logo
Don't rely on Medicaid? Tax bill will drive up costs to your healthcare too

Don't rely on Medicaid? Tax bill will drive up costs to your healthcare too

Al Jazeeraa day ago
United States President Donald Trump's signature piece of budget legislation, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', will likely raise healthcare costs, experts have said. While the Medicaid cuts will directly impact those who depend on the programme, the consequences will extend to others as well.
The 869-page bill, which includes roughly $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid over the next decade, passed in the House along party lines, with only two Republicans – Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania – breaking ranks. It will be signed into law by Trump on Friday.
In addition to patients, Medicaid funds also help financially strapped hospitals and other healthcare facilities, and the cuts could lead to their closures.
Apart from this, almost 12 million people could lose health insurance by 2034 due to reductions to both Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act marketplace, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis.
Experts warn the new law will drive up costs elsewhere in the system. Patients may face higher out-of-pocket expenses, while hospitals could be forced to lower the quality of care, raise prices, or close entirely due to the financial strain.
'There is the mistaken belief that cuts in Medicaid will only affect those on Medicaid. Many hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organisations depend on Medicaid funding for their operations. Therefore, cuts in Medicaid can adversely affect the types and quality of services they provide,' Bruce Y Lee, professor of health policy at the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, told Al Jazeera.
'In fact, a number of healthcare organisations depend so heavily on Medicaid funding that they could go out of business with significant cuts.'
The cuts would hit rural hospitals hard, according to an analysis from the National Rural Hospital Association (NRHA). About 20 percent of the US population lives in rural areas, where Medicaid covers one in four adults, a higher share than in urban areas, and plays a large part in financing healthcare services.
The cuts are expected to result in a 20 percent reduction in funding for rural hospitals in half of all states.
That will hurt patients like Martha Previte and her partner Jim Earl, who live in rural Maine. Both have type 1 diabetes and rely on regular hospital visits for a range of procedures, including blood tests and kidney treatment.
'I fear that these cuts are going to close hospitals that we rely on to get care, and we're not going to have anywhere to go,' Previte told Al Jazeera.
This bill could result in as many as 338 hospitals closing around the US. There are already nearly 800 hospitals that are facing financial hardship.
'Our goal is to help ensure hospitals can remain open for their communities, and people can get the care they need when they need it. Our nation's health and economic future depend on it,' the American Hospital Association said in a statement condemning the bill's passage and calling it 'an extremely disappointing and very difficult day for health care in America'.
Those that stay open could result in cuts to essential care like chemotherapy and behavioural health services.
The bill does include $50bn for rural hospitals to offset the additional financial strain they will face. But because of cuts to Medicaid, that funding will not make enough of a dent to keep healthcare costs from rising and healthcare facilities from shuttering.
Analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation found that Medicaid cuts would still lead to a drop of $155bn in federal Medicaid spending on rural hospitals over the next 10 years.
'While the President promised to lower costs for Americans, this bill is set to spike premiums and other healthcare costs,' Elizabeth Pancotti, managing director of policy and advocacy at the Groundwork Collaborative, told Al Jazeera.
Rural hospitals in the state of Missouri will be the hardest hit and are expected to lose an average of 29 percent of Medicaid funding. While Missouri's Senator Josh Hawley, in a May op-ed in the New York Times, said cuts to Medicaid would be 'politically suicidal', he and his fellow Missouri senator, Republican Eric Schmitt, voted in support of the bill before it moved to the House of Representatives on Tuesday.
The cuts are also expected to affect nursing homes disproportionately in urban areas, according to an analysis from Brown University School of Public Health, which forecast that 579 nursing homes could shutter. Those at highest risk have a Medicaid payer share greater than 85 percent. It was found that the Medicaid cuts overwhelmingly affected nursing homes in California, Georgia, Illinois and Texas.
Looming Medicare changes
Medicaid is not the only healthcare programme seeing cuts. While Medicaid is intended for those who are low-income, Medicare covers healthcare for those 65 and older, as well as some others who have disabilities. Some patients, like Previte, receive both.
'Medicare is my primary insurer, and Medicaid picks up what Medicare does not cover. I am a type 1 insulin-dependent diabetic of 41 years with serious complications. Medicare covered my recent hospitalisation and upcoming outpatient procedures,' Previte told Al Jazeera.
The Republican bill could also indirectly lead to cuts in Medicare services because of the statutory Pay‑As‑You‑Go Act of 2010. Under this, the White House's Office of Management and Budget is required to keep a 'scorecard' to track net increases to the deficit, with a goal to 'eliminate the overage'.
Because of that, the programme may not get all of the money allocated to it, a potential $490bn loss in access to funds over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office, affecting coverage for people who rely on Medicare.
'The whole thing [the tax bill] is a stark abandonment of human social responsibility,' Previte's partner Earl said.
Affordable Care Act changes
The upcoming law also makes significant changes to the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare. It shortens the annual enrollment period for healthcare coverage by about a month and drives up premium costs for those who need it.
According to analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation, insurance premium prices could increase on average by $1,296 a year.
Those who get their healthcare coverage through the exchange will also need to annually update their personal information, which includes income and immigration status, rather than being enrolled automatically.
The changes will cause a strain on the small business economy. Last year, as many as 3.3 million self-employed individuals and small business owners relied on the marketplace for health insurance.
'If you're a young business owner, already stretched thin by housing costs, child care bills, and health premiums, this bill just made your future harder,' Richard Trent, executive director of Main Street Alliance, an advocacy group for small businesses, said in a statement.
Former President Barack Obama, in a post on X, weighed in as the bill strips parts of his signature policy, a key part of his legacy.
'It will increase costs and hurt working class families for generations to come,' the former president said in a post before the bill's passage.
'This will be another branch of a limb of a disastrous tree. I'm concerned about what this means for our future care. The thing with diabetes, like many ailments, they're livable if they're treated properly. You can live a long, happy, healthy life, but when you're deprived of healthcare, maintenance-of-health care, and things like that, then a whole Pandora's box of disasters can happen to your health,' Earl added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil hosts BRICS summit; Russia's Putin, China's Xi skip Rio trip
Brazil hosts BRICS summit; Russia's Putin, China's Xi skip Rio trip

