Money for Chaos Waterpark passes doesn't come from county's tax levy
This is the message Eau Claire County's CLTS Supervisor Amanda Gaetz stressed is one of the most important points she wants the public to understand about the money being spent not just for the waterpark passes but for the entire CLTS program.
'I just want to make sure that it's very clear,' Gaetz said. 'It's our expenses, [such as] the waterpark passes, [that] are fully reimbursed. They do not come out of Eau Claire County's tax levy budget.'
Concerns that the county had spent $68,000 between January and April had been expressed by County Board Supervisor Michele Skinner of District 11 at the last county board meeting. Eau Claire County Director of Human Services Angela Weideman sent out a memo clarifying why the funds could not be used for rent, utilities, groceries, and other basic household expenses, but further clarification of the memo specifies that these expenses are reimbursed by the state.
'Ultimately, the way that we set our rates with the state allows our full costs of the program to be reimbursed,' Behavioral Health Division Administrator at Eau Claire County Department of Human Services Luke Fedie said. 'Reimbursement means reimbursement. There is no fiscal benefit to the county based on provider or provider cost.'
He specified that the property tax levy — the portion of funds the county intends to raise from its portion of property taxes — is used to pay for what is called a 'maintenance of effort' or MOE, which the county pays the state.
'That's $359,970,' Fedie said. 'There are pushes from counties to eliminate the maintenance of effort because it is burdensome on the county to have that. Each county has a different maintenance of effort. That MOE stays consistent by the state regardless of program spending. So none of the CLTS program expenses contributed to the department's overage in 2024.'
Fedie stressed how important CLTS is to disabled children and their families.
'This is a really vital part of what we do at Human Services,' he said. 'This is really meant to make sure that every child has the opportunity to thrive, connect with others, reach their fullest potential, and ultimately remain in the community. One of the things that's important to consider with the CLTS program is that each of these children reach a level of care where they could potentially be placed outside of the home.'
He said that one of the goals of CLTS is to enable children to remain in the community, with their families.
When it comes to choosing between the YMCA passes or Chaos Waterpark, Weideman said 'that families have some choice in who they work with to try to meet the needs of their children. The YMCA is a wonderful place and often has swim lessons, lanes blocked off for lap swim. That can make the pool unavailable to children and families to use. Timing may matter for some families.'
To learn more about what CLTS one family in the region, see the article titled 'A mother talks about the value of CLTS for her disabled son' published in the June 6 edition of the Leader-Telegram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump's anti-DEI order sparks new federal funding guidance in Washington County
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Washington County has approved guidelines aimed at helping officials maintain critical funding amid President Donald Trump's anti-diversity, equity and inclusion policies. One of several established that entities with DEI practices would no longer be eligible for funding from the U.S. government. After several months of talks centered on how to preserve federal grants and other financial support, the Washington County Board of Commissioners voted to approve guiding principles during a meeting on Tuesday. CDC delves into bubonic plague case detected in Oregon in early 2024 The new guidance states that leaders will continue to operate 'in a transparent and open manner' while complying with federal, state and local regulations, among . Earlier in June, the its February 2020 commitment to DEI practices in response to the executive order. following pushback from several residents who argued leaders of the diverse county shouldn't adhere to the Trump administration's demands. However, County Administrator Tanya Ange noted that officials rely on $135 million in federal funding annually — and July through August is typically the period in which grants and contracts are renewed. Senior Medicare services administered through the Oregon Department of Human Services and overdose prevention programs managed by the Oregon Health Authority are among the resources that are currently 'at risk' as local officials wait to learn whether funding has been secured, according to Ange's . Despite uncertainty surrounding which resources will remain accessible in the county, some community members are arguing the new guidelines are too vague to ensure the protection of all residents. 