Katie Thurston Gives Candid Look at Being in ‘Medically Induced Menopause' at 34 Amid Cancer Battle
'What it's like to have hot flashes due to medically induced menopause,' Thurston, 34, wrote via her Instagram Stories on Sunday, July 20, sharing a screenshot of her Apple Health chart.
Per a screenshot, Thurston spent eight hours and 54 minutes in bed, but she was only asleep for just over six hours.
'I have the option to add a prescription to the routine of meds I'm on, but tbh I'm just simply scared,' Thurston wrote in her caption. 'Every added pill comes with a new risk for side effects. But, I might be reaching my breaking point when it comes to quality of life.'
Katie Thurston Details How Intimacy With Husband Jeff Arcuri Has Changed Since Breast Cancer Battle
She continued, 'I'm always tired and uncomfortable.'
Thurston was diagnosed with breast cancer in February, later discovering that the malignant tissue had spread to her liver, which elevated her diagnosis to stage IV. In order to adequately treat her specific type of cancer, doctors had to put her body into early menopause.
'Slept like s*** because I'm now in medically induced menopause, which means I get hot flashes,' she said in a social media video posted in May. 'Tonight I have to be social so I figured I would ease into that by being social with you guys during the day. In the meantime, show you kind of what a normal day looks like for me.'
She added at the time, 'My lips have been chapped for what feels like two weeks straight. And so it's this game of, like, catch-up and trying to just make sure I get enough water. Which I was already bad at before medication and now it's like a true task every day to force myself to consume water. So, good morning!'
Before Thurston went into menopause, she did a round of in vitro fertilization and froze embryos.
'I'm basically putting my ovaries into a temporary menopausal state (I like to say hibernation) to protect them from chemo,' Thurston said in a March Instagram update. 'It will also reduce estrogen production, which is particularly important in hormonereceptor-ER+/PR+ breast cancer as estrogen can fuel cancer growth.'
A Timeline of Former Bachelorette Katie Thurston's Breast Cancer Battle: From Diagnosis to Treatment
Thurston and her husband, Jeff Arcuri, also plan to use a surrogate to carry any future children down the line. Us Weekly exclusively confirmed earlier in March that the pair tied the knot.
'We were wanting to plan a wedding and there's a lot of emotions that come in with chemo and the impact and the health and we don't know what the next year looks like,' Thurston told Us. 'And one night he said, 'I want to show you that I still love you and that I'm here to stay. I'll get married to you tomorrow.' We flew our parents in from Michigan and Washington State. We got our marriage license and a friend is just gonna marry us.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Is The Mental Health System Broken Or Was It Never Built To Work?
Five years ago, a research team at Stanford achieved what many in psychiatry had long hoped for: A treatment for severe depression that worked rapidly, reliably, and without medication. In their 2020 SAINT trial, 19 out of 21 participants with treatment-resistant depression achieved remission after just five days of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It was a landmark moment. Yet today, the treatment remains almost entirely inaccessible to the average patient. Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) is still paid for out of pocket, costing roughly $20,000, and insurers have been slow to move. A paradox at the heart of American mental healthcare: as innovation accelerates, access stalls. Over the last five years, more than $13 billion has been invested in the sector, but outcomes haven't improved in kind. Patients still cycle through multiple failed treatments. Clinicians are burnt out, and payers are stuck making decisions with no data. It's tempting to say the system is broken. But perhaps it was never built to do what we're now asking of it. A System Built for Simplicity, Not Reality Modern mental healthcare still relies on a medical model designed for acute illness: assess symptoms, assign a diagnosis, and prescribe a standard treatment. It's a linear approach that works well for infections and injuries. But mental illness is not linear. A messy intersection of biology, trauma, environment, and social context shapes conditions like depression, PTSD, and OCD. There's no single cause, no universal treatment. And yet, the system continues to reduce people to diagnosis codes and protocol templates, often leaving naivety at the door. This reductionist model doesn't reflect the complexity of the human experience, and it leaves patients, clinicians, and payers with more questions than answers. The system doesn't work for anyone. Yet, the misalignment of incentives means that all stakeholders are working against one another. Payers prioritize risk management—and in the absence of meaningful data, default to spending as little as possible. Providers focus on individual outcomes. Pharma chases scalable efficacy. Patients just want relief. But it seems no one is working with the correct information, and the frustration and disappointment are palpable. Data alone doesn't matter, because it's about how you use the data to drive change, according to Brayden Efseroff, psychiatrist and Chief Medical Officer at Allia Health. 'When patients cycle through multiple failed treatments before finding relief, it's not just frustrating - it's a sign of systemic dysfunction. Decisions are being made without context.' Ariel Ganz, PhD, a precision mental health researcher at Stanford, agrees, 'The same data clinicians need to design effective treatment plans is also critical for payers to manage risk, researchers to improve understanding, and patients to advocate for themselves on their health journey. 'Without more high-quality data, none of these parties can effectively improve patient outcomes.' Precision Mental Health Company is addressing this issue at its core. Their AI-native electronic health record (EHR) isn't designed to replace therapists or psychiatrists, but to support them by capturing, organizing, and translating real-world data into usable, structured insights. This innovative solution holds the promise of a brighter future for mental healthcare. Instead of extracting revenue from clinicians through software subscriptions or taking a percentage of their reimbursement, payers partner directly with Allia on value-based contracts. They're paid only when patients achieve measurable improvements, a stark contrast to the fee-for-service model that rewards volume over outcomes. Amie Leighton, CEO of Allia Health, discovered the need for better data firsthand during years of cycling through hospitals and treatment before finally receiving adequate care. The turning point came when her clinicians had access to complete information about her and were able to communicate with each other - something that had been missing throughout her previous treatments. This personal experience, and the empathy it engenders, shaped the company's mission: to build the infrastructure that allows for context-rich, coordinated, and personalised care. The Bigger Picture How do you fix a system that was never designed to work in the first place? We still have a long way to go, but for the millions of Americans struggling with mental health challenges, finally, an infrastructure-first approach offers something that's been missing: a system designed to actually help people recover. In an industry where patients commonly endure multiple failed treatments before finding relief, this represents a significant shift toward care that prioritizes outcomes.
