New NMC rules expand faculty eligibility: 220-bed hospitals recognised teaching units; centre eyes 75,000 medical seats in 5 years
Doctors working in government hospitals, even if not part of teaching institutions, can now be appointed as faculty in medical colleges under the new rules by the National Medical Council (NMC).
Non-teaching consultants with 10 years of experience can become associate professors, while those with at least two years can be appointed as assistant professors without completing senior residency. They must complete a basic biomedical research course within two years of joining.
Government hospitals with over 220 beds can now be treated as teaching hospitals. This changes the earlier rule that applied only to 330-bed hospitals being converted into medical colleges.
The new regulations, issued by the Post Graduate Medical Education Board (PGMEB) under NMC, aim to address faculty shortages and support the expansion of MBBS and MD/MS seats across the country. The Centre plans to add 75,000 medical seats in the next five years, but lack of qualified faculty has been a barrier.
Postgraduate courses can now start with two faculty members and two seats, instead of three faculty and a senior resident.
Bed requirements per unit have also been relaxed.
Senior consultants with three years of teaching experience in NBEMS-recognised government institutions can be made professors. Diploma holders with six years of experience in NBEMS-run departments can become assistant professors. Up to five years spent in roles at the NMC, medical councils, or related government bodies will count as teaching experience.
The age limit for senior residents in pre- and para-clinical subjects is now 50 years. Tutor or demonstrator experience after PG will also count toward assistant professor eligibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Costly outpatient services in corporate hospitals leave patients high and dry
Hyderabad: Inflatedcosts of outpatient services offered by private hospitals are leaving patients high and dry, including those who may have already spent a fortune as in-patient in the same hospital. Upon discharge, many in-patients are referred to in-house doctors who offer outpatient services during specified hours within the hospital premises. A portion of the high fees of such doctors goes to the hospital. This explains why they charge hefty sums ranging from Rs 1,000 to Rs 2,500 per visit. For other patients too, the same amount is charged by these in-house doctors, be they surgeons or physicians. Such squeezing takes place in corporate hospitals across the city and elsewhere due to the state medical authorities' laxity in regulating this aberration. Due to the lack of regulatory oversight, managements of corporate hospitals are raking in the moolah unethically as if they are not accountable to anybody. There was a time when outpatient services were economical than hospitalization, but now, due to now the rising charges, outpatient expenses are becoming a cause for concern for the common people. The hospitals are charging at least Rs 1,000 for normal OP services and amounts ranging from Rs 1,500 to Rs 3,000 for specialized consultations like cardiology, neurology, nephrology etc., depending on the size and 'brand value'of the hospital. Insurance cover is normally for in-patient services. However, the charges for outpatient services are draining their financial resources. Aside from high registration charges, patients are forced to pay indiscriminate and excessive charges for a battery of diagnostic tests prescribed by doctors. The woes of the patients do not end at registration and consultations but continue while they move out of the hospitals in the form of prescription of medicines. That apart, the doctors in such hospitals prescribe medicines that are only available in their in-house pharmacies, which are costly compared to the prices in outside medical shops. It may be mentioned here that the National Medical Commission (NMC) has issued guidelines asking doctors to prescribe drugs using generic names, avoid unnecessary medications and avoid irrational fixed dose combinations. The State Medical Councils have the authority to take disciplinary action against doctors who violate these regulations. The Supreme Court, while hearing a PIL plea, had suggested the states to introduce a policy so that hospitals do not compel patients to buy essential medical items from in-house pharmacies at inflated rates. Judge Justice Surya Kant highlighted concerns over patients being left with no choice but to purchase medicines, implants and medical devices at exorbitant prices from hospital-linked pharmacies. The Court noted that regulations in private healthcare remain inconsistent, leading to potential exploitation. The petitioner had argued that the practice leads to blackmailing, depriving patients of their rights to have fair pricing. K Shashikala (name changed), who wanted to see a senior endocrinologist for thyroid was asked to pay Rs 900 (Including 100 for registration) for walk-in consultation or Rs 1,000 for registration through phone. During their next visit to show their diagnostic report, they were asked to come to a corporate hospital if it was very urgent as the doctor provides the services there. The patient postponed the visit for two-three days to avoid paying the registration fee in the corporate hospital. When asked, a senior official from the Health Department, who did not want to be identified said that while the doctors have the right to prescribe the combinations as per the needs of the patients, the patients cannot be forced to take medicines from the in-house pharmacies. The official further said that the pricing of the outpatient consultations also depended on the facilities the hospital provided and the modern equipment they possessed.
