logo
EU diplomat warns that Russia has a plan for long-term aggression against Europe

EU diplomat warns that Russia has a plan for long-term aggression against Europe

'Russia is already a direct threat to the European Union,' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said.
She listed a series of Russian airspace violations, provocative military exercises, and attacks on energy grids, pipelines and undersea cables.
Ms Kallas noted that Russia is already spending more on defence than the EU's 27 nations combined, and this year will invest more 'on defence than its own healthcare, education and social policy combined'.
'This is a long-term plan for a long-term aggression. You don't spend that much on (the) military, if you do not plan to use it,' Ms Kallas told EU politicians in Strasbourg, France.
'Europe is under attack and our continent sits in a world becoming more dangerous,' she added.
Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte has said that Russia is producing as much weapons and ammunition in three months as the 32 allies together make in a year.
He believes that Russia could be in a position to launch an attack on a Nato ally by the end of the decade.
The acts of sabotage and cyber attacks are mostly aimed at undermining European support for Ukraine, military officers and experts have said.
But concern is mounting in Europe that Russia could try to test Nato's Article 5 security guarantee — the pledge that an attack on any one of the allies would be met with a collective response from all 32.
In 2021, Nato allies acknowledged that significant and cumulative cyber attacks might, in certain circumstances, also be considered an armed attack that could lead them to invoke Article 5, but so far no action has been taken.
With the Trump administration now turning its sights on security challenges in the Middle East and China, Europe has been left to fend for itself, and for Ukraine, and finds itself in a more precarious position.
Last week, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service (BND), Bruno Kahl, warned against underestimating Russian intentions toward the West and Nato.
'We are very certain, and we have intelligence evidence for this, that Ukraine is just a step on the path to the West,' Mr Kahl told the Table Today podcast on June 9, according to German news agency dpa.
Russia's goal is to expand its sphere of influence westward, the BND chief said.
'They want to catapult Nato back to the state it was in at the end of the 1990s. They want to kick America out of Europe, and they'll use any means to achieve that,' Mr Kahl said.
He warned that 'this must be nipped in the bud,' and that deterrence is the 'most bloodless way' to prevent war.
Nato countries are set to agree a new defence investment pledge at a summit in the Netherlands next week, pouring billions of dollars more into security-related spending.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Guardian view on an EU army: leadership and unity remain elusive
The Guardian view on an EU army: leadership and unity remain elusive

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on an EU army: leadership and unity remain elusive

The Spanish prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, called for the creation of a European army earlier this year, suggesting that, this time, the continent might finally be serious. Defence budgets are rising. Threats are mounting. The US is distracted. Surely now is the moment. Except, of course, it isn't. For all the political soundbites that rattle sabres with increasing confidence, Europe is probably no closer to fielding a unified military force than it was when the French rejected the European Defence Community in 1954. The problem is not one of capacity. Europe, including the UK, collectively boasts about 1.5m active military personnel, and some of the world's most successful defence firms. The problem, as ever, is politics. Or more precisely: who leads? Germany, claiming a Zeitenwende (turning point), and asking the EU to exempt military investment from budget rules, might be the frontrunner. Poland is spending more as a share of GDP than anyone. The French would like to think they would be at the front of any queue. But their Gaullist, unilateral instincts run deep. Italy has industrial knowhow but lacks the economic heft. Post-Brexit, the UK is building bridges with the EU's military powers but it still sees itself as Nato's keystone. And the Baltic states? They want no European project that might scare off Washington. Even defining a European army is difficult. Would it be a single force under the EU flag, combining the 27 national armed forces of the EU members into one common force? Or something looser, to keep Irish and Austrian neutrality intact? Could it be a smaller European intervention force? Or a joint effort by regional groupings in a new hat? The short answer is no one can agree on anything but disagreement. Squabbling might not be the best response to an increasingly assertive, hawkish and unpredictable Russian giant. Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine made territorial defence a pressing concern. Suddenly, Europe remembered why armies exist. Brussels pins its hopes of an industrial renaissance on a five-year rearmament plan that is meant to reduce reliance on US contractors. European firms like Rheinmetall and MBDA are scaling up, but the economies of scale found in the US military industrial complex elude the continent. Everyone wants to protect their local champion. No wonder the bloc has appointed a commissioner for defence whose role is about overseeing the companies making drones, shells and missiles – not the armed forces per se. A Gallup poll in 45 countries last year showed deep ambivalence toward war among Europeans. Four of the five least willing to fight were in the EU – including Spain, Germany, and Italy, where only 14% said they'd take up arms. Even in frontline states like Poland and Lithuania, fewer than half were willing to fight. This pacifist mood reflects an EU integration designed to make war between member states unthinkable. The irony is that the European army is seen as a symbol of independence from the US – while quietly relying on American satellites, command structures and munitions. Many European countries have upped defence spending, but they are not ready to go it alone. An integrated force would demand pooled sovereignty, unified command and a level of political consensus that don't currently exist. That may change. But for now, Europe continues to depend on Washington's capricious leadership – even as it dreams of 'strategic autonomy'.

