One of our most ancient freedoms is under threat. This Labour plot cannot stand
Far too often, we have seen judges making decisions that are totally out of step with the public's instincts, whether on immigration, asylum or free speech. At a time when trust in the justice system is already in short supply, we cannot afford to dismantle this crucial safeguard. Yet that's exactly what this Labour Government might be about to do.
It's no secret that Britain's courts are a mess. After Covid, judicial strikes, and a marked rise in certain types of crime, the number of cases waiting for trial stands at a record high. Rape cases are now being scheduled as far away as 2029, a horrific delay in justice for victims. Shamefully, this backlog has only grown since Labour came to power, with 750 cases added every month.
So what's their plan to solve this crisis? If yesterday's Leveson Review is anything to go by, they look set to provide yet more sentencing discounts, which could see criminals serve as little as 20 per cent of their sentence. Then there's the plan to allow drug dealers and stalkers to avoid a criminal record by settling out of court, hardly the sort of result anyone could call 'justice'.
The proposal to scrap jury trials in many cases is just as pernicious, eroding one of this country's ancient liberties. According to Courts Minister Sarah Sackman, this is 'an idea whose time has probably come'.
By the report's own admission, scrapping jury trials will only have a 'limited impact' on the court backlog. It will save £31 million, amounting to just 0.2 per cent of the Ministry of Justice's budget. And while the report only recommends scrapping jury trials in some cases, it also says that there is 'no limit' to the cases that jury trials might be removed from in future.
What's more, it suggests giving judges a blanket power to decide which cases are too 'complex' for juries to opine on. That's a slippery slope which could end in the total abolition of jury trials.
Scrapping this pillar of our constitution for the sake of (very limited) administrative convenience is a disgrace. Alongside parliamentary democracy, trial by jury ranks as one of this country's greatest gifts to the world. Eight centuries ago, Magna Carta set out the principle that nobody shall be judged but by their peers. While the exact shape of the system has evolved, this core principle has remained consistent.
Today, jury trials are one of the few ways in which ordinary members of the public can play a part in the justice system – a crucial safeguard against judicial overreach.
In his report, Leveson invokes Lord Devlin, one of the greatest legal minds of the 20th century. Yet it was Lord Devlin who once, rightly, called jury trials 'the lamp that shows that freedom lives', noting that 'no tyrant could ever afford to leave a subject's freedom in the hands of 12 of his countrymen'.
Devlin was absolutely correct. Jury trial has long ensured that the law can never stray too far from the common sense of the British public, reining in the mistaken impulses of an occasionally fallible judicial branch.
Take the case of Jamie Michael, a former Royal Marine who was arrested after he posted a Facebook video urging people to organise peacefully against migrant hotels. He faced a jury at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court, who took just 17 minutes to clear him of stirring up racial hatred.
While critics claim that juries are slow, the public can draw the line between clumsy anger and real incitement faster than any official. So why is the Government being so careless with one of our constitutional traditions?
The answer is simply because the Labour Party thinks that judges always know best. We see it in their approach to the Chagos Islands, the European Convention on Human Rights and, now, in their willingness to scrap jury trials. For Keir Starmer, the rule of law simply equals rule by lawyers; it's no surprise that these instincts are shared by his Labour colleagues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Hundreds gather again at Essex asylum hotel in weekend of anti-immigrant protests
Hundreds of protesters gathered outside a hotel in Epping on Sunday for the fifth time to protest at the premises being used to house asylum seekers, as protests spread to other hotels over the weekend. A large police presence containing officers from multiple forces restricted contact between anti- and pro-immigrant protesters, with Essex police saying restrictions were necessary after what it described as repeated serious disruption, violence and harm to the community since the first demonstration took place on 13 July. Two men have been charged with public order offences after a protest of about 400 anti-immigration and 250 counter-protesters outside a hotel in Diss on Saturday, Norfolk constabulary said. There was a further protest outside a hotel in Canary Wharf, London, on Sunday, with the number of protesters appearing to be in the low hundreds. The demonstration in Epping, Essex on Sunday – which saw about 300-500 anti-immigrant protesters gather behind metal barriers outside the Bell hotel – was the latest in a series of protests sparked after an asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault for allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Kebatu, 41, from Ethiopia, has denied the offences and is in custody. Protesters wore T-shirts and held up signs with the slogan 'Protect our kids', while others waved England flags. Other flags seen included one for Reform UK, and a white flag with a red cross on a purple square, as seen in America at anti-abortion demonstrations. Counter-protesters held banners including 'Don't let the far right divide us with their hatred and violence', and 'Care for refugees'. They chanted 'Refugees are welcome here' and 'Nazi scum off our streets'. Police said three people were arrested during the peaceful protest, two from the anti-hotel protest group and the other from the counter-protest group. 'I want to thank those who attended for the peaceful nature of both protests,' said Ch Supt Simon Anslow of Essex police. 'I am pleased that today has passed off without incident and I am grateful to our colleagues from other forces for their support.' In a letter sent to the Guardian, asylum-seekers said 'harmful stereotypes' about refugees did not reflect the truth. 