logo
Audi A6 E-tron and S6 E-tron review

Audi A6 E-tron and S6 E-tron review

Yahoo03-05-2025
Whatever other decisions may yet be made in the busy corridors of power at Audi's Ingolstadt headquarters, we know one thing for sure: this is the new, all-electric Audi A6 E-tron - and it's just touched down in the UK, in right hand drive form.
Soon enough, however, another new Audi A6 will touch down, that you can have with a combustion engine if you prefer. That will, no doubt, leave some a little confused.
The latter car was all set to be a new A7. But the idea, as Audi originally planned, that A6 devotees might willingly switch to an A5 or A7 in order to avoid inadvertent electrification - and that even-numbered Audis would, for the sake of simplicity, hence force be electric - has proven too much for the company's customer base and dealer network to accept.
So, rather than adjusting the entire model nomenclature strategy to make room for a growing number of EVs which European buyers remain stubbornly slow to warm up to, Audi's had a rethink. A sensible one, it seems to me. Right now, lots of people instinctively know what an Audi A6 is; likewise an A4, a Q2, etc. That's money in the bank that, frankly, Audi can ill afford to lose.
This new A6 E-tron, however, doesn't look much like an A6. It looks, to us, like a car that could have had several proposed identities during the course of its gestation; and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that 'Audi Axolotl' was one of the more leftfield ones. There's a certain similarity with the platform-related Q6 E-tron; but also a slightly strange, pumped up, lizard-featured look to it which I'm not sure that Audi's long-standing, design-loving clientele will instantly appreciate. At any rate, at least it isn't 'evolutionary'.
This car joins the ranks of the BMW i5, Mercedes EQE and perhaps even the Porsche Taycan, then, in the pursuit of the well-heeled executive's company-car dollar. Available as either five-door Sportback or Avant estate, it can be had with one motor or two; with either 75.8- or 94.9kWh of usable battery capacity; and from a UK-market departure price of £62,500.
Uncharacteristically, Audi has made the single-motor versions rear-wheel drive - but the same is true of last year's new Q6 E-tron SUV, and will continue to be so of other Audi EVs built on the same PPE platform; so we'll doubtless get used to that idea.
Suspension will be via steel coil springs and multi-link axles on all UK-market A6s, with adaptively damped air springs reserved for the range-topping S6 E-tron - which also offers close to 550-horsepower and a sub-4.0sec 0-62mph sprint, and is the derivative we used to take the performance and efficiency readings, among other measurements, you'll see throughout this test.
Through the lower tiers of the model range, you can have 322-, 376- or 456bhp, lastly in the twin-motor A6 E-tron Quattro version; but ours was a mid-level 376bhp A6 Avant E-tron Performance.
So, let's get stuck into the range-topper, shall we? The driveline technology may be different but the approach Audi takes to evolve an A6 into an S6 in the electric age follows a familiar path, as it always has with combustion-engined models. Namely, more power, control and grip, but in a measured manner, so not with full RS levels of commitment, drama and cost.
Both the A6 and S6 E-tron sit on the 800V Premium Platform Electric (PPE), co-developed again with Porsche, and use powertrains made at Audi's mammoth Gyor facility in Hungary. The S6 picks up the baton from the most potent of the mainline A6 models – the 422bhp Sport E-tron Quattro – and ups the ante to 496bhp, or 542bhp if you're engaging the car's launch control function. That power, along with an eyebrow-raising 620lb ft, comes courtesy of a 10cm asynchronous motor at the front and a permanent magnet synchronous motor at the rear, with an axial length of 20cm.
Compared with the first-generation E-tron products, Audi says its latest motors take up 30% less space and weigh 20% less. The platform's higher voltage also means thinner, lighter cables can be used, and various tweaks (a new hairpin winding and direct oil-spray cooling system for the larger motor, and an electric oil pump in the gearbox) have boosted range by about 25 miles over the old platform in terms of like-for-like capacity.
But nobody will be surprised to learn that the S6 E-tron, particularly in big-bodied Avant form, isn't very light. Its on-paper weight of 2335kg (11kg more in reality) is substantial, though the distribution is peachy, at 48:52 front to rear. It is also no heavier than its chief rival, the BMW i5 M60 xDrive Touring, which has a claimed weight of 2350kg (though the BMW does in fairness carry actuators for its rear-axle steering and has active anti-roll bars, while the Audi has neither).