Why Vance is worth watching this summer
Why Vance is worth watching this summer

Spectator

time5 hours ago

  • Spectator

Why Vance is worth watching this summer

America's two most powerful men are visiting Britain this summer. After Donald Trump's trip to Scotland last month, his Vice President is expected shortly in the Cotswolds. Both men share an interest in the UK – but for different reasons. Trump's ties are ancestral; Vance's passion is more intellectual. 'What's going on with Reform?' he asked Peter Mandelson at a recent function. His choice of England as a holiday destination reflects an engagement in this country's politics. Among Vance's friends and contacts are several prominent British academics. They include Blue Labour founder Maurice Glasman, who corresponded with Vance over email, and James Orr, with whom Vance bonded in 2019 after converting to Catholicism. Shortly after his election to the Senate in January 2023, he came to London and was keen to meet with prominent conservatives. As Vice President, he has shown an eagerness to use his office to engage in UK domestic issues. The best example of this was his Munich Security Conference speech in February. Here he attacked successive British governments for ignoring voter concerns on migration and free speech. He demonstrated too a level of familiarity with specific UK case studies – including a man in Bournemouth convicted for praying outside an abortion clinic. Vance has subsequently weighed in on different European issues, calling the continent the 'cradle of Western civilisation'. All this is to say that Vance is willing and able to use his status to shape the dynamics of the UK-US relationship and, potentially, the future of British conservatism. Right-to-life groups in this country were ecstatic when Vance raised the little-known-case of the Bournemouth abortion clinic. The Vice Presidency might have once been dismissed as 'not worth a bucket of warm piss' – but JD Vance has shown that it affords a bully pulpit with considerable clout in the social media age. Prominent figures in both Reform and the Conservative party are clearly aware of this dynamic. Allies of the Vice President have already met with senior members of Nigel Farage's party. The Clacton MP, who made little comment about Trump's Scotland visit, was this week willing to publicly indulge talk of a meeting with Vance when interviewed on LBC. Other engagements are expected with other leading conservative personalities of interest. Such engagements are timely, given Vance's status as the Intellectual-in-Chief of this White House. For now, he remains the second most powerful in the United States – but all that could change very shortly. The race for 2028 is set to begin in earnest in about 18 months' time and Vance is in prime position to succeed Trump as the Republican nominee. Much as how Thatcher and Reagan first met in 1975, an engagement with Vance this summer could prove most fruitful in four years' time.

Russia issues terrifying 'dead hand' warning to Donald Trump during bizarre rant
Russia issues terrifying 'dead hand' warning to Donald Trump during bizarre rant

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Russia issues terrifying 'dead hand' warning to Donald Trump during bizarre rant

Former Russian president Dmitri Medvedev has issued a scathing warning to US president Donald Trump. He threatened Trump with deadly nuclear weapons during a bizarre rant A former Russian president has hit back at Donald Trump after he told him to "watch his words", sparking further tension between the pair. ‌ Dmitri Medvedev issued a terrifying threat to the US President and reminded him just how "dangerous a dead hand can be." A dead hand is Cold War terminology for nuclear weapons which can be used even if a country's leadership has been wiped out. ‌ In the bizarre rant, Medvedev, who is a part of Russia 's Security Council, ordered Trump to remember "his favorite movies about the walking dead". Medvedev earlier warned the US president that if he issues Russia any ultimatums then he would treat it as a "threat and a step toward war". He further told Trump that he should tread carefully. It comes as Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. ‌ ‌ Writing on Telegram, Medvedev wrote: "About Trump's threats against me in his personal network Truth, which he banned from operating in our country: If some words of the former Russian president cause such a nervous reaction in the entire formidable US president, it means that Russia is right in everything and will continue to go its own way. "And about the 'dead economy' of India and Russia and 'entering dangerous territory' - well, let him remember his favorite films about the 'walking dead', as well as how dangerous a "dead hand" that does not exist in nature can be..." The news came just one day after US President Donald Trump issued a scathing rebuke to Medvedev, warning him to be careful what he says next, reports Express. However, the US President responded furiously, writing: "Tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory." This comes after Mr Trump announced he would bring forward the deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine during his meeting with Sir Keir Starmer in Scotland. Asked by reporters how long he would set for the new deadline, Mr Trump said: 'I am going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today. There is no reason to wait.' Mr Medvedev's threat to Mr Trump follows the United States' threat of steep tariffs if a deal with Ukraine is not reached. Mr Trump took office in January with the position that Russia's invasion of Ukraine would never have happened if he were president at the time. He then vowed to bring peace to the region within a short timeframe, yet has failed to do so. During the peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, the US President has admitted that Vladimir Putin has not been reasonable, taking a more stern approach with the Russian president.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store