Bills to ban gender-affirming breast surgery, hormone treatments for minors attract heated debate
House Bill 377 would make it a Class B felony to prescribe, administer, or supply puberty blockers or hormone replacement therapy to anyone under 18. (Photo by)
When Jennifer Boisvert's son Luke told her at age 9 that he identifies as a boy, the transition process was simple: support her son, buy him his preferred clothes, and use his preferred pronouns.
'He's had months, years of counseling,' she said to lawmakers Monday. 'He's well rounded. He's a happy kid.'
The more difficult process would come later. Luke Boisvert, now 13, does not produce sex hormones and has just one X chromosome, a condition known as Turner syndrome. That means he does not need puberty blockers — but he does need hormone treatment, either in the form of testosterone or estrogen.
'My body physically cannot go through puberty on its own,' Luke Boisvert testified Monday. 'Because of this, I need to take one of the hormones so I can go through puberty. I would prefer to take testosterone, of course, because it fits what I want to look like, sound like, feel like, and who I am: a boy.'
The Boisverts, who live in Nashua, are moving forward with a process and a team at Massachusetts General Hospital. But proposed legislation in the state would bar such practice of hormone therapy in New Hampshire — and threaten felony charges.
IF YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW is in a crisis, call, text or chat the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988. To reach the New Hampshire Rapid Response Access Point, call or text 833-710-6477. If you need help with grief and loss, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention offers advice and resources. You can also call the National SAMHSA Helpline, 1-800-662-HELP, with services in English and Spanish, toll free 24/7.
In 2024, Gov. Chris Sununu signed into law a ban on certain gender-affirming surgeries for people under 18. But the ban did not apply to all types of surgeries, nor did it impact other treatments for transgender youth, such as puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy.
This year, Republican state lawmakers are seeking to ban those, too. A pair of bills to do so attracted heated, emotional testimony to the House Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs Committee Monday.
House Bill 377 would make it a Class B felony to prescribe, administer, or supply puberty blockers or hormone replacement therapy to anyone under 18. And House Bill 712 would ban gender-affirming breast surgeries for minors, and limit the use of such surgeries to those needed to treat 'malignancy, injury, infection, or malformation.' The latter bill would not carry a felony charge but could open surgeons up to litigation for providing them.
Republicans, inspired by national political trends, say the procedures should be banned until people are adults and can decide to undergo the treatments without parental consent. They argued that not enough is known about the long-term effects of the procedures and pointed to cases in which adults have expressed regrets for undergoing them as children.
'Children cannot fully comprehend the lifelong implications of altering their bodies with powerful medications,' said Rep. Lisa Mazur, a Goffstown Republican and the sponsor of HB 377. 'Yet we are witnessing a concerning trend where children, some as young as 3 years old, are being seen as patients in gender clinics.'
Democrats and LGBTQ+ advocates, meanwhile, decried the bill as an attack on transgender people and said it would exacerbate gender dysphoria among transgender youth and could ultimately increase suicide attempts. Over hours, transgender teens and young adults testified to their own experiences, seeking to convince the committee not to recommend the bills.
Gender-affirming surgeries for minors are rare, according to data from the National Institutes of Health. Puberty blockers and hormone therapy treatments are more common for that age group.
But opponents of the bills say allowing both as options is crucial to give physicians the best tools to help struggling youth.
'All transgender young people in New Hampshire should be able to get the doctor-prescribed medical care they need,' said Linds Jakows, the co-founder of the advocacy group 603 Equality, in a statement Monday. 'Patients, families, and providers must be the ones making these decisions, not politicians.'
Conservatives and other supporters of the bill had the opposite view, contending that the procedures are more likely to harm children than help them.
Rep. Erica Layon, a Derry Republican, argued there should be better avenues to help transgender teenagers than to give them procedures that can be irreversible.
'It's not compassionate to give these to kids, and I ask that we stand up and we say that it's time to end this experiment and protect kids,' Layon said.
