logo
HC quashes conviction & acquits all 12 accused in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case

HC quashes conviction & acquits all 12 accused in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case

Time of Indiaa day ago
Mumbai: Severely indicting the prosecution for the case it had made out and the state anti-terror squad for its shoddy probe, the Bombay high court on Monday quashed the conviction of all 12 accused found guilty a decade ago for the July 11, 2006 synchronised Mumbai train blasts between Mahim and Borivli that left 187 dead and 824 injured.
The HC refused to confirm death sentences for five and life sentences given on Sept 30, 2015 to seven by the special court set up under the anti-organised crime Act and acquitted all, directing their immediate release.
Punishment for an actual criminal is essential to uphold the rule of law, but "creating a false appearance of having solved a case… gives a misleading sense of resolution. This deceptive closure undermines public trust and falsely reassures society, while in reality, the true threat remains at large.
Essentially, this is what the case at hand conveys," a special bench of Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak observed in the introduction to their 671-page judgment, before shredding the prosecution case.
The identification parade was not conducted properly, witnesses identifying accused in dock after four years lacked credibility and MCOCA was invoked without application of mind, the HC said, discarding confession statements relied on for want of "trustworthiness and completeness."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
The HC also accepted defence arguments of torture of accused vitiating confessional statements.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
"The prosecution utterly failed to establish the offence beyond reasonable doubt against the accused on each count. It is unsafe to reach the satisfaction that the accused committed the offences for which they were convicted and sentenced," the bench held.
After over six months of hearing and going through more than 44,000 pages of record, Bombay HC concluded the Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) had no case against the 12 accused in the 11/7 train blasts case.
Over two decades ago, bombs planted on first-class compartments exploded during the peak evening commute at seven locations on the Western Railway suburban network. They ripped metal and lives between Khar Road and Santacruz, Bandra and Khar Road, Jogeshwari and Mahim Junction, Mira Road and Bhayander, Matunga and Mahim Junction, and Borivli.
The prosecution case was of sophisticated explosive RDX being used, of accused being members of terror outfits like SIMI who received training in Pakistan, and of 15 wanted accused, mainly Pakistanis.
While the trial court's special MCOCA judge Y D Shinde in 2015 said special public prosecutor Raja Thakare had rightly described the accused as "merchants of death" and Thakare argued that the trial verdict could not be dislodged and the noose be confirmed, the HC noted the prosecution case had unravelled completely.
The HC also held that the prosecution failed to prove what kind of explosive was used. It said no importance can be attached to claims of recovery of RDX, circuit boards and detonators, as prosecution failed to prove custody chain before analysis.
The dozen men were in prison all along since their arrests in 2006. While one of them died in 2021, the 11 whose appeals were allowed joined on Monday via video-conferencing from prisons across the state, including Pune's Yerawada and prisons in Nashik, Amravati and Nagpur.
"Bahut bahut shukriya Sir," said a convict, in white prison uniform with a white topi, on video conference from Yerawada, when defence lawyer Yug Chaudhri, conveyed to them in Hindi that they all stood freed.
The HC, in a detailed analysis of the case and evidence on record, said while "prosecution has referred to Al-Qaeda Manual for many things, nothing is brought on record about it."
The prosecution case was that wanted accused Azam Cheema alias Babaji, a Pakistani national, and two of the accused given death sentence as planters had conspired since 1999 to wage war against the govt of India and were in touch with Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).
Conspiracy meetings were held in Bandra and one accused brought six Pakistanis to Mumbai in 2006, ATS had said. HC wondered why no CDRs were brought on record. "The alleged connection of the accused with Azam Cheema and members of LeT could have been established with the help of CDRs," HC said.
The HC classified prosecution witnesses in four categories: for identification, eyewitnesses of bomb assembly, of conspiracy, and taxi drivers who allegedly ferried two planters.
The court discarded their testimonies as doubtful. For one who claimed to have been to a planter's (A3, an alleged 'jihadist') house where he allegedly saw a few Pakistanis whose names he recalled but did not know what the meeting was for, the HC, doubting his credibility, said that "at the same time, he could not recollect the name of a particular dancer, with whom he had a close relationship for over a month in the same year.
"
Kamal Ansari, given death sentence by the trial judge, died in 2021. He too stood acquitted by HC. Apart from convicts' appeals, before the HC was the state's reference for death sentence confirmation, as required by law for capital punishment to become executable. Thakare and Avdhoot Chimalkar for the state argued the appeals were fit to be dismissed. The conviction relied primarily on the confessions of 11 accused under the stringent MCOCA Act to nail them.
Before HC, an alleged planter Naved Khan, from Nagpur prison, had said he suffered "needlessly for 19 years" and while lives were lost, innocents could not be hanged.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shocking! Radhika Yadav's friend stunned by disturbing comments: ‘Father ne sahi kiya'
Shocking! Radhika Yadav's friend stunned by disturbing comments: ‘Father ne sahi kiya'

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Shocking! Radhika Yadav's friend stunned by disturbing comments: ‘Father ne sahi kiya'

