
Report finds five north country hospitals at risk if Republican Medicaid cuts pass Congress
Jun. 26—Five hospitals in the north country could be faced with steep cuts to their operating revenues if the budget bill Republicans are pushing through Congress right now passes, according to analysis from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill's Sheps Center for Health Services Research.
Analysis from the center found that rural hospitals across the country would be majorly hurt by the Medicaid cuts the Republican budget bill calls for, because rural hospitals often have a significant portion of their patient pool, sometimes a majority of it, in the Medicaid or Medicare programs that serve poor and elderly people, respectively.
The Sheps Center looked for hospitals that are both in the top 10% of Medicaid payer mix, meaning they have the largest proportions of Medicaid patients to non-Medicaid patients, and that have reported three straight years of negative total operating margins, meaning they've been paying out more money than they've been taking in.
In New York, 11 hospitals fit that criteria, including 5 in the north country; Claxton-Hepburn Medical Center in Ogdensburg, Massena Hospital, Clifton-Fine Hospital in Star Lake, Gouverneur Hospital and Lewis County General Hospital in Lowville.
Ogdensburg and Lowville are not considered top Medicaid providers, but they do each serve a significant number of Medicaid recipients each year and both demonstrate negative annual margins.
The Sheps Center analysis posits that the cuts to Medicaid, which come from a combination of changes to federal support for Medicaid spending, expanded work requirements and adjustments to the fees and taxes states can charge providers, would result in significant numbers of everyday Americans being kicked off of the program. Those people would still need emergency medical care as they receive at hospitals, which have a duty to provide it, but those hospitals would no longer be paid for the care they provide at all.
In a letter to President Donald J. Trump and the Republican leaders in the House and Senate, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., and three other Democratic Senate leaders implored them to reverse course on the Medicaid cuts outlined in the reconciliation bill, which Trump has named the "One Big Beautiful Bill."
"Many of these rural hospitals are facing financial instability today, even before any of the Republican health care cuts take effect," their letter reads. "Rural hospitals will be disproportionately impacted by health care cuts. Addressing the crisis in rural health care access is a national, bipartisan priority, and it should be bipartisan to not worsen it. However, if your party passes these health care cuts into law, Americans in rural communities across the country risk losing health care services and jobs supported by their local hospitals."
State Democrats are criticizing north country Rep. Elise M. Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, for backing the bill and continuing to support it as Republicans push it to final approval.
"Five hospitals in Elise Stefanik's district are on the chopping block because of her vote for the largest cut to Medicaid in history," said Addison Dick, spokesperson for the state Democratic Party. "Instead of fighting for her constituents, Stefanik is caving to Trump and supporting his budget that will rip away coverage, increase health care costs, and devastate rural health care."
A spokesperson for Stefanik pushed back on the claims that the Medicaid provisions in the reconciliation package will result in loss of coverage for her constituents, which he called an "indespensible lifeline for our nation's most vulnerable."
"However, far left Democrats continue to fearmonger because they know that President Trump is delivering results for the American people," the spokesperson said. "He ran on the promise that he would root out the wasteful and fraudulent government spending. In New York alone, an estimated $20 billion is spent on fraudulent Medicaid claims annually. On top of this insurmountable burden resting on the shoulders of hardworking taxpayers, illegals are also eligible for Emergency Medicaid which has ballooned more than 1,200 percent since 2014. This spending is unsustainable and in order to continue protecting and preserving benefits for America's most vulnerable, waste, fraud, and abuse must be rooted out."
The Empire Center for Public Policy, a conservative New York think tank, found in late 2024 that as many as 3 million New Yorkers may be fraudulently collecting Medicaid and other health insurance benefits from the state, basing their analysis off of census data and information obtained from the state Medicaid program.
Overall, 44% of New Yorkers receive Medicaid or a similar program, including children on the state-level Child Health Plus program and the New York Essential Plan, provided through the American Care Act health insurance marketplace and providing Medicaid-like coverage to people making up to 250% of the federal poverty level.
The Empire Center also found earlier this year that the state program to offer emergency medicaid to undocumented immigrants, which has 480,000 people enrolled as of March, represents 7% of total Medicaid enrollment in the state.
If the reconciliation package passes into law with the provisions for Medicaid included in the House-passed version, the federal government could cut the money it pays to the state for its portion of Medicaid funding, which would reduce available benefits for all recipients.
