logo
New lightning sensors could detect Tahoe wildfires in seconds. Here's how they work

New lightning sensors could detect Tahoe wildfires in seconds. Here's how they work

When thunderstorms rolled across the Sierra Nevada in late July, officials warned that lightning could ignite wildfires in forested areas loaded with dry vegetation.
Thousands of lightning bolts struck the Sierra Nevada and sparked dozens of small fires, but officials generally can't determine which strikes ignite wildfires unless people or webcams report smoke. A new network of sensors installed across the Tahoe basin could change that, letting firefighters deploy more rapidly.
The network could allow firefighters to catch blazes before they burn out of control. Many of California's largest wildfires were caused by lightning, most notably in 2020 from a massive thunderstorm outbreak. Eight sensors were installed across the Tahoe basin, including at ski resorts, fire departments and the UC Berkeley Central Sierra Snow Lab, which spearheaded the project.
'It sounds a bit like 'Star Wars,' but they sense a disturbance in the electromagnetic field and are able to map a lightning strike,' said Andrew Schwartz, director of the snow lab.
The high-risk lightning detectors come from Fire Neural Network, a Florida company that has installed detection networks across the West, including San Bernardino County. Unlike other lightning detection technology, the network pinpoints where a lightning strike occurs while simultaneously analyzing meteorological and environmental data to determine which bolts have the highest risk of sparking a wildfire. The company says it can accurately map strikes within 100 feet of where they touch down.
Not all lightning strikes are the same. Some release more energy than others, making them more likely to start wildfires. But these high-risk bolts make up only a small portion of all lightning, said Fire Neural Network co-founder Caroline Comeau.
'Our sensors are able to distinguish those lightning strikes that last extra long,' Comeau said. 'They last up to 1,000 times longer, creating a lot more heating than a regular strike.'
Thunderstorms that rattled the Tahoe region from July 22 to 29 dropped 723 lightning strikes. Fire Neural Network determined that 41 of those bolts were most likely to start fires, according to Comeau.
Wildfire detection technology in California is much more advanced than it was a decade ago. UC San Diego's webcam network utilizes artificial intelligence and has detected more than 1,200 fires across California since 2023.
But Comeau says even more rapid detection is needed. Within 40 seconds, Fire Neural Network's algorithm calculates which strikes have a high probability of starting fires and alerts authorities.
'If a camera system picks up the smoke above the tree line, that's often too late,' Comeau said.
Extra warning time for evacuations could be a game changer for Lake Tahoe. It could take up to 11 hours to flee South Lake Tahoe during a wildfire.
'There's effectively a higher risk around the Tahoe basin because it's a higher populated area and there's limited evacuation routes,' Schwartz said. 'There's a bit of anxiety about fires that start in the Tahoe basin, and these extra detectors could be useful there.'
Still, some scientists are skeptical of Fire Neural Network's claims about pinpoint strike accuracy and efficiency.
'I would like to see validation of those claims,' said Chris Vagasky, a meteorologist and manager of the Wisconsin Environmental Mesonet.
Cal Fire Santa Clara Unit chief Marcus Hernandez has not yet 'seen a correlation between what they determine to be a high-risk lightning strike and an ignition.'
If the network is able to provide firefighters with proper early warning, it could help mitigate the growing number of megafires in a warmer, drier climate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pairing cigarettes with this other habit ups your chance of oral cancer by 624% in the next 5 years
Pairing cigarettes with this other habit ups your chance of oral cancer by 624% in the next 5 years

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Pairing cigarettes with this other habit ups your chance of oral cancer by 624% in the next 5 years

