Gunman Started Fire, Then Fatally Shot 2 Firefighters In Ambush Attack, Idaho Officials Say
The suspect has been identified as Wess Roley, a law enforcement official told The Associated Press on Monday. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the investigation. 'We do believe that the suspect started the fire, and we do believe that it was an ambush, and it was intentional,' Norris said at a Sunday night news conference. 'These firefighters did not have a chance.'
Sheriff's officials said crews responded to a fire at Canfield Mountain just north of Coeur d'Alene around 1:30 p.m. Sunday, and gunshots were reported about a half hour later. Three victims were brought to Kootenai Health, spokesperson Kim Anderson said. Two were dead on arrival, and the third was being treated for injuries, Anderson said. The wounded firefighter was fighting for his life after surgery and was in stable condition, Norris said.
The scene was sheer pandemonium as the brush fire burned and firefighters rushed to the scene only to come under heavy fire. First responders made urgent calls for help on their radios: 'Everybody's shot up here … send law enforcement now,' according to one dispatch. Idaho Gov. Brad Little said multiple firefighting personnel were attacked. 'This is a heinous direct assault on our brave firefighters,' Little said on X. 'I ask all Idahoans to pray for them and their families as we wait to learn more.'
Norris said it appeared the sniper was hiding in the rugged terrain and using a high-powered rifle. He said he instructed deputies to fire back. An alert by the Kootenai County Emergency Management Office asked people to avoid the area around Canfield Mountain Trailhead and Nettleton Gulch Road about 4 miles (6.5 kilometers) north of downtown Coeur d'Alene. Though the shelter-in-place order was lifted, the sheriff's office cautioned residents to be prepared because the fire was still burning. The status of the fire was not immediately known Monday morning.
The FBI responded to the scene with technical teams and tactical support, Deputy Director Dan Bongino said. The Idaho House Republican Leadership said in a statement: 'We are horrified by the murder of two firefighters in Coeur d'Alene and shocked by such a vicious attack on our first responders. We are praying for them, the injured, their families, and their colleagues.'
Coeur d'Alene is a city of 55,000 residents near the border with Washington. Canfield Mountain is a popular hiking and biking area on the city's outskirts covered with trees and heavy brush and crisscrossed with trails that lead into a national forest. Fire is always a big concern for the region, said Bruce Deming, whose property abuts the trail system. When he noticed smoke on the ridge Sunday afternoon, he wondered why no firefighting helicopters were responding. When a friend texted to tell him about the shooting, he realized why he wasn't seeing aircraft: 'Because they're concerned about being shot at,' he said. As deputies set up posts nearby, Deming pointed them to a trail that starts near his backdoor and leads directly to the site of the fire. 'I just don't want to have to wake up in the middle of the night to figure if somebody's out prowling around my place,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Lawsuit Says Trump's Immigration Crackdown Has Put LA 'Under Siege' in Defiance of Federal Law
A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday accuses President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during an ongoing immigration crackdown that has put the region under siege. The court filing in US District Court alleges that federal agents have violently and indiscriminately arrested people without probable cause while carrying out immigration raids, flooding street corners, bus stops, parking lots, agricultural sites, and day laborer corners. The lawsuit asks the court to block the Trump administration's ongoing pattern and practice of flouting the Constitution and federal law during actions in and around Los Angeles. 'These guys are popping up rampant all over the city just taking people randomly, and we want that particular practice to end,' Mohammad Tajsar, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, told the Los Angeles Times. In addition, the complaint claims that those arrested are held in dungeon-like conditions without access to lawyers. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the US Department of Homeland Security, said in an email that any claims that individuals have been targeted by law enforcement because of their skin color are 'disgusting and categorically false.' McLaughlin said enforcement operations are highly targeted and officers do their due diligence before making arrests. 'All detainees are provided with proper meals, medical treatment, and have opportunities to communicate with lawyers and their family members,' she said. The complaint centers around three detained immigrants, several immigrant rights groups, and two US citizens – one who was held despite showing agents his identification. It comes days after the Trump administration sued Los Angeles to overturn what it called an 'illegal sanctuary city law.' Tens of thousands of people participated in recent rallies over immigration raids and the subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines. Los Angeles prosecutors have charged more than 40 people in connection with protest-related violence and vandalism. Among the latest people charged were a man and woman accused of assaulting police horses and a 17-year-old boy who faces felony counts including attempted murder and assault against an officer. At least 14 people are facing separate federal charges on allegations of assaulting police officers with cinder blocks and Molotov cocktails and conspiracy to impede arrests.
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
The Latest: Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty in University of Idaho stabbings
Kohberger is expected to appear in court Wednesday to plead guilty to murder in the fatal stabbing of four University of Idaho students in 2022. He agreed to the plea deal just weeks before his trial was to begin to avoid the death penalty, which prosecutors had said they intended to pursue. Kohberger, 30, has been charged with killing Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, and Madison Mogen at a rental home near campus in Moscow, Idaho, on Nov. 13, 2022. The northern Idaho farming community of about 25,000 people was rocked by the killings and hadn't seen a homicide in about five years. Here's the latest: Kohberger decided to accept a plea deal only after failed efforts to strike the death penalty failed. His attorneys tried to bar prosecutors from seeking the death penalty on an array of grounds – that it would violate standards of decency or flout international law, that prosecutors had failed to provide evidence properly, that their client's autism diagnosis reduced any possible culpability. They challenged the legitimacy of DNA evidence and sought permission to suggest to a jury that someone else committed the crime. None of it worked, so they turned to a final option: a plea deal to avoid execution.
Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Al Arabiya
Idaho Murder Case Highlights Limits of Victims' Input in Plea Bargains
The man charged in the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students in November 2022 has agreed to plead guilty, according to an attorney for a victim's family. But the family says it opposes any deal that would take the death penalty off the table. Shanon Gray, an attorney for the family of Kaylee Goncalves, said the family has requested that a change of plea hearing for Bryan Kohberger set for Wednesday be delayed so that families could travel to Boise to attend. The family of Ethan Chapin, another of those killed, supports the plea deal, said family spokesperson Christina Teves on Tuesday. Karen and Scott Laramie, the mother and stepfather of Madison Mogen, plan to make a statement through their attorney, Leander James, after the hearing. Relatives of Xana Kernodle did not immediately respond to interview requests. Prosecutors stressed in a letter to victims' families obtained by ABC News that they had met with available family members last week before extending the offer. What happens when surviving families of crime victims, or victims themselves, disagree with prosecutors? Here's a little more on what rights and recourse victims do and don't have in the US and in Idaho. Generally, what rights do crime victims have? A movement to address the needs and well-being of victims of crime started in the 1970s and made grassroots advancements, like the first victims' help hotline. Laws addressing the rights of crime victims followed in the '80s, '90s, and 2000s and are relatively new for the criminal justice landscape. The 2004 federal Crime Victims' Rights Act granted eight specific rights to victims in federal criminal cases, including the right to be protected from the person accused of committing the crime, the right to reasonable and timely notice of proceedings, the right to restitution, and the reasonable right to confer with the prosecution. States were left to pass laws that governed victims' rights for state-level criminal prosecutions. Every state has some form of law addressing the rights of crime victims that vary. Most, at minimum, provide the right to seek restitution or to be informed about court hearings in advance. Many states have passed larger packages, sometimes called a victims' bill of rights. 'Really what these laws are designed to do is to make sure that victims are meaningful participants in the architecture of justice,' said Meg Garvin, the executive director of the National Crime Victim Law Institute. What rights are guaranteed in Idaho? Idaho's Constitution outlines ten rights of crime victims, including to be treated fairly and respectfully, the right to notification of case events and to attend those events, and the right to communicate with prosecutors, among others. It also specifically allows for victims to be heard upon request at all criminal justice proceedings considering a plea of guilty, sentencing, incarceration, or release of the defendant, unless manifest injustice would result. It was unclear Tuesday if any of the families had requested to make a statement at that hearing, but Garvin said that would be a meaningful opportunity for them to speak to the court. 'When a court decides to accept or reject a plea agreement, it has to be done in the interest of justice,' she said. 'It's a victim's right to have input in the prosecution, but also to make sure the court knows how they feel about a plea. The victims don't have control over the outcome, but they can offer something that helps the court analyze whether the plea is in the interest of justice.' Judges can reject plea agreements in Idaho, but it is a rare occurrence. The judge in Kohberger's case previously denied a defense attorney motion to remove the death penalty from consideration that had argued Kohberger's autism diagnosis made him less culpable. What does the right to confer with prosecutors guarantee? The right to confer covers a broad range of communication with prosecutors but largely means being kept informed and participating as a case proceeds. That can mean having conversations before a bail hearing to propose conditions of a defendant being released that increase a victim's feeling of safety or strategizing victim impact statements before sentencing. It does not mean that victims or their families get the final say in how prosecutors try a case or whether they can offer or approve a plea agreement. There is no appeals process for victims or families who disagree with a prosecutor's decision, but that doesn't mean there isn't recourse if a victim believes their rights have been violated. Garvin said not providing an opportunity for meaningful victim input can lead to courts reconsidering sentences or overturning outcomes and holding new hearings. She cited the recent case of Adnan Syed in Maryland, whose murder conviction had been vacated in 2022 after Baltimore prosecutors said they had uncovered issues with the initial prosecution. The victim's family later succeeded in getting the conviction reinstated after challenging the ruling on procedural grounds, arguing they didn't receive proper notice to attend the hearing that freed Syed from prison– a victims' rights violation. In the letter sent to the families of the Idaho victims Monday, prosecutors wrote, 'Your viewpoints weighed heavily in our decision-making process, and we hope that you may come to appreciate why we believe this resolution is in the best interest of justice.' Goncalves' family wrote in Facebook posts that family members had spoken to prosecutors multiple times from Friday to Monday to register their objections to a plea and explain their views about pushing for a conviction at trial and the death penalty. The statement said the Friday discussions were vague and that the whole process moved incredibly fast, despite nearly two years of preparations and waiting for a trial that had been scheduled to start in August.
