UN Security Council to meet on Gaza hostages: Israeli ambassador
Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, posted the announcement on social media amid anger over videos showing two of the hostages held by Palestinian militant group Hamas emaciated.
Danon said that the Council 'will convene this coming Tuesday for a special emergency session on the dire situation of the hostages in Gaza.'
The videos make references to the calamitous humanitarian conditions in Gaza, where UN-mandated experts have warned a 'famine is unfolding.'
Israel has heavily restricted the entry of aid into Gaza, while UN agencies, humanitarian groups and analysts say that much of what Israel does allow in is looted or diverted in chaotic circumstances.
Many desperate Palestinians are left to risk their lives seeking what aid is distributed through controlled channels.
Earlier Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu requested the help of the International Committee of the Red Cross to get food to the hostages.
In response, Hamas said that it would allow the agency access to the hostages but only if 'humanitarian corridors' for food and aid were opened 'across all areas of the Gaza Strip.'
The Al-Qassam Brigades said it did 'not intentionally starve' the hostages, but they would not receive any special food privileges 'amid the crime of starvation and siege' in Gaza.
Over recent days, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad have released three videos showing two hostages seized during the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the ongoing war.
The images of Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David, both of whom appeared weak and malnourished, have fueled renewed calls in Israel for a truce and hostage release deal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Netanyahu says will instruct military this week on how to proceed to meet war goals
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he will instruct the military this week on how to proceed in Gaza in order to meet war goals. Developing
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
The illusion of deterrence: Lebanon's crisis is no longer an Israeli one
Lebanon stands at a critical juncture. On the eve of a landmark cabinet session expected to address the disarmament of Hezbollah – an issue long avoided by the Lebanese political class – the US government officially delivered its final proposal outlining a roadmap for resolving the country's security crisis. President Joseph Aoun and Speaker Nabih Berri were notified by the Trump administration that the document is final and non-negotiable, in stark contrast to previous drafts that had been left open for discussion. For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app. This document offers a phased plan for Hezbollah's disarmament – beginning with its heavy weapons, followed by drones and unmanned aerial systems, and ending with individual arms. It also calls for the accelerated demarcation of Lebanon's borders with Syria and Israel, a cessation of Israeli strikes, Israeli withdrawal from remaining occupied points in southern Lebanon, and the release of Lebanese detainees. In return, the United States and its international partners pledge robust support for Lebanon's reconstruction and economic recovery – contingent upon full compliance with these demands. To assuage Lebanese sensitivities, key phrases have been softened. 'Internationally recognized borders' was replaced with 'international borders,' and the matter of Shebaa Farms was deferred to a later phase of negotiations. But the overarching tone remains unequivocal: Washington expects a definitive answer. With the cabinet meeting fast approaching, Lebanon is being asked to shed its habitual ambiguity and finally take a stand. For a state long paralyzed by fear and clientelism, the moment of reckoning has arrived. The timing could not be more symbolic – or more damning. The cabinet is set to meet one day after the fourth anniversary of the Beirut port explosion, a national tragedy for which Hezbollah bears political, logistical, and criminal responsibility. It is a crime that destroyed half the capital, killed hundreds, and injured thousands. And yet, Hezbollah has done everything in its power to obstruct justice, intimidate judges, and derail the investigation. President Aoun's legacy – if it is to carry any credibility – hinges not only on his ability to confront and disarm Iran's militia, but also on his refusal to allow the port blast to be buried under the lie of mere negligence. There can be no reconciliation without accountability. If Hezbollah and the Amal Movement once again resort to creative evasions – boycotting the session, obstructing quorum, or diluting the language of any final resolution – they will only confirm the core argument of this moment: That the militia state remains unwilling to accept the authority of the republic, and that its leadership is committed to maintaining Lebanon as a hostage rather than as a sovereign nation. Such maneuvers will not buy time – they will accelerate collapse. The key question remains: Is Lebanon's political class willing to govern – or will it continue to outsource sovereignty to a militia? For decades, Hezbollah has operated beyond the authority of the Lebanese state, unaccountable to its institutions, immune from criticism, and increasingly divorced from the national interest. Its narrative of 'resistance' has become a threadbare excuse for political domination, economic capture, and social coercion. Most tellingly, its own leaders, including its uninspiring Secretary- General Naim Qassem, who now insists that disarmament is a 'red line,' and that any local initiative to discuss it amounts to treason. Such statements should provoke national outrage. They confirm what many have long suspected: Hezbollah is not merely unwilling to relinquish its weapons – it is unwilling to acknowledge the authority of the very state it claims to protect. Even United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, which Hezbollah once invoked to halt Israeli bombardment, is now dismissed as a threat to its hegemony. Israel's recent strikes across southern Lebanon and the Beqaa Valley were not timed to coincide with political developments in Beirut. They are part of a broader, methodical campaign to degrade Hezbollah's military infrastructure. More significantly, they reflect