logo
Precise Positioning Could Accelerate Autonomy, Industry Panel Predicts

Precise Positioning Could Accelerate Autonomy, Industry Panel Predicts

Forbes08-04-2025

Ford Fusion equipped with Swift Navigation Skylark positioning system at the American Center for ... More Mobility, Ypsilanti, Michigan.
On a closed course, as soon as the driver gets behind the wheel of a specially-equipped Ford Fusion all the windows are covered. With no physical view of the course, the driver will attempt to navigate its twists and turns using only an image on a tablet positioned above the steering wheel.
After some period of adjustment and about a dozen crushed traffic cones, it's a clean crawl through a series of wide and tight turns and s-curves.
It feels like a video game but the exercise at the American Center for Mobility near Ypsilanti, Michigan this week was a demonstration of Swift Navigation's Skylark Precision Positioning System.
By using what's called global navigation satellite system, or GNSS, Swift's technology aims to provide vehicle location accuracy within one centimeter, by correcting any errors caused when satellite signals travel from space through the atmosphere to a series of thousands of ground reference stations around the world, according to the company.
It's a cloud-based software solution that works in concert with properly-equipped vehicles.
Swift Navigation image representing the difference in the accuracy of its system, from others. The ... More orange lines represent the correct driving course. The others show how far off other systems could be.
Not to be confused with the more familiar global positioning system, or GPS, which is a U.S.-owned system, GNSS is actually the umbrella term for all global navigation systems.
'GNSS in the vehicle, is the only absolute position sensor that tells you where you are in the world, but it's part of the larger suite of sensors in the vehicle,' explained James Tidd, vice president, systems engineering at Swift during a panel discussion of the future of vehicle autonomy at the ACM on Tuesday, presented by the Society of Automotive Analysts.
Panel discussing the future of vehicle autonomy at the American Center for Mobility, Ypsilanti, ... More Michigan, April 8, 2025. Seated left to right: Moderator Gary Vasilash; Mark Barrott, Plante Moran; Curtis Hay, General Motors; Daniela Steinbacher, Bosch; James Tidd, Swift Navigation.
Indeed, as the auto industry looks to improve advance driver safety systems and increasing self-driving capabilities, the demand for more precise accuracy in vehicle positioning has become more acute.
The challenges, however range from technology to budgets to competitive secrecy, panel members pointed out.
'We don't have a standardization, and I think this is a very crucial topic,' said Daniela Steinbacher, program manager at Bosch. 'Everybody's doing their own stuff.'
Stuff costs money. Mark Barrott, a partner at management consultants Plante Moran warned with average vehicle transaction prices already around $50,000, adding cost for technology, as advantageous as it might be, is probably not a good business decision.
'I cannot put this technology into a vehicle to force another $2,000, $3,000 on top of that, the price of that vehicle,' said Barrott. 'It has to be affordable. It has to be useful, and my consumer has to understand how to use it, what benefit they're going to get.
Self-driving systems such as General Motors's SuperCruise are becoming more popular, providing a break for drivers, as long as they keep their eyes on the road most of the time.
However, the systems are only as safe and accurate as their programming, sensors and information ingested about the roads and environment on which the vehicles are traveling.
Feedback from customers is they don't want SuperCruise to work in some environments, they want it to work everywhere, said technical fellow at GM, Curtis Hay.
'So as we expand automated driving to new environments, what happens? We see more trees. We see more buildings,' said Hay. 'We've got to solve those, they become more important problems to tackle the automated drive down highways.'
About 70% of auto brands are currently using GNSS, according to Tidd and Swift is working with around 20 automakers.
As both urgency and demand for more effective and accurate autonomy and ADAS technology increases, Tidd stresses it's imperative to look outward and upward.
'I think what's happened is people are now treating the intelligent transport system as a much larger system,' Tidd advised. 'You can no longer look at four wheels and a body of chassis and say, that's my system. You have to include the upper atmosphere, the surrounding environments, the road conditions.'
Indeed it must at least be accurate enough for a driver to get though a course without crushing a dozen cones.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's the 'Taylor Swift Tax'? How Rhode Island proposal could impact the star
What's the 'Taylor Swift Tax'? How Rhode Island proposal could impact the star

