
IPS officer returns President's Medal, questions 360° review; cites campaign to link him with RSS
Saxena, an Inspector General-rank officer of the 1994-batch currently posted in the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB), while maintaining that he is not aware of the reasons why he has been denied empanelment since 2022, in a letter to the President in February this year accused senior IPS officers of running 'a malicious campaign' against him.
New Delhi: Dr Paresh Saxena, a senior IPS officer of the Bihar cadre, has returned the President's Police Medal citing repeated denial of empanelment to the post of additional director under the 360-degree review of civil servants introduced in 2020, which according to him, is 'shrouded in secrecy,' ThePrint has learnt.
The retired IPS officer served as director general (DG) of the Bureau of Police Research & Development (BPR&D) when Saxena was posted there in 2022.
'The empanelment process is shrouded in secrecy, but it's understood that feedback is gathered from serving and retired officers who have worked with the candidate,' Saxena wrote in the letter to the President. Adding, 'In the rigidly hierarchical CAPFs (Central Armed Police Forces), the DG serves as the sole spokesperson for juniors before top bureaucracy and DIB, who ultimately decide on empanelment.'
According to the letter, the 'narrative initiated' by the retired IPS officer that Saxena has a 'deep RSS base' gathered steam, and after his retirement successive DGs too 'misrepresented' Saxena as a 'rigid and uncooperative officer (who) misled his superiors and intimidated colleagues and subordinates'.
This, he said, was due to the 'camaraderie among Chiefs of CAPFs from the same batch'.
'When the ADG and DG visited me after my mother's passing, they became aware of my family background,' he wrote in the context of the allegation that he had an RSS background. Adding, 'Despite my personal beliefs never impacting my professional conduct as an IPS officer, the DG's disapproval led to a malicious proposal for my repatriation.'
'Fortunately, his recommendation was rejected (vide MHA Order dated 14 December 2018), allowing my lateral shift from BPR&D to SSB,' Saxena wrote in the letter.
After his name was announced for the President's Medal for Distinguished Services this Republic Day, Saxena was optimistic about his empanelment, he said. Despite that his name was not in the empanelment list even though he has been serving in the Centre since 2018, he wrote.
Adding, 'I am unclear about the reasons for denying my empanelment, based on the multi-source feedback (MSF) or 360-degree process, which does not share the grounds for rejection with affected officers.'
'The lack of communication regarding the grounds for denial has left me feeling utterly demoralized over the past two years,' he wrote.
When contacted by ThePrint, Dr Paresh Saxena refused to comment on the matter.
Requesting for repatriation of his cadre, Saxena wrote to the President: 'I am compelled to return the coveted Medal for Distinguished Services (PSM) awarded by the Hon'ble President of India, as it would be inconsistent for me to accept it after being denied empanelment unfairly.'
Also Read: Home Secy Govind Mohan joins IAS/IPS/IRS officers who have benefited from Modi govt's extension culture
Allegations levelled by Saxena
According to Saxena, when he was posted in the SSB, he investigated three important cases of corruption, which antagonised a section of cadre officers of the force, who he said, were already upset with an old Supreme Court ruling which had upheld the deputation of IPS officers in the CAPFs.
The first, he said, involved the Leave Travel Concession (LTC) scam, which implicated persons of all ranks, including at least two former DGs.
The second, he said, was regarding procurement of I-CAS, an AI-based intelligence collation and analysis software procured from a private firm for approximately Rs 3.68 crore on 4 October, 2019, but never operationalised. 'My detailed inquiry report (512 pages) was submitted on 15 December, 2021, highlighting how six officers made a vendor-driven procurement in complete disregard of procedure and by misinforming the MHA,' the letter alleged.
Saxena also presided over a General Force Court, trying charges of corruption against a DIG-level officer, he wrote in the letter, adding that he sentenced the officer to imprisonment and dismissal on 30 June, 2021, and the officer served his sentence at Tihar Jail.
'Some senior officers, after being found culpable in the vigilance enquiry, submitted multiple false complaints to the DGs and MHA, both verbally and in writing, including pseudonymous complaints, and reportedly a PIDPI (Public Interest Disclosure and Protection of Informers) complaint,' Saxena wrote to the President in February.
'The top leadership of SSB failed to make timely and consistent decisions on vigilance findings and recommendations in these matters, allowing disgruntled officers to spread false information about me,' he added. 'DGs' indecisiveness contributed to an adverse narrative against me, potentially impacting my empanelment and career progression in the GoI.'
