logo
‘They roll right over': Many Democrats call their party weak and ineffective, AP-NORC poll finds

‘They roll right over': Many Democrats call their party weak and ineffective, AP-NORC poll finds

WASHINGTON (AP) — Many Democrats see their political party as 'weak' or 'ineffective,' according to a poll that finds considerable pessimism within Democratic ranks. Republicans are more complimentary of their party, although a small but significant share describe the GOP as 'greedy' or say it is generally 'bad.'
The poll conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research in July reveals warning signs for both major U.S. parties as the political focus shifts to elections in New Jersey and Virginia this fall and the midterm contests next year.
Respondents were asked to share the first word or phrase that came to mind when they thought of the Republican and Democratic parties. Answers were then sorted into broad categories, including negative and positive attributes. Overall, U.S. adults held a dim view of both parties, with about 4 in 10 using negative attributes, including words such as 'dishonest' or 'stupid.'
But nearly nine months after Republican Donald Trump won a second presidential term, Democrats appear to be harboring more resentment about the state of their party than do Republicans. Democrats were likelier to describe their own party negatively than Republicans. Republicans were about twice as likely to describe their own party positively.
'They're spineless,' Cathia Krehbiel, a 48-year-old Democrat from Indianola, Iowa, said of her party.
She believes the party's response to the Trump administration has been 'scattershot.'
'I just feel like there's so much recently that's just going abhorrently wrong,' Krehbiel said. 'And they speak up a little bit and they roll right over.'
Democrats speak out against their own party
Overall, roughly one-third of Democrats described their party negatively in the open-ended question.
About 15% described it using words like 'weak,' or 'apathetic,' while an additional 10% believe it is broadly 'ineffective' or 'disorganized.'
Only about 2 in 10 Democrats described their party positively, with roughly 1 in 10 saying it is 'empathetic,' or 'inclusive.' An additional 1 in 10 used more general positive descriptors.
It is unclear what impact the Democrats' angst may have on upcoming elections or the political debate in Washington, but no political organization wants to be plagued by internal divisions.
Still, the Democrats' frustration appears to reflect their concern that party leaders are not doing enough to stop Trump's GOP, which controls Washington.
There is little sign that such voters would abandon their party in favor of Trump's allies in upcoming elections, and the vast majority of Democrats described the GOP negatively. But disaffected Democrats might decide not to vote at all. That could undermine their party's push to reclaim at least one chamber of Congress in 2026.
Jim Williams, a 78-year-old retiree from Harper Woods, Michigan said he typically supports Democrats, but he is 'disappointed' with the party and its murky message. He feels much worse about the Republican Party, which he said 'has lost it' under Trump's leadership.
'All he does is bully and call names. They've got no morals, no ethics. And the more they back him, the less I like them,' the self-described independent, said of Trump.
What do Republicans say about their party?
Republicans are about twice as likely as Democrats to describe their party positively, with many also using straightforward ideological descriptors like 'conservative.'
About 4 in 10 Republicans used positive attributes to characterize the GOP, making general mentions of words such as 'patriotic' or 'hardworking,' or offering associations with the word 'freedom.'
Samuel Washington, 65, of Chicago, said he typically votes Republican. Washington praised Trump's leadership, even while acknowledging that the president's policies on trade and spending might be creating short-term economic hardship.
'There's a lot of pain, but the pain is the result of 12 years of misuse and misguided leadership from the Democratic Party,' he said. 'I'm feeling really good about Republicans and the direction that they're going.'
But views were not uniformly good. About 2 in 10 Republicans said something negative about the party, including phrases such as 'greedy,' 'for the rich' or 'corrupt.'
Republican Dick Grayson, an 83-year-old veteran from Trade, Tennessee, said he is 'disappointed' by his party's fealty to Trump.
Among other things, he pointed to the price tag of Trump's tax-and-spend package, which will add nearly $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
'I've always been a Republican, but I'm disillusioned about both parties,' Grayson said.
How Americans view the parties overall
Among all Americans, the poll finds that the Republican Party is viewed slightly more negatively than the Democratic Party. The different is not large: 43% used negative words to describe the Republicans, compared with 39% for the Democrats.
Much of the negativity is driven by the opposing party — and independents' distaste for both. Independents are much likelier to describe both parties with negative attributes rather than positive descriptors, though a significant share did not offer an opinion at all.
Curtis Musser, a 60-year-old unaffiliated voter from Beverly Hills, Florida, said both parties have shifted too far toward the extreme for his liking.
He said he is ready for a serious third party to emerge before the next presidential election, pointing to Elon Musk's new 'America Party,' which has been slow to launch.
'Maybe he would get us headed in the right direction,' the retired schoolteacher said.
___ Peoples reported from New York.
___
The AP-NORC poll of 1,437 adults was conducted July 10-14, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left state over Trump-backed redistricting
Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left state over Trump-backed redistricting

