Only eagle-eyed people can spot the four differences in this cozy living room scene in less than 11 seconds
Everyone can see the sofa, but only the most eagle eyed can spot the four differences between the two images in under 11 seconds.
2
Whether you're trying to improve your sight, or test your IQ, this puzzle will prove a challenge to many readers.
Put your observation skills to the test and figure out whether you have what it takes to spot the four differences in just a few seconds.
Make sure to set your stopwatch before undertaking this challenge, to make it extra hard for yourself.
If you can do it in under 11 seconds, you are said to have 20/20 vision.
At first glance, it looks like these two images, provided by RiversWallArt.com are identical.
However, hawk-eyed readers will immediately be able to spot that this is not the case.
There are actually four subtle differences between the two images.
Unless you're lucky enough to find the four differences immediately, we recommend analysing the image very closely to spot the answers.
The visual deception of this image will have you peeling your eyes, but the payoff is worth it.
If you need a hint, we recommend first focusing on the top half of the image.
Everyone can see the beach but only those with a high IQ can spot five differences in 32 seconds in this brainteaser
Two differences can be found between the walls of the two images.
Another tricky brainteaser challenges readers to find the image of Elon Musk that is different to the rest in under 15 seconds.
And if you're looking for more of a challenge, this mind boggling illusion tasks readers to locate the hidden zero among the sea of sixes.
If that's not hard enough, try searching for the three tiny differences between these two images of a man fishing.
How can optical illusions and brainteasers help me?
Engaging in activities like solving optical illusions and brainteasers can have many cognitive benefits as it can stimulate various brain regions.
Some benefits include:
Cognitive stimulation: Engaging in these activities challenges the brain, promoting mental agility and flexibility.
Problem-solving skills: Regular practice enhances analytical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
Memory improvement: These challenges often require memory recall and can contribute to better memory function.
Creativity: They encourage thinking outside the box, fostering creativity and innovative thought processes.
Focus and attention: Working on optical illusions and brainteasers requires concentration, contributing to improved focus.
Stress relief: The enjoyable nature of these puzzles can act as a form of relaxation and stress relief.
Finally, only those with a high IQ will be able to spot the odd one out in under 30 seconds in this horse-themed puzzle.
Coming back to our challenge, were you able to spot the four differences in under 11 seconds?
For those struggling, we have marked out the answer for you.
2
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Man conned by deepfake of Jennifer Aniston reveals he was 'relentlessly' targeted by AI-generated videos
A British man has revealed he was scammed out of nearly $300 by an AI deepfake of Jennifer Aniston. Paul Davis, 43, from Southampton, England, who unemployed man and suffers from depression, said he was 'relentlessly' targeted by AI-generated videos – including ones that featured Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and even the iconic Friends star. Davis said he was sent an image of what looked like Jennifer Aniston's driving license before she told him she loved him and asked for money. Sadly, he believed the message was real and sent the money in the form of non-refundable Apple gift cards. He said: 'I've got fake videos from Jennifer Aniston asking me for £200 ($274) and saying she loves me. I've paid and I was bitten. Once bitten, twice shy.' The scam is part of a worrying online trend, where advanced AI technology is used to create convincing fake videos of celebrities, designed to con victims into handing over cash or personal details. Paul said he'd been receiving dozens of messages every day, with scammers trying to fool him into thinking he's won a 'special prize', from cash to a luxury Range Rover. Some of the videos even feature AI versions of Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg saying: 'This is not a scam, believe me,' insisting he's a 'genuine person'. The fake messages are often accompanied by doctored certificates or phony ID cards. Davis went on: 'It's been going on for about five months. I thought people would get into trouble for this, but these people seem to be having a laugh and getting away with it. 'Someone I know has spent over a grand on Apple gift cards for scammers.' Struggling with his mental health and unable to work, he said the the scams were taking a toll on him. 'I can't keep taking that sort of hit,' he added. Conversations: Messages between Paul and Jennifer Aniston Deepfake: Davis has also received scam messages from an AI version of Elon Musk, claiming he has won $500K Dr Jennifer Williams, an AI expert at the University of Southampton said that this is a classic phishing scam, but with a terrifyingly modern twist. She said: 'The scammer would input details like the victim's name (obtained from various sources) into an AI model to generate the image, refining it until it appears convincing. 'The goal is to get the victim's home address under the guise of 'delivering' prizes like a car or a non-existent Facebook Mastercard.' Once a relationship is established, scammers often request victims to purchase gift cards – and then send them the codes. Dr Williams warned people to stay vigilant and watch for telltale signs such as odd phrasing, highly pixelated images, and suspicious wording like 'don't be afraid' – all designed to provoke an emotional response. She also said to be wary of different pixelation patterns around names, which can indicate they were digitally altered. And perhaps, most importantly, Facebook does not give away large sums of money or luxury vehicles.