The bills emerged after a 2024 election season in which transgender rights became a central flashpoint, as Republicans, including now-President Donald Trump, vowed to ban the procedures across the country.
Supporters of the bill on Monday pointed to research indicating that hormone therapy and puberty blockers can carry long-term side effects and hamper bone growth and bone density.
Advocates pushed back on the safety risks, with some citing a 2023 study in the New England Journal of Medicine showing increases in 'appearance congruence, positive affect, and life satisfaction' among teenagers and young people after two years of their transitioning.
And transgender people said they disagreed that any risks justified banning the procedures. To many, puberty blockers and hormone therapy allowed them to finally realize their gender identity and shed the misery they had experienced before.
'There's been a lot of talk about regret and permanent, irreversible decisions, and let me start by saying that my biggest regret is not transitioning sooner,' said Savannah Griffin, a transgender woman from Bradford.
When Griffin was 17, before she had come out, her severe depression caused her to drive her truck off the road in an attempted suicide. She survived, and began seeking therapy and taking antidepressants. Eventually, realizing the source of her pain, she began estrogen treatments at age 18.
'It's the best decision I've ever made,' she said. 'Six and a half months after starting the estrogen, I was able to quit the antidepressants. I've been as happy as I've ever been, and I go months without having suicidal thoughts at all, whereas before coming out it was daily.'
'As for irreversible changes, suicide is an extremely irreversible change,' Griffin said.
The committee will make a recommendation on the bills in the coming weeks, after which they will head to the full 400-member House.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Planned Parenthood isn't the only loser in Supreme Court case. Women lose, too.
While Democrats have shied away from talking about abortion since the 2024 presidential election, it is still an issue Republicans are rallying around. Almost three years to the day since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the justices have once again made a decision that will limit access to reproductive care. This time, they're explicitly coming after Planned Parenthood. On Thursday, June 26, the Supreme Court ruled in a decision that could allow states to keep Medicaid dollars from the organization. In the 6-3 ruling, the justices determined that individuals could not sue to choose their health care provider after a patient sued South Carolina to receive reproductive care from Planned Parenthood. By making this decision, the courts are potentially shutting Planned Parenthood out of millions of dollars that would go to necessary health care options like birth control, cancer screenings and testing for sexually transmitted infections. It's a ruling that, like Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson pointed out in her dissent, is going to harm people who rely on Planned Parenthood for their care. The plan was always to end abortion in every state It's just another instance of conservatives ignoring the realities of women's health care in favor of their beliefs, and a reminder that abortion continues to be a Republican target. It's also a reminder that we'll be living in this dystopian health care nightmare for a very, very long time. While Democrats have shied away from talking about abortion since the 2024 presidential election, it is still an issue Republicans are rallying around. They were never going to be satisfied with simply returning abortion rights back to the states, the plan was always to eradicate the health care procedure nationwide. Opinion: Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me. In May, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered the Food and Drug Administration to review mifepristone, an abortion medication, because of a study from a conservative think tank that relies on flawed data. The majority of abortions in 2023 were medication abortions. If mifepristone were suddenly taken off the market, it would have huge ramifications for patients across the country. Planned Parenthood was also already struggling after President Donald Trump froze federal funding to more than 100 clinics earlier this year. It has led clinics across the country to shut down. His One Big Beautiful Bill Act also would block Medicaid patients from seeking care at Planned Parenthood, which could lead to more closures. None of this is happening in a vacuum. All of these Republican attacks amount to a nationwide assault on abortion rights, no matter where one is located in the country. Millions of people could soon lose access to the care they need because of the Republican agenda. Abortion bans aren't working. Defunding Planned Parenthood won't change that. Despite these targeted attacks on abortion, the procedure hasn't become less popular in the years following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. In 2024, there was actually an increase in abortions, with a quarter of those procedures occurring via telehealth for medication. Public opinion on abortion has remained