logo
Ukraine hopes leaving landmine treaty will level the battlefield

Ukraine hopes leaving landmine treaty will level the battlefield

Times5 hours ago

Ukraine has taken the first legal step towards withdrawing from the international treaty banning landmines, arguing that the restrictions create an 'unequal' situation on the battlefield as Russia makes extensive use of them.
President Zelensky signed a decree on Sunday instructing his government to begin withdrawing Ukraine from the 1997 Ottawa convention, also known as the Mine Ban Treaty.
The foreign ministry said that Russian use of anti-personnel mines since 2014, which increased after the full-scale invasion of 2022, has created an unequal situation that limits Ukraine's right to self-defence.
In his nightly video address, Zelensky accused Moscow of 'using anti-personnel mines with utmost cynicism' in Ukrainian territory and of seeking to 'destroy life by all means at their disposal'. He also described anti-personnel mines as 'often the instrument for which nothing can be substituted for defence purposes'.
The decision must be confirmed by parliament before Ukraine can formally withdraw from the treaty.
Poland made the same decision a week ago in response to security fears over the threat from Russia. Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz, the defence minister, said at the time that Warsaw intended to leave the treaty because of 'security conditions on the eastern flank'.
Other countries bordering Russia, including Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, have either withdrawn, suspended certain treaty obligations or publicly signalled that they may do so. Russia is not a signatory to the treaty.
On Friday Lithuania said it had notified the United Nations of its withdrawal, and it will cease to be bound by the treaty six months after the notification. Kestutis Budrys, it foreign minister, said on X: 'This decision was not taken lightly.'
The potential withdrawals are a blow to the Ottawa convention, which has 164 signatory states at present and is widely credited with reducing the civilian casualties from landmines globally.
Anti-personnel landmines are small explosive devices, often made of plastic, designed to detonate under a person's weight or with a tripwire. They are attractive to militaries because they can block an enemy advance, channel forces into kill zones and protect defensive positions. They are a serious threat to civilians, often remaining lethal for decades after a conflict has ended.
Two months before he left office in the US, President Biden approved the delivery of anti-personnel mines to Ukraine to help stall Russian gains in the east of the country.
According to a 2023 report by Human Rights Watch, Russian forces have laid landmines in at least 11 of Ukraine's 27 regions since the start of the war in 2014, making Ukraine one of the most heavily mined countries in the world.
A report by the United Nations concluded that landmines had killed 413 civilians and injured another 966 between the invasion of February 2022 and December 2024. The Ukrainian defence ministry says that sapper squads have cleared almost 450,000 mines from de-occupied areas in the past three years.
Human Rights Watch has condemned the use of anti-personnel landmines, warning that they pose long-term dangers to civilians and hamper postwar recovery efforts.
Ukraine ratified the Ottawa convention in 2005 and destroyed millions of Soviet-era stockpiled mines as part of its disarmament obligations.
Roman Kostenko, chairman of the Ukrainian national security, defence and intelligence committee and a decorated special forces colonel said on Facebook that Kyiv 'cannot remain tied down in conditions where the enemy has no restrictions'. He added: 'This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded. Russia is not a party to this convention and is massively using mines against our military and civilians.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-un weeps over coffins of troops he sent to die in Putin's meatgrinder war in Ukraine
North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-un weeps over coffins of troops he sent to die in Putin's meatgrinder war in Ukraine

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-un weeps over coffins of troops he sent to die in Putin's meatgrinder war in Ukraine

KIM Jong-un wept as he watched himself back draping flags over the coffins of North Korean troops he sent to die on Putin's front-line in Ukraine. Around 12,000 North Koreans were shipped over to fight for Russia - but they were ill-prepared for the battlefield and many were decimated. 7 7 7 Kim hosted a ceremony which remembered the soldiers taken out by Zelensky's brave army - and things got emotional for the tyrant. Thousands of North Koreans stood to attention in the vast auditorium, with Kim in the front row. Images of Kim draping the North Korean flag over soldiers' coffins were broadcast on a giant screen at the front while a huge orchestra played emotional music. Women in long dresses sang passionately and there was even a harp player stationed on the stage. Kim draped flags over at least six coffins, and could be seen resting his hands on them in reflection. Watching the scenes back, the dictator's eyes shone with emotion. Other members of the audience - which reportedly included North Korean and Russian soldiers - were also visibly moved. The state-run Korea Central News Agency hailed the gala for reaffirming the "ties of friendship and the genuine internationalist obligation between the peoples and armies of the two countries that were forged at the cost of blood. The event was attended by Russia's culture minster Olga Lyubimov, who was visiting the Hermit Kingdom to mark the first anniversary of the strategic partnership treaty. Signed last June by Putin and Kim, it included a mutual defence pact - guaranteeing they will protect one another. North Korea's 'Benidorm' to FINALLY open next week as tyrant Kim Jong-Un cuts ribbon - and Brits have signed up to visit The treaty is believed to have majorly ramped up co-operation between the nations. Moscow is understood to be providing Pyongyang with vital military technology - including blueprints for missile guidance systems and air defence weapons. And after months of speculation, the leaders finally admitted that North Korean troops had fought for Russia. Kim's men were first reported to be in Russia back in October, and the following month there was strong evidence of them on the battlefield. 7 7 7 They fought alongside Putin's men mainly in the Kursk region - an area of Russia which Ukraine took in a surprise incursion. Thousands of the North Koreans died, with analysts suggesting they were not prepared for the modern style of drone warfare. However, it was admitted that the Korean soldiers were ultimately instrumental in Russia winning back the land in March this year. As the rotten partnership blooms, North Korea is expected to send another 6,000 troops over to Russia later this summer. The military assistance has been slammed by concerned nations, including South Korea and Japan. Officials in Seoul have raised concerns that it violates UN sanctions on North Korea. 7