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

What's the 'Taylor Swift Tax'? How Rhode Island proposal could impact the star

Taylor Swift soon may be required to pay a hefty amount of taxes on her New England home, which is undergoing renovations, if a proposed tax act in Rhode Island goes through. Earlier this month, Rhode Island's House Finance Committee approved the state's 2026 budget, which includes a tax that targets high-end, vacant properties in the state. The "Non-Owner Occupied Property Tax Act," deemed the "Taylor Swift Tax," proposes a statewide tax rate for non-primary residences valued at more than $1 million. If passed, the act would tax properties, which are not the primary residences of their owners, valued more than $1 million. As Rhode Island's House of Representatives continues to work through the budget bill, here's what to know about the proposal and how it may impact the superstar's wallet. The proposed act would mean that "non-owner occupied" homes, or secondary residences, valued more than $1 million, would be taxed at $2.50 for each $500 of assessed value. For example, a property assessed at $1.2 million would see an annual tax of $1,000 and a property at $2 million would have a $5,000 annual tax, New England law firm Pierce Atwood explained in a blog post. The total value of the property is not taxed, just the value that exceeds $1 million. So how much would Swift potentially be taxed? When she purchased the house in 2013, it was worth about $17 million, but the property value has increased over the last decade. Zillow lists the property at $28.1 million, meaning it would be taxed at about $135,500 annually. The budget bill passed through the state's House Finance Committee days before authorities identified the remains of 31-year-old Eric Wein on Swift's property, shared by the South Kingstown Police Department on June 13. Wein's remains had washed ashore in an enclave on Swift's property on May 14. Taylor Swift's home: Human remains found near Taylor Swift's Rhode Island home have been identified The "Non-Owner Occupied Property Tax Act" has not been passed yet. As of June 11, the state's 2026 budget bill, which includes the act, was passed in the House Finance Committee. As of June 26, it is under review of the House of Representatives as a whole. If passed, the tax would affect properties on and after July 1, 2026, the state's budget bill reads. If passed, the tax would affect owners of residential properties who own a property that does not serve as their primary residence, valued at $1 million or more as of Dec. 31 of the tax year. The owner would not live at the property the majority of days out of the year. While the tax may be imagined for wealthy folks like Swift, Rhode Island natives could also be impacted by the tax, Stephen MacGillivray, a Pierce Atwood partner, told USA TODAY. "Rhode Island's a strange state where people in the northern part of the state have a summer house 40 minutes away ... often handed down from generation to generation. Those sometimes modest homes are now quite often worth more than $1 million, so there's concern that this is going to hit Rhode Islanders." The tax would not affect owners of rental properties that have been rented within the past 183 days, the budget bill states. MacGillivray said this exception may lend itself to an "interesting loophole." "You can imagine people coming up with all sorts of arrangements from legitimate to not so legitimate, where by they rent their house while they're not there," he said. High-end properties that are not an owner's primary residence can have an affect on their neighborhoods, city and state at large, the budget bill states. These property owners may not have a "vested" interest in the community their property is within and often, these properties remain "deliberately" vacant. MacGillivray said some believe these vacant properties are an eyesore in a vibrant community at the budget bill states that vacant properties often are in greater demand of police and fire protection. This story was updated to clarify where Taylor Swift's Rhode Island home is located. and correct typos. Contributing: Jay Stahl, USA TODAY Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Taylor Swift Tax': Rhode Island housing policy could impact singer Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What's the 'Taylor Swift Tax'? How Rhode Island proposal could impact the star
What's the 'Taylor Swift Tax'? How Rhode Island proposal could impact the star

