2025 Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3 Review
You've heard data is the new currency and it's changing the way we consume everything around us. Data is changing the way we experience motorcycles, something we got to experience first-hand with the new Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3. The latest update does not bring any cosmetic or mechanical changes, but adds a major upgrade to performance with the new Ballistic Plus mode via a software update. We sampled the changes on the F77 Mach 3 on a test track recently at UV's home turf, Bengaluru. Here's how it feels.
The F77 Mach 3 gets upgrades as a result of Ultaviolette's extensive testing in Europe with data generated from over 80 lakh kilometres (Pawan Dagia) Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3: When Data Translates To Performance
The F77 Mach 3 has been developed as a result of Ultraviolette's foray into Europe. The company says it tested its products in Europe for one year before commencing sales this year, generating tonnes of data, helping the brand tweak performance on the electric motorcycle. UV says the F77 was tested for over 80 lakh kilometres in Europe, which offered a significant insight on usage patterns in India vs the old continent. The European roads and highways allow for more aggressive usage with the throttle staying wide open for longer, leading to higher average speeds.
Also Read : Ultraviolette enters European market, launches F77 in 10 countries
UV says while the average speed in India is around 40-50 km over a 40-minute ride, the same goes up to 85-90 km in Europe for the same period. This crucial insight led to the brand tweaking overall performance to suit the more aggressive nature of the European market.
The throttle is more aggressive with the Mach 3 with UV fine-tuning the motor-controller setup on the F77
The result is more upfront torque at the lower end of the power band. The difference is immediately noticeable, and the surge of torque just kicks in the moment you open the throttle. There's no change in power output with the motor producing the same 39.6 bhp and 100 Nm, but the torque surge has gone up by 20 per cent. The difference is most tangible in the new Ballistic Plus mode.
This also addresses the one complaint we constantly had with the F77 that the Ballistic mode didn't feel spirited enough. The Mach 3 changes that with a livelier throttle at your disposal. UV also says that 0-60 kmph time has gone down by a few seconds, and the bike feels faster on a straight line. The Combat mode has also been revised to feel faster, while the Glide mode has been subtly tweaked to continue offering the balance between performance and range.
UV says the more aggressive throttle should be felt across different speeds, especially in the mid-range. Overtakes on the highway should be much easier now, something European customers will like when cruising at near triple-digit speeds. The benefit in India is a much faster motorcycle without compromising on other attributes.
The data helped improve the transient temperature control on the motor, ensuring improved thermal efficiency. There's no change in the range and the 10.3 kWh battery pack on the Recon variant continues to offer 323 km (IDC) on a single charge. The 10-level regen braking introduced last year remains the same as well.
The Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3 remains a taut handler but isn't the most nimble motorcycle given it hefty weight (Pawan Dagia) Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3: Handling & Braking
The Achilles heel on the F77 Mach 3 remains its weight. It's one of the few complaints we've had with the machine since inception. The nature of the platform is such that the heavy battery pack makes for a higher kerb weight on the bike. The weight is noticeable at the front, especially around a sharp corner. It's still a taut handler and will easily keep you entertained around the twisties. The weight is distributed well, and at no point do you feel the bike being too front-heavy. However, moving it around at crawling speeds still feels like a task.
Braking performance is on point and the front lever feels progressive. It also manages to accommodate the more aggressive throttle well, especially under hard braking, which is impressive considering there's no change in the hardware.
There are no cosmetic changes to the Mach 3, which is great news for the F77 Mach 1 and Mach 2 customers Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3: Design & Ergonomics
There are no changes to the design and styling either. You continue to get the jet fighter-inspired bodywork that looks fantastic, while the fit and finish, as well as overall quality levels, feel top notch. This makes it virtually impossible to distinguish the Mach 3 over older models, something existing owners will appreciate. That said, you will now get the Ballistic+ branding on the digital console, which is the giveaway for the new mode and additional performance.
