NCP's Tatkare says discussions held with BJP over possible merger
Tatkare was speaking at a party workers' meeting during his organisational tour of Marathwada. 'The BJP leadership has accepted us with due thought. If any decision on merger ever has to be taken, BJP's top leadership will certainly be taken into confidence,' he said.
Tatkare also remarked that the party's current experience within the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) has been 'more harmonious' compared to earlier alliances. Reflecting on the NCP's past, he noted that even in 1999, despite contesting against the Congress, the party chose not to align with the BJP, then led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee. 'Today, however, we have passed a resolution to remain with the NDA,' he said.
On preparations for upcoming local body elections, Tatkare said the party is receiving encouraging responses from its ongoing tours in North Maharashtra and Marathwada. Referring to possible seat-sharing scenarios, he said, 'In some places, we may consider contesting outside the Mahayuti alliance. A final call will be taken after district-wise reviews in coordination committee meetings.'
Responding to questions on the Public Security Act—recently backed by the NCP in the legislature—despite opposition from party founder Sharad Pawar, Tatkare said support for the Act does not indicate a rejection of Pawar's ideology. 'We are in the government, and the Bill has been thoroughly read and understood. The support is based on that. But that does not mean we are going against Pawar saheb's thinking,' he said.
Among those present at the meeting were district president Satish Chavan, Maharashtra Women's Commission chairperson Rupali Patil Chakankar, and MLA Vikram Kale.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Plea in Supreme Court seeks political parties to comply with POSH law
A petition filed in the Supreme Court has sought a direction to political parties to comply with the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The plea argues that political parties are covered by the ambit of the 2013 Act, therefore, bound to follow the procedures outlined in it. It said in 2024 the petitioner, Yogamaya MG, an advocate, filed a similar plea in the top court, which granted her the liberty to move the competent authority. The petitioner sent a representation to the Election Commission of India but has received no response till date, the plea added. Safe environment for women political workers Before the top court now, she sought directions to ensure a safe and inclusive work environment for women in political parties and holding political parties accountable to prevent and address sexual harassment. With Centre and political parties, including BJP and Congress added as respondents, the plea sought a direction to constitute a grievance redressal mechanism to tackle the menace of sexual harassment in line with the apex court's directions in the landmark Vishaka verdict and the 2013 Act. "This writ petition challenges the exclusion of female political workers from the ambit of protection under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act)," the plea filed through advocate Sriram P said. Vulnerability of women grassroot workers Despite the Act's progressive intent, the plea said, women political workers particularly at the grassroots remain vulnerable to sexual exploitation during campaigns and party work, with no effective legal remedy under the existing legislative framework. "Citing studies by UN Women (2013) and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (2016), which highlight widespread psychological and sexual harassment of women in political spaces, the petition underscores the urgent need for inclusion and protection of such workers under POSH," the plea said. The petitioner argued absence of rationale or intelligible differentia to exclude women in politics from protection available to women in other professions. Political party workers fit the definition of "employees" under the Act and the petition seeks to establish a clear framework for preventing and addressing sexual harassment within political parties, the petitioner said. The plea also sought a direction to political parties to constitute an internal complaints committee to address complaints of sexual harassment in adherence of the mandate of the 2013 Act.
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Meghalaya High Court seeks response on challenge to Khasi Lineage Act
GUWAHATI A law that restricts the issuance of Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificates to individuals who adopt their father's or husband's surname has come under judicial scrutiny in matrilineal Meghalaya. On Wednesday (July 23, 2025), the High Court of Meghalaya sought a response from the State's Advocate General to a petition challenging certain provisions of the Khasi Hills Autonomous District (Khasi Social Custom of Lineage) Act, 1997, which aims to preserve the matrilineal structure of the Khasi community. The public interest litigation (PIL) was filed by Syngkhong Rymphei Thymmai, a group advocating reforms and a shift from the matrilineal to a patrilineal system. The group has questioned the legal validity of the restrictions imposed under the Act. The petition refers to an official letter issued by the State's Social Welfare Department on July 21, 2020, to the Deputy Commissioners of East and West Khasi Hills districts. The letter clarified that the Lineage Act did not prevent individuals from adopting surnames from either parent and permitted non-Khasi women to adopt their husband's surname. However, the department subsequently withdrew the letter on May 21, 2024. Following this, authorities allegedly began denying ST certificates to Khasi individuals who used their father's or husband's surname. The group contended that surname preference should not form the basis for denying an ST certificate, provided the applicant met the bloodline and lineage criteria under the Act, as amended in 2023. 'We do not think, at this stage, that for the disposal of the public interest litigation, affidavits are required. If affidavits are required at a later stage, we shall call for them, but in the interest of the Khasi community at large, this issue should be resolved as expeditiously as possible,' an order by a division bench comprising Chief Justice Indra Prasanna Mukerji and Justice Wanlura Diengdoh read. The court has listed the matter for further hearing on August 7.
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka decides to levy 1% fire cess on newly constructed multi-storey buildings
The State Cabinet on Thursday decided to levy 1% fire cess to the property tax of newly constructed multi-storey buildings in Karnataka. The Chief Minister had announced in the 2024-25 Budget speech that 'according to the Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964, to increase efficiency in the Fire and Emergency Department, 1% fire cess will be levied to the property tax of multi-storey buildings which will be newly constructed in the State.' The Karnataka Fire Force (Amendment) Bill, 2025, will be tabled in the Monsoon Session of the State legislature that would commence on August 11, to introduce the new fire cess. To enhance the efficiency of the Fire and Emergency Services Department, Section (15) of the Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964, would be amended to levy 1% fire cess along with the property tax on multi-storey buildings which would be newly constructed in the State, Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H.K, Patil told reporters.