Meanwhile, charge is held by the larger of the two nickel-manganese-cobalt batteries also found in the A6 (100.0kWh in capacity, 94.9kWh of which is usable). Spread across the width of the floorpan, it gives the S6 E-tron a considerably lower centre of gravity than any car previously to have worn the badge.
So what else does the S6 owner get for their near-£100k outlay, beyond more power than the A6? Bigger brakes, thicker anti-roll bars, a larger contact patch and a sportier tune for the air springs and adaptive dampers, although Audi will tell you the alterations are subtle in nature, rather than transformative.
Audi's designers have somehow made this look like quite a low, ground-hugging car from the kerbside; so when you get into it and feel as high-perched as you do, it's something of a shock. Audi has never traded in particularly low, sporty driving positions, to be fair - and the A6's seat itself is widely adjustable and supportive, and comfy over distance. You just don't feel like you can put it quite where you'd like to - relative to the beltline of the car, the nearness of the panoramic glass roof, or the primary controls in front of you.
This is nonetheless a comfortable cabin, and the S6 is as per the A6, only with the red stitching and plenty of synthetic suede, as is the Audi way for sporty derivatives.
Audi's latest cabin design and digital technology philosophy relies a great deal on a 14.5in central multimedia touchscreen that has no separate cursor controller, so it demands plenty of your attention while driving. There are no physical heating and ventilation controls, though there are a few useful physical buttons (for ADAS systems management and drive modes); and that touchscreen does have a permanently displayed shortcut zone as a usability aid.
Cabin quality is good enough, albeit not at the lofty level, relative to the executive class norm, that we've known of big Audis more traditionally. And some of the car's technological features (camera-based door mirrors that don't grant a sufficiently adjustable field of vision, and a head-up display that likes to blind you with red light if you get an arbitrary centimeter too close to the car in front) seem a bit gratuitous and self-serving.
There's reasonable leg and head room in the rear seats, unless you're very long-legged, that is - when you may find your knees bent up due to a fairly high floor. Still, kids are well catered for with three sets of Isofix seat anchorages (two in the back and one in the front passenger seat) and some usefully practical plastic backings to the front seats that will wipe clean of the inevitable shoe scuffs.
There's also a compact 'frunk', which is good, because space isn't as ample in the boot as you might expect. The 502-litre luggage space in the Avant is actually the same as the Sportback's, which is a bit disappointing. The floor is deep and wide, and you will get your double buggy or duo of labradors in there, plus there's some underfloor storage pace. But the sloping rear windowline eats into overall boot capacity; the i5 Touring (570 litres), ID 7 Touring (605 litres) and Macan Electric (540 litres) all offer more outright cargo space.
As for the camera-based wing mirrors, they are said to add about four miles in official tests, but they add yet more digital real estate.
Here we focus on the S6 Avant, where Audi, to its credit, hasn't gone in on moody, synthesised soundtracks for this car, and the electric boom-whir that accompanies prods of the acceleration in Dynamic mode isn't overbearing, even though something more dramatic would have been fully justified given the pace of the S6 E-tron.
Our Avant test car hurtled to 60mph from rest in just 3.7sec and with an insouciance we didn't expect. Triple figures arrived after 8.6sec, and the headline here is that the understated rapid Audi estate is alive and well in the electric era. As for overtaking, you need only think it, and it's done. Roll-on response is characteristically instant, and 2.9sec taken to dispatch 30-70mph is just a tenth shy of our time for the new BMW M5 (tested in saloon form, but also made as an estate).
We also like the fact that this car, with variable regenerative braking modes (controllable via the steering wheel-mounted paddles, though the auto setting is clever and effective), can fully coast, which often pays dividends in cars this heavy, as you can use that mass to your benefit. It means the driver can hustle or flow the S6 as their mood, and the situation, demands.
The S6 acquits itself equally well under heavy braking too, stopping around two metres sooner from 70mph than the S E-tron GT we tested recently, and doing so with more resolute pedal feel.
While the S6 is quite easily the quickest car in the range, every version of the A6 has the same crisp accelerator response and smooth delivery. And because even the weediest model still makes 322bhp, no A6 E-Tron is what you'd call slow.
There's an oily progression of weight to the A6's steering as you add lock, a good sense of how much grip you've got, and an easy nonchalance to the way the big Audi can be placed precisely on the road. There are more tactile steering set-ups out there, though: just ask Porsche and BMW.
