
Inside Labour's identity crisis as party members and MPs speak their mind
More than two-thirds of Labour members want the party to shift to the left - as Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces calls for a reset of the direction of his Government
More than two-thirds of Labour members want the party to shift to the left - as Keir Starmer faces calls for a reset.
Polling by LabourList, shared with The Mirror, shows 64.5% of Labour members back a move to the left, with just 1.6% calling for a rightwards shift.
Next weekend will mark a year since Keir Starmer won a landslide election victory. But now, the PM is battling flagging poll ratings, rebellious Labour MPs and the surge of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK.
After last week's U-turn on welfare cuts, Mr Starmer's former political director Luke Sullivan warned the Government it must 'use this as a moment for a reset'. Some Labour MPs have grown uneasy over the direction of the Government, culminating in a major rebellion over welfare cuts.
Keir Starmer was forced into a climbdown over plans to cut Personal Independent Payments to avoid a humiliating defeat in the Commons. He had faced losing a crunch vote on his welfare legislation next week after 126 backbenchers signed a rebel amendment.
It came after the PM last month announced a U-turn on cuts to winter fuel payments. The policy sparked a backlash and was blamed for a difficult set of local election results for Labour, while Reform UK took control of a number of English councils.
There have been signs that Labour has been spooked by the success of the rightwing outfit. The Home Office has published pictures and video of migrants being deported, sparking criticism from refugee charities.
Mr Starmer also came under fire when he said Britain was at risk of becoming an 'island of strangers' in a speech on immigration, which drew comparisons to Enoch Powell's infamously racist Rivers of Blood speech. The PM has since admitted he 'deeply regrets' using the phrase.
Labour MP Nadia Whittome said: "While this government has taken some crucial steps towards undoing this, there's a growing sense across the country that the scale of change just isn't matching the urgency of the moment, while other policies, like the proposals to cut disability benefits, feel like a repeat of the austerity era. At a time when the far-right is gaining ground both at home and abroad, Labour must also show bold, principled leadership. We cannot abandon our progressive values in pursuit of Reform voters."
One Labour MP, who asked to speak anonymously, told The Mirror: 'Personally, I don't think you can ever out-Reform Reform, or the right, on issues like immigration. That isn't who we are.
'We are an internationalist party and that's what our values should remain rooted in. We're haemorrhaging votes to progressive left-wing parties, not to the right.'
They said the series of U-turns over winter fuel cuts and disability benefits showed the Government 'did not have a clear plan'. Criticising the welfare reforms appearing to be born out of a need to save money, the MP continued: 'When you start from a position of wanting to just make cuts, inevitably, you are going to hurt the most vulnerable.
'And that's a political choice, and it was the wrong choice, morally and economically, and it was moving us away from our Labour values: Equality, social justice and fairness. We've just got to remember who we are as a party… We shouldn't be tacking anywhere to the right on any of these issues.'
Another Labour MP said party members want the party to return to its 'core values' and just be more 'Labour'. 'The Labour Party was set up in the first place to be a voice for working people, to stand up for equality and social justice, and therefore they won't recognise the party today and some of the decisions it's making,' they said.
They said ensuring people had vital support, as opposed to withdrawing it, trying to lift children out of poverty, and trying to clamp down on corporate greed should be at the heart of Labour values.
They said 'there are so many positive things' the Government are doing, from renationalising the railway, building more social homes, improving employment rights, or expanding free school meals for kids. 'But when it comes to these crunch issues, they're just missing the point. Not engaging with people that policies are impacting is not how the Labour Party should behave. So I just call on the Labour Party to be more Labour.'
But not all Labour MPs agree with party members' plea to move to the left. MP Gurinder Singh Josan said: "When it comes to winning elections, how the voters see things has to be more important than just our members' views.
"And recent elections, including the catastrophic 2019 general election defeat under a markedly more left wing leader, shows voters are more often in the centre and are more interested in practical solutions to everyday problems rather than an ideological fixation."