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

Brazil hosts BRICS summit; Russia's Putin, China's Xi skip Rio trip

Leaders of the growing BRICS group are gathering in Brazil for a summit overshadowed by United States President Donald Trump's new tariff policies while presenting the bloc as a defender of multilateralism. The leaders, mainly from the developing world, will be discussing ways to increase cooperation amid what they say are serious concerns over Western dominance at their two-day summit that begins in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday. The BRICS acronym is derived from the initial letters of the founding member countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The bloc, which held its first summit in 2009, later added Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as full members. It also has 10 strategic partner countries, a category created last year, that includes Belarus, Cuba and Vietnam. But for the first time since taking power in 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping will not be attending in person, instead sending Prime Minister Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin will also miss in-person attendance as he is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for his role in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Brazil, as a signatory to the Rome Statute, would be required to enforce the arrest warrant. The notable absences are raising questions over the group's cohesion and global clout. Now chaired by Brazil, leaders at the BRICS summit are expected to decry the Trump administration's 'indiscriminate' trade tariffs, saying they are illegal and risk hurting the global economy. Global health policies, artificial intelligence and climate change will also be on the agenda. The BRICS countries say they represent almost half of the world's population, 36 percent of global land area, and a quarter of the global economic output. The bloc sees itself as a forum for cooperation between countries of the Global South and a counterweight to the Group of Seven (G7), comprised of leading Western economic powers. However, behind the scenes, divisions are evident. According to a source quoted by The Associated Press news agency, some member states are calling for a firmer stance on Israel's war in Gaza and its recent strikes on Iran. The source requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the discussions. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Egypt's Abdel Fattah el-Sisi will be attending the Rio summit. However, Al Jazeera's Lucia Newman, reporting from Rio, said the group's aim remains clear. 'The BRICS goal is to exert pressure for a multipolar world with inclusive global governance to give a meaningful voice to the Global South, especially in the trading system,' she said. 'It's not super organised, nor does it have a radical global impact,' Newman added. 'The real question is, can an expanded BRICS whose members have very different political systems and priorities form a sufficiently unified bloc to have any significant impact?'

