After Ukraine, this European country is at risk of facing Putin's wrath, ex-CIA chief reveals
He believes Russia wants to remove Ukraine's President Zelensky and put a puppet leader who listens to Moscow. Once Ukraine is controlled, Russia will look at other countries next, especially the Baltic states like Lithuania. Lithuania has been mentioned a lot in Putin's speeches, which should have been taken more seriously, according to the Mail Online report.
Petraeus criticized the US for being too slow in sending weapons to Ukraine. He gave examples like delays in sending M1 Abrams tanks, F-16 jets, and rocket systems. He said these slow decisions hurt Ukraine's chances to stop Russia early. Petraeus said the US should have helped Ukraine more and faster so Russia would understand it can't win at an 'acceptable cost', as per reports.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất
IC Markets
Đăng ký
He also said the UK should allow the use of cluster bombs, which are banned in many places, because they can help defend better. Petraeus led US, UK, and other soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, and later became the CIA chief, as stated in the reports.
Petraeus also blamed Trump for being too soft on Putin many times. He also criticized Biden for not sending enough weapons to Ukraine in time. While Europe is doing NATO military drills and building stronger ties to stop Russia, the US seems confused and changing its position.
Live Events
Trump's advisor Keith Kellogg said it's 'fair' for Russia to worry about NATO expanding into Ukraine. Kellogg also said the US doesn't support Ukraine joining NATO right now, and other countries also feel the same. He added that Russia is also worried about Georgia and Moldova joining NATO. But Kellogg said Trump is still angry at Putin for attacking Ukrainian cities and called him unreasonable, as per ABC News report.
Kellogg said the total number of people killed or injured in the Ukraine war is around 1.2 million. He said nearly 1 million Russians are either dead or can't fight anymore, including 500,000 killed or too injured to return to war. Petraeus said Russia is not interested in peace yet and wants to grab more land before making any deal.
Even though Ukraine offered a 30-day ceasefire many times, Russia said no and wants its own demands met first. Trump has changed his attitude a bit now and called Putin's actions 'absolutely crazy', but still hasn't done enough to push Putin into peace talks, as per Mail Online report.
FAQs
Q1. Which country would Russia attack after Ukraine?
Experts say Lithuania might be next if Russia wins in Ukraine.
Q2. Why is the U.S. being criticized in this situation?
For being slow to send weapons and help to Ukraine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Who is Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian war hawk who got under Trump's skin?
Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has become embroiled in a tense back-and-forth on social media that prompted U.S. President Donald Trump to announce he had ordered the re-positioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines. Who is Medvedev, what is his track record and how influential is he? Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Design Thinking Others Product Management Project Management Healthcare Data Science Management CXO MBA Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Public Policy Leadership healthcare Technology Digital Marketing Degree PGDM Data Science Operations Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details PRESIDENT WHO BRIEFLY RAISED HOPES IN THE WEST by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo Medvedev was elected Russian president in 2008 when Vladimir Putin, having served two terms, was barred from standing again under the law in force at that time. Medvedev ran the Kremlin for four years, with Putin as his prime minister but widely assumed by analysts in Russia and the West to be still calling the shots, before the two swapped places after the 2012 election - a political manoeuvre that provoked opposition protests. Medvedev, the son of two university professors, had studied law and worked for a time in the private sector. Short in height and quietly spoken, he was described by contemporaries as cultured and intelligent. Live Events As president, he was seen initially in the West as a potential moderniser and reformer, prepared to work to thaw relations with the United States. In 2009 he signed the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty with President Barack Obama. But Medvedev's presidency also saw Russia fight a brief war with its neighbour Georgia in 2008, and he failed to achieve his stated goals of tackling pervasive corruption, improving the rule of law in Russia, strengthening the role of civil society and rebalancing the economy to reduce its over-reliance on oil and gas production. AFTER THE KREMLIN Medvedev served as Putin's prime minister for eight years in a period in which tensions with the West escalated anew, particularly over Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine. But his political fortunes took a dive when he was removed in January 2020 and replaced by Mikhail Mishustin, who has held the post ever since. Medvedev was shunted into a new role as deputy chairman of the Security Council, a powerful body that includes the heads of Russia's intelligence services. WAR CHEERLEADER After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Medvedev carved out a new role for himself as an arch-hawk and full-throated champion of the war, hurling aggressive rhetoric at Kyiv and the West and warning repeatedly of the risk of a nuclear "apocalypse". In May 2024 he said it would be a "fatal mistake" on the part of the West to think that Russia was not ready to