When the Devil drives: Ukraine will deploy a truly horrible weapon
When the Devil drives: Ukraine will deploy a truly horrible weapon

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

When the Devil drives: Ukraine will deploy a truly horrible weapon

The decision by Ukraine to withdraw from the Ottawa Convention, known as the Mine Ban Treaty, comes as no surprise given the gravity of the situation that the embattled Ukrainians find themselves in in this third year of all-out war. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine there has been constant domestic pressure on the government and on President Zelensky to withdraw from the treaty, mainly for protective pragmatic reasons and in light of the fact that Russia is not a signatory to the treaty and is a prolific user of landmines. The treaty of 1997 bans the use, production, stockpiling or transfer of anti-personnel landmines (APLs). It further requires signatory nations to destroy stockpiles and to clear laid minefields. Ukraine ratified the treaty in 2005. It is a fact that APLs are horrible things. They do not only maim and kill soldiers, but anyone who may approach including children and other non-combatants. They are extremely difficult and dangerous to clear up, and often render stretches of land unusable for many years. But they are extremely effective, particularly as a means of defence against an attacker. In the face of the widespread use of mines by Russia since 2014 and especially post 2022, when Ukraine has been engaged in full-scale war with Russia, it increasingly looks nonsensical to have this significant disadvantage – designed for a world where the rules of the international order are followed by all sides and therefore a world that simply does not exist. The invasion by Russia has seen the increased use of mines of all sorts, though the use of anti-personnel mines by Ukraine has drawn scrutiny due to treaty obligations. Ukrainian officials and military have floated the idea of leaving or suspending the treaty citing the need to defend territory more effectively, asymmetry in military tools and tactics between Ukraine and Russia and the fact that whilst Ukraine adheres to the treaty the aggressor faces no such limitations in what, for Ukraine, is an existential war. It comes at a time when Russia's near neighbours in Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Finland have withdrawn from the treaty this year, once again citing the fact that Russia has no such restrictions and learning the lesson of the surprise invasion of February 2022. The fighting in Ukraine has also shown just how easy it is to clear anti-tank mines – which are allowed under the Treaty – when these are not mixed with APLs. The move is likely to be seen as a pragmatic move and looking to the USA – which is also not a signatory to the treaty but maintains a voluntary non-use outside of the Korean Peninsula – it is not ultimately one that should not upset too many of Ukraine's backers. The danger is that from a humanitarian, legal, and diplomatic standpoint, withdrawal would be controversial and potentially damaging. That said – if your country no longer exists would that matter? Needs must when the Devil drives, I believe.

Russia has taken first village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk, state media claims
Russia has taken first village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk, state media claims

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Russia has taken first village in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk, state media claims

Russian forces have captured a village in the Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk for the first time in their three-year offensive, Russian state media and pro-war bloggers have claimed, marking a potential psychological blow to Ukraine. There was no immediate confirmation from Ukrainian officials or from the Russian defence ministry. Russia's state RIA news agency cited an influential pro-Russian official, Vladimir Rogov, as saying that Russian forces had taken control of Dachnoye just inside Dnipropetrovsk. 'Our troops have advanced further in this direction and have already driven the enemy out of the village of Dachnoye. This is the first populated area in the Dnipropetrovsk region from which the enemy has been expelled,' Rogov wrote on Telegram. Three weeks ago, Russian officials similarly claimed their forces had entered Ukraine's eastern Dnipropetrovsk region, but Ukrainian authorities said the assault was repelled. Dnipropetrovsk, which lies to the west of the Donetsk region, is not among the five Ukrainian regions over which Russia has asserted a formal territorial claim. During recent peace talks in Istanbul between Moscow and Kyiv, Russian officials threatened Kyiv with taking more territory unless Ukraine signed a peace deal on Russian terms. Moscow has been pounding Dnipropetrovsk relentlessly, killing at least 17 civilians in a strike last week that damaged schools, hospitals and a passenger train. Russia occupies roughly a fifth of Ukraine's territory and has been making steady progress in seizing more land, though Kyiv says Moscow's summer offensive is stalling. Over the weekend, Russian troops took over a major lithium deposit in Donetsk, cutting off a valuable resource that Kyiv had hoped to use in deepening its economic partnership with the US. In April, the US and Kyiv signed an agreement to share profits and royalties from the future sale of Ukrainian minerals and rare earths, sealing a deal that Donald Trump has said will provide an economic incentive for the US to continue to invest in Ukraine's defence and its reconstruction after he brokers a peace deal with Russia. But the agreement did not offer Ukraine any security guarantees or protection and Moscow's capture of the mineral deposits could further weaken Kyiv's leverage with Washington. Areas under Russian control in eastern and south-eastern Ukraine include Crimea, more than 99% of Luhansk region and 70% of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. Russia also controls fragments of the Kharkiv and Sumy regions. Sign up to Headlines Europe A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day after newsletter promotion Russia has shown no sign of winding down its offensive in Ukraine, even as it continues to claim interest in peace talks. The Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said on Monday that the Kremlin expected the timeline for a third round of talks with Ukraine to become clear soon, adding that the dynamics of the negotiations largely depended on Kyiv's position and the effectiveness of Washington's mediation. Meanwhile, Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, does not appear any closer to persuading the US to introduce sanctions on Russia. On Sunday, the US senator Lindsey Graham – one of Kyiv's staunchest supporters and a close ally of Trump – said the US had backed a bill he introduced targeting Russia's oil trade. Butt he US president has repeatedly suggested he would be reluctant to impose further sanctions on Moscow, arguing they could jeopardise peace negotiations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store