I thought I was paying £90 for excess hire car cover – then Hertz charged me £542
I live in Dublin and often hire cars from Hertz as I've found it offers good deals over the phone. In April I reserved an automatic SUV (Group N) at Munich Airport for 20 days. Hertz in Dublin quoted €761 (£651) including a cross-border charge with a collision damage waiver/theft excess of €1,250 (£1,070).
Initially I declined excess protection insurance at the rental desk, but when I saw the car had some previous damage, I returned to ask about cover. The agent didn't speak very good English and I thought he said it would cost an extra €104 (£90). I agreed to the charge and signed another agreement. The next day I discovered a second charge of €1,067.70 (£913) on my bank account. I tried repeatedly to phone Hertz to cancel this but nobody ever picked up.
When the post-return invoice arrived I saw I had been charged a total of €1,584.75 (£1,356). The agent had charged €633 (£542) for a 'Super Cover' insurance package before applying a discount of €104. I have complained about the mis-selling but Hertz says that as I signed the agreement I must pay the charges.
– C Ryan
Dear CR,
Hertz is correct; it can charge you for Super Cover as you have admitted that you requested it. It is hard to unpack the technical abbreviations and itemised list of charges and discounts on rental agreements presented on pick-up when there's such pressure to get on and sign. This is a long-standing tactic used by agents to gloss over extra charges.
I did notice that Hertz had charged €295 (£253) plus VAT for the location service charge on the final invoice, compared with the estimated cost of €134 (£115) on the initial rental confirmation, so I queried this with the company.
Hertz tells me that the location fee (which covers running the airport desk) is charged as a percentage of the total rental cost including any optional extras. This meant that you paid just under €1,000 (£856) for the top-up insurance – almost as much as the excess itself – which is a disgrace.
Although you have a long relationship with Hertz Dublin, I would look at booking online in future. The deals should be similar and the extras, including excess insurance and breakdown cover charges, are clearly laid out. A similar N Group 20-day rental currently costs €737 (£630) if you pre-pay online compared with €812 (£695) if you pay on pick-up. Super Cover is shown as €934 (£800) – a ridiculous price hike given that annual policies offered by specialist car excess insurers cost around £40.
I'm also going to give a shout out to my favourite UK car rental agency, Zest which offers a far better deal with Hertz for a similar rental, quoting £685 (€801) including excess protection, breakdown assistance and free cancellation.
Your travel problems solved
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
This is the best time to book your car hire - and the dates to AVOID
Travel experts have revealed the ideal time to book a car rental and there are a couple of dates you'll definitely want to avoid. Holidaymakers could save nearly 50 per cent on their car hire if they time their booking correctly, according to research by TravelSupermarket. The experts found that booking around two weeks before a holiday offered the best prices on car hire, with average prices of £46.75 a day. Despite that, tourists should avoid booking exactly 14 days ahead of departure. The research found there was often a spike in price exactly two weeks before a holiday due to a surge in demand on that date. But the worst mistake is booking a full year ahead of travel when prices average £93.12 a day, nearly double the best price. Last-minute bookings are another expensive error, with holidaymakers who secure a car the day before their trip paying around 15 per cent more than the average rate. The Christmas period is the priciest time of year to hire a car, with bookings between December 20 and January 5 around 60 per cent more expensive than the average. On the flipside, October half-term is the cheapest time to hire a car, with prices 16 per cent below the average, making an autumnal break an attractive option. TravelSupermarket recommends booking a hire car around two weeks before the pickup date, while avoiding one year ahead and exactly 14 days before. Ed Sharp, head of car hire at Travel Supermarket, says: 'Whether you're planning a city break or a beach holiday, these timing principles apply universally. 'The key is understanding that car hire pricing follows predictable patterns, and smart travellers can use this knowledge to their advantage. 'Car hire prices aren't swinging as wildly as they did post-pandemic, so there's less pressure to jump early. 'I'd recommend using a deal with free cancellation - book something you're happy with, then check back for drops as your trip approaches.'
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Boost for Aviva boss Amanda Blanc as watchdog gives Direct Line takeover the green light
Aviva's boss has secured her most ambitious deal to date after the competition watchdog gave the takeover of Direct Line the green light. In a major boost for Amanda Blanc on her fifth anniversary as chief executive of the insurance giant, the Competition and Markets Authority cleared the £3.7billion takeover. The deal will create the UK's largest home and motor insurer – but it also puts up to 2,300 jobs at risk. Direct Line boss Adam Winslow, who joined from Aviva last year, is stepping down. There is said to be no love lost between Winslow and Blanc after their spell together at Aviva. The combined group will shed up to 7 per cent of its total workforce as it eliminates overlapping roles.
Times
7 hours ago
- Times
Alcohol advertising ban dropped after industry backlash
A planned ban on alcohol advertising has been dropped after a backlash from industry. Public health measures considered for inclusion in the government's ten-year plan for the NHS have been left out after pushback from Treasury and business ministers concerned about the impact on the economy. Tougher health warnings telling drinkers that alcohol causes cancer are being considered, but there is unlikely to be a blanket requirement for them to be carried on bottles. Ministers have considered a model in Ireland, where alcohol packaging will soon be required to carry labelling warning of a 'direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers'. The plan is expected to include suggestions for exploring such a policy. Health officials had originally hoped to include a minimum unit price for alcohol in the plan, importing a Scottish policy that means a pint of beer cannot be sold for less than about £1.50 or a bottle of vodka for less than £20. However, this was vetoed at an early stage, while alcohol advertising restrictions remained in play. This could have been either a total ban or a 9pm watershed designed to bring alcohol into line with rules being introduced this year for unhealthy food. The Times understands that alcohol advertising restrictions have now been dropped from the plan to be published on Thursday after public health measures were watered down. • Restaurants to report diners' calorie counts in obesity drive The development followed a furious response from the industry, which urged ministers not to add to burdens after a rise in national insurance and the minimum wage. Emma McClarkin, chief executive of the British Beer and Pub Association, told ministers of 'extreme concern' in the industry, criticising advertising restrictions as 'disproportionate, misguided and economically damaging' and warning they could lead to bankruptcies. She pointed to figures showing under-age drinking at record lows as young people turned away from alcohol. 'The beer and pub sector is not just an economic engine — it is a cornerstone of British culture and sport,' McClarkin said. 'These proposals were not included in the Labour Party's 2024 manifesto and risk being widely perceived as anti-growth and anti-business.' Health campaigners condemned the retreat on advertising restrictions. Jem Roberts of the Institute of Alcohol Studies said: 'One of the main goals of the ten-year health plan was to 'shift from treatment to prevention' — yet if reports are accurate, all of the prevention policies for one of the leading causes of death have been stripped out. 'That would be a baffling contradiction at the heart of a plan meant to prioritise prevention.' He said 'alcohol giants making billions from harm will be rubbing their hands in glee', adding: 'Ministers must now stand up to private corporate profits, protect the most vulnerable and, if alcohol is too 'difficult' for the ten-year plan, commit to a standalone alcohol strategy where all evidence is reviewed and all cards put openly on the table.' Campaigners have been warning of a rise in alcohol deaths. More than 10,000 people a year die directly from alcohol in the UK and deaths in England are at record highs. Thousands more cancer deaths are thought to be attributable to alcohol. Treatment costs the NHS at least £3.5 billion a year.