Radhika Yadav father. (PTI) Himaanshika Singh Rajput, a close friend of slain tennis player Radhika Yadav has alleged in social media videos that people are justifying what Radhika's father murdering his own daughter. Deepak Yadav, 49, who confessed to the crime and told police he was taunted for living off her income from a tennis academy. The 25-year-old was shot four times, three in the back and one in the shoulder, according to the postmortem report by a board of three doctors, said police. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! In a new video, Himmanshika has highlighted disturbing comments from her earlier posts, where several men appeared to justify her father's alleged actions. Comments included phrases like "respect for the father," "good father," and "father did the right thing," while some even went as far as accusing her of being dishonest. "I posted two videos about Radhika Yadav last week, and I was shocked to see my entire comment section filled with men defending men. This is not okay. Justice must be served. Men need to understand that this world doesn't belong to them alone, women exist, women resist, and women will continue to fight for each other," she wrote on her Instagram. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like A genetic disorder that is damaging his organs. Help my son Donate For Health Donate Now Undo "It is not acceptable for men or parents to impose "small" restrictions at home, like telling girls what to wear, where to go, or how to behave. These are not small. These are part of the problem. It's time for men to educate other men. "It's time for parents not just mothers to teach their sons how to respect women. Enough of only teaching daughters how to stay safe. When will men finally learn?" Himmanshika had earlier said thatRadhika was "miserable" 10 days before her death. "She was completely broken and had simply given up. She even told her family that she was ready to live according to their instructions." She also claimed that Radhika's father had "psychological issues", saying that he appeared to have "lost his mind" as he would walk around with an "expressionless" poker face. Sharing details about the Yadav household, Himaanshika stated that the family was very "orthodox" and was constantly worried about how society perceived them. "Radhika loved posting videos and reels, but eventually, that stopped. Her family would often pressure her, saying, 'What will people say?' They had a problem with almost everything and restricted Radhika from doing what she liked. She even had a curfew" she said. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

Cash discovery row: Justice Varma urges SC to accord urgent hearing on his plea
Cash discovery row: Justice Varma urges SC to accord urgent hearing on his plea

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Cash discovery row: Justice Varma urges SC to accord urgent hearing on his plea

Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma on Wednesday urged the Supreme Court to accord urgent hearing on his plea seeking to invalidate a report by an in-house inquiry panel, which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row . "I will have to constitute a bench," Chief Justice B R Gavai told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who mentioned the matter for Varma. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Leadership Healthcare Degree Public Policy Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence MBA Management Operations Management Design Thinking Technology Product Management healthcare Cybersecurity Project Management Data Science PGDM CXO Others others Data Science MCA Digital Marketing Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details The CJI was heading a bench which also comprised Justices K Vinod Chandran and Joymalya Bagchi. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo Sibal requested the bench to list the matter as early as possible, saying they have raised some constitutional issues in the plea. Varma has also sought quashing of the May 8 recommendation by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna urging Parliament to initiate impeachment against him. Live Events The three-judge panel headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana High Court conducted the inquiry for 10 days, examined 55 witnesses and visited the scene of the accidental fire that started at around 11.35 pm on March 14 at the official residence of Justice Varma, then a sitting judge of the Delhi High Court and now in the Allahabad High Court.

Alina Habba sacked by judges, reinstated by DOJ; another Trump vs judiciary clash in the offing
Alina Habba sacked by judges, reinstated by DOJ; another Trump vs judiciary clash in the offing

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Alina Habba sacked by judges, reinstated by DOJ; another Trump vs judiciary clash in the offing

Federal judges from New Jersey removed interim US Attorney Alina Habba , and replaced her with Desiree Leigh Grace as the US Attorney for President, sparking another round of judiciary vs Trump administration clash. The order to remove Habba, who was picked by President Donald Trump as the state's top federal prosecutor, was signed by New Jersey chief federal judge Renee Marie Bumb. An interim US Attorney has a tenure of 120 days, post which if an attorney is not selected, the district courts can choose their replacement. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Others MBA Technology Management Digital Marketing CXO Design Thinking Product Management others Degree Data Science healthcare Artificial Intelligence Data Science PGDM Cybersecurity Healthcare Project Management Finance Leadership MCA Data Analytics Public Policy Operations Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT-ISB Transforming HR with Analytics & AI India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 months IIM Lucknow SEPO - IIML CHRO India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 28 Weeks MICA CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India Starts on undefined Get Details When New Jersey's federal judges chose former deputy of Habba, Desiree Leigh Grace as the replacement, immediate support rained in for Habba. US Attorney General Pam Bondi, and the DOJ, moved in to remove Grace and reinstate Habba. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo Why was Alina Habba removed? New Jersey's judges said such a decision was according to the law and keeping in mind Alina Habba's lack of proper courtroom experience and notoriety for targeting particularly Democrats during prosecution. Live Events Stating the judges had 'overstepped' their right by the replacement, AG Pam Bondi and the DOJ reinstated Habba as the attorney. They cited that Habba had broader public support. Bondi, a well-known Trump loyalist, has been criticised for this action, however, her defence is that the judges showed a partisan retaliation when it came to judiciary action, implying such an act was not entirely improbable. The federal judges invoked 28 US Code and 546 (D) to appoint a new attorney if no replacement was made in the 120-day period. The DOJ contended that this was meant to be an executive action and not a business of the judiciary. Post her 120-day period, federal judges of New Jersey replaced her with former deputy Desiree Leigh Grace. Habba, known for her right-wing stance, with open comments such as 'New Jersey will soon be Red', has come to the scrutiny of federal judges and political mahouts. Alina Habba's list of controversies Habba has been the prosecutor for high-profile Democrat officials. One such person was Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Representative LaMonica McIver. Habba alleged that the mayor and her representative had 'trespassed', by organizing a migration protest. Even, the federal judge of the case, commented that this was a 'worrisome step' and both Newark mayor and representative have accused Habba of being politically driven. Habba, who has only had state level practice as a lawyer, has been criticised for her inexperience to handle contentious cases. In the E Jean Caroll defamation case against President Trump, the judges commented on how the evidence was mishandled, and basic courtroom procedures, which are taught in the first year of law school, were not followed. Disturbing workplace accusations In 2022, she was allegedly suspected to have pressured an employee of the Trump National Golf Club to sign a non-disclosure agreement, contrary to the wishes of the employee and lack of proper explanation as to why such a move took form. Former US Attorney, Ty Cobb, called her courtroom performance 'minor league'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store