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left state over Trump-backed redistricting

Texas House Democrats join Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks about the Texas Republican plans to redraw the House map during a press conference at the Democratic Party of DuPage County office in Carol Stream, IL on Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Mark Black) MB flag wire: true flag sponsored: false article_type: : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/toronto_star bHasMigratedAvatar : false :

White House pressure mounts as Trump clashes with Fed chair
White House pressure mounts as Trump clashes with Fed chair

Canada News.Net

timean hour ago

  • Canada News.Net

White House pressure mounts as Trump clashes with Fed chair

WASHINGTON, D.C.: On August 1, President Donald Trump escalated his feud with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, urging the central bank's board of governors to seize control from Powell if he refused to slash interest rates. The extraordinary demand made on Trump's Truth Social account underscored how aggressively the president has been pressuring the independent central bank to support his economic agenda. Trump denounced Powell as "stubborn," repeating months of verbal attacks against the Fed chief. Traditionally, the Federal Reserve operates free from partisan politics, with its mandate focused on price stability and maximum employment. However, Trump has been openly frustrated by Powell's refusal to move interest rates lower in the face of mounting economic headwinds. So far this year, Powell has resisted changing the Fed's benchmark overnight lending rate, which remains steady at an average of 4.33 percent. He has argued that policymakers need time to measure the economic effects of Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. In Powell's view, those tariffs could still ripple through inflation and broader financial conditions, making it too risky to act hastily. Trump, however, is demanding drastic action. "If Powell doesn't substantially lower rates, THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!" he wrote. Interestingly, two Fed governors—Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both appointed by Trump—have begun to echo part of the president's argument. In statements released August 1, the pair said that they see Trump's tariffs as essentially creating a one-time bump in prices, not a sustained inflationary threat. They added that the labor market appears to be cooling. As a result, they dissented at Wednesday's policy meeting, advocating for minor rate cuts, though not nearly as deep as Trump wants. Trump quickly celebrated their stance, calling their opposition "strong dissents," even as he continues to insist that the broader U.S. economy is thriving. His political calculus is clear: rate cuts would both ease borrowing costs for households and reduce federal debt servicing expenses, helping him head into the election claiming credit for strong growth. But fresh economic data complicates his narrative. The July jobs report showed only 73,000 new positions created, far below expectations. Meanwhile, earlier employment figures for May and June were revised downward to just 14,000 and 19,000, respectively—evidence that the economy is slowing more sharply than the White House has admitted. Trump insists inflation is not a concern, but the Fed's preferred measure currently runs at 2.6 percent annually, above the central bank's two percent target. Cutting rates by the three percentage points he is demanding would amount to an unprecedented shift. Economists warn such a steep move could flood the system with liquidity, driving up prices rather than containing them. The clash between Trump and Powell is not only economic but also constitutional. In May, the Supreme Court ruled that a president cannot dismiss a Fed chair merely over disagreements about policy. That decision forced the White House to explore other legal avenues, including whether Powell could be ousted "for cause" because of cost overruns tied to the Fed's US$2.5 billion headquarters renovation. For now, Powell remains secure in his post. His current term as chair runs until May 2026, after which Trump—if still in office—will be able to nominate a successor subject to Senate confirmation. Until then, the tug-of-war between the president's political demands and the Fed's cautious independence looks set to continue.