Stefanik, who has floated a run for governor next year and has made criticisms of state programs aiding undocumented immigrants a core part of her early, pre-campaign message, said in a visit to Albany last month that she would seek to use executive actions and push the state legislature to end the emergency Medicaid program and cut down on fraud if elected.
Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul, who is running for reelection, has not expressed any interest in changing that aspect of the state's Medicaid operations.
It's not clear if the final package will include the major Medicaid provisions as passed by the House. On Thursday, the U.S. Senate Parliamentarian, which is charged with ensuring all actions taken by that chamber follow the proper laws and procedures, struck many of the most impactful Medicaid provisions from the bill for procedural reasons. Whatever resulting legislation passes in the U.S. Senate will have to go back to the House for a final vote before it can go to the president for approval. The two chambers have not seen eye to eye on many aspects of the reconciliation bill.
Trump has demanded that lawmakers deliver a finished bill to his desk by July 4.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
New Englanders clash over Trump's sweeping health reforms
And he is not alone. In a recent Globe survey of 11 New Englanders across the political spectrum, all seven respondents who voted against Trump said they worry that basic health insurance and many vaccines will be harder to obtain for those who need them if the Big Beautiful Bill becomes law. The four respondents who voted for Trump, despite being unfamiliar with many of the legislation's specifics, said they support changes to health care programs to repair what some of them called a broken, bloated system. Advertisement The voters were surveyed as part of an ongoing Globe series on their views on the first year of the Trump administration, with previous installments centered on The cost of health care has been a major focus for Trump, who has said he wants to eliminate waste and fraud from programs such as Medicaid. The president has said he wants the legislation passed before July 4. But along with savings, Trantham noted, many experts predict that more Americans will end up uninsured if Trump's vision becomes the new landscape of national health care. Advertisement 'There will be more people who can't afford their medications. There'll be more people who avoid going to the doctor because they don't have the money,' said Trantham, who is an unenrolled voter and voted for former vice president Kamala Harris in 2024. 'And then they'll end up needing a higher level of medical care, which then puts a broad burden on the rest of us,' he added. Related : Trump's passed by the House, many The agency also predicted that 4 million people could see their access to food stamps reduced or eliminated. In addition to benefit cuts, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the House bill would increase the US deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. And on Thursday, Joann Flaminio, 69, a retired Democrat from Providence, said she is concerned that few people are aware of the myriad dangers tucked into the sprawling bill. 'The devil really is in the details. And one of the proposals in the Big Beautiful Bill — that requires Medicaid recipients to re-enroll every six months — is a draconian measure designed to deny services to those most in need,' said Flaminio, who served as retirement administrator for the state of Rhode Island. Advertisement 'My sister was on Medicaid in the final years of her life, and I know what the application process is like in order to get somebody approved. Many people hire a lawyer in order to do that, but it can be arduous, and it certainly is,' she added. The president's bill also would impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients, from ages 19 to 64, who would need to work at least 80 hours per month if they did not qualify for exemptions. From her experience, Flaminio said, linking benefits to work requirements is impractical. 'We tried to mandate work requirements ... for those people who are on disability benefits,' Flaminio said. 'And I would say, for the most part, it's a waste of time and effort. The vast majority of recipients, an estimated 96 percent, cannot work, which is the reason why they apply for Medicaid in the first place.' But for the survey's Trump supporters, trimming the Medicaid rolls is worthwhile if it rids the system of fraud and abuse. Seth Sole-Robertson, a 45-year-old Republican from Medway, was asked if Medicaid cuts concern him. 'I'd be concerned if I was an illegal alien,' Sole-Robertson answered, 'and I'd be concerned if I were committing fraud.' The goal is to strip benefits from 'people who are ineligible or taking it in two different states,' said Sole-Robertson, who owns a marine repair business. 'There's lots of hoopla or fake news about what's going on with Medicaid.' Karen Sysyn, 54, an unenrolled Trump supporter from Londonderry, N.H., said she wasn't sure where the bill was headed or what was in it. 'I hear a lot of rumors that they're looking at cutting Social Security and disability and stuff like that,' she said. Advertisement If people are able to work, taxpayers should not bear their burden, said Sysyn, who is searching for work after losing her job as a housing inspector. But if people are genuinely in need of support from Social Security or Medicare, they should receive support, she added. Another unenrolled Trump supporter, 56-year-old Brian Jankins of Sutton, was asked what he knew about the bill. 