Another Labour MP, who also did not want to be named, said moving left was not the solution and the Government must continue to be 'country first, and party second'. 'I'm a big fan of solutions-based politics where you don't always have to be entrenched in a left or right view,' they said.
'It's about what will deliver the change that's needed for the country. So we've got our manifesto, that's what's being voted on, and then in terms of the policy that we push through, it's to deliver that. Left, right, centre is completely irrelevant.'
The MP said, immigration issues such as the small boats crisis should be looked at from a humanity, security, economic and infrastructure perspective.
'It's about then finding solutions that some might perceive as being more to the right, but actually it's about delivering them within Labour values, so you're not demonising and creating that horrible rhetoric that we see from some parties,' they added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
21 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
School term dates 'jeopardise Royal Welsh Show for pupils'
Changes to school term dates meaning pupils and families from outside Powys miss the opening days of the Royal Welsh Show have been "strongly opposed" by organisers of the national event. The Welsh Government announced on Wednesday (June 25) that following a consultation into school term dates and holidays, the summer term in 2027 will end on Tuesday, July 20. Only schools in Powys will have finished the term by Friday, July 16, which is three days before the opening day of the Royal Welsh Show in Llanelwedd, near Builth Wells. The Royal Welsh Agricultural Society's chief executive, Aled Rhys Jones, said: 'We are strongly opposed to schools in Wales being open during the week of the Royal Welsh Show. "The Show has always been held during the first week of the school summer holidays and is a highlight of the national calendar. It attracts thousands of visitors - including families, schoolchildren, exhibitors and volunteers - from across Wales and beyond. 'Thousands of young people take part in competitions and activities, gaining hands-on experience and valuable vocational learning. 'While we welcome the decision for schools in Powys to close the week before, it's vital to recognise that the Royal Welsh Show is a national event, not just a local one. 'Its significance to Welsh culture, education, and rural life must be protected.' Education Secretary Lynne Neagle said variations in school term dates and school holidays could cause difficulties for many families and businesses across Wales, and she fully acknowledged there were both advantages and disadvantages to aligning school term dates. 'Reduce footfall' The changes have been met with criticism from the Welsh Conservatives who are calling for it to be scrapped completely because every pupil and family hoping to attend the "culturally significant" show should be able to do so from the start to the end. Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Education, Natasha Asghar MS, added: "These plans will undoubtedly reduce footfall at the Royal Welsh Show by restricting the number of families who can attend its first two days. 'As the Royal Welsh was a major barrier to Labour and Plaid Cymru implementing their deeply unpopular school holiday reform, making this small change now feels like they are laying the groundwork to implement their original plans to rob our children of their summer holidays in the future. The very best livestock attend the Royal Welsh Show. It's a place for champions. (Image: RWAS) Hundreds of thousands of people attend the show every year. 'The Welsh Government cannot ignore the opposition from every teachers' union, as well as the farming, tourism and business sectors. We need a rethink on these dates immediately, and the school holiday reform must be scrapped completely not just postponed." Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Samuel Kurtz MS, said: 'Any changes that jeopardise that ability for young people to enjoy it should be confined to the bin. 'This decision adds to the narrative that agriculture and rural communities are an afterthought for Labour, and never a priority.' A spokesperson for the Welsh Government said: 'We believe there are benefits to having the same term dates across Wales, including helping to eliminate difficulties for parents and school staff who may work and live in different local authority areas. 'The dates for 2026-27 were proposed by the majority of local authorities in Wales, including Powys, Ceredigion and neighbouring local authorities and were supported by a large proportion of respondents to our recent consultation.


Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Migrants face restrictions on social housing
A new immigration clampdown will limit access to social housing to people with strong, long-term connections to Ireland, and emergency homeless accommodation will also be restricted. Under plans due to go to cabinet in the next fortnight, social housing applicants must be lawfully and habitually resident in Ireland, meaning they must have close ties with the state, have been living in Ireland for some time and intend to stay for the foreseeable future. The government first floated the suggestions in a proposed law early last year, but later dropped the plans. It is understood that, after extensive legal advice in recent months, the measures are back on the table. The rules could spark controversy because they are likely to lead to an increase in non-Irish nationals being excluded from housing and homeless lists. Ministers will be told that the law is needed to eliminate 'ambiguity' over existing rules for non-Irish nationals who want to apply for social housing at a time of intense public and political scrutiny over housing waiting lists. Alongside the new rules, ministers are also due to approve plans to introduce similar eligibility criteria for access to homeless accommodation. This will mean that local authorities will not be required to assess households for homeless supports unless they are legally and habitually resident in the state. Local authorities currently do not have a legal basis to refuse accommodation based on legal or habitual residence. • Ministerial row stalls use of empty offices to house asylum seekers The issue of immigration and its effect on the homeless figures was previously raised by Simon Harris, the tanaiste, in an interview with The Sunday Times. At the time, the Fine Gael leader said: 'People understand the fact that homelessness numbers are heavily impacted by the fact we are seeing many people seek protection in our country, seek asylum in our country and many people come from abroad hoping to have a new future in Ireland and immigration. It has many, many pluses, but it has had a challenge there.' The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission previously raised concerns about any move to change social housing eligibility, saying it could have a 'discriminatory and disproportionate impact on ethnic minority communities, and on the most vulnerable groups in our society'. It added that applying the new habitual residence condition to social housing assistance was likely to result in criticism of Ireland by human rights monitoring bodies. Under further changes due to be signed off, there will be an independent appeals mechanism for people who feel they have been unfairly excluded from social housing eligibility. Changes to the criteria for getting homeless accommodation will be made by way of an amendment to the Housing Act 1988, which sets out what assistance can be offered by local authorities in terms of homelessness. It comes after homeless figures again reached another record high. Figures released last week by the Department of Housing show that 15,747 people were living in emergency accommodation in May, an increase of 167 people on those recorded as homeless in April. The total includes 4,844 children. At present, asylum seekers are not entitled to housing support or emergency beds. However, if an asylum seeker is granted leave to remain and has nowhere to stay, and potentially leaves direct provision, they will show up on official homeless figures. The homeless figures for May show that 3,031 adults in emergency accommodation, or 28 per cent of the overall adults, were not citizens of the European Economic Area. Separately, it has emerged that the planned delivery of almost 3,000 social homes has been delayed over value-for-money concerns. The homes were due to be built in Dublin, Wicklow, Kildare and Sligo by a consortium under the public-private partnership model. The Department of Housing said this weekend the decision 'reflects a careful consideration of the costs and taxpayer funding'.


Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Starmer says he was 'heavily focused' on world affairs before U-turn on welfare bill
Sir Keir Starmer has said he was "heavily focused" on world affairs before he was forced to U-turn on his welfare bill after rebellion by MPs. In a piece in The Sunday Times, Sir Keir said he was occupied with the G7 and NATO summits and the escalating tensions in the Middle East for much of the past two weeks. His "full attention really bore down" on the welfare bill on Thursday, he added. It comes after the government was forced to U-turn on plans to cut sickness and disability benefits after significant rebellion by Labour MPs earlier this week. The government has since offered concessions ahead of a vote in the Commons on Tuesday, including exempting existing Personal Independence Payment claimants (PIP) from the stricter new criteria, while the universal credit health top-up will only be cut and frozen for new applications. Sir Keir defended the U-turn by saying: "Getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn't necessarily achieve the desired outcome." He said all the decisions were his and that "I take ownership of them". There have been reports that rebel MPs blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for the government's approach. Sir Keir said: "My rule of leadership is, when things go well you get the plaudits; when things don't go well you carry the can. "I take responsibility for all the decisions made by this government. I do not talk about staff and I'd much prefer it if everybody else didn't." 1:30 Sir Keir said on Saturday that fixing the UK's welfare system is a "moral imperative". Speaking at Welsh Labour's annual conference in Llandudno, North Wales, Sir Keir said: "Everyone agrees that our welfare system is broken, failing people every day. "Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way, conference, and we will."