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
Govt Restores 30 per cent Faculty Quota for MSc/PhD Holders in Medical Colleges
New Delhi: Revisiting faculty norms in medical education, the National Medical Commission (NMC) has reinstated the 30 per cent appointment quota for non-medical faculty — MSc/PhD degree holders — in non-clinical departments such as Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Pharmacology. In its latest gazette notification, the country's apex regulatory body for medical education stated, 'In the departments of Anatomy, Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Pharmacology, non-medical teachers may be appointed to the extent of 30 per cent of the total number of posts in the department, subject to the non-availability of medical teachers.' This marks a reversal of the earlier move under the 2020 Minimum Standard Requirements (MSR) guidelines, where the ceiling for non-medical faculty had been reduced to 15 per cent, triggering concern and legal challenges from affected professionals. Dr Arjun Maitra, President of the National Medical Teachers' Association (NMMTA), welcomed the move, stating, 'The ministry has stood by the principles of fairness and meritocracy. This reform brings relief to hundreds of highly qualified MSc/PhD faculty members who were unfairly sidelined.' Although NMMTA's legal petition against the previous guidelines is still pending, Dr Maitra said the Ministry's decision to resolve the issue through policy reflects a commitment to justice and inclusivity. 'We see this as a milestone in our long and difficult journey toward recognition and respect,' he added. Previously, the NMC had also restricted such faculty to teaching only during a "transitional period" — without defining its duration — and did not clarify the scope of applicability. The lack of specificity led to confusion and anxiety among educators. Dr Ayan Das, Secretary of NMMTA, stressed the need for further clarity. 'To avoid ambiguity and alleviate concern among current faculty, the body must now clearly define the 'transition period' and correct misinterpretations around UGC norms — particularly the misconception that part-time PhDs earned in-service are invalid. Only distance-mode PhDs are not recognised.' The reinstatement is being seen as a significant step toward equity in academic appointments, especially in the backdrop of a growing demand for quality educators in India's expanding network of medical colleges.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 hours ago
- Business Standard
NMC relaxes medical faculty rules, aims to widen pool of medical professors
Non-teaching government hospitals with more than 220 beds can now be designated as teaching institutions to expand medical education capacity and strengthen faculty availability, according to the new faculty rules notified by the Post Graduate Medical Education Board (PGMEB) under the National Medical Commission (NMC). In a bid to widen the faculty pool under the new Medical Institutions (Qualifications of Faculty) Regulations 2025, existing specialists with ten years of experience can be appointed as associate professors, while those with two years of experience can be appointed as assistant professors without the mandatory senior residency. Before this, non-teaching doctors were allowed to become assistant professors after two years in 330-bed non-teaching hospitals that were being converted into medical colleges. Similarly, faculty with super-specialty qualifications currently working in broad specialty departments can be formally designated as faculty in their corresponding super-specialty departments. Bed requirements per unit have also been rationalised for several specialties. New government medical colleges will now also be permitted to start undergraduate (UG) and PG courses simultaneously, expediting the production of healthcare professionals and teaching faculty, the regulations said. The commission added that the move comes in line with the Union government's plan to facilitate the expansion of UG (MBBS) and PG (MD/MS) seats in medical colleges across India. In this year's budget, the Centre had announced a plan to add 75,000 new medical seats over the next five years. The Union Health Ministry had also recommended the use of existing infrastructure, such as small hospitals, for medical education. However, a critical bottleneck has been the availability of qualified faculty required to initiate or expand medical programmes. The regulations, NMC said, mark a shift in how faculty eligibility is determined, from rigid service norms to competency, teaching experience, and academic merit. 'These new regulations are a major step towards unlocking the existing human resource potential within government health systems and optimising medical education infrastructure,' it added.