Scepticism and hope for end to Gaza war before Trump-Netanyahu meeting
Scepticism and hope for end to Gaza war before Trump-Netanyahu meeting

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Scepticism and hope for end to Gaza war before Trump-Netanyahu meeting

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visiting the United States on Monday, a visit analysts expect will focus on celebrating Israel and the US's self-anointed victory against Iran and discussing a proposal for a ceasefire in Israel's war on Gaza. This is the third time this year Netanyahu will be meeting US President Donald Trump, who claims the US and Israel 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme during a 12-day war and that he would resume bombing Iran if it restarts nuclear activities. Last week, Trump said Israel had agreed to conditions for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, which would allow all parties to work towards an end to Israel's 21-month-long war on the besieged enclave. On July 4, Hamas gave a 'positive' response to Qatari and Egyptian mediators about the latest ceasefire proposal. On Friday, after Hamas's response to the proposal, Trump said there could be a 'deal next week' and promised to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu to ensure a ceasefire. Israel has since said that Hamas has requested changes to the proposal that it found 'unacceptable', but that Israeli negotiators would be going to Qatar on Sunday to discuss the proposal. According to a leaked copy of the deal obtained by Al Jazeera, the ceasefire entails a 60-day pause in hostilities and a phased release of some of the 58 Israeli captives held in Gaza since a Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 57,000 people, mostly women and children, in what United Nations experts, legal scholars and human rights groups describe as a genocide against Palestinians. Many experts told Al Jazeera that they are not optimistic a temporary ceasefire will lead to a permanent end to the war. 'The way [the ceasefire talks] are being framed leaves me sceptical,' said Omar Rahman, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the Middle East Council for Global Affairs. Rahman added that he believes Trump was focused on getting the Israeli captives released, but not on ending the war and the suffering of the people of Gaza. Trump previously promised an end to the war after pushing for a ceasefire just days before he became president in January. However, two months later, Trump did nothing when Israel unilaterally resumed its attacks on Gaza, killing thousands more people. Mairav Zonszein, an expert on Israel-Palestine for the International Crisis Group, said that could happen again. 'It all rests on Trump and the US to sustain real pressure [on Netanyahu], but that is highly doubtful,' she told Al Jazeera. 'I'm optimistic there could be some kind of ceasefire, but longevity and the terms are highly questionable,' Zonszein said. 'It's also possible we could see a ceasefire that does not last because … Israel still every so often just bombs something without repercussions [in Gaza],' she added. Yaser al-Banna, a Palestinian journalist in Gaza, said many in the Strip are divided over whether a ceasefire will end the war. While everyone prays it will, some people cannot imagine Netanyahu sticking to a deal. Netanyahu insists that the war will not end without a 'total victory' over Hamas, a concept he has not defined. 'About half the people in Gaza are very pessimistic… The other half believes this time could be different due to shared interests among Israel, the Palestinians, Arab states and the US to end this war,' he said. Many analysts believe that Trump is driven by his desire to strike grandiose deals in order to boast about his achievements in global affairs. On Monday, he is likely to take credit for ostensibly dismantling Iran's nuclear programme – even though that may not be true – and express his desire to retrieve the rest of the Israeli captives in Gaza. He also wants to get the 'Gaza issue' out of the way to pursue more normalisation deals between Israel and neighbouring Arab states, said Khaled Elgindy, an expert on Israel-Palestine and a professor of Arab Studies at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. 'Trump wants to be able to say that he got back the Israeli hostages… and got a Palestinian state… Then he can call himself master of the universe, but getting those things is much harder than he thinks,' Elgindy told Al Jazeera. It's unclear whether Netanyahu's political calculations align with Trump's ambitions. Israel's next parliamentary elections have to take place before October 2026, and Netanyahu could go to the polls sooner, riding on a likely wave of popularity if he succeeds in returning the remaining captives. Like Trump, he would also tout what he terms a stunning victory against Iran to the Israeli public. Those considerations are important because it is likely that Netanyahu's frail far-right coalition, held together by pressure to prolong the war on Gaza, would collapse if a permanent ceasefire is reached, said Hugh Lovatt, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the European Council on Foreign Relations. 'At the end of [the possible] 60-day ceasefire, [Netanyahu] could go to elections by committing to a full end to the war and collapse his coalition; or he could go back to war to keep his [far-right] coalition together should he judge the time not right for elections,' he told Al Jazeera. Staying in office is particularly important for Israel's longest-serving prime minister, who faces several domestic legal charges of fraud and bribery. During his much-anticipated meeting with Trump, experts expect them to discuss Netanyahu's trial, which many believe plays a large role in dictating his political calculations. Netanyahu's position as prime minister has enabled him to undermine the Israeli judicial system by appointing loyalists to high courts and delaying court hearings – an influence he would lose if his coalition unravels. Trump is acutely aware of Netanyahu's dilemma. On June 25, he called on Israel to drop the charges against Netanyahu, referring to the trial as a 'witch hunt'.Trump's comments suggest that he is trying to pressure Netanyahu's opponents to issue a pardon in exchange for ending the war on Gaza, said Georgetown's Elgindy. Elgindy referenced Trump's recent social media post where he alluded to suspending military aid to Israel unless charges against Netanyahu were dropped. 'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollars a year, far more than any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' Trump wrote on June 28. That would be a major – almost unfathomable – decision to emerge out of the meeting between Trump and Netanyahu, said Elgindy. 'I don't see him following through, but this is a typical [threat] that Trump would make,' he told Al Jazeera. 'His [modus operandi] is to blackmail and coerce. That is his version of diplomacy.' Elgindy added that it was distressing that Trump would threaten to cut military aid to Israel to protect Netanyahu and not beleaguered, starving Palestinians in Gaza. The decision to pardon Netanyahu lies with Israel's President Isaac Herzog, but such a move would be unprecedented, and the president has not indicated that he plans to do so. Analysts believe Herzog may be willing to pardon Netanyahu if he agrees to exit political life, but not simply to secure a ceasefire. Zonszein, from Crisis Group, adds that there are lawyers and justices in Israel who have warned 'for years' that it is in the public's interest to reach a plea bargain with Netanyahu due to the power he holds over the country. Their only condition is for Netanyahu to agree to leave politics. 'I don't think that is something Netanyahu is considering. If he was willing to leave political life, then he could have already negotiated a plea bargain,' she told Al Jazeera.