Smoking leaves more than just a bad taste in your mouth — it could be fueling your oral cancer risk. Studies have consistently reported that cigarette users are five to 10 times more likely to develop oral cancer than non-smokers. A new study out of UC San Diego suggests that a chronic weed habit carries a higher risk of oral cancer as well. Researchers determined that people who often smoke marijuana are 3.25 times more likely to contract the disease within five years compared to those without cannabis use disorder. Advertisement 3 Researchers determined that people who often smoke marijuana are 3.25 times more likely to develop oral cancer within five years compared to those without cannabis use disorder. Getty Images/iStockphoto 'Cannabis smoke contains many of the same carcinogenic compounds found in tobacco smoke, which have known damaging effects on the epithelial tissue that lines the mouth,' said Raphael Cuomo, an associate professor in the Department of Anesthesiology at UC San Diego School of Medicine and member of UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center. 'These findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that chronic or problematic cannabis use may contribute to cancer risk in tissues exposed to combustion products.' Advertisement Oral cancer encompasses cancers of the lips, tongue, gums and the lining of the cheeks and mouth. The American Cancer Society projects that there will be nearly 60,000 new US cases of oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer this year and about 12,800 deaths. 3 Oral cancer encompasses cancers of the lips, tongue, gums and the lining of the cheeks and mouth. TommyStockProject – Known risk factors of oral cancer include tobacco use, chronic alcohol consumption and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Advertisement Cuomo's team analyzed health data from over 45,000 oral cancer patients, including 949 who had been formally diagnosed with cannabis use disorder. They accounted for age, sex, body mass index and smoking status. They calculated that tobacco smokers with a cannabis addiction are 624% more likely to contract oral cancer within five years compared to cigarette users not prone to smoking marijuana. The researchers posited that the inhaled smoke is to blame because it can damage mouth tissues. Advertisement Edibles and beverages infused with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in cannabis, don't seem to carry a similar oral cancer risk as smoking weed. 'Research is still evolving, so regular self-checks and dental exams remain wise for all cannabis users,' Cuomo told The Post. His findings were published in the September edition of Preventive Medicine Reports. 3 Studies have consistently reported that cigarette users are five to 10 times more likely to develop oral cancer than non-smokers. The risk goes up if cigarette smokers also smoke weed. Getty Images/iStockphoto The researchers emphasized that there should be more exploration of the long-term effects of cannabis, and oral health awareness should be highlighted in substance use disorder treatment and counseling. The UCSD study is not the first to sound the alarm about cannabis use and cancer. A 2024 study out of the University of Southern California linked daily marijuana use to a three to five-fold increase in the risk of head and neck cancers. Oral cancer is a type of head and neck cancer. Advertisement Cuomo suggests seeing a dentist or an ear, nose and throat specialist if you have a sore, ulcer or red or white patch in your mouth that has not healed after two weeks, especially if you have a lump, numbness, bleeding or pain when swallowing. 'Early evaluation is critical because oral cancers caught in the first stage are usually curable,' he said.

New lightning sensors could detect Tahoe wildfires in seconds. Here's how they work
New lightning sensors could detect Tahoe wildfires in seconds. Here's how they work

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

New lightning sensors could detect Tahoe wildfires in seconds. Here's how they work

When thunderstorms rolled across the Sierra Nevada in late July, officials warned that lightning could ignite wildfires in forested areas loaded with dry vegetation. Thousands of lightning bolts struck the Sierra Nevada and sparked dozens of small fires, but officials generally can't determine which strikes ignite wildfires unless people or webcams report smoke. A new network of sensors installed across the Tahoe basin could change that, letting firefighters deploy more rapidly. The network could allow firefighters to catch blazes before they burn out of control. Many of California's largest wildfires were caused by lightning, most notably in 2020 from a massive thunderstorm outbreak. Eight sensors were installed across the Tahoe basin, including at ski resorts, fire departments and the UC Berkeley Central Sierra Snow Lab, which spearheaded the project. 'It sounds a bit like 'Star Wars,' but they sense a disturbance in the electromagnetic field and are able to map a lightning strike,' said Andrew Schwartz, director of the snow lab. The high-risk lightning detectors come from Fire Neural Network, a Florida company that has installed detection networks across the West, including San Bernardino County. Unlike other lightning detection technology, the network pinpoints where a lightning strike occurs while simultaneously analyzing meteorological and environmental data to determine which bolts have the highest risk of sparking a wildfire. The company says it can accurately map strikes within 100 feet of where they touch down. Not all lightning strikes are the same. Some release more energy than others, making them more likely to start wildfires. But these high-risk bolts make up only a small portion of all lightning, said Fire Neural Network co-founder Caroline Comeau. 'Our sensors are able to distinguish those lightning strikes that last extra long,' Comeau said. 'They last up to 1,000 times longer, creating a lot more heating than a regular strike.' Thunderstorms that rattled the Tahoe region from July 22 to 29 dropped 723 lightning strikes. Fire Neural Network determined that 41 of those bolts were most likely to start fires, according to Comeau. Wildfire detection technology in California is much more advanced than it was a decade ago. UC San Diego's webcam network utilizes artificial intelligence and has detected more than 1,200 fires across California since 2023. But Comeau says even more rapid detection is needed. Within 40 seconds, Fire Neural Network's algorithm calculates which strikes have a high probability of starting fires and alerts authorities. 'If a camera system picks up the smoke above the tree line, that's often too late,' Comeau said. Extra warning time for evacuations could be a game changer for Lake Tahoe. It could take up to 11 hours to flee South Lake Tahoe during a wildfire. 'There's effectively a higher risk around the Tahoe basin because it's a higher populated area and there's limited evacuation routes,' Schwartz said. 'There's a bit of anxiety about fires that start in the Tahoe basin, and these extra detectors could be useful there.' Still, some scientists are skeptical of Fire Neural Network's claims about pinpoint strike accuracy and efficiency. 'I would like to see validation of those claims,' said Chris Vagasky, a meteorologist and manager of the Wisconsin Environmental Mesonet. Cal Fire Santa Clara Unit chief Marcus Hernandez has not yet 'seen a correlation between what they determine to be a high-risk lightning strike and an ignition.' If the network is able to provide firefighters with proper early warning, it could help mitigate the growing number of megafires in a warmer, drier climate.