'There are some refugees who do not behave respectfully or who do not follow the rules of the host society. But those individuals do not represent all of us,' they said. 'As with any group of people, there are both good and bad – and it is unfair to judge the majority by the actions of a few.' The letter mentioned fleeing persecution and violence. 'We refugees are not here to take advantage of the system. We are here to rebuild our lives, to work, and to contribute,' they wrote, adding: 'This letter is not a plea for sympathy, but a call for understanding and fairness.' Outside the Bell hotel, one local woman, who did not want to be named, said local people had complained about an increase in antisocial incidents since it began housing asylum seekers but felt ignored and unfairly labelled as 'far-right'. 'I'm not saying everyone in any of these hotels is up to no good. I'm not going to judge everyone, but there is no vetting,' she said. 'We won't stop until they start listening and shut this hotel down.' Activists from far-right groups including Homeland, Patriotic Alternative and the neo-Nazi White Vanguard movement have been present at previous protests. On Sunday Kai Stephens, the Norfolk branch organiser for Homeland, held a sign which said: 'Put local people first.' Stephens said: 'Unfortunately, there has to be a certain point where we turn around and say, the British people should be put first, the indigenous British people.' Supporters of the far-right activist Tommy Robinson were also present. Robinson, 42, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, had said he would attend before changing his mind and saying it would not be helpful to protesters. Wendell Daniel, a former Labour councillor who is now a film-maker for Robinson's Urban Scoop video platform, asked one man if he understood why Robinson had not attended. He responded: 'We're with Tommy all the way.' Other local protesters said that far-right agitators were not welcome. 'It's 100% unhelpful, because it just gives them a message which is not what we're trying to achieve here,' said one man, who did not want to be named. Stand Up to Racism, the group that organised the counter-protest, estimated about 700 people had gone to Epping. Lewis Nielsen, an officer at Stand Up to Racism, said Nigel Farage's Reform UK had emboldened the far right. 'It's a really dangerous situation at the moment because you haven't just got the protest here, you've got other protests coming up around the country,' Nielsen said. 'We stopped the riots last August with these kinds of mobilisations, and that's why we're pleased the one today has been successful.' Joshua Bailey, who said he grew up in Epping, said increasing anti-immigration sentiment had made his non-white friends feel vulnerable and threatened. 'It's very important that we have a positive stance towards refugees, who are people fleeing genuine tragedy and disaster,' he said. He added that he did not agree with chants that labelled protesters as fascists or Nazis. 'There is room for nuance,' he said. 'I'd like to be able to sit down in a pub with someone who had opposing views and be able to speak about it.'
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Starmer to convene cabinet meeting, most likely to discuss Gaza
LONDON, July 27 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will convene a cabinet meeting next week, a government source said on Sunday, most likely to discuss the situation in Gaza after coming under growing pressure to recognise a Palestinian state. The Financial Times, which initially reported the story, said ministers, currently in a summer recess until September 1, would reconvene to discuss Gaza. Starmer's office did not immediately reply to a Reuters request for comment. The recall comes after Starmer said on Friday the British government would recognise a Palestinian state only as part of a negotiated peace deal, disappointing many in his Labour Party who want him to follow France in taking swifter action. President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday France would recognise a Palestinian state, a plan that drew strong condemnation from Israel and the United States, after similar moves from Spain, Norway and Ireland last year. More than 220 members of parliament in the UK, mostly Labour members representing about a third of the House of Commons, wrote to Starmer on Friday urging him to recognise a Palestinian state. Successive British governments have said they will formally recognise a Palestinian state when the time is right, without setting a timetable or specifying the necessary conditions. Starmer's approach has been complicated by the arrival in Scotland on Friday of U.S. President Donald Trump, with whom he has built warm relations. In foreign policy terms, Britain has rarely diverged from the United States. Israel has been facing growing international criticism, which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government rejects, over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
BreakingNews.ie
2 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
US and EU clinch trade deal to avert prohibitive US tariffs, Trump says
The United States has struck a framework trade deal with Europe, U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Sunday, averting a spiralling row between two allies who account for almost a third of global trade. The deal, that includes a 15 per cent tariff on EU goods entering the U.S. and significant EU purchases of U.S. energy and military equipment, will bring welcome clarity for EU companies. Advertisement However, the baseline tariff of 15 per cent will be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal, although it is better than the threatened 30 per cent rate. The announcement came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled to Scotland for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump to push a hard-fought deal over the line. Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old U.S. trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of "90 deals in 90 days." Trump has periodically railed against the European Union saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade. His main bugbear is the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached $235 billion, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The EU points to the U.S. surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance.
