Ukraine's parliament to consider restoring power of anti-graft agencies
Protesters hold placards during a rally ahead of a vote in parliament on Thursday, in which lawmakers will consider restoring the independence of two key anti-corruption agencies, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Peter
KYIV - Ukrainian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to consider a bill restoring the independence of the country's two main anti-corruption agencies, aiming to defuse a political crisis that has shaken faith in President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's wartime leadership.
Thousands of protesters rallied in Kyiv and other cities in recent days in a rare show of discontent after lawmakers led by Zelenskiy's ruling party rushed through amendments last week defanging the respected agencies.
Zelenskiy reversed course after the outcry and under pressure from top European officials, who warned Ukraine was jeopardising its bid for EU membership by curbing the powers of its anti-graft authorities.
Demonstrations had continued even after he submitted the new bill restoring their independence, with hundreds rallying near the presidential administration in Kyiv late on Wednesday to chants of "Shame!" and "The people are the power!".
"I really want parliament to vote (for the new measure) just as quickly as it did last time," said protester Kateryna Kononenko, 36, referring to last week's fast-tracked approval of the controversial amendments.
Activists also called for demonstrations near parliament ahead of Thursday's vote in an attempt to pressure lawmakers to approve the new bill.
Eradicating graft and shoring up the rule of law are key requirements for Kyiv to join the EU, which Ukrainians see as critical to their future as they fend off a Russian invasion.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Asia US-Malaysia tariff deal set for Aug 1 after Trump-Anwar phone call
Asia Malaysia PM Anwar says Trump to attend Asean Summit in October
Singapore Underground pipe leak likely reason for water supply issues during Toa Payoh fire: Town council
Singapore Driver in 2024 Tampines crash that killed 2 set to plead guilty in October
Multimedia 60 years, 60 items: A National Day game challenge
Asia US CDC weighs travel notice for China as chikungunya cases rise
Singapore Wegovy and beyond: Will weight-loss drugs change the way people look at obesity?
Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family'
Last week's amendments had given Zelenskiy's hand-picked general prosecutor the power to transfer cases away from the anti-graft agencies and reassign prosecutors - a step critics had said was designed to protect allies from prosecution.
While much smaller, the rallies of the past week have sparked comparisons to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan revolution, when protesters toppled a president they accused of corruption and heavy-handed rule.
More than two-thirds of Ukrainians support the recent protests, according to a recent survey by Ukrainian pollster Gradus Research.
CORRUPTION FIGHTERS
The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) have stepped up a closely watched campaign against graft since Russia's February 2022 invasion.
They have produced charges against lawmakers and senior government officials, including a then-deputy prime minister who was accused last month of taking a $345,000 kickback.
Speaking to Reuters last Friday, after Zelenskiy's reversal, NABU chief Semen Kryvonos said he expected pressure against his agency to continue, fuelled by what he described as corrupt forces uninterested in cleaning up Ukraine.
He added that he and other anti-corruption officials felt a greater sense of responsibility following the protests, but also called on the country's leadership to help their effort.
"This responsibility must be shared with the government, which needs to react and say, 'Okay, there's corruption here - let's destroy it.'" REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Prabowo's political rivals among over 1,000 granted clemency before Indonesia's Independence Day
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox JAKARTA – Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto granted clemency to two high-profile political rivals, in a gesture of national reconciliation ahead of Independence Day on Aug 17 that included amnesty for more than 1,000 people. Relief for former Trade Minister Thomas Trikasih Lembong and senior opposition official Hasto Kristiyanto was announced July 31 alongside the mass amnesty, which included people jailed under controversial laws covering presidential insult and non-violent treason. Mr Lembong, a prominent critic of Mr Prabowo during the 2024 election campaign, was a key adviser to rival candidate Anies Baswedan. Mr Hasto, meanwhile, serves as secretary-general of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, known as PDI-P, the only major party outside Mr Prabowo's ruling coalition and the largest bloc in Parliament. The move could ease political tensions with the PDI-P, whose chair Megawati Soekarnoputri has so far withheld public support for Mr Prabowo. Their legal relief – abolition for Mr Lembong and amnesty for Mr Hasto – was approved by parliament on July 31, after receiving the presidential letters. They were both convicted recently in separate graft cases. Law Minister Supratman Andi Agtas said during a press conference late on July 31 that the decision was grounded in legal review and framed it as a unifying act. Under Indonesia's constitution, the president has the authority to grant amnesty and abolition, subject to parliamentary approval. Mr Lembong's legal team described the move as a constitutional correction of a flawed legal process. Mr Hasto's lawyers said in a text message they are awaiting a formal presidential decree. Bloomberg
Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed US President Donald Trump enough to take action. WASHINGTON – As the Gaza Strip tips into famine and images of starving children trigger new demands for action, US President Donald Trump faces a test all too familiar to his predecessors. Time after time, American presidents have found themselves watching suffering in faraway countries with the knowledge that they could act to save innocent lives. Images of death and misery in places such as the Balkans, Rwanda, Darfur and Syria, to name a few, haunted their consciences – sometimes moving them to act, but often leading to excuses. The desperation in Gaza has emerged as such a test for Mr Trump. By his own account, images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed him enough to take action. 'I mean, some of those kids are – that's real starvation stuff,' Mr Trump said in Scotland on July 28. 'I see it, and you can't fake it. So we're going to be even more involved.' It was unclear what Mr Trump meant by getting 'more involved'. Days earlier, he had withdrawn his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, from talks between Israel and Hamas in pursuit of a ceasefire to end the war in Gaza. Mr Witkoff travelled to Israel on July 31 to discuss Gaza , and Israeli news outlets reported that he might even visit a food distribution centre in the territory. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump modifies reciprocal tariffs ahead of deadline; rate on Singapore likely to remain at 10% Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore Business OCBC Q2 profit drops 7% to $1.82b as interest rates fall, to pay lower interim dividend Asia Thailand seeks neutral venue for border talks with Cambodia Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' Mr Witkoff's change of plans comes as aid groups say hunger in Gaza is reaching crisis levels. One UN-affiliated group said in a report this week that a worst-case famine scenario is unfolding, and Gaza health officials say that dozens of Palestinians, including children, have died of starvation in recent weeks. Those grim facts have been driven home by gut-wrenching images of skeletal toddlers and people fighting for food. Israeli officials reject responsibility for food shortages in Gaza, which they say are exaggerated and caused by Hamas. 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Hamas 'robs, steals this humanitarian aid and then accuses Israel of not supplying it', he added. But Hamas denies that, and Israeli military officials privately say they have found no evidence that Hamas systematically steals aid. Such protests have not defused global anger. France announced this week that it would recognise an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations in September , and Britain said it would follow suit if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas . And in Washington this week, one of Mr Trump's fiercest Republican allies in Congress, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, condemned Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide'. Mr Trump has few good options. The United States supplies Israel, its close partner, with billions in annual military aid. Even if Hamas is the main obstacle to aid delivery, Mr Trump lacks influence over the militant group. His only real hope is to insist that Israel, which controls Gaza's borders, does more to clear roads and protect aid convoys. A long-term solution may require leveraging American aid to force Mr Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire on terms short of his long-time demands. Dr Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow in the American Statecraft Programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the quandary is a familiar one for US presidents. 'President Trump's excuse-making over Gaza resonates with a long line of presidents who were pressured to address humanitarian catastrophes,' Dr Wertheim said. That pressure comes from a sense of moral duty in the country's DNA, dating as far back as John Winthrop's 1630 'City on a Hill' sermon, in which he told Puritan Massachusetts colonists that 'the eyes of all people are upon us'. As the United States grew in power and wealth, so did its sense of obligation to people in need everywhere. Before he became a free-market Republican president, Herbert Hoover ran a federal foreign aid programme that sent food to famine-stricken Soviet Russia in 1921. 'Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!' he declared. Cold War competition for global influence with the Soviet Union reinforced the instinct, on strategic grounds. Many conservatives argue that America is not a charity, and should help people abroad only when it advances the national interest. Mr Trump has made that argument explicit in his America-first foreign policy, his deep cuts to foreign aid spending and his dismantling of the US Agency for International Development. Displaced Palestinians waiting for food at a charity kitchen in Gaza City on July 23. PHOTO: SAHER ALGHORRA/NYTIMES Mr Stephen Pomper, the chief of policy at the International Crisis Group, noted that a president who preaches an America-first foreign policy has undermined an international system built over decades to prevent foreign atrocities. The United States 'looks increasingly like it rejects or is indifferent to the founding principles of the order that it helped create', he said. Still, the crisis in Gaza has echoes of past humanitarian crises that left presidents wringing their hands over how to respond. President Bill Clinton took office in 1993 as a champion of human rights and international institutions. But when machete-wielding Hutu militias started to slaughter ethnic Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994, he rejected