Longer jail terms proposed for assaults on first responders, prison officers
People who assault on-duty police officers, firefighters, paramedics, or prison officers would face longer prison sentences under new criminal offences announced by the Government today.
Under the proposed legislation, an existing provision for assaulting police would be expanded to cover paramedics, firefighters and prison officers with a maximum sentence of up to three years' imprisonment.
Those who assault with intent to injure will face up to five years, while those who injure with intent could receive up to seven years — an offence that will also trigger the Three Strikes regime, requiring mandatory minimum sentences.
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said first responders ran towards danger to help those who needed urgent assistance.
"Assaulting them puts multiple lives at risk, so there must be greater consequences for these heinous acts of violence. We want to send a very clear message that assaults against our first responders will not be tolerated."
ADVERTISEMENT
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. (Source: 1News)
He said it was part of the Government's plan to "restore real consequences for crime".
"It's all part of our plan to restore law and order, which we know is working."
The new offences expand on existing laws which currently applied to assaults on police staff and were a commitment in the National - New Zealand First coalition agreement.
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters told 1News that the bill had long been a priority for his party.
"It's simply wrong that people carrying out their lawful duties—ambulance officers, firefighters, police, and, dare I say, prison officers—are being assaulted without consequences," he said.
An earlier version of the legislation from NZ First MP Darroch Ball was voted down ahead of its third reading in 2020. It would have introduced a minimum six-month mandatory sentence for assaults on police, corrections officers, paramedics, nurse and fire services.
ADVERTISEMENT
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters. (Source: 1News)
Peters said he was "really saddened" by the bill's earlier failure but was now "seriously confident" it will pass into law.
"We negotiated this, and we expect people to keep their word," he added.
Labour justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said first responders did a tough job and needed to be protected both by the law and by being properly paid and supported.
"However, the Government has failed to recruit the 500 frontline police they promised they would and at the same time, meth usage has doubled. This puts those at the frontline under great pressure.
"We also need to be looking at the causes of crime before offending occurs, such as homelessness, unemployment, mental health and addiction, and poverty."
AUT law professor Kris Gledhill. (Source: Auckland University of Technology)
ADVERTISEMENT
List of workers covered 'limited' - law professor
AUT law professor Kris Gledhill said the Sentencing Act 2002 already treated assaults on emergency workers and prison officers as an aggravating factor during sentencing.
"Some might suggest that this makes it unnecessary to have a separate offence because the status of the worker is already reflected in sentencing practice."
Gledhill also said the list was "limited" and that having separate offences created "anomalies".
He pointed out that UK legislation includes public health workers like nurses and doctors, whereas New Zealand's proposal did not.
"Nurses, doctors and other workers in New Zealand's hospitals or other health settings might ask why they are not covered," he said.
"There are also lots of other workers in public services who may consider that they are at risk of assault when they are just carrying out their jobs – traffic wardens, dog control officers, for example."
ADVERTISEMENT
Asked about protections for workers in the New Zealand health system, Goldsmith said it was a fair question and that it could be considered as the bill progresses through Parliament.
"What we've chosen at the start here is ambulance workers, firefighters and police and corrections officers, but you know, that's a debate we could have during the select committee."
Frontline leaders back tougher penalties
St John deputy chief executive of ambulance operations Dan Ohs said there were daily reports of workers being hit, kicked, spat on, abused, and threatened.
"That's a 10% year-on-year increase and that's of significant concern to us."
He said anything which discourages people from assaulting ambulance personnel was a "fantastic initiative".
"The only caution I would make is in our situation, people have specific medical problems which may make them behave in a certain way."
ADVERTISEMENT
Corrections Association president Floyd du Plessis (left), St John deputy chief executive of ambulance operations Dan Ohs (right). (Source: 1News)
Corrections Association president Floyd du Plessis said staff assaults were "extremely high" across the country.
"Police look at it as not being within the public interest to prosecute because of the fact that they're already in prison. We need to see consequence for these things, and staff need to feel like them being injured matters to somebody."
He said the legislation was "absolutely needed".
"We need more consequence, because without consequence, why would you stop?"
The Police Association told 1News it welcomed the intent of the legislation and looked forward to considering the details of the bill when they were released.