'Simply changing the wording may not be enough to get the federal funds that we need, or maybe the wording is enough, but the resolution you pass is ambiguous enough to open the door for these funds to be made available for purposes they were not intended for — for not serving the under-resourced members of our community,' one testifier said. Ritz-Carlton in Portland sold back to lender to 'strengthen' struggling property District 1 Commissioner Nafisa Fai proposed an amendment that would have changed the guidelines to include language about Oregon's sanctuary state status, and to affirm that all Washington County residents would still have the right to access resources despite discrimination. When no other leaders voted to second the proposal, a decision that was met with 'boos' from attendees of the public hearing, District 4 Commissioner Jason Willey said legal counsel had already advised the county against changing the resolution. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Fast Company
2 days ago
- Fast Company
Stop coaching women to ‘lead like a man'
Sylvia was a senior partner at a consulting firm who decided to put her hat in the ring for the coveted CEO position. Four other internal applicants—all men—made it to the list of final candidates. Early in her campaign, Sylvia met with Andrea to talk about her strategy to win over the board and senior partners whose votes she would need to secure the CEO position. Sylvia deftly noted that, as the only woman in the running, her gender would be salient in the minds of the decision makers. As such, she wondered whether she should 'lead like a man.' Too often, women in the workplace are told, explicitly or implicitly, that success means emulating male norms. Speak up more. Interrupt more. Show less emotion. But when women follow this advice, they're often penalized for it. The problem isn't that women need to change. Rather, our definition of leadership needs to change as it is still stuck in a mold that rewards masculine traits and sidelines others. Based on our respective experiences researching gender bias at work and coaching senior executives on their communication skills, as well as our personal experiences, we've seen this pattern play out again and again. Women are coached to overcome imposter syndrome and project authority in ways that often backfire. Meanwhile, organizations suffer, missing out on broader leadership styles, emotional intelligence, and more inclusive decision-making. Two urgent shifts are needed: First, we need to stop encouraging women to lead like men. Second, we must expand our understanding of what strong leadership looks like. Until we do, we're not just failing women, we're limiting our organizations' potential. There are four specific ways women are often advised to 'lead like a man'—but instead of reinforcing gendered norms, we can coach everyone, regardless of gender, to adopt more inclusive, effective leadership strategies. Here are the four problematic approaches and what to do instead. 1. Avoid Weak Language When outlining her strategy for obtaining the CEO role, Sylvia referenced how many stakeholders expected her, as a woman, to use weak language, but then penalized her for doing so. Sylvia decided that she would strategically use weak language with some old-school stakeholders but consciously avoid it with others. The question is, should this focus on weak language have come up at all? 'Weak language' is language that is tempered with disclaimers ('I don't know, but . . .'), hedges ('sort of,' 'I hope'), tag questions ('. . . don't you think?'), and apologies ('I'm sorry, but . . .'). Women are often faulted for using indecisive language, and we are all urged to avoid it. So-called weak language can soften a message, convey interpersonal sensitivity, and build trust. As such, it can be a way to strategically position yourself with various cohorts. Recognizing the impact that it can have, we encourage a relabeling of 'weak language' to 'strategic language.' This is about all of us being strategic or purposeful with our language, including when we demonstrate vulnerability. Certainly, leadership requires communicating with conviction. But let's coach everyone not to be overconfident when they speak. Leadership also requires curiosity and humility. Disclaimers, hedges, and tag questions are useful when we aren't totally sure and to express concern and humbleness. Strategic language can be a source of power and strength. 2. Be Authoritative As a young information technology leader, Amy tried to emulate male colleagues through authoritative decision-making. But when Amy made a unilateral decision, she was surprised that she lost points with her staff. She quickly learned to seek everyone's input and ideally achieve consensus before making important decisions. Sometimes guidance to be an authoritative leader is overt. A client of Andrea's who had served in multiple C-suite roles left her last position when her male CEO repeatedly insisted that she was too soft and she needed to 'be a killer.' Authoritative leaders are also called visionary leaders, with their own vision for success. Men in leadership may default to using authority, as displays of dominance align with traditional male stereotypes and therefore tend to go unchallenged. While women may learn to use this approach in their attempts to establish credibility, it can