Elon Musk launches the America Party as feud with Trump escalates
Elon Musk launches the America Party as feud with Trump escalates

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Elon Musk launches the America Party as feud with Trump escalates

Billionaire Elon Musk has followed through on his pledge to create a new political party in the United States after President Donald Trump signed his controversial budget legislation, the so-called 'One Big, Beautiful Bill', into law. Musk in a post on X on Saturday declared the formation of the 'America Party', to 'give back' the people of the US their freedom and challenge what he called the nation's 'one-party system'. He cited a poll, uploaded on Friday – the US's Independence Day – in which he asked whether respondents 'want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system' that has dominated US politics for some two centuries. The yes-or-no survey earned more than 1.2 million responses. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk wrote on Saturday. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' he declared. The move comes amid a worsening of the feud between the world's richest man and Trump over the new budget law, which the Tesla and SpaceX CEO said would bankrupt the US. Musk was Trump's main campaign financier during the 2024 election, and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term, aimed at slashing government spending. The two have since fallen out spectacularly over disagreements about the 'Big, Beautiful Bill'. Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill, which experts say will pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit. 'They will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk had said. There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government, and to deport the South African-born tycoon. 'We'll have to take a look,' the president told reporters when asked if he would consider deporting Musk, who has held US citizenship since 2002. It is not clear how much impact the new party will have on the 2026 mid-term elections, or on the presidential vote two years after that. On Friday, after posting the poll, Musk laid out a possible political battle plan to pick off vulnerable House of Representatives and Senate seats, and for the party to become 'the deciding vote' on key legislation. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' Musk posted on X. All 435 US House seats are up for grabs every two years, while about one-third of the Senate's 100 members, who serve six-year terms, are elected every two years. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly is a tall order, given that it has dominated US political life for more than 160 years, while Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40 percent, despite the president's often divisive policies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store