Trump admin plans first ‘Golden Dome' test of space-based missile defense system: report
Trump admin plans first ‘Golden Dome' test of space-based missile defense system: report

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Trump admin plans first ‘Golden Dome' test of space-based missile defense system: report

Pentagon officials are aiming to test President Trump's space-based Golden Dome missile defense system to safeguard the US in the fourth quarter of 2028, according to a report. That timeframe lines up with Trump's ambitious goal to 'have it done in three years' and comes amid pitches from defense contractors to score coveted contracts to develop the cutting-edge system. 'They want a win to point to in November [2028],' a defense official told CNN. 'And DoD [Department of Defense] wants to avoid anything they perceive will slow them down.' Advertisement The test, which will be conducted by the Missile Defense Agency, is expected to be called FTI-X, which stands for 'Flight Test Integrated,' in a nod to how it will assess the Golden Dome's vast array of sensors and weapons systems, according to the report. Development of the state-of-the-art missile defense system is expected to cost about $175 billion, according to Trump, who tapped Gen. Michael Guetlein, vice chair of operations at the Space Force, to oversee the ambitious project in May. 4 President Trump wants the US to develop a state-of-the-art missile defense system to protect the homeland from advanced attacks. Getty Images Advertisement 4 The Golden Dome system is intended to safeguard the colossal continental US. AP Congress has already allocated $25 billion in funding for the Golden Dome in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Trump signed into law last month. Military officials have explored space-based missile defense technologies for decades, including during Ronald Reagan's Star Wars program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Space-based missile defense technology can be advantageous because it can help thwart an enemy missile much earlier in its trajectory than other technologies that the US currently has in its arsenal. Advertisement It can also reduce geographical barriers and catch certain types of enemy missiles at a stage when they are slower and easier to intercept. However, there are many drawbacks. The US would need to make significant technological advances to develop that system, which is likely to be very costly and could entice other countries to weaponize space. 4 Skeptics have raised questions about whether the Golden Dome can be completed on time and within the budget President Trump laid out. Getty Images The defense official called it a 'hard problem, and technically very risky,' CNN reported. Advertisement 'The possible number of satellites needed to achieve a probability of engagement success is going to be very high, given the time and area needed to cover the continental United States,' the defense official said. Plans for the test in 2028 are expected to be 'phase one' of the project. A deluge of defense contractors and other private companies have been jockeying for contracts to help develop the massive defense system. Precise details of how the Golden Dome system will function are not fully known. Trump has taken inspiration from Israel's feted Iron Dome system, which helps defend populated areas from short-range attacks. Trump's plans would encompass much more sophisticated missiles, such as ballistic and hypersonic missiles, that may potentially be fired off from much more distant locations than what Iron Dome defends against. 'Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world,' Trump teased in May. 4 Precise details about how the Golden Dome system will function are not clear. Getty Images Guetlein has admitted that the Pentagon faces enormous challenges in successfully completing the project. Advertisement 'I think the real technical challenge will be building of the space-based interceptor,' Guetlein said at a summit last month. 'That technology exists, I believe. I believe we have proven every element of the physics, that we can make it work.' 'What we have not proven is, first, can I do it economically, and then second, can I do it at scale? Can I build enough satellites to get after the threat? Can I expand the industrial base fast enough to build those satellites?' The initiative comes amid advancements in the American space industry, with tycoons such as Elon Musk working to bring down the costs of launching satellites. The Defense Department didn't reply to a request for comment Sunday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store