Insurer ordered to pay $750k for misleading contracts
The HCF Life insurance term stated coverage could be denied if a doctor later formed the view that symptoms or signs of the condition existed before the customer signed the contract.
Justice Ian Jackman agreed with claims from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission that HCF was prevented from making such a term under the Insurance Contracts Act.
"The contravening conduct should be regarded as objectively serious," he said while delivering the judgment on Thursday.
But there was no evidence the not-for-profit organisation intended to breach the act, Justice Jackman said.
"Nor has ASIC demonstrated more than a theoretical risk of harm to consumers," he said.
Justice Jackman accepted that HCF intended to make its contract term clearer for policyholders to understand.
"While that desire miscarried as matters transpired, the intention of HCF Life was, in itself, a commendable one," he said.
There was also no evidence HCF Life benefited financially from the contraventions, Justice Jackman found.
"Insurance products were presented as less desirable than they actually were," he said.
In response to the Federal Court's findings, HCF Life issued a statement accepting the pre-existing condition in its Recover Cover products were liable to mislead the public.
"We apologise for any confusion that this may have caused and are committed to supporting our policyholders," the insurer said.
The insurer said it has published corrective information on its website and issued notices to affected current and former policyholders.
Along with the $750,000 fine, Justice Jackman ordered HCF Life to publish a corrective notice explaining its breach of the act.
ASIC has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
30 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
'Facts can no longer be concealed': Labor's renewables push undermined by CSIRO report proving coal is 'king', energy expert claims
Labor's claims about renewable energy appear to have been undermined in a new CSIRO report, with the Centre for Independent Studies' energy expert Aidan Morrison confident coal was still the "king" of cheap power. Speaking to Sky News, Mr Morrison refuted Labor's claims renewable energy was the best path forward and said the CSIRO's 'own numbers' in its recent GenCost report showed coal was cheaper than firmed integrated renewables. In the report, black coal cost $111 per megawatt hour at the lowest end of annual forecasts while backed-up wind and solar was $116 MWh under the cheapest model. Last year's report had black coal in second place at $107 MWh compared to firmed renewables, which were in first place at $97 MWh. Energy Minister Chris Bowen, however, said the CSIRO report showed renewables, backed by batteries and transmission, was the cheapest form of energy. 'Much cheaper than nuclear and the Liberal Party remains committed to nuclear, the most expensive form of the energy, rejected by the Australian people,' he said. Mr Morrison said the headline from the GenCost report should be: 'Coal is the king of low cost energy'. 'CSIRO's own numbers in this report actually say that coal is now cheaper to build than firmed integrated renewables,' he said. Mr Morrison claimed the CSIRO demonstrated coal was now the cheapest form of electricity for consumers, but had 'bent over backwards' to conceal the truth. 'In particular, the estimation for the cost of firm renewables, that is providing all the gas and the transmission and the storage to make that intermittent feast and famine energy into reliable electricity,' he said. 'Last time they told us that that was between $42 and $48. This time they're saying it's between $48 and $64. There is literally no overlap between draft and final between those two different estimates for how much it costs to firm renewables." Mr Morrison said the CSIRO had 'moved the goalposts' by adding 'caveat words' to its website such as 'low-carbon electricity', referring to renewables. 'They are literally shifting the goal posts in front of our eyes when they are no longer able, in their own analysis, to sustain the argument… that renewables are not just environmentally virtuous but also economically virtuous,' he said. 'The facts can no longer be concealed.' Mr Morrison said the CSIRO's report could not be 'taken seriously'. Earlier on Tuesday, the CSIRO refused to reveal its modelling on the cost of the renewable energy transition, sparking transparency concerns over the Albanese government's push for net zero. Among those voicing their concerns was shadow energy minister Dan Tehan, who pointed to the final GenCost report released by the CSIRO in which it said the modelling on its renewable integration costs was 'not suitable for general release'. Mr Tehan said the government needed to release the information given its broken $275 power bill reduction promise. 'Why? This is our leading scientific organisation and it will not release the modelling on these costs they are putting forward,' Mr Tehan said. 'Nothing in this report goes to that fact. As a matter of fact, all we see now is our leading scientific organisations saying they cannot release that model. Well, I think the government needs to explain why. 'The cost is being hidden by this government.'
