Fifth python discovered on road just one week after 'monster' 18ft snake found
The severely dehydrated and injured albino python was spotted on Kirton Road near Twigmoor Woods in Lincolnshire by members of the public on Saturday evening.
Humberside Police arrived on the scene soon after and officers contacted RSG Reptiles in Alford.
The rescue and animal encounter firm had already recovered one 18ft, 50kg 'monster' python at Twigmoor Woods and three others in the nearby village of Manton on June 13 and 14.
The five snakes, all reticulated pythons over 11ft long, are currently in the care of RSG.
After the first four were found, police said there were reports of a fifth snake on the loose and warned people to be vigilant and keep dogs on a lead.
It's suspected all were abandoned by the same owner, who has not yet been identified.
Officers from Humberside Police's Rural Task Force are investigating potential offences under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
Rob Stokes, co-owner of RSG Reptiles, told Metro that when they arrived to collect the fifth python 'police were on the scene redirecting traffic and the snake had been kept underneath a pop up tent to keep it contained'.
He said the female python was severely dehydrated and had an infected wound, so will need vet treatment.
'We've been treating her with baths, and cleaning the wound every day and the swelling has gone down, but a trip to the vets has been arranged for this evening,' he added.
'She's lucky she survived – especially considering she's been out in the elements for more than a week and ended up on a busy road.'
One of the other snakes, also an albino, will likely need treatment as well he added, as it is covered in lumps.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
'The rest of the snakes seem really well, however. They all have lovely personalities and are all very friendly,' he said.
Rob said rescuing five snakes in little more than a week was 'very unusual, especially ones of this size' and urged any reptile owners struggling to care for their pets to reach out for help instead of abandoning the animals.
'The reptile community is so large there is always someone out there who would be able to remove these reptiles and look after them. There is no need to abandon them.
'There are many people to contact if you cannot look after your reptiles anymore – we can take them and so can NCRW, RSPCA or any exotic pet shop.'
The reptiles will be treated as police evidence while an investigation is ongoing, Rob explained.
Once there's a prosecution or no further action from police they will either be given new suitable homes or stay at RSG and potentially become part of the firm's animal encounter experiences.
Rob said he wanted to thank members of the public for staying with the fifth python until they arrived.
'They, along with the police, stood there in the heat waiting for us, to make sure the snake was safe. It shows how wonderful the community is and we want to say a heartfelt thanks.' More Trending
RSG Reptiles has set up a GoFundMe to help cover vet fees for the snakes. You can donate here.
Reticulated pythons are the world's largest type of snake and native to South East Asia. They're non venomous but can squeeze the life out of their prey.
However, RSG and the police said pythons – especially pets – will generally not attack humans unless they feel threatened.
Metro has contacted Humberside Police for comment.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: MP admits getting staff member to put down his Labrador with a shotgun
MORE: 'Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide': Trump's man in Florida reveals chilling plan for immigrants
MORE: Inside New York's 'Pigeon Fest' where impersonators battle for title
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
35 minutes ago
- Metro
Netflix viewers 'infuriated' over gripping new true crime documentary
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A new true crime documentary has landed on Netflix, leaving viewers both 'gripped' and 'infuriated'. Amy Bradley is Missing premiered on the streaming service today, and follows the mystery surrounding the disappearance of Amy Bradley following a family cruise in the late 90s. The 23-year-old was traveled on the Rhapsody of the Seas in March 1998, along with parents Ron and Iva, and her brother Brad – however, just a few days into their journey to Curaçao, she vanished after returning to her cabin following a night at the ship's nightclub. Despite an extensive search and an FBI investigation, she was never found, with the new three-part documentary exploring her final moments as well as new information surfacing over the years, and possible sightings. While the true crime program has only just arrived on Netflix, viewers have devoured the episodes already, flocking to social media to share their thoughts on the case so far. Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. Reddit user AngryMango9 posted: 'I'm halfway through and incredibly impressed. Her parents are breaking my heart. That's unconditional love right there. I pray they get answers.' Over on Twitter, Tiffanymariexox commented: 'Amy Bradley is Missing on Netflix is f**king sad….' Cole agreed: 'Watching Amy Bradley is missing on @netflix. It's gripping.' Shocked by the footage, Julishwa wrote: 'Watched @netflix Amy Bradley is Missing, and I am infuriated by @FBI and how they failed Amy. 'How do you have 4 witnesses who saw Amy in a specific region and still do nothing waiting for Amy to knock on your office door! even putting witnesses on lie detector test.' 'There's a must-see true crime documentary that's on Netflix this week,' Dan added. 