steady, with Pew Research Center reporting that 63% of Americans supported abortion in all or most cases in 2024. Opinion: Democrats don't need to move to the center. Mamdani proves progressives can win. Clearly, Republican leaders are only listening to a small subset of their constituency when they decide to go after Planned Parenthood. They do not listen to the millions of people who have benefited from the wide range of services that the organization provides. Instead, they would rather spread falsehoods about abortion and how it is funded. They will not be happy until abortions are nearly impossible to obtain, even when someone's life is at risk. The Supreme Court's latest cruel decision shows that we are still living with the long-term repercussions of having Trump nominate three justices to the bench. And this is just the beginning. It's clear nothing is going to stop Republicans from attacking Planned Parenthood until it's unable to function because of a lack of government funding. It's shameful that they continue to put a political agenda ahead of the health care needs of women. It's also not changing anytime soon. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno


Business Upturn
6 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Dairy Council of California Releases New Edition of The Healthy Eating TABLE, Exploring the Role of Dairy and Nutrition in Healthy Aging
SACRAMENTO, Calif., June 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Dairy Council of California has released the latest edition of The Healthy Eating TABLE , a thought leadership publication that translates, amplifies and bridges the latest evidence in nutrition and dairy science. This edition focuses on the critical role nutrition, including dairy foods, plays in supporting healthy aging. As California's older adult population continues to grow—with one in four Californians projected to be over age 60 by 2040—this issue serves as a timely catalyst for collective action. It aims to spark meaningful conversations among health professionals, educators, and community leaders about the importance of nutrition in promoting vitality and independence as people age. 'Nutrition can be a powerful tool in helping older adults maintain health, mental sharpness and a better quality of life,' says Amy DeLisio, MPH, RDN, CEO of Dairy Council of California. 'This edition of The Healthy Eating TABLE highlights actionable insights that can inform care, shape programs, and support public health strategies.' In addition to in-depth content and research highlights, the edition features a new, evidence-based educational handout designed to support community nutrition education for older adults. Available in English and Spanish, this resource is a versatile tool that can be used in clinics, classrooms, workshops, and outreach events. A partner-driven evaluation and webinar are also planned to enhance its relevance and expand its impact. Access the full June 2025 edition of The Healthy Eating TABLE : About Dairy Council of California Since 1919, Dairy Council of California has been a trusted nutrition organization committed to elevating the health of children and communities. Through education, advocacy, and multisector collaboration, the organization promotes lifelong healthy eating patterns and advances the role of milk and dairy foods in improving nutrition security and supporting sustainable food systems. With more than a century of experience, Dairy Council of California continues to lead with evidence-based nutrition science, education and strategic partnerships to build healthier communities. Learn more at Media Contact: Malynda ParsonsCommunications Program ManagerDairy Council of California [email protected] (916) 633-9333

Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Report finds five north country hospitals at risk if Republican Medicaid cuts pass Congress
Jun. 26—Five hospitals in the north country could be faced with steep cuts to their operating revenues if the budget bill Republicans are pushing through Congress right now passes, according to analysis from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill's Sheps Center for Health Services Research. Analysis from the center found that rural hospitals across the country would be majorly hurt by the Medicaid cuts the Republican budget bill calls for, because rural hospitals often have a significant portion of their patient pool, sometimes a majority of it, in the Medicaid or Medicare programs that serve poor and elderly people, respectively. The Sheps Center looked for hospitals that are both in the top 10% of Medicaid payer mix, meaning they have the largest proportions of Medicaid patients to non-Medicaid patients, and that have reported three straight years of negative total operating margins, meaning they've been paying out more money than they've been taking in. In New York, 11 hospitals fit that criteria, including 5 in the north country; Claxton-Hepburn Medical Center in Ogdensburg, Massena Hospital, Clifton-Fine Hospital in Star Lake, Gouverneur Hospital and Lewis County General Hospital in Lowville. Ogdensburg and Lowville are not considered top Medicaid providers, but they do each serve a significant number of Medicaid recipients each year and both demonstrate negative annual