'I don't want to live on benefits, I want to work'
Teenager Kailee Kember-Brown, a wheelchair user, says she has so far applied for more than 40 jobs without success.
Kailee, from Dover, in Kent, is currently entitled to a top-up to her Universal Credit income because of her disability.
It means the 19-year-old is not required to look for a job, but she wants one to avoid having to stay at home getting bored. Most of her friends are also in work.
And her financial situation could soon be changing too, under government plans to cut the Universal Credit health top-up for under-22s with long-term illnesses or disabilities, currently worth £423-a-month to people like Kailee, as part of their wide-ranging welfare reform proposals.
A government consultation on the proposed cut to the top-up for under-22s is due to end on Monday.
The wider reforms, many of which are set out in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, have prompted a rebellion from over 120 Labour MPs, who have signed an amendment calling for the proposals to be scrapped.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday that he planned to press ahead with the plans despite the criticism, adding that his party was "pretty united" on the need for reform.
Overall, the government says it will save £5bn a year by 2030 through the cuts to disability and sickness-related benefits payments.
Ministers also say they want the changes to help those who are "trapped" in the benefits system to find work.
But Kailee, whose functional neurological disorder means she feels physically weak and struggles to walk, says she has only heard back from a quarter of the job applications she has sent out.
Her disability means she requires certain adjustments from employers, such as accessible facilities and flexible hours to allow her to attend physiotherapy and doctor's appointments.
A lot of the jobs she has applied for are with companies listed in the government's Disability Confident scheme, which encourages employers to hire and retain disabled staff, and Kailee says it's particularly "disheartening" when she fails to hear back from them.
"When you apply for it and you're like, 'Oh my God, I tick all the boxes,' and then they never get back to you or even look at your CV, it's kind of like, well, what am I meant to do now?"
Jane Hatton, who runs a jobs platform for disabled job seekers and only employs disabled staff, says many employers harbour misconceptions that disabled employees won't have the necessary skills for the job or might take more sick days than their non-disabled colleagues.
"As an employer, if you interview two candidates of equal value in every other respect - one of them is non-disabled and one might need adjustments - [you might be] tempted to go with a non-disabled person," she says
But those stereotypes are not borne out of reality, she says, adding that prospective employers should support all their candidates with whatever adjustments they may need.
"The barriers that people face tend to be inaccessible recruitment processes," she says.
"What we say to employers is that it's about making adjustments so that people can flourish."
She also says government schemes like Access to Work (AtW) have not been working effectively enough to get jobs for the disabled people it's designed to support.
Ministers have previously acknowledged the problems with AtW and say they will look at how it can be updated.
It's one of a long list of issues the government hopes to fix in order to get more disabled people into work, while reducing the benefits bill.
Disability Minister Sir Stephen Timms told the BBC he acknowledged that the jobs market was tough for disabled people, adding that the government was "making the changes that are needed to welcome disabled people into employment".
One of the biggest concerns for disabled people and campaigners among the government's welfare reforms is the plan to change the eligibility criteria for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip).
The benefit is designed to pay for the additional living costs many disabled people face, from travel and transport to home adaptations and care.
The proposed changes to Pip is one of the reasons given by many of the Labour backbenchers who have decided to oppose the government's legislation.
But Timms said Pip does need reform, adding that the rising cost of delivering the benefit has been "unsustainable", and that if the government "didn't act then it would end in tears".
"I want to make sure that Pip is going to be there in full, uprated properly every year, for those with severe impairments who are very dependent on it," he said.
What are the Pip and universal credit changes and who is affected?
PM defends leadership amid growing welfare rebellion
MP who backed out of welfare rebellion apologises
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
What to Know About Bob Vylan, the Band at the Center of a Scandal
Before this weekend, Bob Vylan was a rising punk band with about 273,000 monthly listeners on Spotify — hardly a household name. Now, after leading chants of 'Death, death to the I.D.F.' in reference to Israel's army at the Glastonbury festival in England, it has become punk rock's latest notorious act. On Monday, British police opened a criminal investigation into the chant, shortly after Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Jewish groups condemned it as hate speech. In the United States, the deputy secretary of state, Christopher Landau, said that the State Department had revoked visas for Bob Vylan's members, meaning the band can no longer play a planned U.S. tour. Despite all the attention now focused on the group, many people had never heard of it before. Here's what you need to know. Who is in Bob Vylan and what's its music like? A British punk-rap duo known for fast-paced, politically provocative songs, the group uses pseudonyms and deliberately obfuscates other biographical details. The singer goes by Bobby Vylan and the dummer by Bobbie Vylan Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bank of England's Bailey defends bond programme after Reform UK criticism
By William Schomberg LONDON (Reuters) -Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey defended the central bank's programme of government bond purchases and sales which has come under fire from some politicians for its cost. In a letter to Richard Tice, deputy leader of the Reform UK party which is led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage, Bailey said claims that the programme was more expensive than those run by other central banks did not tell the full story. Britain's government issued more long-term debt than other countries at a time when the BoE's bond-buying - or quantitative easing - was keeping borrowing costs low, giving the country a longer-lasting benefit, Bailey said. "Put simply, the cash flow cost of QE/QT is not therefore what it seems, and the outcome in these terms will be better," he said in the letter published on Monday. Reform - which is leading Britain's more established political parties in opinion polls - has said the government could save as much as 40 billion pounds ($53.6 billion) a year by stopping payment of interest to banks on reserves held at the BoE. Most of those reserves were created as a byproduct of the central bank's bond purchases which began in 2009 and reached a peak of almost 900 billion pounds in holdings in 2021. Since then, the BoE has sold much of its bond portfolio - known as quantitative tightening - and the programme is due to incur losses for the public finances because of a rise in interest rates and a subsequent fall in the value of the bonds. In his letter, Bailey said the bond purchases shielded Britain's economy from a string of economic shocks over the past 16 years. "It is easy to forget the severe problems we faced with these shocks," he said. "Although the counterfactual is unknowable with any precision, most estimates indicate that QE provided very significant support to the UK economy, protecting both jobs and tax revenues." Bailey said that ceasing paying interest on reserves was tantamount to increasing taxes on banks and would lead to lower interest payments for savers or higher interest rates for borrowers. He also disputed Reform's view that British banks were making excess profits. "Interest paid on reserves is not free money for the banks, not least as most of it is paid on to customers in the form of interest on their deposits," Bailey said. (Writing by William Schomberg; editing by David Milliken) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AstraZeneca CEO considers moving company listing to US, the Times reports
(Reuters) -AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot is considering moving the company's stock market listing to the U.S., the Times reported on Tuesday, citing multiple sources. Soriot has privately expressed a preference to shift the FTSE 100 company's listing on multiple occasions and has also discussed relocating AstraZeneca's domicile, the report said. The company declined to comment on the report. The UK pharmaceutical giant already has American depositary receipts trading in the U.S. Soriot could face opposition from some board members and the British government if he pursues the move, according to the report, adding that the government has not been informed. London-listed shares in AstraZeneca were up 2.7% at 10,400 pence at 1504 GMT. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data