'Honestly, I've never seen a true crime series that lacks evidence but can be so compelling at the same time.' Amy was last seen on the balcony of her family's cabin in the very early hours of the morning, after returning from the nightclub on board. When her family went to check on her in the morning, there was no trace of her – they raised the alarm on board but she was never found. Over the years, there have been countless reported sightings and extensive searches and, while there are no confirmed details, her loved ones have never given up hope that she could eventually return. Director and executive producer Ari Mark opened up about speaking to them for the episodes, telling Netflix's Tudum: 'Most of the people [in the series] have never been interviewed. The only people who've been interviewed have been the Bradleys. 'It's one thing to talk about the void of Amy, and it's another thing to experience it. 'This is a family who really deeply believes in what they're saying, and what they're saying is, 'She's out there, we're going to find her, and we're ready.'' 'On March 23, 1998, 23-year-old Amy Bradley disappears without a trace from the cruise ship she and her family were vacationing on,' the official synopsis reads. 'Despite thorough searches of the ship, Amy is nowhere to be found and the cruise has already docked in their next port, Curaçao, opening the door for 2400 passengers to explore the island and allowing Amy to potentially disappear into the crowd. 'Hours later, Amy is still nowhere to be found and fear sets in that Amy may have fallen overboard before port. But a body is never discovered. The search for Amy expands as the FBI and local authorities launch an investigation where everyone becomes a potential suspect.' More Trending The three-part series 'delves into this cold case decades in the making as the search for Amy continues. 'As the years pass by, possible sightings of Amy pop up in various locations from multiple people. Is it really her? Was this a tragic accident or a crime? – anything is possible. But for Amy's family – only one thing matters: bringing their daughter home alive.' Amy Bradley Is Missing is available to stream on Netflix now. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: Ragtag Zohran Mamdani protest likened to Netflix comedy sketch MORE: Stranger Things season 5 releases first trailer and fans are already 'horrified' MORE: 'Compelling' mystery thriller soars up Netflix chart as fans binge all 6 episodes
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Why was a superinjunction put on the Afghan evacuation story and what did it do?
On Tuesday, it was revealed for the first time that the British Government had used a superinjunction to keep a secret from the public. The term 'superinjunction' may be familiar to people who paid attention to the news in the 2010s, thanks to their deployment by several high-profile figures who wanted to stop people reading about their private lives. It is a court order a step above an injunction, which is used to stop details of the case being published in public. In a case with a superinjunction, not even the existence of the injunction can be made public. These orders are powerful enough when used by an individual. The use of one by the government to keep the entire UK in the dark is unprecedented. Hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers' money was spent without the public's knowledge, to bring a large number of individuals to the UK from Afghanistan without anyone being allowed to learn why. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. It all stemmed from an accidental data breach in February 2022, which exposed the personal details of more than 18,000 Afghans who had assisted British forces in their fight against the Taliban. When the government learned about this breach 18 months after it happened, then-Defence Secretary Ben Wallace requested an injunction in the courts. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The reason for this, according to court documents, was to 'preserve the confidentiality of the personal information for as long as possible in order that His Majesty's Government may do everything it reasonably can to help those who might have been put at further risk by the data compromise'. But when the time came for the injunction to be placed, Judge Robin Knowles decided to go a step further. More Trending He wrote: 'I conclude that it is an environment of no publication that best protects lives, although again the matter must and will be kept under constant review.' This decision was made for eight reasons listed in the judgement: 'The risk in question is to the lives of many individuals and their families, and of torture.' The confidentiality of the data was not completely lost, though it had been breached. The order would create a period of time where the data compromise is 'not known or widely known'. It would be less likely for the information to fall into the wrong hands during that period. The period would provide an opportunity for the government to do 'everything it reasonably can' to help those at risk. The impact on freedom of expression was 'justified in the particular and exceptional circumstances of this case'. The fact the injunction would probably no longer be needed at some point and be lifted would limit that impact. The operation and duration of the injunction would be kept under close review. This order was so stringent, then-shadow Defence Secretary John Healey did not tell his party leader about the situation when he was briefed before last year's election. Instead, Sir Keir Starmer learned about it after he became Prime Minister. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: What changes in ISAs could mean for you and where you should invest MORE: Middle class parties hit by lumpy skin disease MORE: What changes to mortgages for first-time buyers means for you
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Trump loved Epstein conspiracy theories - now he's at the heart of one
For well over a decade, Donald Trump has thrived on conspiracy. He questioned Barack Obama's birthplace and citizenship, claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him without a shred of evidence, and has endorsed and promoted far-right figures who gleefully stoked the lie that Hillary Clinton ran a child sex ring from the basement of a pizza restaurant. These weren't fringe ideas muttered in back rooms or basements. They were central to Trump's political theatre – designed to paint his opponents not just as wrong, but satanically evil. So when the President recently told reporters he didn't understand why his supporters are interested in late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, dismissing the entire saga as 'a very boring story', the response from the conspiratorial base was, predictably, swift and furious. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video From InfoWars and Telegram channels to MAGA influencers and mainstream news, the reaction boiled down to one thing: how dare he? Today, Trump ramped up his criticism, saying that the discussions around the former banker were a 'scam', labelling it a 'bulls**t Jeffrey Epstein hoax' and urging his supporters not to be 'hoodwinked.' Well, tough luck – conspiracies can't be controlled. Not even by Trump. Let's remember, Epstein's story isn't boring – it's horrifying. A convicted child sex trafficker with friends in high places. A mysterious prison death. A long list of alleged enablers and abusers still unnamed, still unaccountable. Rumours (encouraged by Trump and his allies) of a blackmail 'client list' held by Epstein. People are obsessed because they should be. Because justice, clearly, hasn't been served. The President has made a rod for his own back. He fuelled the fire for years, and not just on this. He platformed figures who are prominent in the QAnon conspiracy movement (which believes, among other things, that President Trump is battling satanic elite paedophiles), posted cryptic messages about 'the storm' (a QAnon dog whistle), and appointed people like Mike Flynn who actively amplified such theories. Trump's years of conspiracy indulgence were based on set rules: suspicion by association, trust no institution, and believe only him. But now, scrutiny has edged closer to Trump himself – with people on the left and right revisiting his long-standing friendship with Epstein, sharing those awkward photos and the quote where he called Epstein a 'terrific guy' who liked women 'on the younger side' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Suddenly, the President is no longer interested. You can't unleash a monster and then act surprised when it turns on you. Trump made himself the hero of the anti-elite, anti-paedophile crusade. But when people apply that same lens to his own past, he retreats. And not with his usual bluster, either. Lately, Trump's tone has changed. Usually, he has his supporters eating out of his hand. Now, he's reduced to begging them not to be 'taken in' by a 'hoax' he endorsed. But this isn't a rebrand. It's fear. Trump's scared. Because his supporters are asking questions he can't answer with a soundbite or a slogan. And the timing couldn't be worse for him. Public frustration over Epstein hasn't faded – it's deepened. It's not just that Epstein was a monster, although he was. It's that the system seemed to protect him. He maintained his network of powerful friends even after conviction. He secured sweetheart deals. And he died before a trial could truly begin and victims could get even a whiff of justice. The result, instead of accountability, is a vacuum, into which QAnon and other conspiracy movements poured. The thirst is twisted into the kind of pure fantasy that defined 'pizzagate' – a satanic cabal of baby-eaters apparently led by Hillary Clinton in secret bunkers under a pizza shop – and Trump as the saviour. Total fiction, rooted in real fury. But the emotional truth remains: people feel that the powerful get away with everything. Trump capitalised on that anger. Now, he's the one looking over his shoulder. The nature of their friendship, the timeline, and when exactly Trump stopped calling the paedophile financier a 'terrific guy' are all under scrutiny. The same scrutiny that was, in Trump's own way, the fair questions that he demanded be asked of the Democratic elite. Now, with Trump in power once again, Republican lawmakers have voted to block a Democratic effort to force the release of the Epstein files, which amounts to a mythological cache of apparently undisclosed information about the convicted sex offender at the centre of American politics for over three decades. The Epstein files may be buried, but the case is still open – if not legally, then morally. Survivors are still waiting. Names are still redacted. And trust in institutions is still on life support. Trump doesn't now get to call this 'boring'. More Trending He wanted to be the one to expose the rot. He told his base he was the only one who would clean it up. Now, faced with their anger, he shrugs and calls it dull. He isn't bored. He's terrified. And he should be. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Ragtag Zohran Mamdani protest likened to Netflix comedy sketch MORE: John Torode doesn't remember using racist language – that's a problem MORE: The Great British Sewing Bee is back – but I miss Kiell Smith-Bynoe