Tough US-Japan Trade Negotiations Open Opportunities for India
Tough US-Japan Trade Negotiations Open Opportunities for India

Japan Forward

timean hour ago

  • Japan Forward

Tough US-Japan Trade Negotiations Open Opportunities for India

Japan has been significantly impacted by recent United States tariff policies, with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba describing the situation as a "national crisis at one point. While Tokyo finalized a trade agreement with the US on July 23, it is worth revisiting the deal-making's broader implications. In April, the US imposed a baseline 10% tariff on all imports, along with proposed reciprocal tariffs on countries with trade surpluses. That included Japan, which posted a $63.63 billion USD surplus in 2024. Additional measures include a 25% tariff on auto imports and the reinstatement of 25% tariffs on Japanese steel and aluminum products. Starting July 9, Japan was to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. Accordingly, the July 23 agreement reduced tariffs on cars and other goods to 15% in exchange for a $550 billion Japanese investment package directed to the US, including equity, loans, and guarantees. It also ensured that Japan would always receive the lowest tariff rate on chips and pharmaceuticals compared to all other pacts negotiated by Washington. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on July 31st that reaffirmed the trade deal. Leading up to the deal, US tariffs were having a severe impact on trade, leading to declines in Japanese exports in May. Measured by value, exports decreased by 1.7% compared to 2024. Declines were primarily due to prices in the car, steel, and mineral fuel sectors, while overall export volume rose by 8%. Furthermore, Japanese imports declined by 7.7%, with crude oil and coal experiencing some of the sharpest declines. This resulted in a trade balance deficit of ¥637.6 billion ($4.4 billion) for Japan. These numbers rattled investor sentiment, causing the Japanese yen to drop by roughly 1% overnight in July. The Japanese currency remained under pressure, falling to a two-week low of 147.5 per dollar as of August 4. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (left) and US President Donald Trump attend a joint press conference at the White House on February 13 (©Reuters) In this context, India could become a strategic economic partner for Japan by boosting bilateral trade, strengthening supply chain cooperation, and encouraging long-term investments in the manufacturing and technology sectors. This article explores the potential enhancement of economic diplomacy between the two countries. Geopolitical shifts and uncertainties under Trump 2.0 create opportunities. Tokyo is moving from a mainly bilateral strategy to increased coordination with middle powers, and the India-Japan partnership can address this strategic gap. Japan has growing concerns about the long-term openness of the US market, viewing its heavy dependence on US trade as a risk. The weakening of multilateral trade institutions during both Trump administrations has hurt global trade and weakened rule enforcement. In response, Japan is expanding its broader trade connections, including pursuing a multilateral strategy with regional partners, such as South Korea and Taiwan. It is also increasing its engagement with the European Union (EU), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries (Malaysia, Indonesia), and frameworks like the Supply Chain Resilience Initiative involving Australia and India. In May, India and Japan notified the WTO of plans to impose retaliatory tariffs on US goods, citing WTO rules. India estimated it had $7.6 billion in affected exports. Japan's WTO notification reveals that its retaliatory measures would have targeted not only US steel and aluminum tariffs, but also American import restrictions on automobiles and auto parts. These were part of a coordinated effort to counter US tariffs as part of the proposed suspension of concessions. They provided an opportunity for recalibration of priorities, passively positioned within the US alliance structure. Meanwhile, they were accompanied by active reconsideration of ways to develop resilience. The US tariffs provide India with room to negotiate a new framework of cooperation with Japan that could have long-term ramifications. First, as the world's most populous country, India attracts Japanese companies. Existing cooperation with Australia on rare earths also enhances trade opportunities and economic integration. Second, Japan–India economic ties are intensifying. India becomes a more attractive manufacturing partner—a trend indicated by Nomura, which sees India benefiting from trade diversion and supply-chain shifts. It also utilizes a trilateral