Greenpeace Slams Govt For Failure To Commit To Protecting Rivers
Greenpeace Aotearoa is slamming the Government after Parliamentary Under-Secretary for RMA Reform, Simon Court, refused yesterday to commit to upholding Water Conservation Orders, which protect lakes and rivers.
Speaking at the Environmental Defence Society's annual conference, Simon Court refused to answer whether the Government would uphold existing Water Conservation Orders for rivers, as well as National Environmental Standards, under the Government's RMA reforms.
Greenpeace spokesperson Will Appelbe says, "Everyone should be able to swim in and fish from New Zealand's lakes and rivers without getting sick. But nearly half of New Zealand's rivers are unsafe for swimming, and many are unsuitable for food gathering. Water conservation orders are meant to protect significant waterways - the ones that are still in a good state - and ensure that they aren't also destroyed.
"That's why it is deeply concerning to hear a member of the government refuse to commit to upholding the very limited protections we have for fresh water in Aotearoa.
"The primary polluter of fresh water in Aotearoa is the intensive dairy industry. It has polluted lakes, rivers, and drinking water with excess nitrate contamination, as a result of the overuse of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser. And their excessive water takes have sucked rivers dry in order to irrigate dairy paddocks."
"Now, the government wants to allow the intensive dairy industry to pollute the few waterways that have been identified for special protection. This is a government that is letting polluters write the policy, and going against the interests of everyday New Zealanders who just want to be able to swim in their local river."
"With a government that is overturning every freshwater protection that exists in order to please the dairy industry, it's more important than ever that local governments - like Environment Canterbury, who have responsibility over the majority of New Zealand's freshwater ecosystems - step up and take real action to protect lakes, rivers, and drinking water."
"That means phasing out synthetic nitrogen fertiliser, and not allowing any new dairy conversions or intensifications to take place."
"People across the country are standing up for better protection for lakes, rivers, and drinking water. If the politicians won't take action, then they should expect resistance."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
3 hours ago
- 1News
Longer jail terms proposed for assaults on first responders, prison officers
People who assault on-duty police officers, firefighters, paramedics, or prison officers would face longer prison sentences under new criminal offences announced by the Government today. Under the proposed legislation, an existing provision for assaulting police would be expanded to cover paramedics, firefighters and prison officers with a maximum sentence of up to three years' imprisonment. Those who assault with intent to injure will face up to five years, while those who injure with intent could receive up to seven years — an offence that will also trigger the Three Strikes regime, requiring mandatory minimum sentences. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said first responders ran towards danger to help those who needed urgent assistance. "Assaulting them puts multiple lives at risk, so there must be greater consequences for these heinous acts of violence. We want to send a very clear message that assaults against our first responders will not be tolerated." ADVERTISEMENT Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. (Source: 1News) He said it was part of the Government's plan to "restore real consequences for crime". "It's all part of our plan to restore law and order, which we know is working." The new offences expand on existing laws which currently applied to assaults on police staff and were a commitment in the National - New Zealand First coalition agreement. New Zealand First leader Winston Peters told 1News that the bill had long been a priority for his party. "It's simply wrong that people carrying out their lawful duties—ambulance officers, firefighters, police, and, dare I say, prison officers—are being assaulted without consequences," he said. An earlier version of the legislation from NZ First MP Darroch Ball was voted down ahead of its third reading in 2020. It would have introduced a minimum six-month mandatory sentence for assaults on police, corrections officers, paramedics, nurse and fire services. ADVERTISEMENT New Zealand First leader Winston Peters. (Source: 1News) Peters said he was "really saddened" by the bill's earlier failure but was now "seriously confident" it will pass into law. "We negotiated this, and we expect people to keep their word," he added. Labour justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said first responders did a tough job and needed to be protected both by the law and by being properly paid and supported. "However, the Government has failed to recruit the 500 frontline police they promised they would and at the same time, meth usage has doubled. This puts those at the frontline under great pressure. "We also need to be looking at the causes of crime before offending occurs, such as homelessness, unemployment, mental health and addiction, and poverty." AUT law professor Kris Gledhill. (Source: Auckland University of Technology) ADVERTISEMENT List of workers covered 'limited' - law professor AUT law professor Kris Gledhill said the Sentencing Act 2002 already treated assaults on emergency workers and prison officers as an aggravating factor during sentencing. "Some might suggest that this makes it unnecessary to have a separate offence because the status of the worker is already reflected in sentencing practice." Gledhill also said the list was "limited" and that having separate offences created "anomalies". He pointed out that UK legislation includes public health workers like nurses and doctors, whereas New Zealand's proposal did not. "Nurses, doctors and other workers in New Zealand's hospitals or other health settings might ask why they are not covered," he said. "There are also lots of other