Perth Now
30 minutes ago
- Perth Now
'Think twice': Libs warned on anti-build to rent stance
The voice of the Australian property industry is urging the federal coalition to think twice about trying to block the construction of new rental homes. The opposition plans on Wednesday to move a motion in the Senate to halt the Labor government's Build to Rent program, arguing that it's against the national interest because it gives tax advantages to foreign investors. But the Property Council of Australia, which has more than 2300 members, says attempting to block the building of some 80,000 new rental homes in the middle of a housing affordability crisis is wrong. "This is wrecking ball policy," Chief Executive Mike Zorbas said on Wednesday. "The main game, the only game in Australia right now, should be the rapid supply of new housing." The Build to Rent legislation passed the Senate during the last parliament, ahead of Labor being returned to power at the federal election in May. Under the laws that applied from January 1 this year, the rate of withholding tax paid by developers halved from 30 to 15 per cent and the capital works deduction rate rose from 2.5 to four per cent, allowing developers to write off the cost of construction faster. Liberal Senator Andrew Bragg, who is leading the Senate motion, says the program is effectively a "tax cut for foreign investors". "Labor's obsession with foreign landlords and big super taking over Australian housing once again prioritises vested interests over Australia's national interest," he said on Wednesday. "The Australian Dream is about people - not corporations." Under the build to rent model, developers build and retain ownership of properties for rental purposes. The federal government has previously argued that the private market needs to do the heavy lifting to improve affordability and access to homes. Almost one-third of Australian households rent and that number is expected to rise in the years ahead. The government's Build to Rent measure will operate in addition to state and territory initiatives designed to support the Build to Rent sector. Under the legislation, at least 10 per cent of dwellings in a Build to Rent development must be affordable dwellings, which would be rented at 74.9 per cent or less of the market rate and have income thresholds for eligible tenants. The Property Council says build to rent housing offers high-quality, secure, long-term rentals in well-located areas and that the model is used in nations with economies similar to Australia's. But Senator Bragg says the coalition's priority is for Australians of all ages to own their own homes. The coalition's disallowance motion will go the Senate later on Wednesday.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Tanker believed to be carrying fuel processed in India from Russian oil docks in Western Australia
A tanker believed to be carrying fuel derived from Russian oil has docked in Western Australia, with question marks surrounding the cargo exposing glaring loopholes in government sanctions against Moscow. Seferis sails under a Greek flag and berthed in Kwinana, 40 kilometres south of Perth, about 3am on Wednesday after departing India on July 11. Australia sanctioned Russian oil soon after it invaded Ukraine in February 2022. But India did not and refines Russian crude oil into liquid fuels like diesel and petroleum. When Australia purchases those products from India, it could be inadvertently funding the war in Ukraine. The issue is, there is no real way to confirm the origins of the fuel on Seferis, let alone what is being pumped at the bowser. Russia's income from exporting oil is the backbone of its economy and has effectively bankrolled the nation's war machine in Ukraine for three-and-a--half years. While Australia has committed to starving that revenue, the involvement of third parties like India has muddied the waters. Director of national security at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, John Coyne, said the majority of the country's imported liquid fuel does not come from India, but that does not clear up the issue at hand. "If Australia is to meet its full commitment of applying those sanctions, then it must also ensure that we don't contribute to a system that washes Russian oil through India," he said. Mr Coyne said Australia could follow the lead of the European Union, which applied sanctions to refineries that use Russian crude oil. "The first step here is making that very clear declaration that Australia will not take liquid fuels that find their origin in Russian oil and result in the transfer of money back into Russia that inevitably is used to prosecute and fund the campaign in Ukraine," he said. Ukrainian and Australian campaigners say Seferis is delivering fuel from the Jamnagar refinery in India. The Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) found in the first half of this year, almost half of Jamnagar's crude oil feedstock came from Russia. "This crude is refined into a variety of oil products — gasoline, diesel, jet fuel etc. Any country importing these products from this specific refinery can expect Russian molecules in them," CREA's EU-Russia analyst Vaibhav Raghunandan said. CREA estimated in the first four months of 2025 Australia bought more than $1 billion of oil from India that was derived from Russian crude. Earlier this month, two vessels carrying 175,000 tonnes of oil from the Jamnagar refinery berthed at Botany Bay in Sydney. The federal government said it had imposed more than 1,500 sanctions on Russia, including measures to restrict the import of oil that originated in Russia. In June, Foreign Minister Penny Wong announced Australia's first sanctions against Russia's shadow fleet, which employs a variety of murky tactics to conceal the origins of its cargo. "Regrettably, the mechanisms we would need to track and monitor all energy products via third countries are not in place in those countries," a spokesperson for Ms Wong said. "We are evaluating options to place further pressure on Russia's oil revenues." Speaking on Tuesday, WA's Defence Industries Minister Paul Papalia said the western world needed to be alert to the prospect of "Russia getting around sanctions and getting its oil to market … by sneaky means". "I think that is a real threat, anywhere in the world," Mr Papalia said. "Russia is still selling its oil around the world and they do it by third parties, things like refining in [third party] countries and then exporting." An international law expert said without mechanisms to oversee third party imports, the option to cut off India from Australia's supply is theoretically on the table. Australia introduced its autonomous sanctions laws, allowing it to impose sanctions independently of the United Nations, in 2011 and it has given flexibility to the government to target restrictions. "They can issue sanctions on a particular product and how we import that, which could include banning importing through a third-party state if it can be connected back to Russian oil," said Melanie O'Brien, an associate professor of international law at the University of Western Australia. Mr Coyne said the government would have to weigh up the implications of a drastic move like cutting ties with India. "At the pump, Australians want to pay the cheapest possible price for liquid fuel," he said. "There's [also] the pressure of our diplomatic relationship at a bilateral level with India. "All of these things play out."