Reiterating that no reason was given to him for the denial of empanelment, Saxena wrote: 'Continuing to serve the Government of India under these circumstances would compromise my dignity.
'Therefore, I am left with no choice but to opt for repatriation to my parent cadre.'
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: IPS officer won shooting gold at World Police Games. Army dreams broke, Olympic aim alive
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Retired police officer claims he was ordered to arrest RSS chief
MUMBAI: A day after a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted former BJP MP Pragya Thakur, Army officer Lt Col Prakash Purohit and five others in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, a retired police officer stirred fresh controversy on Friday, claiming former Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh and his seniors in the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad had asked him to arrest Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat while investigation was underway, to bolster the 'saffron terror' narrative. Mehboob Mujawar Singh, who was then an additional commissioner of police with the Maharashtra ATS, denied the charge and said the officer, Mehboob Mujawar, was never a part of the ATS. On Friday, speaking on the phone from his residence in Solapur, Mujawar told HT that while he was working with the ATS, Singh and his seniors had directed him to arrest the RSS chief and the two wanted accused in the case, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, who allegedly planted the bomb in Malegaon that killed six people. Both Kalsangra and Dange have been at large since 2008. 'Singh and his seniors had asked me to arrest Bhagwat to create a 'saffron terror' narrative. But I did not obey the order as it was issued orally, and there was no written communication,' he said. Param Bir Singh, however, denied the allegation. 'He (Mujawar) is a disgraced policeman who is being opportunistic,' he told HT. 'Names of RSS leaders never came up in our investigation. The NIA had also examined him (Mujawar) but his claims turned out to be totally bogus.' Singh also claimed that Mujawar was never part of the ATS. 'Mr Hemant Karkare (then ATS chief) got him involved on the recommendation of then Solapur superintendent of police to help with detection (of the bomb blast case). But he never participated in the investigation and indulged in some criminal activities. I remember that some offence was registered against him in Solapur and the commissioner of police, Solapur had sacked him.' Singh added that Karkare was leading the investigation of the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, and he was additional CP, ATS, only for Mumbai. 'This investigation was not under my supervision ever. I was only assisting Mr Karkare whenever asked by him,' he said. The NIA court, in its order on Thursday, stated that Mujawar was very much 'a member of ATS team' and he had investigated the Malegaon blast case 'as per the directions of his superior officer'. Mujawar conceded that he was booked under the Arms Act and accused of having disproportionate assets, but said he was implicated in those cases after he refused to obey Singh's instructions. 'Apart from arresting Bhagwat, I was asked to show that Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, who were both killed by ATS officers and shown among the victims of the 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai, were still alive,' he said. In his statement before the NIA, which took over the investigation into the Malegaon blast in 2011, Mujawar had sought a probe into the post-mortem reports of 26/11 victims and suggested that DNA samples from the two dead bodies be obtained for verification. Both Kalsangra and Dange, based in Indore, were aides of former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur. Ramchandra used to work with his brother Shivnarayan as an electronic contractor while Dange was associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and had completed a course in information technology. According to the ATS, they had planted the bomb on the motorcycle parked outside the mosque in Malegaon, which killed six people and injured 95 others. Even as the NIA has got red corner notices issued against the duo, and declared a ₹10 lakh reward for anyone who provided information relating to them, their family members have lost hopes of seeing them again. 'My elder brother Ramchandra (Ramji) Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange were detained by Maharashtra ATS on October 10, 2008. We have no information about them,' said Ramji's brother Shivnarayan Kalsangra, who too was arrested in the Malegaon bomb blast case, but was later discharged. He now works as a real estate agent in Indore. 'It was a completely fabricated case. I was arrested and was behind bars for 34 months. They planted timers at our home claiming that we had supplied timers for the bomb,' said Shivnarayan, who was arrested by ATS along with Pragya Singh Thakur. He got bail in 2011 from the Bombay high court due to lack of sufficient evidence and was discharged by the special NIA court in 2017.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Court acquits accused in Malegaon blast case, rejects political pressure claim