a shift in regional perception: Hezbollah is no longer seen as an organic Lebanese actor, but as an Iranian asset whose wars do not rally national unity. What we are witnessing is not the prelude to a full-scale war, but the unraveling of a political-military entity whose bluff has been called. Despite its rhetoric, Hezbollah was unprepared for the current confrontation. Its weapons were never about defending Lebanon – they were about dominating it. When faced with a genuine military threat, Hezbollah's posture collapsed. Lebanon can no longer pretend to be a sovereign republic while allowing an unaccountable militia to hold a monopoly over force. No state can claim legitimacy if it tolerates an armed group that invades its capital, silences its critics, derails investigations, and assassinates political opponents – including former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and activist Lokman Slim, and many others in between the two. Even in diplomacy, Hezbollah has failed to act as a national stakeholder. During the maritime demarcation negotiations with Israel, Hezbollah and its allies conceded more than was asked – only to later reframe the outcome as a 'resistance victory.' Behind their posturing lies a deeper truth: Hezbollah's power is ultimately guaranteed not by the Lebanese state, but by tacit American tolerance, as the Obama and the Biden administrations gave Iran and its proxies a mandate over Lebanon and the region. It is now up to President Aoun and his cabinet to end this deception. The president need not order a military operation – he must instead articulate, clearly and decisively, that only the state has the right to bear arms. Hezbollah's parallel military structure must end. This is not a call for internal conflict. It is a call to reestablish legal and constitutional order. Speaker Nabih Berri, too, must be held accountable. His repeated manipulation of the constitution to serve Hezbollah's interests has undermined the credibility of parliament. The legislature cannot serve as a haven for armed factions. It must represent the people – not their captors. Some claim Lebanon lacks the time, will, or strength to confront Hezbollah. But time has already run out. The international community is offering one final opportunity for Lebanon to reintegrate into the regional order and secure its future. The shift from Morgan Ortagus to Tom Barrack – and now back to Ortagus – is a signal that the window for compromise is closing. Hezbollah's arsenal no longer serves as a deterrent against Israel. It has become a liability, not only to Lebanon's sovereignty, but to its very survival. Hezbollah knows this. That's why it avoided direct escalation and now clings to threats of internal strife. Its resistance rhetoric has given way to the language of coercion. The Lebanese people – especially those in the south many of whom lost their loved ones and their homes – deserve more than the brittle calm of temporary ceasefires. They want lasting peace, rooted not in fear but in dignity, legality, and a shared national purpose. That peace is no longer a dream – it is an inevitability. Lebanon cannot afford to postpone an open, national conversation about its future – nor can it survive failing to do the right thing when the choice is finally placed on the table. The illusion of deterrence has shattered. It is time for Lebanon to choose statehood over submission – before the next opportunity becomes the final warning.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Over 100 journalists call for foreign media access to Gaza as pressure on Israel mounts
LONDON: More than 100 prominent journalists have called for 'immediate and unsupervised foreign press access to the Gaza Strip,' adding to mounting pressure on Israel to lift its blockade on the territory, where Tel Aviv also faces charges of war crimes and genocide. The petition has been launched under the Freedom to Report initiative which advocates for protecting journalists and upholding press independence globally. The signatories include Sky News special correspondent Alex Crawford, broadcaster Mehdi Hasan, CNN's Christiane Amanpour and Clarissa Ward, and legendary war photographer Don McCullin. 'This is not only about Gaza. It is about defending the universal right to independent, on-the-ground reporting in conflict zones everywhere,' read the statement published on Monday. 'Gaza is the most urgent case, but it is not the only one. It reflects the gravest pattern of silencing journalists and restricting the press. If the democratic world truly intends to push back against this erosion of freedom, it must not turn a blind eye to Gaza.' With Israel continuing to deny international media access, global coverage has relied almost exclusively on Gaza-based Palestinian journalists. They have worked for nearly 22 months under extreme conditions, facing shortages of food, water, electricity, and internet access, and daily risks to their lives. Israel has so far resisted calls from human rights groups and media organizations to allow entry to foreign reporters. But the pressure has intensified in recent weeks amid growing international concern over what UN agencies and humanitarian experts have described as a 'man-made famine' caused by the Israeli blockade on aid. Last month, major international news agencies — including AFP, The Associated Press, Reuters, and the BBC — issued a joint statement calling for a humanitarian corridor to evacuate their local teams, some of whom were struggling to find enough food to survive. Since Israel's latest war on Gaza began, nearly 200 journalists have been killed — most of them Palestinian — making this the deadliest conflict for the press ever recorded. Beyond calling for immediate access and protection of media workers, the petition adds that if 'belligerent parties' continue to ignore these demands, journalists would seek to enter Gaza without consent. They would try to gain access 'by any legitimate means, independently, collectively, or in coordination with humanitarian or civil society actors.' 'These restrictions deprive the world of an impartial account and obstruct the path to accountability,' the letter stated. 'Unrestricted, independent access for foreign journalists is urgently needed, not only to document the unfolding atrocities but to ensure that the truth of this war is not dictated by those who control the weapons and the narrative.'
