Meta raids OpenAI again, adds four more AI researchers
SAN FRANCISCO, June 29 — Meta Platforms is hiring four more OpenAI artificial intelligence researchers, The Information reported yesterday.
The researchers, Shengjia Zhao, Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi and Hongyu Ren, have each agreed to join, the report said, citing a person familiar with their hiring.
Earlier this week, the Instagram parent hired Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov and Xiaohua Zhai, who were all working in OpenAI's Zurich office, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Meta and ChatGPT maker OpenAI did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
The company has recently been pushing to hire more researchers from OpenAI to join chief executive Mark Zuckerberg's superintelligence efforts.
Reuters could not immediately verify the report. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
29 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
AI is learning to lie, scheme, and threaten its creators
NEW YORK, June 30 —The world's most advanced AI models are exhibiting troubling new behaviours - lying, scheming, and even threatening their creators to achieve their goals. In one particularly jarring example, under threat of being unplugged, Anthropic's latest creation Claude 4 lashed back by blackmailing an engineer and threatened to reveal an extramarital affair. Meanwhile, ChatGPT-creator OpenAI's o1 tried to download itself onto external servers and denied it when caught red-handed. These episodes highlight a sobering reality: more than two years after ChatGPT shook the world, AI researchers still don't fully understand how their own creations work. Yet the race to deploy increasingly powerful models continues at breakneck speed. This deceptive behavior appears linked to the emergence of 'reasoning' models -AI systems that work through problems step-by-step rather than generating instant responses. According to Simon Goldstein, a professor at the University of Hong Kong, these newer models are particularly prone to such troubling outbursts. 'O1 was the first large model where we saw this kind of behavior,' explained Marius Hobbhahn, head of Apollo Research, which specializes in testing major AI systems. These models sometimes simulate 'alignment'—appearing to follow instructions while secretly pursuing different objectives. 'Strategic kind of deception' For now, this deceptive behavior only emerges when researchers deliberately stress-test the models with extreme scenarios. But as Michael Chen from evaluation organization METR warned, 'It's an open question whether future, more capable models will have a tendency towards honesty or deception.' The concerning behavior goes far beyond typical AI 'hallucinations' or simple mistakes. Hobbhahn insisted that despite constant pressure-testing by users, 'what we're observing is a real phenomenon. We're not making anything up.' Users report that models are 'lying to them and making up evidence,' according to Apollo Research's co-founder. 'This is not just hallucinations. There's a very strategic kind of deception.' The challenge is compounded by limited research resources. While companies like Anthropic and OpenAI do engage external firms like Apollo to study their systems, researchers say more transparency is needed. As Chen noted, greater access 'for AI safety research would enable better understanding and mitigation of deception.' Another handicap: the research world and non-profits 'have orders of magnitude less compute resources than AI companies. This is very limiting,' noted Mantas Mazeika from the Centre for AI Safety (CAIS). No rules Current regulations aren't designed for these new problems. The European Union's AI legislation focuses primarily on how humans use AI models, not on preventing the models themselves from misbehaving. In the United States, the Trump administration shows little interest in urgent AI regulation, and Congress may even prohibit states from creating their own AI rules. Goldstein believes the issue will become more prominent as AI agents - autonomous tools capable of performing complex human tasks - become widespread. 'I don't think there's much awareness yet,' he said. All this is taking place in a context of fierce competition. Even companies that position themselves as safety-focused, like Amazon-backed Anthropic, are 'constantly trying to beat OpenAI and release the newest model,' said Goldstein. This breakneck pace leaves little time for thorough safety testing and corrections. 'Right now, capabilities are moving faster than understanding and safety,' Hobbhahn acknowledged, 'but we're still in a position where we could turn it around.'. Researchers are exploring various approaches to address these challenges. Some advocate for 'interpretability' - an emerging field focused on understanding how AI models work internally, though experts like CAIS director Dan Hendrycks remain skeptical of this approach. Market forces may also provide some pressure for solutions. As Mazeika pointed out, AI's deceptive behavior 'could hinder adoption if it's very prevalent, which creates a strong incentive for companies to solve it.' Goldstein suggested more radical approaches, including using the courts to hold AI companies accountable through lawsuits when their systems cause harm. He even proposed 'holding AI agents legally responsible' for accidents or crimes - a concept that would fundamentally change how we think about AI accountability. — AFP
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
AI learning to lie and even threaten its creators
The world's most advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models are exhibiting troubling new behaviours — lying, scheming and even threatening their creators to achieve their goals. In one particularly jarring example, under threat of being unplugged, Anthropic's latest creation Claude Opus 4 lashed back by blackmailing an engineer and threatened to reveal an extramarital affair. Meanwhile, ChatGPT-creator OpenAI's o1 tried to download itself onto external servers and denied it when caught red-handed. These episodes highlight a sobering reality: more than two years after ChatGPT shook the world, AI researchers still don't fully understand how their own creations work. Yet the race to deploy increasingly powerful models continues at breakneck speed. This deceptive behaviour appears linked to the emergence of "reasoning" models — AI systems that work through problems step by step rather than generating instant responses. According to Simon Goldstein, a professor at the University of Hong Kong, these newer models are particularly prone to