'Full disclosure, very little,' said Jankins, who works in banking. However, he added, 'our current health care system is broken and dysfunctional ... I'm not versed in what this bill does to address that, but it is broken.' Related : Respondents' opinions about Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health and human services secretary, also were sharply divided, with Trump supporters endorsing his stance against vaccines, among other initiatives, and the president's opponents saying Kennedy was endangering lives. 'I think more Americans are going to die under some of the changes that he's making around vaccinations,' said Vanessa Coppola, a 42-year-old Democrat from North Yarmouth, Maine. Over the administration's first five months, Kennedy became a lightning rod for controversy because of his antivaccine stance, his references to autism as a preventable disease, and his ouster and replacement of the entire immunization advisory panel for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coppola, a job coach and consultant, is particularly worried about Kennedy's proposal to eliminate the COVID vaccine recommendation for healthy pregnant women. Those vaccinations provide coverage for newborns, who are particularly vulnerable to respiratory disease, she said. Anand Sharma, 53, a Democrat from Shrewsbury and electrical engineer, called the rolling drama at the Department of Health and Human Services part of 'the chaos [that] is everywhere right now.' Advertisement And Justina Perry, a 37-year-old Democrat from New Bedford, denounced Kennedy's antivaccine agenda. 'Viruses are going to love this,' said Perry, who runs a physical therapy clinic. 'They're going to be able to spread and spread, and they win in this situation because we're pulling back vaccine access. So the only one who should be excited about this is a virus.' But Darryll White, an unenrolled Trump voter from Skowhegan, Maine, supports Kennedy's efforts to change government guidance on vaccines. Kennedy's work is 'a long-haul scenario — to make America healthy again,' said White, 66, who added that efforts by the news media to 'demonize' the secretary have made his job harder. 'People have to understand that Robert Kennedy is under intense pressure,' added White, the director of a nonprofit community park. White said he supports Kennedy's proposal to upend the government's vaccine guidance. 'That's exactly what needs to happen,' said White, who believed the government was not transparent during the pandemic about possible adverse effects of the COVID vaccine. The respondents were sharply divided yet again about the administration's drastic cuts in medical research grants, and those views aligned with whether they had voted for the president. The cuts have had an outsize effect on universities and other research institutions in the Boston area, particularly at Harvard University, where the government has canceled about $2.6 billion in awarded grants. 'He's cutting off his nose to spite his face,' Rosemary Shea, 62, an unenrolled voter from Hampton, N.H., said of Trump, who she voted against. 'I mean, Harvard is not just doing this research for themselves. They're doing it for the world.' Advertisement 'These universities are doing great research for diseases that are still out there that we have not cracked yet — Parkinson's, cancer, all different types of cancers," Shea added. 'He's just decided 'nope.' And I haven't even heard a logical explanation for it.' Sole-Robertson, the Medway Republican, offered a sharply different take on the government's role in funding medical research. 'A lot of this needs to be shifted back to private industry and raising funds in the private sector,' he said. 'I think a lot of it is just pure nonsense.' Brian MacQuarrie can be reached at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Portland-made documentary aims to make senior homelessness ‘personal'
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – A Portland non-profit, Humans for Housing, is taking its documentary to Capitol Hill in an effort to shine a light on senior homelessness. The documentary, 'No Place to Grow Old,' was released in the fall of 2024, following the stories of three seniors in Portland who were priced out of housing. Screening the film in Washington D.C. on Wednesday in front of lawmakers and policy experts, Humans for Housing is aiming to humanize the homeless crisis, and ensure it's 'personal,' for lawmakers. Neighbors distressed over planned homeless shelter in Portland's Pearl District 'The documentary, 'No Place to Grow Old,' really began as a thought between me and Michael Larson, who's the founder of Humans for Housing,' the film's director Davey Schaupp told KOIN 6 News. 'We were looking to build a film that was going to humanize people experiencing homelessness.' The documentary comes as over 140,000 Americans age 55 and older are experiencing homelessness on any given day. That number is expected to triple by the year 2030, according to a 2019 report from the University of Pennsylvania. Zooming into Portland, the metro area recorded nearly 2,000 people aged 55 years or older who experienced homelessness the night of January 22, according to Dr. Marisa Zapata, Portland State University associate professor of urban studies and planning. Portland native, former UO student joins cast of 'Love Island USA' 'Similar to national trends the number of aging adults continues to grow in the Portland region. This year's count increased by 800 people between 2022-2025, a 63% increase,' Dr. Zapata told KOIN 6. 'Homelessness for all people is driven by a lack of affordable housing. For aging adults, fixed incomes, illness, non-accessible housing, and the death of a partner can make maintaining or accessing housing even harder.' 