logo
Who Is Jon Prosser? Apple Sues YouTuber Over Alleged iOS 26 Leak from Development iPhone

Who Is Jon Prosser? Apple Sues YouTuber Over Alleged iOS 26 Leak from Development iPhone

Apple Inc. has filed a federal lawsuit against popular tech YouTuber Jon Prosser and his associate Michael Ramacciotti for allegedly stealing and leaking confidential details related to its upcoming iOS 26 software. The company claims the duo accessed an unreleased development version of the iPhone and shared internal features on Prosser's YouTube channel, Front Page Tech.
According to Apple's legal filing, Ramacciotti gained unauthorized access to a development iPhone belonging to an Apple employee named Ethan Lipnik. While staying at Lipnik's residence, Ramacciotti reportedly used the employee's passcode and location data to unlock the device. He then FaceTimed Prosser, showing him the unreleased iOS 26 interface.
Prosser allegedly recorded the FaceTime call and used the visuals to create simulated renderings of the iOS 26 design and features, which were then published on his channel. Apple contends that this content included early previews of the new Messages app, a redesigned camera interface, and the "Liquid Glass" user interface with rounded icons and pill-shaped tabs—closely resembling the version later revealed at Apple's WWDC 2025.
The lawsuit further claims that Prosser may have offered Ramacciotti compensation or job prospects in exchange for access to the confidential information. Apple argues that these actions violated the Defend Trade Secrets Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Apple is seeking a jury trial and is asking the court for the following relief:
A permanent injunction to stop further leaks
Punitive and compensatory damages for trade secret theft
An order for the return or destruction of any confidential Apple materials
Legal fees and court costs
Pre- and post-judgment interest
Jon Prosser is widely known for revealing Apple product details before their official announcements. This lawsuit highlights the growing risks surrounding the handling of confidential tech development and the use of social media for content monetization through leaks.
As of now, neither Prosser nor Ramacciotti has publicly responded to the lawsuit.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maid asks for later curfew and nearly S$2k cash advance to buy latest iPhone, employer unsure whether to say yes
Maid asks for later curfew and nearly S$2k cash advance to buy latest iPhone, employer unsure whether to say yes

Independent Singapore

timean hour ago

  • Independent Singapore

Maid asks for later curfew and nearly S$2k cash advance to buy latest iPhone, employer unsure whether to say yes

SINGAPORE: An employer was surprised when her helper, nearing the end of her contract, asked for nearly S$2,000 in advance to purchase the latest iPhone. In a post shared on Tuesday (July 22) in the 'Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic Helper' Facebook group, the employer explained that her helper, who has been with the family for a year and a half, was firm about wanting 'an iPhone' and unwilling to consider other brands. 'Her reasoning is she's worked her whole life for her family, and now she wants a gift for herself,' the employer shared. Along with the cash advance, the helper also requested a later curfew on her days off. While she is currently expected to return home by 7 p.m., she has asked to extend this to 8:30 p.m. so she can have dinner outside before heading back. The employer noted that the helper has been performing her duties 'satisfactorily,' and even mentioned that their toddler has grown attached to her. However, she expressed hesitation about approving the requests, especially the later curfew, as the helper shares a room with their child. 'We absolutely need her to be back early to avoid disturbing the child's sleep at 9 p.m.,' she wrote. Unsure of how to move forward, the employer asked fellow locals, 'What would you do if you were in our position? Would you agree to her requests?' 'She will need to save up if she really wants it.' In the comments section, one netizen said they wouldn't agree to giving a cash advance, especially since the iPhone is 'a want and not a need.' 'She can still buy the iPhone once she saves up enough money. There is also no guarantee that she won't run away after receiving the advance for the iPhone,' they added. Regarding the request for a later curfew, the same commenter suggested that the employer consider a few things before deciding. 'You have to ask yourself: 1. If you can handle the house till 8.30 p.m.; 2. Do you trust her on her off days? Was she wearing any revealing clothes or heavy makeup on her off days? Has she shown any signs of engaging in activities that you are not comfortable with?' Another netizen said, 'I think returning home at 8:30 p.m. on her off days is fine. Sometimes my helper comes home at 9 p.m., and I'm totally fine with that. But the S$2k advance for the iPhone is a bit much… personally, I wouldn't agree to that… she will need to save up if she really wants it.' A third shared, 'About her asking for a S$2k advance, if you trust her, give it to her. If you don't, don't give. With my previous employer, I always took in advance S$2k+, and we deducted it from my monthly salary. But my current employer doesn't like paying in advance, but I can understand her as well.' In other news, a local employer has decided to send her maid back to the Philippines after discovering she had borrowed money from loan sharks. In a post on r/askSingapore, a Reddit forum, the employer explained that she found out about this issue while preparing for an overseas trip scheduled for early December. Read more: 'They threatened my family' – Employer decides to send helper back home after finding out she borrowed money from loan sharks Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

