
Weedkiller ingredient widely used in US can damage organs and gut bacteria, research shows
The ingredient, diquat, is widely employed in the US as a weedkiller in vineyards and orchards, and is increasingly sprayed elsewhere as the use of controversial herbicide substances such as glyphosate and paraquat drops in the US.
But the new piece of data suggests diquat is more toxic than glyphosate, and the substance is banned over its risks in the UK, EU, China and many other countries. Still, the EPA has resisted calls for a ban, and Roundup formulas with the ingredient hit the shelves last year.
'From a human health perspective, this stuff is quite a bit nastier than glyphosate so we're seeing a regrettable substitution, and the ineffective regulatory structure is allowing it,' said Nathan Donley, science director with the Center For Biological Diversity, which advocates for stricter pesticide regulations but was not involved in the new research. 'Regrettable substitution' is a scientific term used to describe the replacement of a toxic substance in a consumer product with an ingredient that is also toxic.
Diquat is also thought to be a neurotoxin, carcinogen and linked to Parkinson's disease. An October analysis of EPA data by the Friends of the Earth non-profit found it is about 200 times more toxic than glyphosate in terms of chronic exposure.
Bayer, which makes Roundup, faced nearly 175,000 lawsuits alleging that the product's users were harmed by the product. Bayer, which bought Monsanto in 2018, reformulated Roundup after the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a possible carcinogen.
The new review of scientific literature in part focuses on the multiple ways in which diquat damages organs and gut bacteria, including by reducing the level of proteins that are key pieces of the gut lining. The weakening can allow toxins and pathogens to move from the stomach into the bloodstream, and trigger inflammation in the intestines and throughout the body. Meanwhile, diquat can inhibit the production of beneficial bacteria that maintain the gut lining.
Damage to the lining also inhibits the absorption of nutrients and energy metabolism, the authors said.
The research further scrutinizes how the substance harms the kidneys, lungs and liver. Diquat 'causes irreversible structural and functional damage to the kidneys' because it can destroy kidney cells' membranes and interfere with cell signals. The effects on the liver are similar, and the ingredient causes the production of proteins that inflame the organ.
Meanwhile, it seems to attack the lungs by triggering inflammation that damages the organ's tissue. More broadly, the inflammation caused by diquat may cause multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, a scenario in which organ systems begin to fail.
The authors note that many of the studies are on rodents and more research on low, long-term exposure is needed. Bayer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Despite the risks amid a rise in diquat's use, the EPA is not reviewing the chemical, and even non-profits that push for tighter pesticide regulations have largely focused their attention elsewhere.
Donley said that was in part because US pesticide regulations are so weak that advocates are tied up with battles over ingredients like glyphosate, paraquat and chlorpyrifos – substances that are banned elsewhere but still widely used here. Diquat is 'overshadowed' by those ingredients.
'Other countries have banned diquat, but in the US we're still fighting the fights that Europe won 20 years ago,' Donley said. 'It hasn't gotten to the radar of most groups and that really says a lot about the sad and sorry state of pesticides in the US.'
Some advocates have accused the EPA of being captured by industry, and Donley said US pesticide laws were so weak that it was difficult for the agency to ban ingredients, even if the will exists. For example, the agency banned chlorpyrifos in 2022, but a court overturned the decision after industry sued.
Moreover, the EPA's pesticides office seems to have a philosophy that states that toxic pesticides are a 'necessary evil', Donley said.
'When you approach an issue from that lens there's only so much you will do,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Democrats want to blame Trump for the Texas floods. They've learnt nothing
Companies such as PlanetiQ, Spire, and Orbital Micro Systems feed data from satellites to computers for detailed analysis. These private-sector innovations are revolutionising forecasting, often outpacing government capabilities. In fact, many government agencies now rely on data from companies to enhance their own models. Nor is rainfall necessarily related to climate change – another assertion regularly made by the Left. A new paper for the Heritage Foundation by Greek professors Theano Iliopoulou and Demetris Koutsoyiannis using 200 years of global data on rainfall concludes that variations in rainfall have 'no systematic pattern'. However, some regions show more variations in rainfall than others. Texas is one of those states with droughts and heavy rainfalls, and the Guadalupe River has seen past flooding. In 1987, a similar deluge killed 10 teen campers and almost drowned 33 more at Pot O Gold Christian Camp. What is important is to be prepared. Sometimes the forecast gets it wrong, but you can't protect everyone against every risk all the time. Senator Schumer wants to know the effects of budget cuts on future weather forecasting and disaster preparedness. But the real story is that major advances are coming from satellite data and private companies such as Disney. These new technologies often also cost less. The current administration is emphasising the use of new, more accurate technology to improve weather forecasting and disaster response. Blaming political opponents for natural disasters may be convenient, but it distracts from the real issues. The tragedy in Texas was not the result of a failure to forecast, but a question of whether enough speedy action was taken to heed the forecast, including by the local authorities. More will be gained by focusing less on partisan finger-pointing. Nature doesn't care who sits in the Oval Office.