The A6 never feels remotely scrappy or wayward, despite the rear-wheel drive. It's characterised by its resolute composure. Its body control becomes more fiddly, restless and firm when the surface underneath is uneven, but it keeps staunch check on lateral body movement in fast corners, and handles quite keenly for such a big, heavy exec - though not in a way you'd call involving per se.
As for the S6? The S6's driveline resorts to pure rear-drive operation until extra traction is required, at which point the front axle joins in. In this sense, the first electric S6 is different from any petrol-powered (or, more recently, diesel-fed) S6 you may have driven, because those cars used full-time Quattro. It was this, along with the layout of the ICE drivelines, that often translated to a faint but determined understeer balance in the ICE cars, though that did improve notably in recent years.
Along with the low centre of gravity inherent in the PPE platform, it means the S6 E-tron has a neater natural cornering style than its forebears, bleeding into 'push' only when you really begin to drive the car harder than you possibly should on the public road. In the main it's impressively neutral, with good grip, superb traction and an understated manner that feels appropriate for a fast, family-oriented Audi. Mind you, turn the ESP off entirely and really let the S6 rip on a circuit, and it will serve up oversteer almost as easily as the M5. Evidently some preconceptions need to be reconsidered when it comes to EVs, as you don't often see dynamic duality quite so stark.
Back on the road, the S6's composure is reflected in its steering, which is nicely geared and resistant to deflection, if also synthetic in feel. In general it's a precise car: easily placed, sped up and slowed down, and so on. It's not especially engaging, though, and that's more of a problem than it was with the old, big-engined S6 models.
Meanwhile, refinement is strong, as you would expect. The S6's wider tyres will generate more roar than those on the A6 E-tron but the uplift is pretty negligible and rolling refinement on par with the Mercedes E450d Estate we also tested recently – itself a match for the latest Range Rover. Ride quality is a strong point too – and not just in terms of the languid motorway gait. The S6, despite its enormous wheels, isolates you from the worst intrusions of our roads even at trundling speeds. Many others don't, even at this level.
The A6 is far from cheap, but it's also comparably good value when stacked up next to the obvious alternatives. Pricing starts at £62,500 for the Sportback, which gets 20in alloy wheels, leather upholstery, heated front seats, tri-zone climate control and adaptive cruise control, so it's hardly poverty spec.
S Line trim ups the ante with sports seats, privacy glass and fancier style tweaks for both the inside and outside. Edition 1 then tops the line-up and is the only trim you can get on the S6. It gets 21in alloys, matrix LED lights, an additional 10.9in touchscreen for the passenger, electrically adjustable front seats and heated rear seats.
The big-battery Performance in S line trim (in which we spent most of our time) is likely to be a fairly big seller and comes in at over £75,000.
So by the time you've added a few packs, it's not going to be unusual to see an A6 Avant with a transaction price of £80,000. Ouch. And yet it's no different to the much shorter-range i5 or less practical Mercedes-Benz EQE saloon. So if you look at it like that, the A6 actually looks like relatively decent value.
Real-world efficiency, meanwhile, averaged around 3.1mpkWh from our single-motor, high-spec, bigger-batteried, 376bhp UK test car, making for dependable range of almost exactly 300 miles; and DC charging speed is strong, up to a claimed 270kW.
And for the S6, well, it was when BMW announced the i5 M60 xDrive that the penny dropped – fast, full-size executive cars of an electric, premium nature weren't going to come cheap.
The Audi is no different. The S6 TDI Avant (yes, you can still buy one, though it isn't anything like as quick as the E-tron) starts at just under £75k, whereas its electric sibling costs £95k. Amazingly, this makes it less expensive than the BMW, and also the Mercedes-AMG EQE 53, which is easily the most expensive of this trio.
Meanwhile, none of them, the S6 E-tron included, is forecast rock-solid residuals either. Expect it to lose around half its value in three years and 36,000 miles.
If that doesn't deter you, efficiency is potentially excellent. The S6 performed especially well in our 'everyday' economy test, managing 342 miles. A touring test range of 266 miles is less impressive, but still competitive, as is the claimed rapid-charging rate of 270kW (for real-world test results, see below).
'Good' feels like damning the Audi A6 E-tron with faint praise. It's EV-class-competitive, for definite. But does that sound like the kind of 'Vorsprung Durch Technik' on which to stake the reorganisation of an entire brand's model nomenclature? To remake Audi's reputation for a new generation of EV-suggestible heartland buyers?