framework with Japan and Taiwan to diversify its supply chains. India is in a prime geopolitical position. According to the International Monetary Fund, India is projected to become the world's third-largest economy by 2027, with a gross domestic product of $5 trillion. Additionally, it has the second-largest English-speaking population worldwide and places a strong emphasis on STEM education, producing over 2 million graduates annually. Its blend of a rapidly growing, well-educated workforce and its strategic location near the Middle East, Europe, West Africa, Southeast Asia, and East Asia — supported by established sea routes — makes it an ideal spot for business. This could be a game-changer for India and its industry. Japan's advanced manufacturing complements India's labor pool, consumer base, low operating costs, and linkages to important international markets. Furthermore, the National Policy on Electronics, established in 2019 to position India as a global hub for electronics, has promoted the development of core components, including semiconductor chips, graphics chips, motherboard chipsets, and other computing devices. This has improved the competitiveness of the electronics industry worldwide. Similarly, there is the Indian government's Production Linked Incentive program. It pursues large-scale electronics manufacturing, provides financial incentives to boost domestic production, and attracts significant investments in electronic components and semiconductor packaging. India-Japan cooperation, through their Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, Supply Chain Resilience Initiative, and semiconductor ties, can help both mitigate US tariff impacts by diversifying supply chains away from the constrained US market. This would enhance regional trade resilience and attract investment in high-tech manufacturing. Together, they can reduce dependency on the US, strengthen regional economic resilience, and promote Indo-Pacific cooperation amid shifting global trade dynamics. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Prime Minister Narendra Modi meet on the side of ASEAN. October 10, 2024 (©Prime Minister's Office) Additionally, Japan faces a complex challenge in key sectors, such as the automobile industry, which is vital to its economy. Indian partnerships could also be utilized in this sector. Currently, Japan has a $4.6 billion trade deficit with India in the automotive trade, highlighting Japan's dominance in high-tech exports. However, India is closing the gap by increasing component manufacturing and collaborating on EV-related projects. By 2030, India and Japan aim to double bilateral automotive trade to $15 billion. This includes launching joint R&D projects in clean energy and smart mobility, as well as training 10,000 Indian engineers in Japanese manufacturing methods. Nevertheless, India has been cautious in its participation in trade rulemaking, its strategies for market access, and supply chain diversification. This is reflected in its positions in multilateral forums and its approaches to industrial subsidies. All of these will play vital roles in shaping its future path in global trade. India's call for fair trade negotiations must be accompanied by necessary domestic-level changes. That includes easing the business environment and relaxing government regulations to boost investor sentiment. This could ultimately benefit the Indian economy in the long run. There is also a shift in trade patterns, prompting a rethink of production strategies that could lead to deeper economic integration. India could benefit from this shift, as well as from increased diversification in global supply chains. With competitive labor costs and a growing manufacturing sector, India may become a more attractive option for production. It is poised to become a reliable long-term partner for Japan, leveraging its youthful demographic, institutional reforms, infrastructure, growing geopolitical stature, and global partnerships to anchor resilient supply chains. Japan should continue recalibrating in response to Trump's second-term trade policy within a multipolar Indo-Pacific framework. Strategic separation is necessary as Ishiba advocates for a shift toward formal, institutional diplomacy. Meanwhile, Japan is taking on a larger share of regional security responsibilities in more dispersed, networked ways. Those include increased coordination between India and Japan, as well as triangulation with other partners. This approach offers new opportunities and an innovative framework for cooperation, including reliance on rule-based multilateralism. It is a well-timed approach aligned with the shared democratic values of both countries. Author: Varuna Shankar

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store