'We saw this huge tidal wave of older adults who are aging into homelessness and yet it didn't feel like nearly enough people were talking about it,' Schaupp explained. 'That is what really sparked the desire to make the film…The storyteller part of me thought Portland would be a really good focus because Portland has a pretty negative reputation nationally for homelessness and I think there's a lot of stereotypes that people put Portland in when it comes to homelessness.' 'I think there's a myth, a very American myth, that homelessness is an individual failure, that if someone is homeless, that it is a result of their capacity, that they're either lazy, they don't have drive, that they want to be homeless or there's some kind of moral or character failure on their part which results in them being homeless,' Schaupp said. 'I think that myth of individual failure is one we've tried to at least address and show that individual choices, of course, affect how your life plays out and have a huge effect on it, but there's also a lot of systemic factors that play a part in if someone has stable housing or not,' Schaupp added. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Schaupp pointed to — professor of medicine at University of California San Francisco's Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative — who says there are two questions society should ask when discussing homelessness. First: why is this person homeless? 'We love to focus on, oh this person might have a drug habit, or this person might display X, Y, Z characteristics, or have a mental health disorder,' Schaupp said. The second question is: why are so many people homeless? Amtrak Cascades, 'one of the most scenic train rides,' unveils new look for 2026 'I think that's really what we're trying to expose in pieces of this film is our housing crisis is a huge cause of so much homelessness. And we're seeing people metaphorically jumping out of a building and we're asking why they're dying but not why they're jumping,' Schaupp said. 'No Place to Grow Old' features the story of Herbert Olive, a man in his 60s who has lived in Portland for most of his life. Schaupp said Olive's story stuck with him after filming wrapped. 'He owned a home and was doing renovations on it and he actually got a predatorial loan from a bank where they said, 'Hey, we can give you a loan for about $50,000 and this will let you do some more home renovations.' But the way they structured the loan, the payments were so high that he couldn't pay them and then he had a default on his home,' Schaupp said. 'He ended up becoming homeless, and then became a journeyman carpenter. He had worked in carpentry his whole life and then has been going back and forth renting and so now he's still working full time in his 60s but his home was kind of originally his retirement asset, that's where he was building wealth. And so when he lost that, and now he's renting in his 60s, he can pay rent but he's relying on his ability to work and so he's in a precarious situation,' Schaupp explained. 'He does have Social Security, and he does have a pension but those only amount to $1,300-$1,400 which is about the average price of rent in Portland. So, that doesn't even leave him enough to pay for groceries on top of that, car insurance on top of that,' Schaupp added. Since its fall 2024 release at Portland's Newmark Theatre, the documentary has been screened around 100 times. 'I think what I've learned is storytelling really does work. As humans, we like to think we're rational creatures and we like to see data and facts and we make all these decisions objectively, but we really are story creatures and we thrive off story and we connect off story,' Schaupp said, reflecting on the documentary. 'I've been amazed, specifically with Portland, Oregon, how many organizations, different faith groups, different advocacy organizations have come out just to build a space where people can witness these stories. Portland is a city with a lot of heart and people really do care. I think there is a lot of empathy fatigue around homelessness, but Portland is an amazing city,' Schaupp said. 'I think one of the biggest takeaways I learned is as the world gets noisier, as there's more and more crises happening, really what matters or what cuts through the noise is story.' KOIN 6 anchor Jeff Gianola: My journey out of silence Schaupp acknowledges that he's not a housing policy expert, but after speaking with experts, including Zapata, while filming the documentary, he believes creating a housing subsidy for older adults would help keep seniors housed, noting, 'For a lot of these seniors, like Herbert…the extra subsidy of $300 or $400 a month would keep him stably housed.' 'The long-term solution is to fix the housing market. That's really the only way we're going to get out of this crisis,' he added. 'That's been a priority on a lot of politician's dockets in Portland and our mayor, our governor has run on housing, but I think it just really is holding them accountable and delivering results and seeing more housing units built in Oregon and across the country.' The D.C. screening comes as the Oregon House of Representatives unanimously passed House Bill 3589 on Tuesday to address the senior housing crisis. MultCo: Drug users can now receive sobering services without police The bill creates a Senior Housing Development Initiative and invests $24 million to build affordable and accessible homes for low-income seniors and people with disabilities. The $24 million will be transferred from Oregon's Property Tax Deferral Program for Disabled and Senior Homeowners, allowing seniors to defer paying property taxes until they move or sell their home. In a press release announcing the bill, the office of Oregon House Speaker Rep. Julie Fahey (D-West Eugene & Veneta) said older adults are the fastest-growing group of people facing homelessness in the United States, noting people over 55 in Oregon make up between 20-25% of the state's houseless population. Oregon state senator resigns from committee after 'aggressive outbursts' 'This is a quiet crisis that's growing fast,' said Rep. Pam Marsh (D-Ashland), chair of the House Committee on Housing and Homelessness and the bill's sponsor. 