CNN
44 minutes ago
- CNN
Judge partially blocks Trump administration from enforcing funding ban against Planned Parenthood
A federal judge on Monday extended an order that blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a provision of President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy law to defund Planned Parenthood's health care services. US District Judge Indira Talwani partially granted Planned Parenthood's request for a preliminary injunction while its lawsuit against the administration plays out. The order does not apply to all Planned Parenthood members. The Trump administration will not be allowed to enforce the funding ban against the Planned Parenthood members who cannot provide abortions because of state abortion bans, or who received less than $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in 2023, the Planned Parenthood said Monday. The measure — which is part of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' that was signed into law July 4 — bars Medicaid users from coverage with a health care provider that also provides abortion services. In a statement responding to the ruling, the Planned Parenthood groups said, 'This isn't over. While we're grateful that the court recognized the harm caused by this law, we're disappointed that not all members were granted the necessary relief today.' 'The court has not yet ruled on whether it will grant preliminary injunctive relief to other members. We remain hopeful that the court will grant this relief. There will be nothing short of a public health crisis if Planned Parenthood members are allowed to be 'defunded,'' they added. Talwani, a Barack Obama appointee, had previously temporarily blocked the provision's enforcement for 14 days on July 7, after the Planned Parenthood Federation of America — along with Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah — sued the administration. While the legislation does not explicitly mention Planned Parenthood, it prohibits federal funding for providers 'primarily engaged in family planning services, reproductive health, and related medical care' that also provide abortion services.' Planned Parenthood previously warned that nearly 200 clinics nationwide — which also provide birth control, STI testing and treatment, and cancer screening — could close as a result of the bill's ban on funds. Talwani, in her order, said Planned Parenthood was likely to succeed on its claim that the law's funding ban violates the health care provider's First Amendment rights because of its support for — and provision of — abortion services. 'Instead of merely prohibiting Planned Parenthood Members that receive Medicaid funds from providing abortions, the statute prohibits them from affiliating with entities that do. Moreover, the record is devoid of evidentiary support for Defendants' suggestion that Planned Parenthood entities share funds that are ultimately used for abortions,' the judge wrote. 'Therefore, restricting funds based on affiliation with an abortion provider operates only to restrict the associational right of Members that do not provide abortion.' The bill originally barred funds for ten years, before the Senate Parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, reduced the measure to one year. CNN has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for comment. Planned Parenthood is also battling the Trump administration in court over cuts to a federal teen pregnancy prevention program. Lawyers for five Planned Parenthood networks argued in a federal District of Columbia court this June that administration's changes to the program, including limits on language around diversity and equity, were vague and could bar Planned Parenthood from providing longtime services.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Judge partially blocks Trump administration from enforcing funding ban against Planned Parenthood
A federal judge on Monday extended an order that blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a provision of President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy law to defund Planned Parenthood's health care services. US District Judge Indira Talwani partially granted Planned Parenthood's request for a preliminary injunction while its lawsuit against the administration plays out. The order does not apply to all Planned Parenthood members. The Trump administration will not be allowed to enforce the funding ban against the Planned Parenthood members who cannot provide abortions because of state abortion bans, or who received less than $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in 2023, the Planned Parenthood said Monday. The measure — which is part of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' that was signed into law July 4 — bars Medicaid users from coverage with a health care provider that also provides abortion services. In a statement responding to the ruling, the Planned Parenthood groups said, 'This isn't over. While we're grateful that the court recognized the harm caused by this law, we're disappointed that not all members were granted the necessary relief today.' 'The court has not yet ruled on whether it will grant preliminary injunctive relief to other members. We remain hopeful that the court will grant this relief. There will be nothing short of a public health crisis if Planned Parenthood members are allowed to be 'defunded,'' they added. Talwani, a Barack Obama appointee, had previously temporarily blocked the provision's enforcement for 14 days on July 7, after the Planned Parenthood Federation of America — along with Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah — sued the administration. While the legislation does not explicitly mention Planned Parenthood, it prohibits federal funding for providers 'primarily engaged in family planning services, reproductive health, and related medical care' that also provide abortion services.' Planned Parenthood previously warned that nearly 200 clinics nationwide — which also provide birth control, STI testing and treatment, and cancer screening — could close as a result of the bill's ban on funds. Talwani, in her order, said Planned Parenthood was likely to succeed on its claim that the law's funding ban violates the health care provider's First Amendment rights because of its support for — and provision of — abortion services. 'Instead of merely prohibiting Planned Parenthood Members that receive Medicaid funds from providing abortions, the statute prohibits them from affiliating with entities that do. Moreover, the record is devoid of evidentiary support for Defendants' suggestion that Planned Parenthood entities share funds that are ultimately used for abortions,' the judge wrote. 'Therefore, restricting funds based on affiliation with an abortion provider operates only to restrict the associational right of Members that do not provide abortion.' The bill originally barred funds for ten years, before the Senate Parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, reduced the measure to one year. CNN has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for comment. Planned Parenthood is also battling the Trump administration in court over cuts to a federal teen pregnancy prevention program. Lawyers for five Planned Parenthood networks argued in a federal District of Columbia court this June that administration's changes to the program, including limits on language around diversity and equity, were vague and could bar Planned Parenthood from providing longtime services.