The Sun
20 hours ago
- The Sun
I was scammed out of hundreds by ‘Jennifer Aniston' who told me she loved me & needed cash for her ‘Apple subscriptions'
A MAN was cruelly scammed out of £200 after being sweet-talked by a fake Jennifer Aniston begging for cash for 'Apple subscriptions'. Paul Davis, 43, from Southampton, handed over the money after believing he was talking to the Friends star on Facebook. 7 7 7 7 Paul says he was targeted by an army of AI scammers pretending to be A-list stars - including the Friends legend herself - in a bizarre new wave of deepfake fraud. The unemployed Brit, who battles depression, revealed how he was bombarded with dozens of eerily convincing videos from bogus celebrity accounts. Some fraudulently posed as tech titans Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. But it was a phoney Aniston who finally fooled him after sending what looked like her driving licence. The fraudster also told Paul she 'loved him' before asking for money. Paul said: 'I've had fake videos from Jennifer Aniston saying she loves me and asking for £200. I believed it – and I paid.' The cruel scam saw him send £200 worth of non-refundable Apple gift cards to the supposed Hollywood sweetheart. 'I got bitten,' he added. 'Once bitten, twice shy.' The shocking con is part of a terrifying rise in AI-powered scams, with crooks creating scarily real deepfake clips of celebs to trick unsuspecting victims out of their cash and private info. Paul says he's been relentlessly harassed for months, receiving fake messages every day claiming he's won everything from mega cash prizes to a flashy Range Rover. My mum's being scammed by an AI deepfake of 'Owen Wilson' who paid her £7 to 'prove' his identity - would you fall for it? One video even showed a fake Zuckerberg declaring: 'This is not a scam - believe me' while flashing a dodgy ID. Another sent him a bogus 'certificate from Facebook' claiming he'd scooped £500k and a luxury motor. 'They make it look so real,' Paul said. 'It's been going on for five months. I thought someone would get in trouble for this, but they seem to be having a laugh – and getting away with it.' Worryingly, Paul says he's not the only one falling victim. He revealed: 'Someone I know's lost over a grand in Apple gift cards to these scams." Now, struggling with his mental health and unable to work, Paul says the constant barrage of cons is taking its toll. 7 7 7 The 43-year-old says he is sharing his story in a bid to warn others and stop the scammers in their tracks. It comes after a scammer who conned a French woman out of nearly £700,000 by pretending to be Brad Pitt was unmasked in Nigeria. Interior designer Anne, 53, was scammed into funding a fake cancer treatment for the star after receiving AI-generated selfies and sweet-talking texts. The cruel romance con lasted over a year, costing Anne her fortune, her marriage, and her mental health. Eventually a crack team discovered the scammer's identity, his Nigerian base, and 34 other victims. Meanwhile, another woman put out a call for help after noticing her mum fall for an AI deepfake scam of Owen Wilson. The unnamed woman took to Reddit, revealing both she and her sister had failed to convince her mum that the man she was chatting to was not the real actor. She decided to share the AI deepfake video her mum had been sent by ' Owen Wilson' with the title 'Owen Wilson befriended my mother.' What are deepfakes? Here's what you need to know... Deepfakes use artificial intelligence and machine learning to produce face-swapped videos with barely any effort They can be used to create realistic videos that make celebrities appear as though they're saying something they didn't Deepfakes have also been used by sickos to make fake porn videos that feature the faces of celebrities or ex-lovers To create the videos, users first track down an XXX clip featuring a porn star that looks like an actress They then feed an app with hundreds – and sometimes thousands – of photos of the victim's face A machine learning algorithm swaps out the faces frame-by-frame until it spits out a realistic, but fake, video To help other users create these videos, pervs upload "facesets", which are huge computer folders filled with a celebrity's face that can be easily fed through the "deepfakes" app
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘I have a lot of sympathy for Elon Musk': Succession creator Jesse Armstrong on his tech bros AI satire Mountainhead