Three years ago, when the car's engineering targets were likely signed off, it might have. But today? Suddenly those nomenclative second thoughts make a lot more first-hand sense.
By current EV class standards, this is certainly a capable executive option. It has plenty of usable range, is a genuine pleasure to spend time in, and is competitive value for money in at least key relative terms. Some may be disappointed by the Avant's underwhelming boot, and that the i5 has the edge on perceived quality; others, that you don't get quite the practical executive car here you used to in an ICE-powered A6.
The range-topping S6 would also be a peachy car to live with: properly muscular, brimming with tech, seriously refined and comfortable. With ultra-rapid charging from the 800V electrical system and plenty of real-world range, it's not hard to see why you would opt for an S6 as your next director-grade company car.
If you're hoping for Porsche Taycan-style handling finesse or Hyundai Ioniq 5 N-style drama, you will be disappointed. But if you can afford an S6, you can afford a Porsche Taycan or an Audi E-tron GT, so the fact that the more practical S6 feels demonstrably different - executive with a dash of sports, rather than sporting with a dash of executive - is no doubt entirely deliberate and a very good thing.
To an enthusiast audience, the S6 is perhaps a bit too calm and undramatic for its own good. As a rapid, lustrous, long-legged electric business express, however, the S6 is probably – just like its A6 siblings – exactly what the target audience will want.
]]>
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why are Sharda Cropchem shares up over 6% today? Explained
Why are Sharda Cropchem shares up over 6% today? Explained

Business Upturn

time2 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Why are Sharda Cropchem shares up over 6% today? Explained

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on July 25, 2025, 13:19 IST Shares of Sharda Cropchem rose sharply by 6.06% to Rs 963.85 in Wednesday's trade after the company reported strong financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The stock gained Rs 55.10 from its previous close of Rs 908.75 and touched an intraday high of Rs 969.70. Sharda Cropchem reported its #Q1Results with a significant rise in net profit to Rs 143 crore, up from Rs 27 crore in the same quarter last year. Revenue also rose 26% year-on-year to Rs 958 crore from Rs 785 crore. The company recorded a forex gain of Rs 73 crore compared to a loss of Rs 8 crore last year, which contributed to the profit boost. EBITDA increased to Rs 216 crore from Rs 77 crore YoY, and the EBITDA margin improved to 21.9% from 9.8%. The strong performance led to renewed investor interest, pushing the company's market capitalization to Rs 8,702 crore, with the stock trading near its 52-week high of Rs 969.70. Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Stock market investments are subject to market risks. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Author or Business Upturn is not liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

The UK's weak economic growth and Brexit: Is the worst over?
The UK's weak economic growth and Brexit: Is the worst over?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The UK's weak economic growth and Brexit: Is the worst over?

Nine years after the vote on Brexit, the latest UK economic indicators send a strong message about an ailing economy that is yet to emerge from the shadows of the 'leave' vote. According to experts, some of the negative impacts of Brexit will endure. GDP has been contracting for two consecutive months, coupled with rising inflation and unemployment, and accompanied by a highly uncertain geopolitical environment and trade wars. UK GDP grew by 0.7% quarter-on-quarter in the first three months of 2025, but monthly data shows that the output contracted 0.1% in May after a 0.3% decline in April. According to S&P Global Ratings, these figures put the economy on course for 0.1% GDP growth in the second quarter, if there is no growth in June. Inflation increased to 3.6% in June — up from 3.4% in May and slightly ahead of expectations. This ties the hands of the Bank of England, which is aiming for a 2% inflation target before it lowers the benchmark rate, currently sitting at 4.25%. These weak datasets indicate that the UK has 'little spare capacity to grow,' Marion Amiot, Chief UK Economist at S&P Global Ratings, told Euronews Business. Some hope that the UK will be able to boost its GDP through exports, supported by trade agreements, including the latest with the US. However, exports alone might not be enough to fix a fundamental problem: the UK is contending with cripplingly low productivity. According to Amiot, productivity woes partially stem from Brexit. 'It has contributed to reducing the UK's labour supply and pulled the brakes on investment on the back of uncertainty in the years following the referendum,' she said. She added that sluggishness in the key financial services sector has also been playing a role: 'Productivity growth in the UK has been particularly weak since the Great Financial Crisis, especially in the financial sector.' UK labour statistics are also signalling a difficult path ahead for the economy. The number of job vacancies has been falling since April 2022. Unemployment in the country has been on the rise since August 2024, and sat at 4.7% in May, the highest level in four years. Related What would a UK-EU thaw mean for financial services? Brexit impact keeps getting worse, economists warn As poor productivity limits wage growth, this is expected to slow inflation. 