use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine. He also spoke of the potential to strike unnamed hostile countries with strategic nuclear weapons. His statements - including personal attacks on foreign leaders - were frequently designed to shock, insult and provoke. He referred to Ukrainians as "cockroaches", in language Kyiv condemned as openly genocidal, and called President Volodymyr Zelenskiy a criminal, a drug addict, a louse, a rat and a freak. In January 2023, he accused Japan's prime minister of shameful subservience to the United States and suggested he should ritually disembowel himself. Russian opposition figures have dismissed Medvedev's outpourings as sad, impotent rants. However, some Western diplomats say they give a flavour of the thinking in Kremlin policy-making circles. Until now, they have rarely provoked a direct response from Western leaders. SPAT WITH TRUMP That changed last month when Trump rebuked Medvedev and accused him of throwing around the "N" word after the Russian criticised U.S. air strikes on Iran and said "a number of countries" were ready to supply Iran with nuclear warheads. When Trump imposed a deadline on Moscow to end the war in Ukraine or face further sanctions, including on buyers of its exports, Medvedev accused him of playing a "game of ultimatums" and moving a step closer to war between Russia and the U.S. Trump retorted: "Tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!" Medvedev waded in again last Thursday, saying Trump's "nervous reaction" showed Russia was on the right course and referring again to Moscow's nuclear capabilities. Trump delivered his statement the following day on posting U.S. nuclear submarines in "the appropriate regions", since when Medvedev has not posted again.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'No foreign students should be in the country right now,' says Steve Bannon: What it means for your H-1B visa and future in the US
As the United States re-enters a tumultuous debate on immigration and workforce priorities, a controversial remark from one of President Donald Trump's closest former advisers has reignited alarm among international students and skilled foreign workers alike. Steve Bannon, a former White House chief strategist and staunch advocate of Trump-era nationalism, made an incendiary call for what he described as a 'complete purge' of foreign students from the country. Speaking on a podcast, Bannon stated, 'I don't think you should have any foreign students in the country right now,' warning that the continued presence of international students is elbowing out opportunities for American youth. His remarks signal more than rhetoric—they potentially foreshadow the revival of a hardline immigration agenda under a possible second Trump administration. A call for an exit visa, not a green card Bannon's suggestion wasn't merely to restrict future inflow, but to ensure that international students currently studying in the US leave immediately after graduation. 'Instead of stapling a green card to their diploma,' he said, 'you staple an exit visa. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dementia Has Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It? Memory Health Learn More Undo Boom, you are out of here.' Such a stance, if echoed in policy, would upend the current post-study visa pipeline. At present, the F-1 student visa often serves as a bridge to Optional Practical Training (OPT), and later, H-1B sponsorship, a route that many foreign graduates from US universities depend on to begin their careers. Bannon's comments challenge this pathway head-on, positioning international students as an economic threat rather than an asset. What does it mean for H-1B visa holders? While Bannon's comments targeted students, the implications extend deep into the realm of skilled immigration, particularly the H-1B visa program. The United States approved nearly 400,000 H-1B visas in 2024, according to recent figures, with the majority being extensions for current visa holders working at tech giants such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Despite widespread layoffs across the tech sector, approximately 80,000 jobs cut this year, according to foreign workers continue to dominate the tech workforce. This dynamic has stoked resentment among some American workers and fueled narratives like Bannon's, which argue that the system favors outsiders at the expense of domestic job seekers. Compounding this, Vice President JD Vance recently warned tech firms that it is 'unacceptable' to lay off Americans while hiring foreigners, signaling bipartisan political scrutiny of the H-1B process. The politics of global talent and national allegiance Bannon's framing of global talent acquisition as a form of 'imperialism' invokes deeper ideological currents. 'Absorbing all the talent from across the world is not going to make the world better,' he said. 'That's how the British ran their empire.' The remark reflects a broader nativist sentiment: That the US, rather than acting as a global hub for merit and innovation, should focus inward, preserving opportunity for its own citizens. This worldview has gained ground in recent years, particularly as the political Right paints immigration not just as a demographic issue, but as an economic and cultural one. Labour market signals raise the stakes The release of the July jobs report according to US media reports, which showed a steep decline in employment growth, with just 73,000 jobs added and 258,000 cut from previous months' data, adds fuel to Bannon's argument. A sluggish labour market could create the perfect storm for populist calls to restrict foreign labor, even as economists argue that immigrants often fill critical skill gaps. While many tech firms defend their hiring practices as a necessity in a globalized, AI-driven