USA Today

time4 days ago

  • USA Today

What's the 'Taylor Swift Tax'? How Rhode Island proposal could impact the star

Taylor Swift's Cape Cod home is reportedly worth about $28.1 million. If the proposal passes, she would be required to pay about $135,500 in taxes annually. Taylor Swift soon may be required to pay a hefty amount of taxes on her Cape Code home, which is undergoing renovations if a proposed tax act in Rhode Island goes through. Earlier this month, Rhode Island's House Finance Committee approved the state's 2026 budget, which includes a tax that targets high-end, vacant properties in the state. The "Non-Owner Occupied Property Tax Act," deemed the "Taylor Swift Tax," proposes a statewide tax rate for non-primary residences valued at more than $1 million. If passed, the act would tax properties, which are not the primary residences of their owners, valued more than $1 million. As Rhode Island's House of Representatives continues to work through the budget bill, here's what to know about the proposal and how it may impact the superstar's wallet. What is the so-called 'Taylor Swift Tax'? The proposed act would mean that "non-owner occupied" homes, or secondary residences, valued more than $1 million, would be taxed at $2.50 for each $500 of assessed value. For example, a property assessed at $1.2 million would see an annual tax of $1,000 and a property at $2 million would have a $5,000 annual tax, New England law firm Pierce Atwood explained in a blog post. The total value of the property is not taxed, just the value that exceeds $1 million. So how much would Swift potentially be taxed? When she purchased the house in 2013, it was worth about $17 million, but the property value has increased over the last decade. Zillow lists the property at $28.1 million, meaning it would be taxed at about $135,500 annually. The budget bill passed through the state's House Finance Committee days before authorities identified the remains of 31-year-old Eric Wein on Swift's property, shared by the South Kingstown Police Department on June 13. Wein's remains had washed ashore in an enclave on Swift's property on May 14. Taylor Swift's Cape Cod home: Human remains found near Taylor Swift's Rhode Island home have been identified When would the tax act go into effect? The "Non-Owner Occupied Property Tax Act" has not been passed yet. As of June 11, the state's 2026 budget bill, which includes the act, was passed in the House Finance Committee. As of June 26, it is under review of the House of Representatives as a whole. If passed, the tax would effect properties on and after July 1, 2026, the state's budget bill reads. Who would the tax affect? If passed, the tax would effect owners of residential properties who own a property that does not serve as their primary residence, valued at $1 million or more as of Dec. 31 of the tax year. The owner would not live at the property the majority of days out of the year. While the tax may be imagined for wealthy folks like Swift, Rhode Island natives could also be impacted by the tax, Stephen MacGillivray, a Pierce Atwood partner, told USA TODAY. "Rhode Island's a strange state where people in the northern part of the state have a summer house 40 minutes away ... often handed down from generation to generation. Those sometimes modest homes are now quite often worth more than $1 million, so there's concern that this is going to hit Rhode Islanders." A potential renting loophole The tax would not affect owners of rental properties that have been rented within the past 183 days, the budget bill states. MacGillivray said this exception may lend itself to an "interesting loophole." "You can imagine people coming up with all sorts of arrangements from legitimate to not so legitimate, where by they rent their house while they're not there," he said. Why did Rhode Island propose the tax act? High-end properties that are not an owner's primary residence can have an affect on their neighborhoods, city and state at large, the budget bill states. These property owners may not have a "vested" interest in the community their property is within and often, these properties remain "deliberately" vacant. MacGillivray said some believe these vacant properties are an eyesore in a vibrant community at the budget bill states that vacant properties often are in greater demand of police and fire protection. Contributing: Jay Stahl, USA TODAY Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@

Exclusive: Xona tallies $92 million as it sends Pulsar-0 to space
Exclusive: Xona tallies $92 million as it sends Pulsar-0 to space

Axios

time4 days ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Xona tallies $92 million as it sends Pulsar-0 to space

Satellite navigation startup Xona Space Systems secured $92 million in new funding, the company told Axios on the heels of its successful Pulsar-0 launch. Why it matters: The modern world would crumble without solid location-and-timing data. Militaries need it. Financial markets need it. A trip to the grocery store needs it. State of play: Xona is targeting automotive, logistics, mining and defense industries, among many others, with its satellite-based positioning, navigation and timing services. The company's planned low-Earth orbit constellation is expected to augment existing GPS until it becomes a standalone source of information. It inked a $4.6 million demonstration contract with the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory earlier this year. Threat level: The U.S. advantage in space is thinning. Plus, Russia's jamming and spoofing efforts scramble signals beyond Ukraine's frontlines. In one high-profile case, Finnair suspended flights to Tartu, Estonia, due to interference. Pilots reported issues near the Black and Caspian seas as well as Kaliningrad. What they're saying: " Navigation and timing are systems the world isn't supposed to think about. They're just supposed to work," Xona chief executive Brian Manning said in a blog post shared with Axios. "When they fail, everything around them will too."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store