'Wage growth has slowed, and unemployment has risen again. For the Bank of England, this is a sign of growing slack in the labour market, which is likely to ease inflationary pressures, and means it can cut rates sooner rather than later,' said Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown. Job vacancies have also been falling due to higher costs, partially attributed to the UK government's decision to increase national insurance contributions, a cost that employers pay for every person on the payroll. What Brexit really cost the UK Nine years after the referendum, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) assessed the economic impact of Brexit. Researchers came to the conclusion that — since 2020 — withdrawal from the EU has led to reduced productivity, lowering GDP by 4%, and trade by about 15%, in both goods and services, compared to a 'remain scenario'. Brexit has also had a sizeable impact on shrinking investments. According to John Springford, an associate fellow at the London-based think-tank Centre for European Reform, Brexit has cost the state £40 billion (€46.1bn) since 2019. 'The 2019-2024 parliament raised taxes by around £100 billion, and if we take the OBR's 4% loss of productivity to be the true figure, £40 billion of those tax rises were needed because of EU withdrawal,' he wrote in a recent study. Is the worst over? 'Brexit is going to have a long-term impact on UK growth beyond the initial fallout seen in trade,' said Amiot, adding that 'with a smaller pool of workers and weaker competition leading to lower productivity, the capacity of the UK to grow will remain durably lower'. She clarified: 'That being said, most of the large impacts are likely behind us.' The years following Brexit came with an increased uncertainty for businesses, and left a sizeable impact on investment, which stagnated for five years, before it returned to growth. Investment is now rising again and has surpassed its pre-Brexit referendum levels. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) and business investment both increased to record levels in the first quarter of 2025. Trade with the EU also struggled, but that could have been partially attributed to a range of other factors, including the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the global slowdown of trade in goods. 'Although much of the initial economic disruption has likely faded as firms adjusted, Brexit still appears to be weighing on export levels and GDP,' Andrew Hunter, Associate Director at Moody's Analytics, told Euronews Business. He added that goods exports to the EU are still 16% lower in real terms, compared to the end of 2019 (before the pandemic and before the UK began leaving the EU). 'And goods exports to non-EU countries have actually performed even worse,' Hunter said. He added that the UK has significantly lagged behind other advanced economies in this respect, due to a 'broader hit to the export sector from Brexit-related trade barriers (with many firms choosing to stop exporting altogether due to the added costs and paperwork).' Many hope the recent trade deal with the US will improve the economy by attracting investment into the country. And the US-UK trade deal provides relief for certain industries in particular. While the EU is finalising its potential countermeasures, including a tariff on US aircraft imports, almost certain to attract a retaliation, the UK has secured free trade for its aerospace sector. Yet, experts are sceptical about the overall contribution of the trade deal to the UK economy. S&P Global Ratings estimates 'that US tariffs are going to represent a direct drag on UK GDP of around 0.1 percentage point this year and next,' partly due to weaker global demand. And other trade deals are also unlikely to boost exports too much. 'The UK government's recent 'reset' deal with the EU has eased some trade barriers, particularly for food and agriculture, but further progress is expected to be slow,' said Hunter, adding that he doesn't expect a strong export rebound in light of global trade uncertainty. According to Springford, Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) signed since Brexit have had a very limited impact. 'The macroeconomic benefit of the new FTAs the UK has signed is very small, only offsetting the 4% loss from Brexit by about 0.2%. Even if a full FTA were signed with the US, that would rise to about 0.35%.' Related UK decision to leave EU a 'disaster' costing thousands of jobs - Lord Mayor A clouded UK economic outlook In the short term, the currently ailing economic output has been fuelling expectations that the government will have to make up for the missing tax revenue by hiking tax rates in the second half of the year, further constricting GDP growth. In the long run, experts agree that the UK's growth will be slower than if it had stayed in the EU. This is due to the fact that the structural changes associated with losing access to the EU market have meant that the UK is missing out on workers, investment and trade opportunities. Looking ahead, the primary source of uncertainty and risk remains productivity, according to the Chief UK Economist at S&P Global Ratings. 'While most forecasts anticipate a rebound in productivity that could support stronger growth, the outlook is clouded by uncertainty around the implementation of government growth policies and the pace at which AI technologies will be adopted,' Amiot said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question
Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question

