Regime change in K-P?
The simmering row between Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and the federal government is a precursor to more political instability. The reported moves by the ruling coalition at the Center to dislodge the PTI dispensation in Peshawar are ill-advised.
The seasoned men at the helm in Islamabad should desist from any such brinkmanship. It is unfortunate that no lessons have been learnt from such bitter episodes of our chequered political history, as democracy and public representation are falling down the abyss. Thus, the evolving diatribe of regime change in K-P will not only have a severe political fallout, especially as the opposition is already pushed to the wall, but also grave ramifications for the restive province that is engaged in a showdown with non-state actors.
The opportunity to dismantle the PTI's two-third majority in K-P has arisen in the wake of the Constitutional Bench's decision on reserved seats. While the party has been stripped of its due share, the wafer-thin opposition in the provincial legislature is all set to grab 25 seats — something that emboldens them to usher in a change of guard by luring 35 more legislators into their ranks. But it goes without saying that this floor-crossing, under coercion, will breed discontent and instability. Other measures being contemplated are dissolution of the assembly and imposing Governor Rule. But such tactics — resorted to in Punjab, Balochistan and K-P in the past — are unlikely to stand in the court of law, or in public opinion.
The federation should avoid being judgmental on K-P government's performance, as it is not its cup of tea. The way ahead is to let the Gandapur government be on its own, and launch efforts to kickstart a dialogue for bringing down the political temperature. PTI's stance that it is open for talks should be responded to by the coalition in Islamabad with a sincere roadmap, which could entail redressing grievances of the party, especially release of political prisoners including former PM Imran Khan. Such a move would offset PTI's plans for agitation, and usher in a semblance of serenity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Gandapur dismisses rift, defends budget
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister, Ali Amin Gandapur, has dismissed any speculation regarding the stability of his government, stating that all members are united and no one is defecting. "If anyone is eager to bring a no-confidence motion, they are welcome to try — it will only expose the truth," he remarked. He added that had the budget not been passed, the government would have collapsed, and the blame would lie solely with PTI, while opponents would be celebrating. Speaking informally to senior journalists at the Chief Minister's House in Peshawar on Friday, Gandapur reiterated his call to the federal government to open trade routes with Afghanistan — from Chitral to Angoor Adda in Waziristan. "This move will not only boost trade but also ensure regional peace," he said. He also urged that individuals with legal status and those wishing to acquire Pakistani citizenship should be granted it, to promote foreign investment in the province. Gandapur addressed internal party tensions surrounding the budget, stating, "There was propaganda from within that the budget shouldn't be presented, and once it was, noise was made about not passing it. However, when Barrister Saif briefed our party's Patron-in-Chief, he expressed satisfaction with the budget's approval." He revealed that only two members abstained from voting for the budget, adding, "Everyone knows who they're aligned with." He hinted that more clarity on internal matters will emerge once the newly elected members of the provincial assembly are sworn in, and said the party's strategy will be shaped accordingly. The chief minister also explained that due to recent legal interpretations, none of the current assembly members are officially affiliated with PTI, as the Supreme Court's previous decision has been nullified following the July 21 Senate ruling. "Everyone is now considered independent, except me," he emphasized. "I'm still a PTI member, as I listed PTI as my party affiliation in my nomination papers." Responding to criticism over alleged extravagant spending, Gandapur clarified: "I didn't spend Rs115 million on biscuits. That amount was used to provide meals for 400 Class-IV staff members at the CM House and Secretariat." He defended his fiscal record, noting, "While I do spend, I've also saved Rs250 billion. It's the responsibility of political leaders to keep bureaucracy in check — and we will do that." While acknowledging that corruption hasn't been entirely eradicated, Gandapur claimed significant control has been achieved. "I'm accountable not for 12 years but for the 15 months of my current tenure," he added. He concluded by announcing plans to revive closed industries in the province by ensuring the provision of low-cost electricity.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
LHC's May 9 ruling
