
Restricting Kids' Cell Phone Use at School: Ethicist
Hi. I'm Art Caplan. I'm at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, where I'm the head of the Division of Medical Ethics.
The state that I live in, Connecticut, has seen some very interesting legislative proposals recently around cell phone use. Many other states — New York, New Jersey, and many others — are having similar debates.The Connecticut one, I think, is the furthest along of them all.
It becomes important because I think parents ask questions about cell phone use for their kids. What should I be thinking? Should I restrict it? Is it dangerous? What should I do?
The state of Connecticut wants to help. First, they've proposed legislation to pull cell phones out of schools — at least kindergarten up through high school — to get the cell phones taken away from the kids so that they're not distracted and that they're paying attention to the teacher and also engaged in social interaction.
Even more radically, there's a proposal in Connecticut, a bill that would ban in young children from being able to access social media platforms, iPads, cell phones, or whatever between midnight and 6:00 AM. Is this a good idea?
A colleague of mine at NYU, Jonathan Haidt, wrote a book called The Anxious Generation . He believes that the rates we see of teenagers who are now experiencing anxiety, which has increased from 2010 to today from 1 in 10 to 1 in 4; the number of teenagers experiencing depression, which has gone up from 1 in 10 to 1 in 5; and even death by suicide, one of the leading causes of deathfor kids aged 15-24, have to do with social media.
Harassment, peer pressure, and getting stalked and bombarded with messages that attack self-esteem, target young people, and make them feel bad about their bodies can absolutely create mental health disorders.
Is there sufficient evidence in his book?Do we have sufficient evidence from other studies to say for sure it's the cell phone or the iPad that somebody's looking at late at night?
I'm going to concede that we don't. There's suggestive evidence, but not really many gold-standard studies that say, yes, it's the cell phone, iPad, or computerand where they are on social media.
On the other hand, I support these legislative efforts, like Connecticut's, to get the cell phones out of school, to get kids talking to one another, to get them paying attention more, and to do what we can to get them off [of their devices] in the middle of the night.
I would look at it this way.[Cell phones] may be causing problems by giving access to disturbing social media outlets. Let's face it, social media is a cesspool at this point, a sewer all over the place, and the companies that run it are doing nothing to self-regulate it. If we're wrong, the worst that happened is [kids] are not online for certain parts of the day.
I know parents sometimes say, well, what about if there's a shooting or an emergency at school? I think we can manage that. You can absolutely have teachers with cell phones. The staff can have cell phones. It's not that there wouldn't be any ability to alert the police or to allow some communication as necessary with the kids.I don't think the rarity of a school shooting, as much as we worry about it, is enough to say, yes, let's let the kids just get lost all day long at school in their cell phones.
I also understand why people are asking how this is going to really be enforced. Maybe it will be possible at school when you ask the kids to turn the cell phones in and lock them up or put them in a pouch where the teacher has the code or something.How is that enforceable at home at night?
One of the things missing, I think, from these efforts in Connecticut and elsewhere to decrease access by young kids to social media is the use of parental controls. I think some social platforms do a pretty good job saying before you give that cell phone to your kid or let them have their own computer, you're going to be able to program it with social parental discretion controls. Other platforms don't seem to care.
Let's set some standards and expectations about what parents could do and would be able to do to restrict access at different times. It's going to take an across-the-board effort from parents, government requirements, and a willingness of people who control social mediato try to make sure that kids aren't getting in trouble, but we have to really start to take steps.
We've got a problem in just saying there's nothing we could do about it, like the horse is out of the barn. That's not a response.
I support the Connecticut effort. We'll see. I don't think federal government's going to be moving in this area anytime soon.They seem oriented toward deregulation. I think many states may, and I think that's something that, as physicians, we should try to support. Less access to social media at certain times of the day and night is not a bad thing for kids.
I'm Art Caplan. I'm at the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.Thanks for watching.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
22 minutes ago
- Medscape
FDA Declines to Approve New Melanoma Therapy
The FDA has declined to approve a new oncolytic immunotherapy, vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1), to treat advanced melanoma. The agency recently issued a complete response letter to the company, Replimune Group, rejecting its biologics license application that sought approval for the new agent in combination with nivolumab (Opdivo) to treat adults with advanced melanoma. In the complete response letter, the FDA indicated that it can't approve the biologics license application for vusolimogene oderparepvec because the company's IGNYTE trial 'is not considered to be an adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation that provides substantial evidence of effectiveness,' Replimune explained in a press release. According to Replimune, the complete response letter also noted that the trial data 'cannot be adequately interpreted due to the heterogeneity of the patient population,' and that 'there are items related to the confirmatory trial study design which need to be addressed.' 'We are surprised by the FDA decision and disappointed for advanced melanoma patients who have limited treatment options, as highlighted by the granting of breakthrough status at the time we provided the IGNYTE primary data,' stated Sushil Patel, PhD, Replimune's chief executive officer. Vusolimogene oderparepvec is the lead product candidate for the biotech company. Patel further noted that the issues raised in the complete response letter were not 'raised by the agency in mid- and late-cycle reviews.' Additionally, he said, 'we had also aligned on the design of the confirmatory study.' The FDA's response to the biologics license application for the new agent, along with its recently announced policy requiring randomized, controlled trials for approval of COVID vaccines in healthy Americans younger than 65 years, may signal that the agency is taking a tougher stance on new drug approvals. Replimune plans to 'urgently interact with the FDA to find a path forward for the timely accelerated approval of RP1,' according to its statement. Sharon Worcester, MA, is an award-winning medical journalist based in Birmingham, Alabama, writing for Medscape Medical News, MDedge, and other affiliate sites. She currently covers oncology, but she has also written on a variety of other medical specialties and healthcare topics. She can be reached at sworcester@ or on X @SW_MedReporter.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How much the COVID-19 pandemic aged our brains
NEW HAVEN, Conn. (WTNH) — In today's Health headlines, how much the COVID-19 pandemic aged our brains, the connection between sleep and alcohol consumption in young adults, and how high blood pressure impacts breastfeeding outcomes. Dr. F. Perry Wilson, associate professor at Yale School of Medicine, Yale Medicine physician, and author of 'How Medicine Works and When It Doesn't,' joined Good Morning Connecticut at 9 a.m. to discuss. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Marcus Smart gives an update on his health issues
Plenty of people are optimistic and even excited about Marcus Smart joining the Los Angeles Lakers. The veteran guard is just three calendar years removed from winning the Defensive Player of the Year award, and he is also a capable ball handler and playmaker who possesses high basketball IQ. But one legitimate concern surrounding him is his health. He played in just 54 games during the past two seasons due to multiple injuries, including a finger problem and an ankle ailment. His inability to stay healthy lately has led some to believe that he simply isn't close to the same player he was just a few years ago. While on the "Sedano & Kap Show" on ESPN 710, Smart said he's just about ready to go in terms of his health. 'If I had to give a percentage I would say I'm a high-90s. I've been dealing with a finger, everybody knows I've been dealing with this finger injury. But I've been cleared to get back to basketball activities and I've been in the gym working and I'm excited to go so we'll see.' It is generally expected that Smart, who is 31 years of age, will significantly upgrade L.A.'s perimeter defense, which has been anemic over the last few years. He officially signed a two-year, $11 million contract on Tuesday after he cleared waivers following the buyout of his previous contract with the Washington Wizards. He has made the All-Defensive first team three times and has career averages of 10.6 points, 4.6 assists and 1.6 steals a game over his 11 seasons in the NBA. This article originally appeared on LeBron Wire: Marcus Smart gives an update on his health issues