backfire when they are misperceived as arrogant. The problem with this noninclusive, authoritarian approach is that it concentrates decision-making with one person and increases the risk of failure. Overreliance on a single perspective can lead to blind spots, regardless of how competent or visionary that individual may be. Even the most capable leaders have limitations in their knowledge, experiences, and biases. Particularly in less time-sensitive contexts, a participative, inclusive leadership style is better for everyone. Coach everyone to approach decision-making as a collaborative process. Invite input from all stakeholders, including those who may ask uncomfortable questions and those who typically remain silent. Building consensus will ensure all voices are heard, considered, and that everyone understands the rationale for decisions. This isn't about giving up control; it's about gaining valuable perspective and buy-in. 3. Master Self-Promotion A former male boss once advised Amy to 'take credit' for the success of projects, explaining, 'Everyone takes credit for everything around here.' But while Amy had led or contributed significantly to many initiatives, she felt uncomfortable claiming to them to be her solitary achievements. Her teammates deserved recognition. One of the most common questions Andrea hears from her female executive clients is: 'How can I talk about my work and strengths without sounding arrogant?' Notably, a leadership coach recently posed this question, proof that even those who coach others on confidence and communication can struggle with taking credit. The response to women and men promoting their own work and achievements has very different outcomes. Research shows that when women self-promote, they are seen as less warm and likable, whereas men who do the same are seen as more competent. Instead: Share Credit Generously Everyone should be trained that strategic self-promotion is leadership, not arrogance, so that women aren't penalized for it. Then the solution isn't to promote your work any more or less. Rather, it's to take credit differently. Visibility matters, and as such it is important to promote our own work. But we all need to consider the extent to which we promote our own work, share credit, and spotlight others' successes. True leaders understand how to confidently communicate their value while also celebrating the contributions of those around them. 4. Don't Be So Emotional After a recent workshop for female executives, Andrea heard from several women how effectively managing their emotions was a challenge. One woman said, 'My male colleagues can pound their fists and exude authority. Meanwhile, if I show emotion, I lose credibility.' Another participant spoke up: 'Imagine having any conviction. Suddenly, I'm labeled as an 'angry Black woman!'' Typically, the leaders we admire exude an ability to stay calm and in control, especially in crises. It seems that leadership is synonymous with emotional regulation. At the same time, emotional 'outbursts' are interpreted differently for men versus for women. For men, displaying emotions is interpreted as passion or authenticity. For women, displaying emotion is a sign of weakness and lack of control. Encourage everyone to lead with authenticity and discretion. Certainly, staying in control in crises situations is productive. But there are also benefits with sharing emotions and vulnerability. Communicating your convictions with passion can inspire a team. Leaders who demonstrate vulnerability also encourage a culture of psychological safety. That said, this is not about being unfiltered. There is an important difference between authenticity and transparency. Filtering and discretion are key. Redefining leadership Sylvia's question of whether she should 'lead like a man' was not just personal. It reflected a broader problem faced by women in leadership: the unspoken expectation to conform to outdated, masculine ideals of authority and success. If we want to cultivate inclusive, innovative organizations, we must redefine what great leadership looks like. Not by urging women to adapt, but by evolving the standards themselves. That's the only way we'll build a future workplace where all leaders can thrive on their own terms.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Steel appoints three American board directors after Nippon deal
(Reuters) -U.S. Steel said on Wednesday it has appointed three American directors to its board, more than a month after Nippon Steel closed its $14.9-billion acquisition of the company. Its board is now comprised of seven directors, four of whom are U.S. citizens, including three independent U.S. directors. Nippon had signed a national security agreement with the Trump administration in a bid to get the go-ahead for its acquisition of U.S. Steel. The agreement gave U.S. President Donald Trump a non-economic golden share and the authority to name a member to the board. The appointments include former AT&T CEO John Donovan, ex-Lockheed Martin chief Robert Stevens and Timothy Keating, who is currently the top boss at Keating Global. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