margins. The Sheps Center analysis posits that the cuts to Medicaid, which come from a combination of changes to federal support for Medicaid spending, expanded work requirements and adjustments to the fees and taxes states can charge providers, would result in significant numbers of everyday Americans being kicked off of the program. Those people would still need emergency medical care as they receive at hospitals, which have a duty to provide it, but those hospitals would no longer be paid for the care they provide at all. In a letter to President Donald J. Trump and the Republican leaders in the House and Senate, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., and three other Democratic Senate leaders implored them to reverse course on the Medicaid cuts outlined in the reconciliation bill, which Trump has named the "One Big Beautiful Bill." "Many of these rural hospitals are facing financial instability today, even before any of the Republican health care cuts take effect," their letter reads. "Rural hospitals will be disproportionately impacted by health care cuts. Addressing the crisis in rural health care access is a national, bipartisan priority, and it should be bipartisan to not worsen it. However, if your party passes these health care cuts into law, Americans in rural communities across the country risk losing health care services and jobs supported by their local hospitals." State Democrats are criticizing north country Rep. Elise M. Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, for backing the bill and continuing to support it as Republicans push it to final approval. "Five hospitals in Elise Stefanik's district are on the chopping block because of her vote for the largest cut to Medicaid in history," said Addison Dick, spokesperson for the state Democratic Party. "Instead of fighting for her constituents, Stefanik is caving to Trump and supporting his budget that will rip away coverage, increase health care costs, and devastate rural health care." A spokesperson for Stefanik pushed back on the claims that the Medicaid provisions in the reconciliation package will result in loss of coverage for her constituents, which he called an "indespensible lifeline for our nation's most vulnerable." "However, far left Democrats continue to fearmonger because they know that President Trump is delivering results for the American people," the spokesperson said. "He ran on the promise that he would root out the wasteful and fraudulent government spending. In New York alone, an estimated $20 billion is spent on fraudulent Medicaid claims annually. On top of this insurmountable burden resting on the shoulders of hardworking taxpayers, illegals are also eligible for Emergency Medicaid which has ballooned more than 1,200 percent since 2014. This spending is unsustainable and in order to continue protecting and preserving benefits for America's most vulnerable, waste, fraud, and abuse must be rooted out." The Empire Center for Public Policy, a conservative New York think tank, found in late 2024 that as many as 3 million New Yorkers may be fraudulently collecting Medicaid and other health insurance benefits from the state, basing their analysis off of census data and information obtained from the state Medicaid program. Overall, 44% of New Yorkers receive Medicaid or a similar program, including children on the state-level Child Health Plus program and the New York Essential Plan, provided through the American Care Act health insurance marketplace and providing Medicaid-like coverage to people making up to 250% of the federal poverty level. The Empire Center also found earlier this year that the state program to offer emergency medicaid to undocumented immigrants, which has 480,000 people enrolled as of March, represents 7% of total Medicaid enrollment in the state. If the reconciliation package passes into law with the provisions for Medicaid included in the House-passed version, the federal government could cut the money it pays to the state for its portion of Medicaid funding, which would reduce available benefits for all recipients. Stefanik, who has floated a run for governor next year and has made criticisms of state programs aiding undocumented immigrants a core part of her early, pre-campaign message, said in a visit to Albany last month that she would seek to use executive actions and push the state legislature to end the emergency Medicaid program and cut down on fraud if elected. Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul, who is running for reelection, has not expressed any interest in changing that aspect of the state's Medicaid operations. It's not clear if the final package will include the major Medicaid provisions as passed by the House. On Thursday, the U.S. Senate Parliamentarian, which is charged with ensuring all actions taken by that chamber follow the proper laws and procedures, struck many of the most impactful Medicaid provisions from the bill for procedural reasons. Whatever resulting legislation passes in the U.S. Senate will have to go back to the House for a final vote before it can go to the president for approval. The two chambers have not seen eye to eye on many aspects of the reconciliation bill. Trump has demanded that lawmakers deliver a finished bill to his desk by July 4.