The Government was hopeful it would pass the legislation by the middle of this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Govt announces harsher penalties for one-punch attacks
The government will legislate to ensure coward punches are treated as a specific offence. Coward punches, also known as king hits, are when strikes are delivered to a victim's head or neck, without warning and when the victim is unable to defend themselves. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said specific offences would reflect the gravity of the crime. "We know how dangerous they are. People can be killed or suffer lifelong brain injuries, yet perpetrators often receive lenient and insufficient sentences," he said. The charges and penalties - An assault offence for one punch attacks which cause grievous bodily harm with associated maximum penalties of - eight years imprisonment when the offender intended to cause injury or acted with reckless disregard for safety. Fifteen years imprisonment when the offender intended to cause grievous bodily harm. - A culpable homicide offence for a one punch attack which results in death with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. - Both offences would be added to the Three Strikes legislation. - The legislation fulfils part of National's coalition agreement with New Zealand First. New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said the legislation made it clear the behaviour would no longer be tolerated. "The victim has no notice, and because of that the chance of them defending themselves is just impossible. So, we want to spell out how unacceptable it is that you behave in that way." There were renewed calls to specifically criminalise coward punches in 2021, following the death of Fau Vake in Auckland. In that instance, Daniel Havili pleaded guilty to manslaughter, and was sentenced to two years and nine months in jail. Goldsmith was reluctant to single out any specific examples of sentences he felt were too lenient, and said the government did not want to be seen to criticise the judiciary over the particulars. National already had a member's bill drawn from the ballot, in the name of MP Paulo Garcia that would criminalise coward punches, and amend the definition of murder. Goldsmith said the government would take over Garcia's bill. A previous National member's bill to create a specific coward punch offence was voted down at its first reading in 2020. The government's announcement follows a separate piece of legislation announced over the weekend, to introduce higher penalties for people who assault first responders. The cowards punch legislation would be included in an amendment bill along with the first responder assault penalties, and changes to citizens' arrest laws. Goldsmith hoped it would be introduced by the end of the year and passed into law before the election.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Flooding Demonstrates Danger In Govt ‘Growth At Any Cost' Ideological Agenda
Flooding in the top of the South Island, and the threat of more to come later this week, demonstrates the dangers of the Government pushing ahead with policy changes based on narrow ideological grounds and a 'growth at any cost' agenda, say freshwater campaigners. Tom Kay, spokesperson for the campaign group Choose Clean Water, says the Coalition Government's proposed resource management reforms, with an ideological focus on 'the enjoyment of property rights', will inevitably leave communities more vulnerable to the impacts of flooding. 'The Coalition Government has demonstrated across its resource management reform that they care more about the profits of commercial players than good governance for the health and stability of our communities. Their 'growth at any cost' agenda is not only thoughtless but downright dangerous.' Kay, a strong advocate for the idea of Making Room for Rivers as a strategy to keep communities and infrastructure safe from flooding while restoring the health of our rivers, says while many communities, councils, and insurance companies are ready for action to avoid hazards and widen allowed floodplains, the Government must not put growth and development on par with community safety and environmental health if they want to meaningfully reduce the risk to communities. 'We've just seen yet another example of devastating flooding following back-to-back experiences in Otago in October, the West Coast in November, and Canterbury in May. The costs are incredibly serious, including people losing their lives. 'We know our rivers need more space to carry floodwater safely, especially with the more extreme weather we're getting as the climate continues to warm. But the Government's narrow focus on growth and private property rights through their resource management reform risks undermining progress towards this.' Kay says international evidence and case studies show the best option for keeping communities and infrastructure safe from flooding is to avoid development in high-risk locations, and to incentivise and fund planned relocation from places already at high risk. This approach also provides the best opportunity for restoration of rivers and their floodplains, whilst increasing community wellbeing, amenity values, and resilience. However, he says the Government's focus on growth and property rights is inconsistent with this. 'Documents continue to highlight the Coalition Government's obsession with growth, and the misplaced idea that somehow we can continue to grow anywhere, with few restrictions, and still somehow mitigate the consequences. We can't. 'While we support the introduction of a National Policy Statement for Natural Hazards, for some reason it is less-developed now than it was last year, and drafted provisions that would have prioritised using nature-based solutions to reduce flood risk—such as making room for rivers, and to direct councils to avoid development in high risk locations, are gone.' 'The proposed provisions direct councils to 'consider' risk and act 'proportionately', leaving plenty of room for vested commercial interests to push councils into continuing to allow development, including homes, in high-risk locations. 'Not to mention that the proposal doesn't apply to the development of infrastructure, which is one of the main and most expensive assets hit during flooding; or to aquaculture, agricultural, pastoral, horticultural, mining, quarrying, or forestry activities and the land and buildings they use.' Kay says proposed changes to weaken the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management will also undermine the need to keep people out of harm's way, and to maintain sufficient river health and width to safely carry floodwaters. 'We have a requirement to prioritise the health of water bodies and communities in the management of our freshwater under the idea of Te Mana o te Wai. Flood managers have supported this idea as a way to help communities reconsider how they live with rivers, including their associated risks and hazards, and to make changes that increase flood resilience and river health together. 'But the Coalition Government wants to get rid of this prioritisation.' 'We also have no idea what the Government wants to do with an existing provision in the policy that prevents the 'loss of river extent', and thereby maintains wider flood corridors, for example; or whether they want to remove a provision that requires water to be managed as part of an 'integrated response to climate change'.' 'Our rivers and wider catchments need to be healthy and resilient if our communities are going to be safe from the worst harms of flooding. This Government needs to understand that private property rights and growth-at-all-costs won't enable that. It will cost us all in the long-run.' The Government's consultation on freshwater and natural hazard policies, as well as related policies, is open for submissions until 27 July.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
COVID-19 Fraud Sentencing
An Auckland woman was sentenced to home detention on charges of defrauding three government schemes set up to help companies adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns. Emma Jane Dentice entered a guilty plea and was sentenced on receiving and fraud charges when she appeared in the Waitakere District Court on June 27, 2025. Dentice was sentenced to 6 months home detention, a sentence which allows her to care for her elderly mother. In April 2020, the Government announced a new Small Business Cashflow Loan (SBC) scheme with applications open from 12 May, 2020. That month, an associate of Dentice's accessed the myIR account of a company using the login details of a former director of the company, and applied for a SBC loan. $11,800 was put into Dentice's bank account. She withdrew nearly $2,000 and spent it. The rest was transferred to another of her bank accounts. In February 2021, the Government introduced the Resurgence Support Payment (RSP) scheme to provide grants to businesses that were adversely affected by the raise in COVID-19 alert levels. In September 2021, Dentice applied for a RSP but was turned down because she didn't meet the criteria. In 2022, the Government introduced the COVID-19 Support Payment (CSP) to help support viable and ongoing businesses or organisations which experienced a 40 per cent or more drop in revenue as a result of COVID-19 circumstances. Dentice applied for a CSP in March 2022 but it too was declined because she didn't meet the criteria. The SBC, RSP and CSP schemes were implemented under urgency using a 'High Trust' application model to ensure eligible businesses could access funds to support the business in a timely manner. Dentice was not entitled to any of the money she applied for. Her offending was premeditated, spanned a 2-year period and was motivated by personal gain.
