
US reduces staffers in Middle East as tensions rise
The State Department said it has ordered the departure of all non-essential personnel from the US embassy in Baghdad based on its latest review and a commitment "to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad".
The embassy already had been on limited staffing, and the order will not affect a large number of personnel.
The department, however, also is authorising the departure of non-essential personnel and family members from Bahrain and Kuwait.
That gives them the option of leaving those countries at government expense and with government assistance.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth "has authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations" across the region, US Central Command said in a statement.
The command "is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East".
Tensions in the region have risen in recent days as talks between the US and Iran over its rapidly advancing nuclear program appear to have hit an impasse.
The talks seek to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of some of the crushing economic sanctions that the US has imposed on the Islamic Republic. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful.
The next round of talks - the sixth - is tentatively scheduled for this weekend in Oman, but US officials said it looked increasingly unlikely that the talks would happen.
President Donald Trump, who has previously said Israel or the US could carry out air strikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed, gave a less-than-optimistic view about reaching a deal with Iran, telling the New York Post's Pod Force One podcast that he was "getting more and more less confident about" a deal.
"They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame ... Something happened to them," he said in the interview recorded on Monday.
Iran's mission to the UN posted on social media that "threats of overwhelming force won't change the facts".
"Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and US militarism only fuels instability," the Iranian mission wrote.
Iranian Defence Minister General Aziz Nasirzadeh separately told journalists on Wednesday that he hoped talks with the US would yield results, though Tehran stood ready to respond.
"If conflict is imposed on us, the opponent's casualties will certainly be more than ours, and in that case, America must leave the region, because all its bases are within our reach," he said.
Earlier, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre, a Mideast-based effort overseen by the British navy, issued a warning to ships in the region that it "has been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners".
It did not name Iran, though those waterways have seen Iranian ship seizures and attacks in the past.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘They were taking our jobs': US employment skyrockets as ICE crackdown continues
Journalist Batya Ungar-Sargon discusses US President Donald Trump's whopping creation of 147,000 new jobs across the country in June. 'It turns out, they actually were taking out jobs,' Ms Ungar-Sargon told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'For five years, I've been making this argument that illegal migrants are undercutting the wages of working-class Americans. 'There's this narrative on the left that they are taking the jobs Americans will not do, or don't want to do and it's absolute nonsense.'

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘All the predictions were wrong': Trump continues to ‘make good' on tariff plans
Journalist Batya Ungar-Sargon says 'everyone was wrong' regarding the effectiveness of Trump's tariff plans. 'He had a theory of the case for how to improve the lives of working-class Americans,' Ms Ungar-Sargon told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'What we are seeing right now is him just making good again and again and again on that theory. 'The entire economic expert class was against this from the get-go and warned that everything he is doing was going to cause massive inflation, and it turned out that every single one of them was wrong and Donald Trump was right. 'He's been talking about this for 40 years, about how tariffs actually improve the lot of working-class people in so many different ways. 'All of the predictions were wrong.'


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
MARK RILEY: Welcome to Trump World, where the White House resembles the UFC octagon
Who would have thought that we would find ourselves in a time and place when it is less politically dangerous for an Australian prime minister to enter the Great Hall of the People in Beijing than it is to visit the White House? But here we are. Anthony Albanese flies to China on Saturday for his second official visit in just over three years, as questions intensify at home about when he will make his first visit to Donald Trump's Washington. Both engagements are important. Both have big strategic and financial implications for Australia. Xi Jinping will welcome Albanese with open arms and a similarly open wallet. Donald Trump, on the other hand, appears to be greeting his allies with a closed mind and a similarly closed fist. He has turned the Oval Office into a political version of his beloved UFC's octagon, luring in leaders such as Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa only to be boxed about the ears. And then he's subjecting all other allies, including Australia, to a metaphorical 'showtime kick' by coming at them from long distance with a flying foot full of terrible tariffs. The primary impact of those levies on Australia, at worst, is expected to run to a few billion dollars. Although an increasing number of global analysts suggest Australia could be a net beneficiary of the broader disruptions to international supply chains and markets. Yes, while the headline threats of 200 per cent tariffs on pharmaceuticals and 50 per cent on steel, aluminium and copper seem shocking at first, the broader effect might be that Australia actually makes money out of all this. Welcome to Trump world. And a closer examination of his intended impost on Australian pharmaceuticals exposes the folly of his blanket approach. To put none too fine a point on it, Donald Trump is threatening to tax the American people's blood. The majority of pharmaceutical products exported to the US are plasma proteins, such as immunoglobulins, albumins and clotting factors. The blood for those products is extracted from American donors through CSL's large US subsidiaries and transported to its Broadmeadows plant, in Melbourne. The proteins are separated through a process called fractionation and then transported back to the US for sale. None of those products from American blood is sold into the Australian market. All of it goes back to the US. The plasma proteins were granted an exemption from the direct price negotiations with health insurers under Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. They were not deemed to be typical 'pharma' products. CSL and Australia's trade negotiators hope the same distinction is made this time. Trump has given the pharma industry a 12-to-18-month grace period to adjust to his threatened trade barrier. That's time CSL and the Government will use to highlight the illogicality of a tariff regime that taxes the lifeblood of its own country — quite literally. And while Donald Trump is levelling his multi-billion-dollar threat at Australian trade, Xi Jinping is celebrating the removal of the last vestiges of his $22 billion a year trade embargo on our country. The revival of the annual leaders' meetings, which is the primary reason for Albanese's trip, is a big part of that process of trade normalisation. Securing a leaders' meeting with Donald Trump to address his abnormal ideas about trade has proved more problematic. Albanese opted not to travel to Washington between Trump's inauguration in January and the Federal election in May. They were the dangerous months in which Trump was signing presidential orders with all the flourish of a whirling dervish and any association with him in the Australian political context was an enormous risk. Circumstances dictated against a meeting at the G7 in Canada. There was nothing Albanese could do about that. And while there is no hard-and-fast rule that an Australian PM should go to Washington before Beijing, diplomatic convention suggests it is preferable. Mind you, diplomatic convention also suggests there is a greater risk for an Australian PM travelling into the Middle Kingdom than there is entering the land of the free and the home of the brave. Just not at Trump time.