Trump wants more drones and missiles, fewer F-35s in US$893bil budget
In the 2026 budget, US President Donald Trump requested fewer F-35 jets made by Lockheed Martin and only three warships. (AP pic)
WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump wants a pay raise for troops, more high-tech missiles and drones in next year's defence budget, while cutting Navy jobs, and buying fewer ships and fighter jets to save money, according to budget materials posted yesterday.
At US$892.6 billion, the defence and national security budget request is flat compared with this year.
The budget, which also includes nuclear weapons-related activities carried out by the department of energy and increases funding for homeland security, puts Trump's mark on the military by pulling funds away from weaponry and services to fund his priorities.
The White House said the funding will be used to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific, and revitalise the defence industrial base.
Most of the funding for Trump's marquee Golden Dome missile defence shield was included in a separate budget request and is not part of the latest proposal sent to Congress.
In the 2026 budget, Trump requested fewer F-35 jets made by Lockheed Martin and only three warships.
'Procurement of a Virginia-class made by General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries and 15 other ships are expected to be included in a separate appropriation bill,' the Navy said.
The budget asks for a 3.8% pay raise for troops, but also trims costs by retiring older weaponry including ships and planes that are more expensive to operate.
Under the plan, the Navy will reduce its civilian employee workforce by 7,286 people.
Compared to Biden's budget from his last year in office, which had asked for 68 F-35 jets in fiscal 2025, Trump's fiscal 2026 request seeks only 47 of the fighter jets.
The budget has already sparked debate on Capitol Hill where the House Appropriations Committee's defence subcommittee's draft bill for fiscal-year 2026 boosts the F-35 buy to 69, one more than Biden's 2025 request.
The Pentagon continues prioritising purchasing munitions and key weapons systems.
The Air Force is continuing its investment the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile – Extended Range and Long Range Anti-Ship missile which have longer ranges and can be more effective in the Pacific.
On the other hand, the budget seeks far fewer Precision Strike Missile, which will replace the Army Tactical Missile (ATACM) used in Ukraine.
Lockheed Martin makes all three missiles.
The budget also boosts spending on small drones – in part because of lessons learned in Ukraine where unmanned aircraft have proven to be an integral part of low-cost, yet highly effective warfighting.
The detailed request comes as Republicans debate defence spending priorities in their sweeping US$150 billion defence package contained in the pending 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act'.
The act has already been passed the House of Representatives and will give an initial US$25 billion boost to Trump's controversial Golden Dome missile defence shield.
Defence spending usually accounts for about half of the US discretionary budget; the rest goes to transportation, education, diplomacy and other departments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
US Senate approves Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
MOSCOW: The US Senate has approved President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" by a majority vote, reported Sputnik/RIA Novosti citing a NBC News report. The lower house of the US Congress in May passed a bill promoted by Trump that cuts federal spending but simultaneously provides significant tax breaks. As a result, according to the Congressional Budget Office, both the budget deficit and the national debt will grow. It is noted that 51 people voted for the bill, 49 voted against it. The day before, US billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk criticised the latest version of the bill on cutting government spending, saying that the document could destroy millions of jobs in the United States.
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Meta raids OpenAI again, adds four more AI researchers
SAN FRANCISCO, June 29 — Meta Platforms is hiring four more OpenAI artificial intelligence researchers, The Information reported yesterday. The researchers, Shengjia Zhao, Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi and Hongyu Ren, have each agreed to join, the report said, citing a person familiar with their hiring. Earlier this week, the Instagram parent hired Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov and Xiaohua Zhai, who were all working in OpenAI's Zurich office, the Wall Street Journal reported. Meta and ChatGPT maker OpenAI did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The company has recently been pushing to hire more researchers from OpenAI to join chief executive Mark Zuckerberg's superintelligence efforts. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. — Reuters
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
US Senate opens debate on Trump's controversial spending bill
WASHINGTON: US senators on Saturday began debating Donald Trump's "big beautiful" spending bill, a hugely divisive proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. Trump is hoping to seal his legacy with the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which would extend his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of US$4.5 trillion and beef up border security. But Republicans eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over the package, which would strip health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than US$3 trillion to the country's debt. The Senate formally opened debate on the bill late Saturday, after Republican holdouts delayed what should have been a procedural vote – drawing Trump's ire on social media. Senators narrowly passed the motion to begin debate, 51-49, hours after the vote was first called, with Vice President JD Vance joining negotiations with holdouts from his own party. Ultimately, two Republican senators joined 47 Democrats in voting "nay" on opening debate. Trump has pushed his party to get the bill passed and on his desk for him to sign into law by July 4, the United States' independence day. Democrats are bitterly opposed to the legislation and Trump's agenda, and have vowed to hold up the debate. They began by insisting that the entirety of the bill be read aloud to the chamber before the debate commences. The bill is roughly 1,000 pages long and will take an estimated 15 hours to read. "Republicans won't tell America what's in the bill," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. "So Democrats are forcing it to be read start to finish on the floor. We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it." If passed in the Senate, the bill would go back to the House for approval, where Republicans can only afford to lose a handful of votes – and are facing stiff opposition from within their own ranks. Republicans are scrambling to offset the US$4.5 trillion cost of Trump's tax relief, with many of the proposed cuts to come from decimating funding for Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans. Republicans are split on the Medicaid cuts, which will threaten scores of rural hospitals and lead to an estimated 8.6 million Americans being deprived of health care. The spending plan would also roll back many of the tax incentives for renewable energy that were put in place under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. On Saturday, key Trump ally Elon Musk – with whom the president had a public falling out this month over his criticism of the bill – called the current proposal "utterly insane and destructive." "It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future," said Musk, who is the world's richest person, and owns electric vehicle company Tesla and space flight firm SpaceX, among others. Independent analysis also shows that the bill would pave the way for a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest 10 per cent of Americans to the richest. The bill is unpopular across multiple demographic, age and income groups, according to extensive recent polling. Although the House has already passed its own version, both chambers have to agree on the same text before it can be signed into law.