calls for US action. Scarred by the deaths of 18 American soldiers on a peacekeeping mission in Somalia, Mr Clinton feared that even modest steps could escalate dangerously. Unchecked, Hutu killers carried out the genocide of an estimated 800,000 Tutsi. Mr Clinton later said he regretted not doing more to stop it. Mr Clinton also hesitated as Serbian forces slaughtered civilians in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the mid-1990s, rebuffing direct pleas from the likes of Elie Wiesel by saying the problem did not warrant risking American lives. The 1995 massacre of 8,000 men and boys at a UN-declared 'safe area' in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica finally moved Mr Clinton to act. A US-led bombing campaign against Serbian forces led to a peace deal credited with stabilising the region. Stopping mass killings in the Darfur region of Sudan in the early 2000s became a campaign for activists and celebrities, including Angelina Jolie and George Clooney. But even after the US State Department formally declared the atrocities there a 'genocide' in 2004, president George W. Bush refused calls to deploy US troops to stop it. He cited, among other things, concern about intervening 'in another Muslim country' at the time of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the time Mr Barack Obama became president, activists and scholars – fuelled by the American failure in Rwanda – had developed new legal theories to support cross-border intervention to protect victims of atrocities. Among them was Ms Samantha Power, an influential national security aide to Mr Obama, who helped engineer a 2011 presidential directive on the subject. 'Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,' it declared. Palestinians carry aid supplies which entered Gaza through Israel in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, on July 27. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG Mr Obama put that idea into practice in 2011, when he ordered airstrikes in Libya against government forces preparing to crush a rebellion in the city of Benghazi. Mr Obama said he acted to avert 'a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world'. But that supposedly limited intervention expanded into a months-long Nato bombing campaign, and Libya collapsed into violent anarchy, leaving Mr Obama regretting the experience. So when he was pressured again to intervene in Syria's civil war against the country's brutal regime, he rejected pleas for airstrikes from top officials, including US Secretary of State John Kerry. Mr Obama did, however, order limited airstrikes in Syria in 2014 against Islamic State group fighters, in part to save thousands of Yazidi people trapped on a mountain in Iraq and at risk of genocidal massacre. 'Earlier this week, one Iraqi cried that there is no one coming to help,' Mr Obama said in an address to the nation. 'Well, today America is coming to help.' Gaza presents Mr Trump with an especially difficult case, as it did for former president Joe Biden. Mr Biden faced withering questions about his support for Israel's military campaign, and was shouted down at public events by protesters accusing him of complicity in genocide. But while Mr Biden often harangued Mr Netanyahu to allow more aid into Gaza – usually with limited and temporary results – he never risked a full break with the Israeli prime minister over the matter. One reason, Mr Biden's officials say, was intelligence showing that Hamas responded to signs of a potential split between the United States and Israel by hardening its negotiation position in ceasefire talks. Mr Biden felt enough of a responsibility – and also perhaps political vulnerability – that he resorted to dramatic displays of support for hungry Palestinians, sending military planes to airdrop supplies and ordering the construction of a US$230 million (S$299 million) pier to allow aid delivery by sea. Critics dismissed both measures as made-for-TV substitutes for putting decisive pressure on Mr Netanyahu. Ultimately, Dr Wertheim said, America's real problem in Gaza is itself. 'It's not that other parties are engaged in atrocities and the question is whether the United States will use its righteous power to stop,' he said. 'In this case, the issue is that the United States is complicit in Israel's conduct.' NYTIMES
AsiaOne
12 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Trump's envoy meets Netanyahu for Gaza aid, ceasefire push, World News
JERUSALEM/CAIRO — US special envoy Steve Witkoff met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday (July 31) in a bid to salvage Gaza truce talks and tackle a humanitarian crisis caused by Israel's military assault in the enclave, where a global hunger monitor has warned that famine is unfolding. Shortly after Witkoff's arrival, President Donald Trump posted on his Truth Social network: "The fastest way to end the Humanitarian Crises in Gaza is for Hamas to SURRENDER AND RELEASE THE HOSTAGES!!" The US State Department also announced sanctions on officials of the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organisation, saying the groups were undermining peace efforts. It was Washington's latest apparent diplomatic shift backing Israel against the Palestinians and diverging from its European allies. The PA and PLO, rivals of the Hamas fighters that control Gaza, are internationally accepted as the representatives of the Palestinian people and administrators of a Palestinian state that France, Britain and Canada have said in recent days they could soon recognise as independent. A spokesperson for the Palestinian Authority did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The full impact of the US move was not immediately clear: the State Department said targeted individuals would be barred from travelling to the United States but