Listen to article It seems political instability and an unpleasant crisscross with the judiciary is there to stay. The detailed order of a division bench of the LHC that found former PM Imran Khan involved in a 'conspiracy' linked to the May 9 upheavals has come too late, thus putting a question mark on its veracity. The court ironically has summarised its entire contention, reliance and judgment merely on the testimony of two police officials presented by the state prosecution. This is simply a travesty of justice and is in need of a holistic approach to dispense fair play in all judiciousness. It is irksome to note that both the sleuths were present on two different occasions in various parts of Punjab with the accused, and were the only ones to hear him instigate his workers to vandalise state properties in case of his arrest. Thus, the charges of criminal conspiracy and abetment slapped on the incarcerated leader have come to not only delay his lawful bail application, but also to prolong an episode of controversy and discontent that has wrecked socio-political harmony for long. The May 9 buzzword has come a long way. Hundreds of arrested men and women have gone through trials and tribulations. And when the tale was nearing its legal and logical end, as judgments and lawful interpretations of proceedings are in order, this new trial after two years hints at nothing but vendetta. It is a foregone conclusion that the judiciary is under pressure, especially after the 26th amendment, and dispensing an impartial trial to the imprisoned opposition party members is a remote possibility. It is, thus, incumbent upon the judiciary to see that justice is seen to be done, and the cases should not be heard and decided in limbo without seeking relevant pieces of witnesses as ordained by law. Learned Justice Athar Minallah had a point, when he told an audience at the Supreme Court, that the society is polarising owing to the phenomenon that the state is trying to construe self-concocted decisions. Time to step back from this disgusting tendency.
Express Tribune
19 hours ago
- Express Tribune
May 9: IHC overturns sentence of 4 PTI workers
Listen to article The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday acquitted four Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) workers who had been convicted in connection with the May 9 riots. The convicts had challenged their sentences in the IHC. Earlier, the ATC, headed by Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra, had sentenced Sohail Khan, Mohammad Akram, Shahzeb and Mira Khan to 10 years in prison on May 30 for their alleged involvement in attacking a police station in Islamabad's Ramna area. The convicts had been charged under Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) Sections 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), 186 (obstructing official duty), 188 (disobeying order of a public servant), 324 (attempted murder), 353 (assault on public servants), 436 (arson) and 440 (mischief); Section 144 of CrPC; and Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), 1997. They were sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment under Section 7 ATA, five years under Section 324 of PPC, four under Section 436, two each under sections 353 and 148. In total, 11 PTI members, including MNA Abdul Latif, were sentenced, but only four were arrested while the remaining suspects are still at large. May 9, 2023, refers to the day when former prime minister and PTI founding chairman Imran Khan was taken into custody by paramilitary Rangers from the Islamabad High Court premises on charges of corruption. The PTI founder's arrest sparked countrywide protests, during which demonstrators allegedly belonging to the former ruling party vandalized state-owned buildings and military installations, including the Lahore Corps Commander's House, commonly known as Jinnah House. Following the protests, several PTI leaders and workers were arrested on various charges, including setting government infrastructure on fire. On Thursday, a divisional bench of IHC comprising Justice Azam Khan and Justice Khadim Hussain Somroo overturned the verdict of ATC, declaring the sentences void after hearing arguments from both sides. PTI lawyers, including Babar Awan, Sardar Masroof and Amna Ali, represented the appellants in the IHC. Awan argued that out of nine prosecution witnesses, only one — ASI Muhammad Sharif — identified the accused. He said no injuries were reported despite allegations of gunfire. "Punish for crimes proven, but do not turn the system into a joke," he told the court. Justice Somroo questioned the prosecution about the evidence to which the prosecutor responded that evidence existed but requested additional time to present it. The court, however, rejected this plea, observing that all arguments had already been heard. The bench noted that no medico-legal certificates (MLCs) or injured persons were presented and questioned the basis for convictions without proving the accused were present at the crime scene. The IHC observed that none of the witnesses had stated in their testimonies that the accused were present at the site. The bench further questioned whether the court was now expected to convict solely on the basis of an identification parade.