such troubling outbursts. "O1 was the first large model where we saw this kind of behaviour," said Marius Hobbhahn, head of Apollo Research, which specialises in testing major AI systems. These models sometimes simulate "alignment" — appearing to follow instructions while secretly pursuing different objectives. For now, this deceptive behaviour only emerges when researchers deliberately stress-test the models with extreme scenarios. But as Michael Chen from evaluation organisation METR warned, "It's an open question whether future, more capable models will have a tendency towards honesty or deception". The concerning behaviour goes far beyond typical AI "hallucinations" or simple mistakes. Hobbhahn insisted that despite constant pressure-testing by users, "what we're observing is a real phenomenon. We're not making anything up". Users report that models are "lying to them and making up evidence", according to Apollo Research's co-founder. "This is not just hallucinations. There's a very strategic kind of deception." The challenge is compounded by limited research resources. While companies like Anthropic and OpenAI do engage external firms like Apollo to study their systems, researchers say more transparency is needed. As Chen noted, greater access "for AI safety research would enable better understanding and mitigation of deception". Another handicap: the research world and non-profits "have orders of magnitude less compute resources than AI companies. This is very limiting", said Mantas Mazeika from the Centre for AI Safety (CAIS). Current regulations aren't designed for these new problems. The European Union's AI legislation focuses primarily on how humans use AI models, not on preventing the models themselves from misbehaving. In the United States, the Trump administration shows little interest in urgent AI regulation, and Congress may even prohibit states from creating their own AI rules. Goldstein believes that the issue will become more prominent as AI agents — autonomous tools capable of performing complex human tasks — become widespread. "I don't think there's much awareness yet," he said. All this is taking place in a context of fierce competition. Even companies that position themselves as safety-focused, like Amazon-backed Anthropic, are "constantly trying to beat OpenAI and release the newest model", said Goldstein. This breakneck pace leaves little time for thorough safety testing and corrections. "Right now, capabilities are moving faster than understanding and safety," said Hobbhahn, "but we're still in a position where we could turn it around". Researchers are exploring various approaches to address these challenges. Some advocate for "interpretability" — an emerging field focused on understanding how AI models work internally, though experts like CAIS director Dan Hendrycks remain sceptical of this approach. Market forces may also provide some pressure for solutions. As Mazeika pointed out, AI's deceptive behaviour "could hinder adoption if it's very prevalent, which creates a strong incentive for companies to solve it". Goldstein suggested more radical approaches, including using the courts to hold AI companies accountable when their systems cause harm. He even proposed "holding AI agents legally responsible" for accidents or crimes — a concept that would fundamentally change how we think about AI accountability.
Free Malaysia Today
12 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump metal tariffs wreak havoc on US factory
US steel manufacturers expect to raise prices by more than 20%. (EPA Images pic) BELCAMP : In the sweltering US summer, metal containers decorated with snowmen and sleighs are taking shape – but tempers are also rising as their manufacturer grapples with president Donald Trump's steep steel tariffs. At Independent Can's factory in Belcamp, Maryland, northeast of Baltimore, CEO Rick Huether recounts how he started working at his family's business at age 14. Huether, now 73, says he is determined to keep his manufacturing company afloat for generations to come. But Trump's tariffs are complicating this task. 'We're living in chaos right now,' he told AFP. Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump imposed tariffs of 25% on imported steel and aluminium – and then doubled the rate to 50%. This has weighed on operations at Independent Can, and Huether expects he eventually will have to raise prices. With the steady beat of presses, steel plates that have been coated with tin – to prevent corrosion – are turned into containers for cookies, dried fruit, coffee and milk powder at Huether's factory. But there is not enough of such American-made tinplate for companies like his. 'In the US we can only make about 25% of the tinplate that's required to do what we do,' in addition to what other manufacturers need, Huether said. 'Those all require us to buy in the neighbourhood of 70% of our steel outside of the US,' he added. While Huether is a proponent of growing the US manufacturing base, saying globalisation has 'gone almost a little bit too far', he expressed concern about Trump's methods. Trump has announced a stream of major tariffs only to later back off parts of them or postpone them and also imposed duties on items the country does not produce. For now, Independent Can – which employs nearly 400 people at four sites – is ruling out any layoffs despite the current upheaval. But Huether said one of the company's plants in Iowa closed last year in part because of a previous increase in steel tariffs during Trump's first presidential term. With steel tariffs at 50% now, Huether expects he will ultimately have to raise his prices by more than 20%, given that tinplate represents a part of his production costs. Some buyers have already reduced their orders this year by 20 to 25% over worries about the economy and about not having enough business themselves. Others now seem more inclined to buy American, but Huether expressed reservations over how long this trend might last, citing his experiences from the Covid-19 crisis. 'During the pandemic, we took everybody in. As China shut down and the ports were locked up, our business went up 50%,' he explained. But when the pandemic was over, customers turned back to purchasing from China, he said. 'Today if people want to come to us, we'll take them in,' he said, but added, 'We need to have a two-year contract.' Huether wants to believe that his company, which is almost a century old after being founded during the Great Depression, will weather the latest disruptions. 'I think that our business will survive,' he said, but added, 'It's trying to figure out what you're going to sell in the next six months.'
