
Dollar eyes first monthly gain for the year as Fed in no hurry to ease rates
The greenback was also on track for its first monthly gain for the year, bolstered by a hawkish Fed and U.S. economic resilience, with uncertainty over tariffs beginning to ease given recent trade deals struck by Washington.
Against a basket of currencies, the dollar was last steady at 99.77, not far from a two-month peak of 99.987 it hit in the previous session. The dollar index was set for a monthly gain of more than 3%.
U.S. President Donald Trump's chaotic tariffs and fears of the dollar's demise earlier this year had undermined the currency and given it the worst start to the year since the floating exchange rate period. Those worries have since abated, giving the dollar new life.
The latest push higher for the currency came on the back of the Fed's policy decision on Wednesday, after Powell reiterated it was still premature to ease rates.
"We've seen the classic correlation still holding, in the sense that we've seen a hawkish Fed push up front-end yields and the U.S. dollar, equities have struggled, and the credibility of the Fed has also been probably reinforced by the view that the Fed chair is still in command," said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank.
"The dollar is not just consolidating, but it's actually getting a little bit of upward momentum...The broader picture as well is that all these tariffs, there's at least an initial impression that the U.S. is the one that's got the upper hand."
The euro was last 0.25% higher at $1.1433, having slid to a seven-week low in the previous session. It was on track to lose 3% for the month.
Sterling languished near a 2-1/2-month low and last bought at $1.3248. It was similarly headed for a 3.5% monthly decline.
Traders have scaled back expectations for Fed cuts this year following Powell's comments, now pricing in about 35 basis points of easing by December.
Markets have also been faced with a blitz of tariff announcements ahead of an August 1 deadline for countries to secure trade deals or face steep levies.
South Korea became one of the latest nations to reach an agreement with the U.S., after Trump on Wednesday said Washington will charge a 15% tariff on imports from the key Asian ally.
The South Korean won strengthened on the news, rising 0.3% to 1,389.20 per dollar.
Trump on Wednesday also slapped a 50% tariff on most Brazilian goods and said the United States is still negotiating with India on trade.
BOJ Meet
Key for investors in Asia on Thursday will be the Bank of Japan's policy decision, where expectations are for the central bank to stand pat on rates.
Focus will be on whether Governor Kazuo Ueda offers any hints of another rate hike this year, as the BOJ weighs lingering tariff-induced risks to growth and mounting inflationary pressure from higher food costs.
The yen wobbled near a four-month low at 149.29 ahead of the decision, headed for a monthly loss of 3.5%.
"In the near term, the balance of risk is gradually shifting toward a more hawkish path - especially if inflation expectations begin to firm or household demand improves meaningfully," said Howe Chung Wan, head of Asian fixed income at Principal Asset Management.
"But for now, the central bank's stance remains one of seeking more flexibility, prioritizing stability over any premature tightening."
In other currencies, the Australian dollar edged up 0.13% to $0.6443 after sliding more than 1% on Wednesday. It was headed for a monthly drop of 2%.
The New Zealand dollar rose 0.2% to $0.5906, having also lost more than 1% overnight. It was set to lose roughly 3% for the month.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proto Labs Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Beats Expectations
Proto Labs (NYSE:PRLB) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$135.1m (up 7.5% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$4.43m (down 2.5% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 3.3% (down from 3.6% in 2Q 2024). EPS: US$0.18. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Proto Labs Revenues and Earnings Beat Expectations Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 5.5%. Earnings per share (EPS) also surpassed analyst estimates by 5.9%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 4.8% p.a. on average during the next 2 years, compared to a 4.3% growth forecast for the Machinery industry in the US. Performance of the American Machinery industry. The company's shares are up 10% from a week ago. Risk Analysis We should say that we've discovered 2 warning signs for Proto Labs that you should be aware of before investing here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.


The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
‘Wanna-be king': Democrats fume at Trump move to oust BLS head
Criticism is mounting after President Trump moved to oust the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Friday following a dismal jobs report. Trump accused BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer, an appointee of former President Biden, of skewing job numbers in the latest report, which showed the U.S. adding only 73,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate increasing slightly. Revisions in the report also showed that the U.S. added 258,000 fewer jobs in May and June than the Labor Department first reported, according to BLS data. 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' he wrote on Truth Social. Later, he called for McEntarfer's ouster, which sparked some backlash on Capitol Hill. 'Instead of helping people get good jobs, Donald Trump just fired the statistician who reported bad jobs data that the wanna-be king doesn't like,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) posted on social platform X. The gloomy jobs report raised serious questions about the strength of the U.S. economy, especially in light of Trump's sweeping tariffs, which have caused anxieties in the global market. Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) called the president's response 'deeply irresponsible.' 'Firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because they accurately report on your struggling economy isn't just corrupt, it's deeply irresponsible,' she wrote online. 'Undermining our economic data is only going to create further chaos and uncertainty for our businesses big and small.' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) also turned the tables back on Trump in a semi-mocking post on X. 'BREAKING: I did some research into Trump's Deep State and found this photo of the real government employee responsible for the job loss numbers,' Schumer wrote Friday, sharing a photo of the president himself. 'Trump must fire him immediately.' Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) reacted with an equally biting post, offering her version of the timeline. She wrote on X, 'Step one: Trump tanks the economy. Step two: Data shows that Trump is tanking the economy. Step three: Trump fires the person who puts out economic data so that in the future, no one will know he's still tanking the economy.' Sen. Tammy Baldwin also weighed in, writing on social media that 'Donald Trump has thrown our economy into chaos and is firing the messenger for telling us.' Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) also took a swing at the president for his reaction, calling it 'one more step toward authoritarianism.' 'Truth being replaced by propaganda. This is what the Soviets did. This is a big deal, and we need to act like it,' Murphy wrote on X, alongside a video message. 'Time for a fight.' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) pressed her GOP colleagues to denounce Trump's firing of the top statistician. 'It is seriously dangerous territory when Trump fires anyone who doesn't cook the books for him. The entire economy hinges on the accurate, nonpartisan data we get from the Bureau of Labor Statistics,' she wrote online. 'Republicans need to join us in fighting to protect the integrity of BLS.' Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who is retiring at the end of his term, placed blame for the dismal report on Trump's trade agenda. The comment came as the latest iteration of 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of countries was set to go into effect Friday. 'President Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because he didn't like that the jobs report was weak—a direct result of his chaotic trade wars,' he wrote. 'Utterly reckless, and a chilling reminder of his autocratic tendencies.' Despite the criticism, Trump's allies have largely stood behind his decision to sack McEntarfer, who has served in the post since 2023. The president also accused the BLS chief of fabricating jobs numbers ahead of the 2024 presidential election to 'boost' former Vice President Harris's chances of winning. A BLS spokesperson, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed to The Hill that McEntarfer was let go. Deputy commissioner William Wiatrowski is set to serve as acting head until the administration finds a replacement.