The UK government recently unveiled a £700 million package aimed at jumpstarting the electric vehicle (EV) transition. At the heart of the plan is a £640 million subsidy scheme to help drivers cover the upfront cost of a new electric vehicle, and an additional £63 million to expand EV charging infrastructure. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect The message from Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is clear: electric vehicles must become more accessible to the average motorist. 'There are a lot of people out there who think that EVs are just for the very wealthiest,' she admitted to The Telegraph. And on the surface, she's not wrong. The average price of a new electric car in Britain is just shy of £50,000, more than double the cost of a typical petrol model. But the message beneath the headline is more ambiguous. Is this plan enough to truly democratise the EV market? Or is it just another patchwork attempt to meet the looming 2030 petrol and diesel car ban, without fully reckoning with the underlying economics of the transition? Too steep for the mass market Let's be blunt: for the vast majority of households in Britain, a £50,000 vehicle is simply not in the realm of possibility. Even with a government grant, rumoured to prioritise UK-made EVs like the upcoming Nissan Leaf from Sunderland, the affordability gap remains vast. The previous Conservative government scrapped EV subsidies in 2022, claiming the market had matured. Since then, demand from private buyers has plummeted, with new consumer EV enquiries dropping 65% year-on-year. It's not just the sticker price. EVs face high depreciation rates due to battery degradation, and many consumers remain wary of both their long-term reliability and resale value. Buying an EV is still perceived by many as a financial risk, not a forward-looking investment. This is the crux of the problem: net zero targets depend on mass adoption, but mass adoption depends on affordability. And the market has failed to close that gap on its own. A patch for a broken model? To be fair, the government's new package includes more than just subsidies. Councils will receive £25 million for cross-pavement gullies, allowing people in terraced houses to charge their EVs at home using cheaper electricity rates. A further £63 million will expand public charging infrastructure and improve signage, a necessary step to address so-called 'range anxiety.' Yet infrastructure is not the primary barrier, it's economics. According to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), EVs accounted for about 20% of new car sales in the first half of 2025. But that growth is increasingly driven by fleet and leasing schemes, not individual consumers. Motability One potentially transformative idea comes from Julian Rose of Asset Finance Policy, who argues that the government could build on the existing Motability scheme to create a fairer and more effective solution to the EV affordability crisis. Rose proposes a revised scheme focused on used EVs and hybrids, with eligibility expanded to include not just those with medical conditions, but also households on low incomes. Key to the idea is removing VAT from lease payments, as with the current Motability model, and offering a modest upfront grant — perhaps £1,000 — to reduce monthly payments. Rose also suggests capped interest rates and using the proven administrative frameworks of Clean Air Zone vehicle replacement schemes to prevent abuse. This approach, he argues, would not only 'help struggling families obtain vital mobility at an affordable monthly cost,' but would also 'strengthen the used car EV market,' reducing depreciation risk and encouraging new EV purchases. With used EV prices currently low, Rose sees this as a 'one-off opportunity' to both support families and build resilience into the second-hand EV market—complementing, not competing with, the government's newly announced subsidy programme. Leasing Meanwhile, private leasing continues to offer a critical bridge. UK-based and continental initiatives like Belgium's LIZY have made second-hand EV leasing more accessible, offering fixed monthly costs that are often lower than car loans. These platforms are proving essential for younger, urban drivers and SMEs who need flexibility and lower upfront investment. Such business models show that affordability isn't just about the purchase price, it's about the total cost of use. Leasing could help normalise EVs in the public mind and serve as a bridge to wider ownership, but these solutions are only scalable if backed by supportive policies and a competitive second-hand EV market. Risk of a two-tier transition What the government is offering now is a partial step forward, welcome, but insufficient. A £640 million grant scheme may provide short-term stimulus, especially for British-made models, but it won't fix the structural problems of price, depreciation, and market segmentation. There's a very real risk we're heading toward a two-tier EV transition: one where company fleets and wealthy households lead the charge, while ordinary drivers are left behind. That undermines both climate goals and social equity. If this revolution is truly meant for everyone, then it can't be designed around those who can already afford to participate. The electric future must be one the average person can actually buy into — literally. So yes, £700 million is a big number. But unless it translates into genuine affordability for the mass market, it won't be nearly enough. "Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store