When he gets to his London office on the morning this piece is published, Jesse Armstrong will read it in print, or not at all. Though the building has wifi, he doesn't use it. 'If you're a procrastinator, which most writers are, it's just a killer.' Online rabbit holes swallow whole days. 'In the end, it's better to be left with the inadequacies of your thoughts.' He gives himself a mock pep talk. ''It's just you and me now, brain.'' Today, the showrunner of Succession and co-creator of Peep Show is back at home, in walking distance of his workspace. He could be any London dad: 54, salt-and-pepper beard, summer striped T-shirt. But staying offline could feel like a statement too, given Armstrong is also the writer-director of Mountainhead, a film about tech bros. Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Open AI's Sam Altman, guru financiers Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen: all these and more are mixed up in the movie's characters, sharing a comic hang in a ski mansion. Outside, an AI launched by one of the group has sparked global chaos. Inside, there is snippy friction about the intra-billionaire pecking order. Mountainhead feels like a pulled-back curtain. But Armstrong also resisted another rabbit hole: spending time in Silicon Valley for research. He tried that kind of thing before. Contrary to rumour, Succession never did involve backdoor chats with the children of Rupert Murdoch. Once the show became a phenomenon, though, he did meet with masters of finance and corporate media, picking their brains for insights at luxe New York restaurants. 'And they'd be charismatic, and namedrop the 20 most famous people in the world, and I'd feel this buzz of excitement by association. Then later I'd look at my notes, and what they'd actually said read like complete inane bullshit. 'Make the move!' 'Be the balls!'' So Armstrong returned to his office and, more generally, his kind. 'I'm a writer,' he says, 'and a writer type. And I'm happy with other writer types.' In America, when Succession exploded, you could sense an assumption the mind behind it must be an English Aaron Sorkin: a slick character as glamorous as the world he wrote about. Instead, here was the dry figure who compares making Mountainhead to an early job at budget supermarket Kwik Save. (Both, he says, boiled down to managing workload.) Rather than stalk Sam Altman, he read biographies and hoovered up podcasts. Amid the oligarchs' tales of favourite Roman emperors, he kept finding a common thread: a wilful positivity about their own effect on the world. 'And it must be delightful to really believe, 'You know what? It's going to be fine. AI's going to cure cancer, and don't worry about burning up the planet powering the AI to do it, because we'll just fix that too.'' Part of the trick, he says, is perspective. At a certain level, money and power give life the feel of an eternal view from a private plane. 'Whereas reality is standing in the road, dodging cars, thinking 'Oh God! This is fucking terrifying!'' Success and Succession have not made Armstrong an optimist. But they did give him the professional heft to direct Mountainhead as well as write it, and to do so at unprecedented pace. Film and TV move achingly slowly; it was last November that he decided he wanted to make a movie about the junction of AI, crypto and libertarian politics. By May, he was preparing for it to come out. He says now he wanted Mountainhead to be 'a bobsleigh run. Short, and slightly bitter, and once you're on, you're on.' His voice quickens recalling a first meeting with Steve Carell, who he wanted to play Randall, 'the group's dark money Gandalf'. This was January. Without a script, Armstrong could only tell the actor the story he'd loosely planned. Carell sat in silence. 'I thought, 'Well, this has gone very badly.'' Then he said yes. 'At which point it was like, 'Fuck. This is actually going to happen. Now I have to write it.'' By March, the film was being shot in a 21,000 sq ft mansion in Deer Valley, Utah, then on the market for $65m. Carell aside, the cast included Cory Michael Smith, Ramy Youssef and Jason Schwartzman. For Armstrong, directing his first feature on a berserk turnaround was made easier by a deep fondness for actors. Standing in front of a camera, he says, paralyses him with self-consciousness. 