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The missing ingredient you should be adding to your protein shakes to build more muscle
For any gym-lover or weight-lifter, they're never too far from their beloved protein shake. Chock full of nutrients that fuel the body after a sweat session and feed muscles to recover and build strength. However, those simply watering down their post-workout protein powder are missing out on major potentials of the shake. Experts recommend swapping the water for milk, which, aside from adding even more protein, gives the shake an added boost. Water may be calorie-free but the extra calories in milk - about 120 per cup of two percent milk - are worth it to reap the benefits of muscle building and recovery. That is because it also contains 8g of protein. Roughly 80 percent of the protein in cow's milk is called casein, which is a gold standard when it comes to essential amino acids that the body needs for muscle building, but doesn't produce on its own. Casein is digested slowly, which means it keeps delivering those muscle-building amino acids over a longer period of time. So, the body is being fed proteins for longer than it would be with watered-down shakes. And a 2020 review in Physical Activity and Nutrition found consuming 40g of casein 30 minutes before bed can boost muscle repair, reduce muscle breakdown, and relieve soreness and inflammation. To gain those well toned abs, or sleeve ripping biceps the body must gain lean muscle. To put on muscle the body undergoes protein synthesis, the process by which cells build protein. The goal is to increase synthesis while decreasing protein breakdown -or keeping protein in the body as much as possible. Casein is a muscle-sparing protein that is released in the bloodstream at a slow rate, and has a powerful effect on reducing protein breakdown, which makes it a highly potent muscle building supplement when taken at the right times. For night-owl exercisers, protein shakes with casein can prove even more potent. A slow releasing protein is much more beneficial to muscle repair and re-growth during your sleeping hours. Casein is a slow-digesting protein that takes three to four hours to reach peak levels in blood amino acids and protein synthesis. It also takes seven hours to become fully absorbed. So by working out in the evenings and following exercise with a milk protein shake, you're setting your muscles up for their best potential. A Baylor University study found that men who drank a casein protein shake (mixed with whey protein) during a 10-week span gained considerably greater muscle mass than those who consumed a whey protein shake without casein. For athletes focusing on stamina, adding milk into the protein keeps muscles from getting sore and keeps the body from feeling depleted after a long run or workout. An added plus is that casein may help to protect against colon cancer, a second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the third most diagnosed cancer in the United States, according to the CDC. Researchers in South Dakota found colon cancer cells could be targeted using derivatives of casein, and it could be used as a promising anticancer drug with minimal side effects. According to the Cleveland Clinic, casein may also be an answer to weight loss because of its slow releasing effects. This keeps you feeling fuller for longer, leading to less calorie intake thanks to the leucine found in casein - another essential amino acid. Milk also provides about 15 percent of your daily vitamin D, which helps your body absorb calcium and supports your immune system. It is also a good source of B vitamins, which support metabolism and help keep skin, muscles, and the brain healthy.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Lila Moss fronts new campaign as Barbie launches its first ever 'diabetic' doll - after the model opened up about living with the condition
Lila Moss fronted a new campaign as Barbie launched its first ever 'diabetic doll' this week. The model, 22, - who lives with type one diabetes - posed in a pink silk mini dress for the project before changing into a black top and white skirt for another shot. The 'diabetic' doll features a continuous glucose monitor and insulin pump - which Lila has spoken about using in the past. The toy firm says it made the first Barbie with type 1 diabetes (T1D) so more children could see themselves reflected in the range of dolls. It worked with Breakthrough T1D, the leading global type 1 diabetes research organisation in developing the new doll, which also has a purse perfect for carrying 'snacks'. The company has marked the release by partnering with fashion model Lila who is an insulin-dependent diabetic herself. The young model previously discussed her condition during a segment on Vogue's In The Bag YouTube after making the unconventional decision to wear the monitor on the catwalk. She said: 'I have some sugar tablets, in case my blood sugar goes low. I'm diabetic so I have this which controls a pod on my leg, which gives me insulin. 'This is very important to keep in my bag, it comes with me everywhere.' The star - worried her essential device could get lost - added: 'I even have an apple air-tag to follow it around with my phone.' Speaking about her condition in 2020, she told The Kit: 'I think not many people know that I have diabetes. It's not visible from the outside, so no one would really know just by looking at you.' Type 1 diabetes causes the level of glucose (sugar) in your blood to become too high. It happens when your body cannot produce enough of a hormone called insulin, which controls blood glucose. You need daily injections of insulin to keep your blood glucose levels under control. It worked with Breakthrough T1D, the leading global type 1 diabetes research organisation in developing the new doll, which also has a purse perfect for carrying 'snacks' Lila landed her first modelling gig at the age of 15 - nabbing a campaign for Marc Jacobs Beauty - at just a year older than her mother was when she entered the business. Yet despite her mother being one of the famous models in the business, Lila has previously revealed that Kate was keen to deter her from following in her footsteps. 'My mum always put me off [modelling],' Lila said. 'She was always like, 'If you wanna do it, you can, but I wouldn't recommend it.'' Despite her mother's apprehension, Lila insisted that she doesn't feel anxious at the thought that modelling success could bring the fame from which her parents tried to protect her. She mused: 'Not really. I've seen it first-hand, so I'm much more able to cope with it. I've had to say no to people. But I'm always nice!' Lila's father is journalist Jefferson Hack, with whom Kate was in a relationship in the early Noughties. Jefferson and Kate - who dated from 2001 to 2004 with Lila being born in 2002 - have an amicable relationship and would ensure their daughter spent a regular amount of time with each of them in her childhood.