Trump envoy meets Israeli hostage families, says he has 'very good plan' to end Gaza war
Trump has made ending the conflict a major priority of his administration, though negotiations have faltered. Steve Witkoff is visiting Israel as its government faces mounting pressure over the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in the enclave.
In a recording of the meeting, reviewed by Reuters, Witkoff is heard saying: "We have a very, very good plan that we're working on collectively with the Israeli government, with Prime Minister Netanyahu ... for the reconstruction of Gaza. That effectively means the end of the war."
Witkoff also said that Hamas was prepared to disarm in order to end the war, though the group has repeatedly said it will not lay down its weapons.
In response to the reported remarks, Hamas, which has dominated Gaza since 2007 but has been militarily battered by Israel in the war, said it would not relinquish "armed resistance" unless an "independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital" is established.
Indirect negotiations between Hamas and Israel aimed at securing a 60-day ceasefire in the Gaza war and a deal for the release of half the hostages ended last week in deadlock.
On Saturday, Hamas released its second video in two days of Israeli hostage Evyatar David. In it, David, skeletally thin, is shown digging a hole, which, he says in the video, is for his own grave.
Witkoff met with Netanyahu on Thursday.
Afterwards, a senior Israeli official said an understanding between Israel and Washington was emerging that there was a need to move from a plan to release some of the hostages to a plan to release all the hostages, disarm Hamas and demilitarise the Gaza Strip, echoing Israel's key demands for ending the war.
Witkoff arrived in Israel with Netanyahu's government facing a global outcry over devastation in Gaza and the starvation growing among its 2.2 million people.
The crisis has also prompted a string of Western powers to announce they may recognise a Palestinian state.
On Friday, Witkoff visited a US-backed aid operation in southern Gaza, which the United Nations has partly blamed for deadly conditions in the enclave, saying he sought to get food and other aid to people there.
Dozens have died of malnutrition in recent weeks after Israel cut off all supplies to the enclave for nearly three months from March to May, according to Gaza's health ministry. It said on Saturday that it had recorded seven more fatalities, including a child, since Friday.
Israel blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza and says it is taking steps for more aid to reach its population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, air drops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys.
UN agencies have said that airdrops of food are insufficient and that Israel must let in far more aid by land and quickly ease access to it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
4 minutes ago
- Zawya
Trump eyes bringing Azerbaijan, Central Asian nations into Abraham Accords, sources say
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration is actively discussing with Azerbaijan the possibility of bringing that nation and some Central Asian allies into the Abraham Accords, hoping to deepen their existing ties with Israel, according to five sources with knowledge of the matter. As part of the Abraham Accords, inked in 2020 and 2021 during Trump's first term in office, four Muslim-majority countries agreed to normalize diplomatic relations with Israel after U.S. mediation. Azerbaijan and every country in Central Asia, by contrast, already have longstanding relations with Israel, meaning that an expansion of the accords to include them would largely be symbolic, focusing on strengthening ties in areas like trade and military cooperation, said the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Such an expansion would reflect Trump's openness to pacts that are less ambitious than his administration's goal to convince regional heavyweight Saudi Arabia to restore ties with Israel while war rages in Gaza. The kingdom has repeatedly said it would not recognize Israel without steps towards Israeli recognition of a Palestinian state. A soaring death toll in Gaza and starvation in the enclave due to blockage of aid and military operations by Israel have buoyed Arab fury, complicating efforts to add more Muslim-majority countries to the Abraham Accords. The war in Gaza, where over 60,000 people including tens of thousands of women and children have died according to local health authorities, has provoked global anger. Canada, France and the United Kingdom have announced plans in recent days to recognize an independent Palestine. Another key sticking point is Azerbaijan's conflict with its neighbor Armenia, since the Trump administration considers a peace deal between the two Caucasus nations as a precondition to join the Abraham Accords, three sources said. While Trump officials have publicly floated several potential entrants into the accords, the talks centered on Azerbaijan are among the most structured and serious, the sources said. Two of the sources argued a deal could be reached within months or even weeks. Trump's special envoy for peace missions, Steve Witkoff, traveled to Azerbaijan's capital, Baku, in March to meet with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. Aryeh Lightstone, a key Witkoff aide, met Aliyev later in the spring in part to discuss the Abraham Accords, three of the sources said. As part of the discussions, Azerbaijani officials have contacted officials in Central Asian nations, including in nearby Kazakhstan, to gauge their interest in a broader Abraham Accords expansion, those sources said. It was not clear which other countries in Central Asia - which includes Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan - were contacted. The State Department, asked for comment, did not discuss specific countries, but said expanding the accords has been one of