'So I honestly find what they do magical.' His own lack of talent as a performer proved important to the younger Armstrong. Between 1995 and 1997, he worked as an assistant to Labour MP Doug Henderson. It was an interesting time to have the job, with Tony Blair about to enter Downing Street. Is there a Sliding Doors world where a rising star assistant becomes an MP himself? One where, by now, Jesse Armstrong is home secretary? He shakes his head for several seconds. 'I just wasn't good at the job. Fundamentally, I didn't understand politics.' He knows it sounds odd, having later written for insidery Westminster comedy The Thick of It. 'But I couldn't do the acting. I didn't get it. I always thought like a writer, so in meetings where I should have been building my career, I'd just be thinking, 'That's weird. That's funny. Why did you say that?'' (Armstrong once wrote for the Guardian about a meeting with then Conservative minister Ann Widdecombe, in which she sat under two posters: one a lurid anti-abortion message, the other Garfield.) Instead, he segued into comedy, and soon after Peep Show, the beloved squirm of a sitcom co-written with Sam Bain. At first glance, Succession is the obvious prequel to Mountainhead, a former newspaper empire giving way to tech superpower. But Armstrong sees a closer link between his new film and Peep Show: 'Because it's about men, and male hierarchies, and the pathos of men trying to connect.' He is tickled by the thought of his own story world, in which characters from different projects collide. 'You can see Super Hans arriving at Mountainhead on a scooter, delivering the ketamine.' Then he pauses, suddenly anxious. Could he make sure I'll mention Bain if I talk about Peep Show? 'Because it was always Sam's show as well.' And Hans owed so much to actor Matt King too, he says, 'and then, of course, there's David Mitchell and Robert Webb.' Should Armstrong ever make an Oscar acceptance speech, we will be there a while. Making sure due credit is given is of a piece with his near-pathological modesty. (He is a keen footballer. Which position? 'Terrible.') Being fair-minded matters too. He adds a postscript to his memory of leaving Westminster. 'I'd also say I don't in any way feel superior to people who do make a career in politics. I still believe we need good, professional politicians.' Turning back to Mountainhead, his even-handedness reaches a kind of event horizon. Armstrong , it transpires, feels sorry for Elon Musk. 'Musk has done huge damage in the world, particularly with Doge, but I have a lot of sympathy for him.' The owner of X was brutally bullied as a schoolboy and according to a 2023 biography, had a difficult relationship with his father. 'This is a traumatised human being,' says Armstrong. Still, not every bullied child ends up making apparent Nazi salutes onstage. 'Yeah. That wasn't great.' But there are other sides to Armstrong. For all the hints of bumble and awkwardness, he has also had the discipline to build a stellar career. And the more measured he is in person, the more Mountainhead feels like the work of a grinning Id, rising up to take a scalpel to his subjects, with their pretensions to philosophy, and dark indifference to life. ('I'm so excited about these atrocities,' a character beams as the world goes violently awry.) But his sympathy has its limits. 'I do think the cocoon they're in makes it hard for them to remember other people are actually real. But they've also been quick to give up trying. And some definitely feel the superior person shouldn't have to try anyway.' More to the point, though, Armstrong finds the tech moguls funny. Much of the grimness of a Musk or Thiel is also brilliantly ridiculous: the epic lack of self-knowledge, the thinness of skin. Having studied them as he has, would he expect his real-life models to be enraged by the film? 'Oh no. They'd instantly dismantle it in a way that would be 50% completely fair, and 50% totally facile. But they wouldn't see any truth to it.' Still, Mountainhead is something very rare: a movie that feels as contemporary as TikTok. For Armstrong, after Succession and now this, you might think stories about the moment had become addictive. He frowns. Is a period piece next, in fact? Victorian bonnets? 'Maybe. Genuinely maybe. Because I'm not actually that drawn to ripped-from-the-headlines ideas.' The frown deepens. 'Am I not? I don't know. I'm losing faith in my own answer, because I evidently am. I mean, I'm not going to claim I don't like writing about right now. But honestly, at the same time – I'd be pleased to get out of it.' Mountainhead is available to own digitally now