The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
There's a better approach for Trump to change Putin's calculus
On Monday, President Trump set a new 10 to 12-day ultimatum for President Vladimir Putin to enter peace talks over Ukraine or face a new tariff regime intended to halt global sales of Russian energy products. Trump is promising a 100 percent 'secondary tariff' on any country that imports Russian energy products, targeting India, China, Turkey and others. He's right to recognize that pressuring the Kremlin's main cash cow is a way to grab Putin's attention, but his approach is counterproductive and incomplete. There are two ways to change Putin's plans in Ukraine. The first is to stop Russia's ability to wage its war of choice by constraining its finances. Oil and gas sales account for about a quarter of the Kremlin's budget. The G7, including the U.S., has taken steps since the onset of the war to lower Russia's energy revenues. Last month, the Kremlin's tax proceeds from energy sales were at their lowest since January 2023; however, the Russian government still pocketed about $6 billion. This shows the tradeoff in the G7's initial goal — dent Russian revenues without fully blocking the sale of Russian oil. The G7 has attempted this balancing act because Russian oil exports still make up 7 percent of global oil supply and a full shut-in would roil energy markets across the world. Trump's new plan proposes to do exactly that. To stave off the threat of U.S. tariffs, importing countries may stop accepting Russian oil. Without Russia's 7 million barrels per day of oil exports on the market, global crude oil prices could shoot up almost 25 percent, even assuming other suppliers like OPEC have the capacity and desire to pick up half the slack. Prices at the pump in America would then climb just as tariff-induced inflation hits the economy at a time when nearly two-thirds of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation. The other scenario, in which some importers defy Trump's threat, is not much better. The imposed secondary tariffs would further ignite inflation in America, especially if they target Chinese imports. Another ratcheting up of tariffs timed simultaneously with increases we saw in bilateral tariffs yesterday could destabilize Wall Street's equity markets again, all while quickening price increases on Main Street. Putin understands these dynamics; that's why the secondary tariff threat won't bring him to the table. It's true that blocking the sales of Russian oil would be a massive hit to the Kremlin, but he sees this as an empty threat because the plan is costly not just to Russia but to the whole world and, in particular, America. Instead, Trump can implement a different tariff to attack Russia's revenues without causing collateral chaos. With existing authorities, the Trump administration can impose sanctions on any company or individual in the world involved in a Russian oil and gas sale. Wanting to maintain access to America's financial system, most will seek to avoid sanctions. The U.S. could permit transactions if Russia pays a shipment fee on each sale — a Russian universal tariff — to the Treasury Department. From there, the U.S. could ratchet this tariff up month by month if Putin drags his feet on negotiating. Financially squeezed over time, Putin will feel increasingly boxed in. The second way to change Putin's calculus is by fortifying Ukraine financially and militarily. Right now, the Kremlin sees global support for Ukraine waning, with citizens in America and Europe fatigued of funding a foreign war. But we don't need to rely on our own taxpayers to back the Ukrainian people. Instead, the U.S. and G7 should seize the $300 billion worth of Russian sovereign assets already frozen in our countries and commit them to supporting Ukraine's defense and reconstruction. Doing so will foil one of Putin's main strategies. Despite a standstill on the battlefield, he thinks he can bring Ukraine to its knees by destroying its economy. That will prove much harder if Ukraine can access Russia's frozen assets. In addition to financial support, Trump and Congress should commit to providing Ukraine with the military resources it needs to continue defending itself. After the 2024 election, Putin thinks he can wait out Ukraine's limited arsenal. Trump needs to flip the script and make clear that a war of attrition is not winnable for Russia. His decision to unpause previously approved military assistance was a good first step. But to force a rethink from Russia, Trump must go further. Committing to arming Ukraine with the weapons made by American workers and companies until Russia agrees to and upholds a ceasefire will do just that. After years of prolonged conflict and unnecessary death, there is a clear need to force Putin's hand. President Trump's instinct is right, but his approach is wrong. To get Russia off the battlefield and to the table, he must delineate a plan that makes negotiating Putin's best option, and that is one that hinders the Russian war machine, helps Ukraine and garners support from Americans and our allies.