workers in public services who may consider that they are at risk of assault when they are just carrying out their jobs – traffic wardens, dog control officers, for example." ADVERTISEMENT Asked about protections for workers in the New Zealand health system, Goldsmith said it was a fair question and that it could be considered as the bill progresses through Parliament. "What we've chosen at the start here is ambulance workers, firefighters and police and corrections officers, but you know, that's a debate we could have during the select committee." Frontline leaders back tougher penalties St John deputy chief executive of ambulance operations Dan Ohs said there were daily reports of workers being hit, kicked, spat on, abused, and threatened. "That's a 10% year-on-year increase and that's of significant concern to us." He said anything which discourages people from assaulting ambulance personnel was a "fantastic initiative". "The only caution I would make is in our situation, people have specific medical problems which may make them behave in a certain way." ADVERTISEMENT Corrections Association president Floyd du Plessis (left), St John deputy chief executive of ambulance operations Dan Ohs (right). (Source: 1News) Corrections Association president Floyd du Plessis said staff assaults were "extremely high" across the country. "Police look at it as not being within the public interest to prosecute because of the fact that they're already in prison. We need to see consequence for these things, and staff need to feel like them being injured matters to somebody." He said the legislation was "absolutely needed". "We need more consequence, because without consequence, why would you stop?" The Police Association told 1News it welcomed the intent of the legislation and looked forward to considering the details of the bill when they were released. The Government was hopeful it would pass the legislation by the middle of this year.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Backing First Responders And Prison Officers
The Government is introducing new offences to ensure those who assault on-duty first responders or prison officers spend longer in prison, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. 'Where others may flee, first responders and prison officers run towards danger to help those who need urgent assistance. 'Assaulting them puts multiple lives at risk, so there must be greater consequences for these heinous acts of violence. Our hardworking police officers, firefighters, paramedics and prison officers deserve better.' Under these proposed offences: Assaulting a first responder or prison officer will have a maximum sentence of three years imprisonment. This expands an existing provision on assaulting Police to cover all first responders and prison officers. Assaulting a first responder or prison officer with intent to injure will have a maximum sentence of five years imprisonment. This is a two-year increase in penalty from the standard offence. Injuring a first responder or prison officer with intent to injure will have a maximum sentence of seven years' imprisonment and will be added to Three Strikes to ensure mandatory minimum sentences in line with that regime. This is also a two-year increase in penalty from the standard offence. 'This builds on our sentencing reforms which came into affect today, and is another way we will denounce violence in New Zealand,' Mr Goldsmith says. 'It fulfils a commitment in the National/New Zealand First coalition agreement, to introduce the Protection for First Responders and Prison Officers legislation to create a specific offence for assaults on first responders which includes minimum mandatory prison sentences. 'We promised to restore real consequences for crime. That's exactly what we're delivering. It's all part of our plan to restore law and order, which we know is working.'
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Q+A Panel Confirms Why Local Government Needs Real Change
Responding to this morning's episode of TVNZ's Q+A, ACT's Local Government spokesperson Cameron Luxton says the panel made the case for change better than ACT ever could: 'If anyone's wondering why ratepayers face crushing rates hikes, crumbling infrastructure, and endless division, just listen to the views being defended around the council table. This panel put it on full display. 'The four outgoing councillors sounded like they'd been swallowed whole by collective groupthink, completely ignoring the people who actually pay the bills. 'They claimed it's dishonest to promise rates restraint – but clearly haven't met ACT Local candidates. Ratepayers see local councils that are bloated, wasteful, and addicted to vanity projects. ACT Local councillors will get back to basics: roads, rubbish, and reliable water infrastructure. 'ACT councillors will do what ratepayers and businesses have been forced to do for years – take the chainsaw to pet projects and 'nice-to-haves' that have nothing to do with core services. That includes scrapping councils' ideological obsession with expensive speed bumps and cycleways, and actually listening to the people who pay rates. 'In central government, ACT is making this easier for councils by pushing RMA reform, fixing infrastructure funding and financing, exploring GST sharing with councils, and developing regional deals. 'Then there's Māori wards. Every panelist backed race-based seats or automatic places for mana whenua with no democratic accountability. Labour deliberately rewrote the law so only some New Zealanders can vote for certain candidates based on who their great-grandparents were without opportunity for the local community to object to this division. "Council seats should be based on geography, where anyone can vote if they live in the area, regardless of their identity. That's how it works for every other ward, including rural wards, despite the attempts from some media and councils to frame it differently. That's why ACT has restored communities' right to remove these divisive Māori Ward seats. 'ACT Local candidates will cut waste to keep rates low, end divisive race-based privileges, and bring some long-overdue common sense back to the council table.'