The ergonomics remain unchanged as well. You get the option of clip-on handlebars or the more commute-friendly Super Street variant, which adds a wide handlebar for a more upright riding posture. The Super Street feels more likeable for everyday riding, and UV says it's also the more popular seller, with six out of 10 F77s sold being the street variant. The riding posture is welcoming and there's enough space to accommodate larger riders too. The seat height is just right at 800 mm, making it accessible for all.
The Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3 finally gets the performance we were looking for from the start, making it livelier than before (Pawan Dagia) Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3: Verdict
UV has finally made the Ballistic mode 'ballistic" enough, and this easily makes me the happiest. The F77 Mach 3 lives up to its potential with the performance now matching up to the expectations. What's even more impressive is that the upgrades are backwards compatible, which means existing F77 Mach 1 and Mach 2 owners will also receive the new Ballistic Plus mode via an over-the-air (OTA) update. Moreover, the upgrade comes at no extra cost to new and existing owners. The Ultraviolette F77 Mach 3 continues to be priced between ₹ 2.99 lakh and ₹ 3.99 lakh (ex-showroom), only this time, it makes a stronger case than ever. With the brand currently present across 13 cities, it's now easier for us to recommend one to you.
First Published Date: 22 Jul 2025, 15:00 pm IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs U.S EU Trade deal agreement has finally been chalked. In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump 's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15 per cent tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9 per cent economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%.Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week."The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB ."We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses."That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner."Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world."A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. US is levying 15 per cent tariffs on Europe.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Canada's passport is losing ground; here's why it matter
Synopsis Canada's passport strength has diminished, now ranking eighth globally, granting access to 184 destinations. This decline reflects a shifting global mobility landscape where traditional leaders like the U.S. and U.K. are also losing ground. Singapore leads with access to 193 destinations, highlighting increasing competition for travel freedom as Asia-Pacific sees significant growth in international travel. Agencies Canada's passport power weakens, slips to 8th in global ranking Canada's passport, once among the most powerful in the world, has slipped again in global rankings, according to the Henley Passport Index, which measures travel freedom across 199 latest data places Canada eighth, tied with Estonia and the United Arab Emirates. Canadian passport holders can now travel visa-free or with a visa-on-arrival to 184 destinations out of marks a drop from seventh place earlier this year, when the figure stood at 188 destinations, and a four-point decline over the past say the ranking change reflects a wider shift in global mobility. A statement from Henley & Partners, which compiles the index, noted that 'traditional mobility champions are losing ground in an increasingly multipolar world.' As countries in Asia, the Middle East, and parts of Africa open their doors and secure reciprocal agreements, many Western nations are introducing tighter entry requirements. The United States and the United Kingdom have also slipped in the rankings, to 10th and 6th, respectively, despite once topping the list in 2014 and 2015. Singapore remains at the top of the 2025 list, with access to 193 destinations. Japan and South Korea follow with 190. Several European countries, including France and Germany, dominate the next the bottom end, Afghanistan's passport grants visa-free access to just 25 destinations, underlining stark global inequality in mobility rights. The Canadian passport remains among the strongest globally, but its gradual decline underscores the need for sustained diplomatic engagement. With international travel demand rising by 5.8 percent in early 2025 and Asia-Pacific leading growth at 9.5 percent, competition for travel freedom is expected to intensify.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?
U.S EU Trade deal agreement has finally been chalked. In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump 's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15 per cent tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. U.S EU Trade Deal Face-saver for Europe? Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Technology others Data Analytics Data Science PGDM MCA healthcare MBA Public Policy Product Management Leadership Healthcare Project Management Others Digital Marketing Design Thinking CXO Operations Management Management Cybersecurity Data Science Artificial Intelligence Degree Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nazlat Alsman: Unsold Sofas Prices May Surprise You (Prices May Surprise You) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9 per cent economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Live Events Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB . "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." Big Win for Donald Trump? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." FAQs Q1. Who is President of USA? A1. President of USA is Donald Trump. Q2. How much tariffs USA is levying on Europe? A2. US is levying 15 per cent tariffs on Europe.