did not identify those targeted. Witkoff arrived in Israel with Netanyahu's government facing mounting international pressure over the widespread destruction of Gaza and constraints on aid in the territory. Following the meeting, a senior Israeli official said an understanding between Israel and the US was emerging that there was a need to move from a plan to release some of the hostages to a plan to release all the hostages, disarm Hamas militants, and demilitarise the Gaza Strip. The official did not provide details on what that plan would be, but added Israel and the United States will work to increase humanitarian aid, while continuing the fighting in Gaza. Witkoff will travel to Gaza on Friday to inspect food aid delivery as he works on a final plan to speed deliveries to the enclave, the White House said. "The special envoy and the ambassador will brief the president immediately after their visit to approve a final plan for food and aid distribution into the region," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. Trump on Thursday called the situation in Gaza "a terrible thing," when asked about comments from his ally and Republican US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who termed Israel's offencive in the Palestinian enclave a genocide. "Oh it's terrible what occurring there, yeah, it's a terrible thing. People are very hungry," Trump told reporters when asked about Greene's social media comments. Trump also noted financial assistance by Washington to address the hunger crisis in Gaza. Israel denies genocide accusations at the International Court of Justice and war crimes accusations at the International Criminal Court while calling its war in Gaza self-defence after the deadly October 2023 Hamas attack. Indirect ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas in Doha ended in deadlock last week with the sides trading blame for the impasse and gaps lingering over issues including the extent of an Israeli military withdrawal. On Thursday, two senior Israeli cabinet ministers, Defence Minister Israel Katz and Justice Minister Yariv Levin, voiced support for annexing the West Bank, Israeli-occupied territory where the Palestinians hope to build their state. "At this very moment, there is a moment of opportunity that must not be missed," they wrote. Palestinians say annexation would foreclose the prospect of a two-state solution and terminate any peace process. Israel on Wednesday sent a response to Hamas' latest amendments to a US proposal that would see a 60-day ceasefire and the release of some hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, a source familiar with the details said. There was no immediate comment from Hamas. Gaza medical officials said at least 23 people were reported killed by Israeli fire across the enclave, including 12 people among crowds who had gathered to receive aid around the Netzarim corridor, an area held by Israeli troops in central Gaza. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots to disperse crowds, and had not identified any casualties. Since Israel's offencive began, the Gaza health ministry has recorded 156 deaths from starvation and malnutrition, most of them in recent weeks, including at least 90 children. Confronted by rising international outrage over images of starving children, Israel said on Sunday it would halt military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of Gaza and designate secure routes for convoys delivering food and medicine. Calls on Hamas to disarm The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said on Wednesday the United Nations and its partners had been able to bring more food into Gaza in the first two days of pauses, but the volume was "still far from enough". Residents face peril from Israeli forces and Palestinian looters when trying to reach supplies. "I have tried several times to grab a sack of flour. The only time I managed to do so, someone with a knife froze me in the street and took it away, threatening to stab me," one man from Deir Al-Balah told Reuters, asking not to be identified. Pressure has been mounting in Gaza on Hamas to reach a ceasefire deal with Israel. Hamas is still holding 50 hostages in Gaza, of whom around 20 are believed to be alive. Mothers of hostages led a protest outside Netanyahu's office, calling on the government to end Israel's war in Gaza, which has killed over 60,000 Palestinians since October 2023. Netanyahu, whose ruling coalition includes two far-right parties that want to conquer Gaza and re-establish Jewish settlements there, has said he will not end the war until Hamas no longer rules the enclave and lays down its arms. Hamas rejects calls to disarm. Qatar and Egypt, who are mediating ceasefire efforts, backed a declaration on Tuesday by France and Saudi Arabia which outlined steps for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The declaration says Hamas "must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority." Israel has ruled out the PA gaining control of Gaza. Hamas-led factions said on Thursday Palestinian resistance will not stop until "the occupation" ends and an independent, fully sovereign state with Jerusalem as its capital is established. Israel has denounced declarations by France, Britain and Canada since last week that they may recognise a Palestinian state, which Israel says amounts to rewarding Hamas for its October 7, 2023, assault on Israeli territory. That attack, in which fighters killed 1,200 people and took 251 hostages back to Gaza, precipitated Israel's ongoing assault in the enclave and sparked the latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, embarking on a visit to Israel, said negotiations for a two-state solution must begin, while for Germany the recognition of a Palestinian state would come at the end of that process. [[nid:720728]]