'We have more older adults on fixed incomes, more people aging without family nearby, and too few housing options that truly meet their needs. We're falling behind—and HB 3589 is a way to start catching up.' Back in D.C., some members of Oregon's congressional delegation are joining the screening, including Senator Ron Wyden (D) and Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici (D-01). 'Homelessness is the most visible, painful symptom of our nation's crisis of housing supply and affordability. Seniors are some of the most vulnerable, and Trump's attacks on Medicaid, critical federal grants for housing projects as well as important food assistance programs to pay for tax cuts for billionaires shows where their priorities are,' Wyden said in a statement to KOIN 6. 'I applaud Davey Schaupp and the Humans for Housing team for highlighting the need to address senior homelessness, and I will continue to fight for more resources to combat the affordable housing crisis like my Decent, Affordable, Safe Housing for All Act.' Bonamici added, 'The stories shared by Portlanders in 'No Place to Grow Old' are heartbreaking and too common in Oregon and across the country. As we see a rising number of older Americans experiencing homelessness, this film reminds us of the real lives behind the statistics. Housing is essential for people to find stability, build a better future, and age with dignity. I hope the film inspires members of Congress to pursue effective, evidence-based policies that address the affordable housing shortage and homelessness crisis.' For Schaupp, he hopes the film becomes personal for lawmakers. 'The decision makers, the lawmakers, the congressional staffers… for them to watch the film and for it to feel personal to them because it really is,' Schaupp said. 'We are a country that should be judged on how we treat the most marginalized in our society, the most vulnerable and here, thousands of our seniors in our communities or older adults, or grandparents — these are people's grandparents — and so I would hope that they leave feeling like this is troubling and this is personal and we actually have not just a political obligation but a moral obligation to address this crisis.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oregon Democratic state Rep. Hòa Nguyễn returns to House following cancer diagnosis
Rep. Hòa Nguyễn, D-Portland, speaks on the House floor on June 20, 2025, her first day back in the Capitol since leaving to undergo cancer treatment in February. (Screengrab from Oregon legislative broadcast) Rep. Hòa Nguyễn, D-Portland on Friday returned to the Oregon House in her first official public appearance since announcing she was undergoing treatment for advanced cancer in February. 'I felt like I have a second chance at life now, by some miracle, whatever, all the prayers and affirmations really help,' she said on the House floor on Friday, surrounded by many of her colleagues and staff wearing face masks. 'I think it's the community, it's all of you here and the support that really, really pushed me through.' The representative comes back to the Legislature at a critical moment for Oregon Democrats, who are working with slim margins in both legislative chambers to pass a transportation package in the face of staunch opposition from Republicans and some Democrats concerned about the tax increases and scope of the proposed measure. In its latest form, the proposal would raise an estimated $14.6 billion over the next 10 years. Any tax increases require 36 votes, and Democrats need Nguyễn if they're not able to sway any Republicans. Nguyễn's seat came under the spotlight in February after she revealed that she was beginning chemotherapy treatments for stage 4 cancer, an explanation for why she had already missed weeks of legislative business. A stage 4 diagnosis is the most intense stage of cancer, when the disease has spread to other parts of the body and is harder to treat. During her remarks, Nguyễn thanked her colleagues for the courtesies they had extended to her aunt, brother and sister when they were recognized on the House floor in May. She called herself 'a fighter' and said she is ready to get back to work at some point, but didn't say for how long she would return or the extent to which she had recovered. Nguyễn was excused for the House's afternoon session on Friday. 'She is taking the session day by day at this point, and we're focused on her health above anything,' said a spokesperson for the House Majority Office in a Friday statement. Nguyễn in a February statement said her staff would provide critical constituent services, vowing to continue her efforts to address chronic absenteeism and improve child care access. She previously served as vice chair of the House Early Childhood and Human Services Committee and a member of the House Education Committee and Ways and Means subcommittee on education, but Speaker Julie Fahey gradually removed her from those rules during her treatment. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX