Ukraine proposes Russia meeting, Kremlin hedges on Putin-Trump
Volodymyr Zelenskyy
said his country had proposed holding a meeting with Russia next week, more than a month after the previous round of direct talks, while the Kremlin hedged on a potential meeting with US President
Donald Trump
.
Rustem Umerov
, who was appointed secretary of the National Security and Defense Council on Friday, made the proposal to the Russian side, the Ukrainian leader said in his daily address to the nation.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Technology
Design Thinking
Management
Public Policy
PGDM
Others
others
Leadership
Digital Marketing
MBA
Finance
CXO
MCA
Healthcare
Data Analytics
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science
Degree
Cybersecurity
Project Management
Data Science
healthcare
Product Management
Operations Management
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Weeks
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
"The dynamics of negotiations must be accelerated," Zelenskyy said on Saturday. "Everything must be done to achieve a ceasefire. The Russian side should stop hiding from making decisions."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Struggling With Belly Fat? Try This at Home
Home Fitness Hack
Shop Now
Undo
Umerov, who previously served as defense minister, led the Ukrainian delegations at talks with Russia in June, which resulted in the start of a major prisoner exchange. Discussions are continuing on one more swap to implement agreements reached during those direct negotiations in Istanbul, the president said.
A precise date for the new round of talks hasn't been agreed yet and will be coordinated, Russia's Tass news service reported from Moscow, citing an unidentified person. Kremlin spokesman
Dmitry Peskov
said July 17 that Russia was waiting for proposals from Kyiv on a third round of negotiations, according to the state-run agency.
Live Events
Ukraine is interested in seeing agreements reached with Trump on air defense and new weapons implemented as soon as possible, Zelenskyy also said, adding that his country was ready to export drones.
The Ukrainian leader reiterated his call for a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, saying "Ukraine is ready for such a meeting."
Separately, Peskov said a meeting between Putin and Trump "is possible, and it will definitely happen in due time."
Russian Airstrikes Across Ukraine Kill at Least Three
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russia launched a large missile and drone barrage overnight, killing at least three people, injuring several others and leaving thousands without power.
Kremlin forces fired more than 300 drones and 30 missiles of various types across at least 10 regions, Zelenskyy said Saturday in a post on X.
One person was killed and six injured when a multi-story apartment building was hit in the Black Sea city of Odesa. Images on social media showed the building in flames.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Romania to buy Israeli anti-aircraft systems for $2.3 bln
Romania has signed a framework agreement to buy Israeli-made Shorad-Vshorad anti-aircraft systems for more than 2 billion euros ($2.3 billion), the Romanian defence ministry said on Monday. Under pressure from US President Donald Trump, Romania and other European countries have been looking to increase their defence spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of neighbouring Ukraine in 2022. The European Union and NATO member state, which shares a 650 km (400 mile) border with Ukraine, has had Russian drone fragments fall onto its territory repeatedly over the past two years as Moscow attacks Ukrainian port infrastructure. The framework agreement with the Israeli company Rafael Advanced Defense Systems – maker with US backing of Israel's Iron Dome defence system – provides for the signing of three further contracts, through which six integrated anti-aircraft systems will be acquired. The contracts will also cover training, ammunition and logistical support. The framework agreement will run for seven years, with the first two Vshorad systems to be delivered within three years of the signing of the first of the three further contracts, the ministry said.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
What's really behind Harvard's clash with the US government over federal funds?
Harvard challenges US funding cuts in $3 billion legal battle with Trump administration Harvard University is currently embroiled in a legal battle with the US government over the freezing of nearly $3 billion in federal funding. The dispute centers on allegations made by the Trump administration and the University's response through a federal lawsuit. The courtroom hearing, taking place in Boston's Seaport District, represents a key moment in the case. The proceedings involve oral arguments over whether Harvard can recover federal research funds that were withheld following the administration's imposition of specific conditions tied to hiring, admissions, and oversight. Background of the lawsuit and key issues at stake The legal conflict began in April when the Trump administration sent a letter to Harvard President Alan M. Garber outlining conditions for continued federal support. These included structural reforms to increase 'viewpoint diversity' and audits of various academic units, as reported by The Harvard Crimson. In response, Harvard filed a lawsuit arguing that the administration's demands violated the First Amendment and bypassed formal legal procedures for terminating federal funding. Following the University's legal challenge, the administration halted more than $2 billion in federal grants. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What Happens When You Massage Baking Soda Into Your Scalp Read More Undo According to The Harvard Crimson, the government escalated further by adding hundreds of millions in additional cuts and warning that Harvard would no longer receive future grants. Federal agencies involved and legal grounds cited Eleven federal agencies are named as defendants, including the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense. Harvard argues that the Trump administration's funding freeze violated the First Amendment by attaching viewpoint-based conditions to funding. The University also cited the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, stating that the government failed to follow the necessary steps before terminating grants. Title VI typically requires a hearing, two formal notices, a 30-day pause, and a failed attempt at voluntary compliance. Harvard contends that none of these steps were followed before the April funding freeze. Key Information Details Amount frozen Over $2.2 billion Total funds at stake Nearly $3 billion Agencies involved 11 (including NSF, DOD, HHS) Legal claims First Amendment, APA, Title VI Judge Allison D. Burroughs Court location Boston, Massachusetts Allegations of antisemitism and racial bias According to the Trump administration, the cuts were prompted by Harvard's alleged failure to adequately address antisemitism and racial discrimination against white students. As reported by The Harvard Crimson, several federal agencies referenced findings from a task force on antisemitism, which described incidents of social isolation and discrimination faced by Jewish and Israeli students. Harvard, however, maintains that it has implemented significant measures, including the formalization of protest policies and expanded academic programs on Jewish and Israeli history. In a court filing cited by The Harvard Crimson, the University said the 2,000-page administrative record submitted by the government failed to show a proper investigation into antisemitism on campus. Ongoing impact and future implications The funding cuts have already disrupted research at Harvard, halting projects in cancer and rare disease treatment and prompting layoffs and hiring freezes. According to The Harvard Crimson, the University requested a summary judgment in early June to resolve the case before the federal government's September 3 deadline for fulfilling financial obligations related to canceled grants. The Trump administration has argued that the case belongs in the Court of Federal Claims, which could delay a final ruling. Meanwhile, discussions between Harvard and the White House have not resulted in a settlement. Judge Allison D. Burroughs is presiding over the case. Though a final ruling is not expected immediately, the court's decision will have significant implications for the University and federal oversight of higher education. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
India-US trade deal stalemate continues, talks to resume in August: Sources
Negotiations between India and the US on a crucial trade pact remain at an impasse, with talks now expected to resume when a delegation from Washington visits Delhi in the second week of August, sources two nations are aiming to finalise a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by September or October. The latest round of talks, the fifth, saw the Indian negotiators in Washington attempting to break a deadlock over duties on auto components, steel, and agricultural products. These issues have emerged as key sticking points in the drawn-out the discussions remained inconclusive, and the Indian delegation returned home just days before US President Donald Trump's August 1 tariff pause deadline rolls around. Talks hit a snag after India drew a red line and refused to yield to US demands on agricultural access, particularly in the dairy sector, which employs more than 80 million Indians, many of them smallholder previously said that while the two countries were close to sealing a deal by the end of June, discussions fell apart before the July 9 deadline set by Trump. India's stand on protecting its dairy sector was a key reason the talks failed to cross the finish meanwhile, has repeatedly claimed that the BTA with India is almost done deal. Yet, he has also warned of sweeping new tariffs on imports from multiple countries, including members of the Brics bloc, of which India is a week, the US President reiterated that Brics nations could face 10 per cent tariffs if they dare to go the de-dollarization way. He also warned of 100 per cent duties on Russian goods and hinted at slapping secondary sanctions on countries buying Russian oil. India, the second-largest buyer of Russian fossil fuels, could be majorly impacted if such measures are at least 14 countries have received formal notices from Washington about impending tariffs ranging from 25 per cent to 40 per cent, India has not received such a letter. This has given hope that negotiations are still alive, albeit under growing outcome of the August round of talks may determine whether India can avoid punishing tariffs as high as 500 per cent and secure a long-pending trade pact with Washington, one that has remained elusive despite repeated assurances from both governments.- Ends