the key objectives of Trump. "We are working to get more countries to join," said a U.S. official. The Azerbaijani government declined to comment. The White House, the Israeli foreign ministry and the Kazakhstani embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment. Any new accords would not modify the previous Abraham Accords deals signed by Israel. OBSTACLES REMAIN The original Abraham Accords - inked between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan - were centered on restoration of ties. The second round of expansion appears to be morphing into a broader mechanism designed to expand U.S. and Israeli soft power. Wedged between Russia to the north and Iran to the south, Azerbaijan occupies a critical link in trade flows between Central Asia and the West. The Caucasus and Central Asia are also rich in natural resources, including oil and gas, prompting various major powers to compete for influence in the region. Expanding the accords to nations that already have diplomatic relations with Israel may also be a means of delivering symbolic wins to a president who is known to talk up even relatively small victories. Two sources described the discussions involving Central Asia as embryonic - but the discussions with Azerbaijan as relatively advanced. But challenges remain and there is no guarantee a deal will be reached, particularly with slow progress in talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two countries, which both won independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, have been at loggerheads since the late 1980s when Nagorno-Karabakh - an Azerbaijani region that had a mostly ethnic-Armenian population - broke away from Azerbaijan with support from Armenia. In 2023, Azerbaijan retook Karabakh, prompting about 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee to Armenia. Both sides have since said they want to sign a treaty on a formal end to the conflict. Primarily Christian Armenia and the U.S. have close ties, and the Trump administration is wary of taking action that could upset authorities in Yerevan. Still, U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump himself, have argued that a peace deal between those two nations is near. "Armenia and Azerbaijan, we worked magic there," Trump told reporters earlier in July. "And it's pretty close." (Reporting by Gram Slattery in Washington; Additional reporting by Steve Holland and Humeyra Pamuk in Washington, Emily Rose in Jerusalem and Nailia Bagirova in Baku Editing by Humeyra Pamuk and Deepa Babington)
The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
EU-US deal won't really happen - the reason is in the details
Energy was one of the most freely traded goods in the post-Second World War era, even behind the Iron Curtain. A flood of sanctions has eroded that in recent years. But are the latest EU-US trade deal and Donald Trump's tariff threats an even greater danger? Under Thursday's trade pact, the EU has agreed to buy an extra $250 billion of US energy each year until 2027, and invest $600 billion in the US by 2028. Separately, Mr Trump has proposed 'secondary tariffs' on countries buying Russian oil, notably India. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told China that it would face 100 per cent tariffs if it continued to purchase Russian oil, for which it is the biggest customer. The reality of the European deal can be dismissed in detail. Impossible numbers The bloc imported $76 billion of American coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil last year. The US exported $318 billion of energy to all its customers, and EU customers imported nearly $407 billion of energy from all suppliers. So, the US would have to divert all its energy exports to Europe, and Europe would in turn have to buy almost exclusively from America. Yes, US LNG exports are set to rise substantially. Here are some easy gains in energy trade for the EU. The last remnants of the old Russian gas empire will be swept away, as Brussels plans to end imports from its hostile neighbour by 2027. But prices are likely to fall as new supply comes online over the next five years, from Qatar, the UAE, Canada and elsewhere as well as the US. Japan and South Korea have also agreed to buy more American energy products. Meanwhile, the EU's bulk energy buys will probably keep falling, as renewables and electric vehicles meet more of its needs. 'Europe' does not buy energy – its companies and consumers do. There is no way for Brussels to redirect energy trade on the massive scale required to meet these commitments. Big chunks of the imports are from Norway, Algeria and Azerbaijan, tied into the EU by gas pipelines. These are not going to be diverted elsewhere, whatever the White House tries to dictate. Similarly, US companies decide whom to sell to on commercial, not political grounds. Here, admittedly, some combination of arm-twisting and subsidies might divert trade. But that is more likely to relate to large, visible, single inward investments such as Japan's reported interest in the $44 billion Alaska LNG project. One-trick trade pony European companies would invest in renewable, hydrogen and electric vehicle projects in the US – but these are undercut by the current administration's hostility. The withdrawal of tax incentives, increased barriers to receiving permits, and onerous rules on foreign content, make them unappealing. As Nippon Steel found out in its purchase of US Steel, sizeable foreign acquisitions of American companies are also likely to face unreasonable opposition and an opaque process of lobbying to win approval. The reliance on energy sales shows the US to be a one-trick trade pony – or at best, three tricks, including agricultural goods and weapons. Its other goods are not very competitive – gas-guzzling cars and planes that fall out of the sky – and will become even less so as tariffs drive up input costs for key materials such as aluminium, steel and copper. Ultimately, such trade commitments by Europe are not