China's smartphone champion has triumphed where Apple failed
China's smartphone champion has triumphed where Apple failed

Business Times

time10 hours ago

  • Business Times

China's smartphone champion has triumphed where Apple failed

EVER since he co-founded Xiaomi in 2010, Lei Jun, the chief executive of the Chinese tech giant, has pulled off feat after feat of salesmanship. A decade ago, he earned a Guinness World Record for selling 2.1 million smartphones online in 24 hours. These days, though, he is not just flogging cheap phones. Last month, Xiaomi sold more than 200,000 of its first electric SUV, the YU7, within three minutes of bringing it onto the market. Xiaomi's rise over the past few years has been vertiginous. Only Apple and Samsung sell more smartphones worldwide. The company also peddles a vast array of devices that connect to its handsets, from air-conditioners and robo-vacuums to scooters and televisions. After a slump in 2022, which it attributed to 'cut-throat competition' in China for consumer electronics, Xiaomi has roared back to growth, with its revenue increasing by 35 per cent last year. Since the beginning of 2024, its market value has nearly quadrupled, to HK$1.5 trillion (S$244 billion). With the successful release of the YU7 – its second electric vehicle (EV) after the SU7, a sporty sedan launched in March last year – Xiaomi has pulled off a feat that eluded Apple, which ditched plans to make its own EV after burning billions of dollars on the effort over a decade. Xiaomi, which announced its carmaking ambitions in 2021, has put more than 300,000 of its EVs on Chinese roads over the past 15 months, and has a backlog of orders that will take more than a year to fill. Although its EV division has lost money so far, Lei has said he thinks it will become profitable later this year, an impressive feat in China's brutally competitive car market. Xiaomi now has its sights set on world domination. Over the coming years, it intends to open 10,000 shops abroad, up from just a few hundred last year, which it will use to show off its sleek new cars alongside its consumer electronics. Can anything stop its stunning ascent? Xiaomi's success in EVs is partly down to being in the right place at the right time. China these days is awash in carmaking know-how; Lei was able to nab top talent from a number of other companies. Prices for parts and machinery have plummeted, given the oversupply of both. Getting a factory approved and built can be done far more quickly in China than most other places. But Lei also deserves plenty of credit. Insiders note that, unlike Apple's Tim Cook, he took personal control over his company's carmaking project. Success required deep changes to how the company operated. Prior to its foray into EVs, Xiaomi did not own factories; like Apple, it outsourced the production of its phones and other devices. Yet it chose to build its own EV factory in Beijing, which it is currently expanding, in order to ensure strict oversight. It is now adopting the approach elsewhere in its business: last year it began producing smartphones itself at another facility in Beijing, and is building a plant in Wuhan where it will make other connected devices, starting with air-conditioners. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Xiaomi's marketing strategy – which relies heavily on Lei's cult following in China – has also aided its expansion into EVs, much as adoration for Steve Jobs helped Apple sell its first iPhones. Wuhan University is said to have enjoyed a surge in interest thanks to Lei's attendance there some 30 years ago. 'Mi Fans', as diehard Xiaomi customers are known, collect company memorabilia and race to get their hands on every new product. Xiaomi has even managed to sustain the excitement around its EVs despite a horrific accident in March in which three university students were killed in an SU7 that was being piloted down a motorway by the company's autonomous-driving system. The episode led to criticism of Xiaomi's safety standards and a temporary sell-off in shares, but they did not quell demand for the YU7 when it was launched three months later. It also helps that Xiaomi has a vast customer base to which it can hawk new products. At the end of last year, it claimed 700 million monthly users across its devices globally, up by about 10 per cent from the year before. Many of them play games purchased on Xiaomi's app store and view ads sold by the company (these generate half of the company's total profit, according to Bernstein, a broker). And a sizeable share of users buy their Xiaomi products directly on its app. The company has already proved adept at persuading them to upgrade to more expensive phones. It needs only a small fraction of them to buy a car for the endeavour to be a huge success. Many of Xiaomi's Chinese customers were in their early 20s when they bought one of its first smartphones a little over a decade ago. They are now in their mid-30s, the target demographic for Xiaomi's EVs. Lei is looking beyond China, too. Nearly half of the revenue the company makes from smartphones and other connected devices comes from overseas, primarily in developing markets such as India and Indonesia. Lei wants Xiaomi to start selling its EVs abroad by 2027. These will probably not enjoy the kind of rapturous reception they have at home: Xiaomi does not command anything close to the same brand loyalty in foreign markets, and few overseas customers will have heard of Lei. That helps explain why Xiaomi is investing in building a vast network of bricks-and-mortar shops abroad, which should raise its profile. At the same time, the company plans to continue expanding into new lines of business. It has developed its own humanoid robot, CyberOne, and in May unveiled an advanced three-nanometre chip it had designed itself. Roughly half of its staff work in research and development, spending on which grew by 26 per cent last year, to US$3.4 billion – more than the company generated in net profit. The thinking within the business is that by developing technologies from the ground up, it can identify efficiencies and raise barriers to competition. Perhaps the biggest risk for Xiaomi is that it is fighting on too many fronts, considering its many products. The price war among Chinese EV companies continues to intensify, and despite its growth, Xiaomi remains a small player. It currently sells around 20,000 cars a month, compared with more than ten times that for BYD, the market leader. Competition in smartphones is also heating up as Huawei, another Chinese tech giant whose handset business was hobbled by American sanctions in 2019, makes a comeback. Still, Lei's salesmanship is not to be underestimated. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved

Exclusive-Apple set to stave off daily fines, EU to accept App Store changes, sources say
Exclusive-Apple set to stave off daily fines, EU to accept App Store changes, sources say

CNA

time16 hours ago

  • CNA

Exclusive-Apple set to stave off daily fines, EU to accept App Store changes, sources say

BRUSSELS :Apple's changes to its App Store rules and fees will likely secure the green light from EU antitrust regulators, people with direct knowledge of the matter said, a move that would stave off potentially hefty daily fines for the iPhone maker. The company last month said developers will pay a 20 per cent processing fee for purchases made via the App Store, though the fees could go as low as 13 per cent for Apple's small-business program. Developers who send customers outside the App Store for payment will pay a fee between 5 per cent and 15 per cent. They will also be able to use as many links as they wish to send users to outside forms of payment. Apple made the changes after the EU antitrust enforcer handed it a 500 million euro ($586.7 million) fine in April and gave it 60 days to comply with the Digital Markets Act aimed at reining in Big Tech and giving rivals more room to compete. The European Commission is expected to approve the changes in the coming weeks, although the timing could still change, the people said. "All options remain on the table. We are still assessing Apple's proposed changes," the EU watchdog said. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company earlier this month said it had implemented the changes to avoid punitive daily fines, while criticising the Commission for mandating how it runs its store. The company could have been hit with daily fines of 5 per cent of its average daily worldwide revenue, or about 50 million euros per day.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store