economy, the optics of high foreign hiring amid domestic layoffs present a narrative that could be weaponized politically in the months ahead. A warning shot or a policy preview? Bannon may not currently hold a government post, but his remarks often serve as ideological test balloons for upcoming Republican agendas. With Trump increasingly surrounding himself with loyalists ahead of the 2026 election cycle, Bannon's statements cannot be dismissed as fringe commentary. If this vision materializes into policy, foreign students could face rapid changes, from visa restrictions and shortened work authorization periods to tightened scrutiny of university enrolments. In short, the traditional American dream for international students may be in jeopardy. What international students and H-1B hopefuls should do now Given the intensifying rhetoric, foreign students and workers are advised to stay informed and proactive: Monitor policy shifts : Immigration policy may change swiftly under a future administration. Keep abreast of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and USCIS updates. Strengthen employment documentation : Ensure all OPT, CPT, and H-1B filings are airtight and well-documented. Explore alternative pathways : Consider options in Canada, Europe, or Australia if uncertainty persists in the US visa policy. Engage with advocacy groups : Organizations such as NAFSA, and local student coalitions can offer legal updates and resources. The future of meritocracy or a turn toward nationalism? At its heart, the debate over international students and H-1B visas is a debate about what kind of nation the US wants to be: A bastion of global meritocracy or a closed system prioritizing national loyalty over global integration. Steve Bannon's words may seem extreme, but they reflect a sentiment that is gaining traction, and one that could soon translate into real-world consequences for the hundreds of thousands who cross oceans in search of opportunity. As the political winds shift, one thing is clear: For international students and skilled immigrants in America, the stakes have never been higher. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Pakistan backs Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy as PM Sharif and Pezeshkian sign 12 cooperation deals
Pakistan on Sunday supported Iran's right to develop nuclear capability for peaceful purposes, as the two sides signed several agreements to expand cooperation in multiple fields. read more Pakistan on Sunday voiced support for Iran's right to pursue nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as both countries signed a series of agreements aimed at deepening bilateral cooperation across various sectors. The announcement came during Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's two-day visit to Islamabad, where he held formal talks with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif at the PM's official residence. At a joint press briefing following their meeting, Sharif reaffirmed Islamabad's backing of Tehran's civilian nuclear programme, which has been at the heart of escalating tensions between Iran, Israel, and the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Pakistan stands with Iran for the acquisition of peaceful nuclear power,' Sharif said. His remarks come at a sensitive time, as Iran's relations with the US—Pakistan's long-time ally and major non-NATO partner—remain strained over nuclear issues. Tensions further escalated in June when Israeli and American forces carried out coordinated airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear installations. In response, Tehran halted its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Sharif also condemned the airstrikes, calling them acts of 'Israeli aggression' and reiterated Pakistan's support for Iran's right to self-defence. He strongly criticised Israel's military operations in Gaza and urged the global community—especially Muslim-majority nations—to take a stand against the ongoing human rights violations there. On the economic front, the two leaders expressed optimism about achieving a trade volume of USD 10 billion annually. Several memoranda of understanding (MoUs) were signed, which Sharif said he hoped would soon evolve into formal agreements. President Pezeshkian confirmed that the MoUs included provisions to expedite finalisation of a free trade agreement between the two neighbours. According to state broadcaster Radio Pakistan, a total of 12 documents—including agreements and MoUs—were exchanged during the visit. These cover cooperation in diverse fields such as trade, agriculture, science and technology, information and communications, culture, tourism, climate action, and maritime safety. He criticised Israel's actions in Gaza and called upon the international community, particularly Muslim nations, to address the ongoing human rights violations in the region. Sharif said the two sides have signed several MoUs and made commitments and hoped that they would soon be transformed into agreements. He said Pakistan and Iran are aiming to achieve the target of USD 10 billion in annual trade. The two leaders also discussed issues related to terrorism and agreed to strengthen cooperation to combat militancy along their shared border. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Pezeshkian, in his remarks, said that the MoUs signed also included one about finalisation of the free trade agreement at the earliest between the two sides. According to state-run Radio Pakistan, Pakistan and Iran exchanged 12 agreements and MoUs in the presence of Sharif and Pezeshkian. The agreements and MoUs included cooperation in trade, agriculture, science, technology and innovation, information and communications, culture, art, tourism, climate, and maritime safety. With inputs from agencies