A special court in Mumbai, while acquitting seven accused in the Malegaon 2008 blast case, acknowledged that former ATS officer Mehboob Mujawar had made a statement claiming that senior ATS officials had directed him to arrest RSS Chief Mohan the court did not consider this statement in its Ranjit Sangle, representing accused Sudhakar Dhardwivedi, submitted Mujawar's statement as evidence before the NIA court. Mujawar was one of the investigating officers in the Malegaon Mujawar alleged that senior ATS officers instructed him to take Mohan Bhagwat into custody, but he refused to follow what he called an "illegal order," as he found no evidence linking Bhagwat to the blast. Mujawar also claimed that he was falsely implicated in a case filed by the ATS before the Magistrate court in one point, Mujawar publicly stated that two who wanted to be accused in the case, Ramchandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, were dead. An enquiry was initiated regarding this statement, and as a result, Mujawar was not listed as a prosecution witness before the presented certified copies of Mujawar's statement from the Solapur Magistrate court, highlighting alleged torture by the ATS and political pressure aimed at implicating RSS members to justify a ban on the argued, 'Both the accused and witnesses spoke about torture. Due to extreme torture by ATS, Kalsangra and Dange died. This torture was politically motivated to ensure RSS members were named.'The court reviewed statements from another ATS officer and confirmed Mujawar's role as part of the ATS team investigating the Malegaon blast under his superior's the special NIA court, while acquitting the accused, noted that Mujawar's statement was made before a Magistrate court and not before Special Judge AK Lahoti stated, 'The statement recorded under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (by Mujawar) cannot be treated as evidence because it was not recorded before this court. Simply submitting documents is not sufficient.'The judge added, 'Evidence must come from cogent and reliable testimony of the concerned witness. Moreover, these documents reflect his defense before a different court, not this one.'Consequently, the court chose not to consider Mujawar's statement in its verdict.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Mumbai


Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Election Commission rejects Rahul Gandhi's ‘atom bomb' claims
The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Friday termed as 'baseless and irresponsible' Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's claim his party had uncovered an 'atom bomb' of evidence proving voters lists were manipulated on a large scale, and said that it ignores such statements. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi said the Congress began investigating after noticing irregularities during the Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Lok Sabha elections. He alleged that over 10 million voters were fraudulently added to the rolls. (Sansad TV) 'We dug deep because the Election Commission wasn't helping,' Gandhi told reporters outside Parliament. 'What we found is an atom bomb. When it explodes, you won't be able to see the Election Commission in India.' The Leader of Opposition said the party began investigating after noticing irregularities during the Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Lok Sabha elections. He alleged that over 10 million voters were fraudulently added to the rolls. 'There was a suspicion in the elections in Madhya Pradesh and the Lok Sabha, and it deepened in the Maharashtra assembly polls. At the state level, we believed there was a vote theft,' Gandhi said. 'It took us six months to study this in detail.' Gandhi issued a warning: 'Whoever is doing this, from top to bottom in the ECI, we won't spare you. You're working against the nation. This is treason.' In response, ECI said, 'The Election Commission ignores such baseless allegations being made on a daily basis and despite the daily threats being given, (it) asks all election officials to ignore such irresponsible statements and work in a fair and transparent manner.' The Congress has repeatedly accused the ECI of acting like a 'biased umpire', particularly in its handling of the 2024 general elections and multiple assembly polls. ECI said it had sent a mail to Gandhi on June 12 after previous allegations, but had not received a response. 'He has never sent any letter to ECI on any issue, whatsoever,' the election watchdog said. The latest accusation comes amid a broader protest by the opposition INDIA bloc over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls, which they claim is a BJP-backed attempt to disenfranchise voters. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge had also blamed the poll body on July 6, saying, 'With the cooperation of the Election Commission, the BJP's master plan to deprive crores in Bihar of their voting rights now seems to be ensnaring them. Forcibly disenfranchising the poor, Dalits, backwards — this is the BJP-RSS conspiracy.' Following a joint strategy meeting, the INDIA bloc parties on Thursday announced they will intensify their protests –– both in and outside Parliament. ECI published the draft electoral rolls for Bihar on Friday. Responding to Gandhi's claim , the BJP asked him to 'flow like water' instead of considering to 'explode like a bomb'. 'Will Rahul Gandhi explode like a bomb? What do you think? Their job is to explode. They have no other work to do,' BJP leader Sambit Patra told reporters at the BJP headquarters. He said the Opposition party speaks of such things because they have no faith in democracy. 'We are those who have faith in democracy. If they explode an atom bomb, we will save the Constitution,' Patra said.