by the political drama unfolding. "They're not gonna worry about those things," he said. "There's the political world and the policy world - that's not the world we live in. "We live in the world where we're asked to do a mission, we did our mission successfully, we'll let others determine the efficacy of that. "But in the end I couldn't be more proud of the pilots, the maintainers, the planners, the intelligence community, everyone, and what they did to make this happen." - ABC News

Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill clears first US Senate hurdle
Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill clears first US Senate hurdle

RNZ News

time21 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill clears first US Senate hurdle

Trump on social media hailed the "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." Photo: SAUL LOEB / AFP By David Morgan and Nicole Johnson , Reuters The Republican-controlled US Senate narrowly advanced President Donald Trump's, sweeping tax-cut and spending bill , during a marathon weekend session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats sought to slow the legislation's path to passage. Lawmakers voted 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill, with two of Trump's fellow Republicans joining Democrats to oppose the legislation that would fund the president's top immigration, border, tax-cut and military priorities. Trump on social media hailed the "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." After hours of delay, during which Republican leaders and Vice President JD Vance worked behind closed doors to persuade last-minute holdouts to support the measure, Democrats demanded that the megabill first be read aloud in the chamber - a task that could delay the start of the debate until Sunday afternoon (US time). Democrats say the bill's tax cuts would disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of social programs for lower-income Americans. "Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass a radical bill, released to the public in the dead of night, praying the American people don't realise what's in it," Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor. "Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish," he said. Once the bill has been read, lawmakers will begin up to 20 hours of debate on the legislation. That will be followed by a marathon amendment session, known as a "vote-a-rama," before the Senate votes on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. Republican Senators Thom Tillis and Rand Paul voted against opening debate, a move that seemed for a time to be in danger of failing. Trump attacked Tillis, who opposed the bill's cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for lower-income Americans, which he said would be devastating for his native North Carolina. Tillis is up for reelection next year. "Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis. I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks," the president posted. Paul opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit on the $36.2t US debt by an additional $5t. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump said on social media. The vote was in limbo for hours as Vance, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other top Republicans sought to persuade last-minute holdouts to support the legislation. It was not clear what deals if any were struck to win over their support. Hardline Republican Senators Rick Scott, Mike Lee and Cynthia Lummis, who want deeper cuts in federal spending, voted to support the bill in the end. Another hardliner, Senator Ron Johnson, initially voted no but flipped his vote and backed the legislation. Trump was monitoring the vote from the Oval Office late into the night, a senior White House official said. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. The nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee released an analysis projecting that the Senate bill's tax provisions would reduce government revenue by $4.5t over the next decade, increasing the $36.2tUS government debt. The White House said this month the legislation would reduce the annual deficit by $1.4t. The world's richest person, Elon Musk, also took a swipe at the bill, which would end tax breaks for the electric vehicles that his automaker Tesla manufactures. The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future. Calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive," he risked reigniting a feud with Trump that raged earlier this month, before Musk backed down from his rhetoric. "The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!" Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. Republicans from states with large rural populations have opposed a reduction in state tax revenue for Medicaid providers, including rural hospitals. The newly released legislation would delay that reduction and would include $25 billion to support rural Medicaid providers from 2028 to 2032. The legislation would raise the cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes to $40,000 with an annual 1 percent inflation adjustment through 2029, after which it would fall back to the current $10,000. The bill would also phase the cap down for those earning more than $500,000 a year. That is a major concern of House Republicans from coastal states, including New York, New Jersey and California, who play an important role in keeping the party's narrow House majority. Republicans are using a legislative manoeuvre to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold to advance most legislation in the 100-member chamber. Democrats will focus their firepower with amendments aimed at reversing Republican spending cuts to programs that provide government-backed healthcare to the elderly, poor and disabled, as well as food aid to low-income families. The bill also would raise the Treasury Department's debt ceiling by trillions of dollars to stave off a potentially disastrous default on the nation's debt in the coming months. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House of Representatives for final passage before Trump can sign it into law. The House passed its version of the bill last month. - Reuters