going to raise US oil and gas output. So, even if fulfilled, they just shuffle energy trade around. Sanctions could be a different matter. Mr Trump could execute his threat of 100 per cent tariffs against India and China if they persist in buying Russian oil. This is a bizarre approach to defeating Moscow's war against Ukraine, instead of imposing stronger sanctions on specific customers and shippers, which is the same approach used against Iran. Beijing will not back down; it cannot allow its economic model, its foreign policy, its alignment with Moscow, to be dictated by Washington. It buys about two million barrels per day of Russian oil. New Delhi might concede, though. It has not changed its policy yet, but Reuters reported that Indian oil refineries had paused purchases of Russian oil while matters are worked out. India's imports of Russian oil averaged 1.8 million barrels per day in the first half of this year. The third major customer, Turkey, takes about 250,000 barrels daily. If India and Turkey drop out, China would no doubt step up its purchases of Russian oil, but it would not take all the remainder. This is partly for logistical reasons, but also political. It would gain further leverage over its junior ally, and could extract generous discounts, as it does from Iran, where it is essentially the only customer. So, there would probably be an overall reduction in Russian oil exports. The gap would be filled by Opec+, depending on its policy decisions, and potentially by higher US output. But US oil production will only increase if prices rise substantially. Mr Trump has shown himself acutely sensitive to inflation and to the concerns of American drivers, preferring lower rather than higher prices, to the discomfort of his supporters in Texas. So how does this all tie together? Less Russian oil and gas means more room for Gulf suppliers. If they end up sending less to Europe to fill a gap in India, or if prices rise enough to boost American production, the US may then supply more to Europe, cosmetically satisfying part of the trade deal. The inconsistency and volatile, contradictory messages emanating from the White House make all this very hard to evaluate. There's a good chance that the impending 'secondary tariffs' never materialise. Yet what is clear that a free and liquid energy market is being replaced by a constrained and politicised one.
The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
Why Lebanon needs closure on the Beirut port blast
On this day five years ago, Lebanon experienced a traumatic event that arguably became the defining moment for an entire generation. Although the country is no stranger to tragedy, the detonation of nearly 3,000 tonnes of improperly stored ammonium nitrate at Beirut port continues to cast a shadow over Lebanon and its people. The blast, which killed more than 220, injured thousands more and flattened large parts of the capital, continues to stir up painful feelings and visceral reactions among many Lebanese and those who love Lebanon. Although the country has gone through the anguish of foreign occupation, Israeli bombardment and civil war, the explosion of August 4, 2020, remains unique in its significance. This is because it sums up so much of the Lebanese experience in recent times: chronic mismanagement; a lack of transparency; poor governance; a cavalier attitude to citizens' well-being as well as attempts to achieve accountability being hampered by obfuscation and delay. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast. The failure to prosecute those responsible for such a catastrophe has repercussions that reach far beyond the frustration of the victims' families. A pervasive sense that the country is on the wrong path led many young Lebanese to reluctantly pack their bags and leave for opportunities abroad. One of them, architect Grace Dergham, recently told The National how, when she left in July 2001, she did so to support her parents because she was 'starting to lose hope in the country'. This is not to overlook the efforts currently under way to put the country on the right path. On Friday, The National reported that tighter regulations concerning the shipping, handling and storage of goods have been introduced in Lebanon to prevent such a tragedy from happening again. That the country now has a functioning presidency and parliament is also an important step forward. And despite many setbacks – including political interference, legal challenges and the removal of lead investigators – a judicial investigation into the blast is continuing. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast Nevertheless, much remains to be done. Beirut port, which suffered extensive damage, has not resumed full operations. Housing, transport and cultural assets, including many religious and archaeological sites and national monuments, remain badly affected. And other issues have emerged to compound these challenges, such as the overspill from the Gaza war and a persistent financial crisis. But there are also faint signs that things may be slowly improving; a World Bank report released on June 19 found that Lebanon's real gross domestic product was projected to grow by 4.7 per cent this year 'supported by anticipated reform progress, a recovery in tourism and consumption and limited capital inflows'. What shines through is the spirit of the Lebanese people, who have demonstrated resilience and determination despite the physical and emotional hurt stemming from the blast and its aftermath. But they should not have to be so resilient. What they want – a better future and a fair, functioning country – is right and just. Therefore, it is the job of the government, the judiciary as well as Lebanon's political and business classes to draw a line under the devastating 2020 explosion by achieving accountability and rebuilding trust in the country's institutions. A failure to do so will dog Lebanon's leaders for years to come and take away the opportunity to meet its people's aspirations.
