U.S. revokes visa of Brazilian judge overseeing Bolsonaro case
July 19 (UPI) -- The U.S. visa of the Brazilian judge overseeing the criminal case against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro was revoked Friday, four days after President Donald Trump called the South American nation's treatment of the former leader a "witch hunt."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio made the announcement on Friday.
"President Trump made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States," Rubio said in a statement. "Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro created a persecution and censorship complex so sweeping that it not only violates basic rights of Brazilians, but also extends beyond Brazil's shores to target Americans.
"I have therefore ordered visa revocations for Moraes and his allies on the court, as well as their immediate family members effective immediately."
The visa restriction policy is pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the secretary of state to not allow anyone whose entry into the United States "would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences."
Rubio, in a cable to diplomatic and consular posts on Thursday, said public comments on foreign elections "should be brief, focused on congratulating the winning candidate and, when appropriate, noted shared policy interests," according to The New York Times, which obtained the memo.
De Moraes doesn't travel often to the United States, The Washington Post reported.
Friday, de Moraes accused Bolsonaro and his son, Eduardo, of conspiring to incite U.S. hostilities against Brazil, ordering the former president to wear an ankle bracelet. Bolsonaro was also barred from contacting foreign governments, and blocked from using social media.
The judge also is investigating online misinformation, and has ordered the takedown of social media accounts that violate Brazil's freedom of speech. In 2024, Elon Musk's X restored service in the country after paying a $5 million fine and appointed a new legal representative there.
Trump's social media company, The Trump Media & Technology Group, sued de Moraes in February, accusing him of censoring conservative voices on social media.
The judge is on the judicial panel to preside over Bolsonaro's trial before Brazil's Supreme Court, who was indicted in February after the alleged coup.
Bolsonaro has been accused of attempting to violently to retain power after his 2022 election loss to Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Lula, in a speech Thursday night, condemned Bolsonaro's supporters, whom he accused of siding with Trump about the "witch hunt."
"They're the true traitors of the homeland," he said. "They don't care about the economy of the country or the damage caused to our people."
On Monday, Trump wrote a letter to Lula threatening a 50% tariff on imported goods, because of how Bolsonaro "has been treated" and an "unfair trade relationship." Unless there is an agreement, the new rate takes effect on Aug. 1, he wrote.
Trump said that "the way Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace. The trial should not be taking place. It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY."
Trump also noted "Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections, and the Fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans."
Then on Thursday, he posted on Truth Social a letter sent to Bolsonaro about his "terrible treatment you are receiving at the hands of an unjust system turned against you," demanding an immediate trial.
"It is my sincere hope that the Government of Brazil changes course, stops attacking political opponents, and ends their ridiculous censorship regime. I will be watching closely."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
Green Card Holders Issued New Warning by Immigration Officials
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a warning to green card holders, reminding lawful permanent residents to carry proof of their immigration status at all times. "Always carry your alien registration documentation. Not having these when stopped by federal law enforcement can lead to a misdemeanor and fines," CBP wrote on X. Why It Matters President Donald Trump has ordered his administration to remove millions of migrants without legal status to fulfill his campaign pledge of mass deportations. The White House has maintained that anyone living in the country unlawfully is considered to be a criminal. In addition to people living in the country without legal status, immigrants with valid documentation, including green cards and visas, have been detained. Newsweek has reported on dozens of cases involving green card holders and applicants who were swept up in Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. A Customs and Border Protection officer in front of the agency's booth during a job fair at the Orange County Fairgrounds in Orlando, Florida, on July 10. A Customs and Border Protection officer in front of the agency's booth during a job fair at the Orange County Fairgrounds in Orlando, Florida, on July 10. Phelan M. Ebenhack/AP What To Know The Office of Homeland Security Statistics estimated that as of January 1, 2024, there were about 12.8 million lawful permanent residents living in the United States. The requirement for noncitizens to carry registration documents is not new. It originates from Section 264(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which makes failure to carry these documents a federal misdemeanor. According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), lawful permanent residents who fail to comply with these legal requirements risk losing their immigration status and may face removal from the country. Green card holders have the right to remain silent and request legal representation if detained. While carrying proof of status is legally required, individuals are not obligated to answer questions without a lawyer present. USCIS has also implemented a new $1,050 fee for certain applications that were previously free when filed as part of a green card case if the case was being adjudicated by an immigration court. The fee applies to Form I-131, used to request travel documents such as advance parole, and Form I-765, the application for employment authorization. The change adds a significant financial burden for individuals navigating the court system while seeking lawful permanent residence. What People Are Saying Customs and Border Protection posted on X: "Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate of alien registration or alien registration receipt card issued to him. Failing to do so can lead to a misdemeanor and fines if you are stopped by federal law enforcement. If you are a non-citizen, please follow the laws of the United States of America."
Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
Alaska Governor: Don't Blame Trump Tariffs for Copper Price Inflation
Record-high copper prices have some observers blaming the introduction of tariffs for the recent spike in prices. But pointing the finger at President Donald Trump misses the underlying problem. We need to increase our supplies of, and access to, copper and the other critical materials so vital to our 21st-century infrastructure. And whether we're able to expand access to copper and other important natural resources depends on four simple letters: N-E-P-A. "NEPA" stands for the National Environmental Policy Act, which has constrained the development of mining and refining facilities, and much else along with it, for decades. The law—or, more accurately, courts' and radical leftists' interpretation of the law—has resulted in incessant delays for important infrastructure projects, which get bogged down in never-ending red tape. In Alaska, for instance, the Ambler Mining District offers multiple deposits of high-grade copper totaling 9.3 billion pounds, as well as other critical minerals. Yet the Biden administration, after a years-long NEPA review, rejected permits for a road the state needed to gain access to the district, preventing the development of Alaska's natural resources for the good of all Americans. The Biden administration took this action to block the road last year even though federal law explicitly requires the Department of the Interior to permit access to the District. Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center at National Harbor in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on February 21, 2025. Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center at National Harbor in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on February 21, 2025. ALEX WROBLEWSKI/AFP/Getty Images But NEPA doesn't just interfere with energy exploration. It impedes approvals for refineries that process raw ore, and slows down permitting for the bridges, railroads, and highways that companies use to transport finished products. While our adversaries like China have been building projects that can grow their economy, the radical Left has utilized NEPA to keep our infrastructure projects stuck in neutral. Fortunately, two factors should help to bring an end to this foolish regulatory overkill. First, the Supreme Court in a recent unanimous decision ruled that courts should not "micromanage" agencies' approval of environmental impact statements, and should instead give them "substantial deference." For instance, courts should not consider upstream or downstream impacts—such as the oil that might travel on a new railway—when evaluating the impact of a particular project (in this case, the railroad). The Court's ruling will rein in the ability of judges to collude with the environmental lobby in ways that prevent projects from ever getting approved. Second, President Trump, unlike his predecessor, wants to supercharge growth, and is taking numerous steps to move in that direction. Several of his executive orders, including a day-one executive order specifically dedicated to "unleashing Alaska's extraordinary resource potential," have focused on marshaling all our nation's natural resources to release our economy's full potential. The new National Energy Dominance Council will help coordinate these efforts, and the Supreme Court's ruling can cut through unnecessary permitting bureaucracy. In announcing his tariffs, President Trump said he wanted the United States to "once again, build a DOMINANT Copper Industry." With a new mine taking an average of 29 years to develop—the second-longest such process in the world—it will take permitting reforms and an impatience for red tape to see that vision through to success. Here's hoping that President Trump's actions and the Supreme Court ruling will help make it happen. Mike Dunleavy is the governor of Alaska. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
UPI
26 minutes ago
- UPI
House committee votes to approve subpoenas on Epstein files
1 of 5 | Protesters hold photos of Jeffrey Epstein and President Donald Trump outside a bail hearing at Manhattan Federal Court in July 2019 after Epstein's arrest on sex-trafficking charges in New York City. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo July 23 (UPI) -- The U.S. House Oversight Committee on Wednesday subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell as a subcommittee sought subpoenas for President Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and the Justice Department. A House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee also approved subpoenas to obtain Department of Justice records related to the Epstein files and deposing former President Bill Clinton and other Democrats. Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., introduced the motion to subpoena the DOJ's "full, complete [and] unredacted" Epstein files, which passed with an 8-2 vote. Republican Reps. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, Brian Jack of Georgia and Scott Perry of Pennsylvania joined Democrats in voting in favor of the subpoena motion. House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said he will sign the DOJ subpoena for the Epstein files, ABC News reported. The subcommittee also seeks former President Clinton's and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's depositions. Others targeted for subpoenas include James Comey, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Robert Mueller, Alberto Gonzales and Jeff Sessions. House speaker questions Maxwell's credibility The Oversight Committee wants to depose Maxwell on Aug. 11 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, Fla. Maxwell, 63, was an associate of former financier and convicted sex offender Epstein, who killed himself while jailed in New York City and awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges that included minors in 2019. She also is the daughter of former British media mogul Robert Maxwell and is serving a 20-year prison sentence in Florida after a jury found her guilty of sex trafficking in 2021. "The facts and circumstances surrounding both your and Mr. Epstein's cases have received immense public interest and scrutiny," Comer said in the subpoena. Comer said the Justice Department also is undertaking "efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to your and Mr. Epstein's cases." "It is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally," he added, "and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of you and Mr. Epstein." Comer submitted the subpoena a day after a House Oversight subcommittee approved a motion that directed him to seek Maxwell's testimony before the Oversight Committee. The Justice Department on Tuesday also announced it will interview Maxwell soon to provide greater transparency in the case against Epstein. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Wednesday questioned the credibility of Maxwell's testimony. "Could she be counted on to tell the truth?" Johnson asked reporters. "Is she a credible witness?" He called Maxwell "a person who's been sentenced to many, many years in prison for terrible, unspeakable conspiratorial acts and acts against innocent young people." Federal judge denies Epstein grand jury files access A federal judge on Wednesday denied one of three DOJ requests to release grand jury records from Epstein's case there. U.S. District of Southern Florida Judge Robin Rosenberg refused to unseal the grand jury testimony and records from cases against Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Rosenberg said the Justice Department did not sufficiently outline arguments to unseal the court records. She also denied a request to transfer the matter to the U.S. District Court for Southern New York. Two federal judges there similarly are considering DOJ motions to unseal grand jury files from the former Epstein cases. Bondi said Trump's name is in the files While those rulings are pending, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump his name appears in the Epstein files, The New York Times reported on Wednesday. Bondi did not state the context in which Trump is mentioned, and White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said Trump did not engage in any wrongdoing. Instead, Trump expelled Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club because the president thought Epstein was a "creep," Cheung added. Bondi earlier suggested she would release files related to the Epstein case, but recently said they don't contain anything noteworthy. Her announcement regarding the files triggered controversy, including among Republican congressional members. Johnson canceled Thursday's House session and said the chamber will recess until Sept. 2.