US Senate Republicans push ahead on Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill
US Senate Republicans push ahead on Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

US Senate Republicans push ahead on Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill

By Richard Cowan , David Morgan and Nicole Johnson , Reuters US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks to reporters following a Senate Republican luncheon, in the US Capitol on 27 June in Washington, DC. Photo: AFP / AL DRAGO US Senate Republicans say they are set to vote on President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill after agreeing on changes to address concerns about funding for rural hospitals and the deductibility of state taxes. Several Republican senators who had previously expressed hesitancy about voting for the bill told reporters that their concerns had been assuaged and that they were ready to vote to clear a first procedural hurdle in the coming hours. The bill is Trump's top legislative goal. With his fellow Republicans controlling both chambers, Congress has so far not rejected any of Trump's priorities. The 940-page megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Nonpartisan analysts estimate that a version passed by the House of Representatives last month would add about US$3 trillion (NZ$5 trillion) to the US$36.2 trillion (NZ$60 trillion) US government debt. The Congressional Budget Office has not released a forecast for how much the Senate version - still subject to change - would add to the debt if enacted. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget public policy organisation on Saturday said its preliminary estimate is that the Senate version would add US$4 trillion (NZ$7 trillion) to the debt over the next decade, including interest costs. "If you thought the House bill borrowed too much - and it did - the Senate manages to make things even worse," Maya MacGuineas, the group's president, said in a statement. The White House said this month that the legislation, titled the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, would reduce the annual deficit by US$1.4 trillion (NZ$2.3 trillion). Democrats opposed the bill, saying its tax-cut elements would disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of social programs relied upon by lower-income Americans. Republican Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine, who had opposed concern about tax-code changes that could hurt rural hospitals, told reporters they were ready to move forward. A successful vote would kick off a lengthy process, as Democrats unveil a series of amendments unlikely to pass in a chamber that Republicans control 53-47. "By passing this bill now, we will make our nation more prosperous and secure," Senate Budget Committee Lindsey Graham said in a statement accompanying the bill text. "It is hard to believe that Republican Senators - in the dead of night - made the bill even worse than their initial awful proposal," top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer wrote on social media. "This bill virtually wipes out all wind and solar. We have to fight it." It is hard to believe that Republican Senators—in the dead of night—made the bill even worse than their initial awful proposal. This bill virtually wipes out all wind and solar. We have to fight it. Republicans from states with large rural populations have opposed a reduction in state tax revenue for Medicaid providers including rural hospitals. The newly released legislation would delay that reduction and would include US$25 billion (NZ$41 billion) to support rural Medicaid providers from 2028 to 2032. "If you want to be a working-class party, you've got to get and deliver for working-class people," Hawley told reporters. "You cannot take away healthcare for working people." The legislation would raise the cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes to US$40,000 (NZ$60,000) with an annual 1 percent inflation adjustment through 2029, after which it would fall back to the current US$10,000 (NZ$16,500). The bill would also phase the cap down for those earning more than US$500,000 (NZ$825,000) a year. That is a major concern of House Republicans from coastal states including New York, New Jersey and California, who play an important role in keeping the party's narrow House majority. Republicans are using a legislative maneuver to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold to advance most legislation in the 100-member chamber. The narrow majorities for Republicans in the Senate and House mean they can afford no more than three no votes from the party in either chamber to advance a bill that Democrats are united in opposing. Democrats will focus their firepower with amendments aimed at reversing Republican spending cuts to programs that provide government-backed healthcare to the elderly, poor and disabled, as well as food aid to low-income families. The bill also would raise the Treasury Department's debt ceiling by trillions of dollars to stave off a potentially disastrous default on the nation's debt in the coming months. If the Senate manages to pass the bill by early next week, the House would be poised to quickly apply the final stamp of approval, sending it to Trump for signing into law. - Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store