Apple and Cook get a boost – and breather
It certainly makes some logical sense; though the data shows consumers' fears soon subsided. According to Placer.ai, which uses mobile location data to monitor foot traffic, elevated sales in the immediate days after Trump's address rapidly petered out – visitors to US Apple stores were up just 0.93 per cent for the entire fiscal quarter compared to a year earlier. Meanwhile, visits to Apple's website from US consumers were down 3 per cent, according to data from Similarweb.
On a call with investors to discuss the results, chief executive officer Tim Cook acknowledged that tariff chatter did create unusual buying patterns in April, mostly around sales in the US of the iPhone and Mac computers.
But overall, the boost was limited – Apple said just one percentage point of its 10 per cent overall revenue growth came from these 'pull forward' sales. If Apple's analysis proves correct – and some analysts seemed sceptical, repeatedly asking for more detail – then that would be good news.
It means investors would have to worry less that the better-than-expected sales won't mean a significant dip for the rest of this year. That's not to say tariffs won't be a drag – Cook said the company would take a US$1.1 billion tariff-related hit in the current quarter, up from US$900 million in the last.
To emphasise the gusto of his most important product, Cook noted that somebody out there has the three billionth iPhone. That's a staying power that will count for a lot as the company moves to this next era of uncertainty.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The quarterly iPhone sales indicate that consumers don't yet care that the bulk of the device's artificial-intelligence features (AI) have yet to materialise – they'll stick with Apple anyway. I found myself agreeing with Cook when he said he felt AI-specific devices – such as glasses from Meta Platforms or whatever it is OpenAI and Jony Ive create – are 'likely to be complementary devices, not substitution' for the smartphone.
Still, AI is on the mind of investors, and the blockbuster quarter was not enough to distract from that. The company reiterated its intent to increase spending to fund its AI efforts and to reallocate talent to speed things up.
Cook didn't, however, address the fact that some of his top AI talent has reallocated itself to Meta. The Apple boss' apparent disinterest in partaking in the unprecedented talent war – one that would have made his predecessor, Steve Jobs, sick to his stomach – is one facet in Apple's obvious unwillingness to follow its peers and bet the entire house on AI.
Its capital expenditures, while growing, are expected to be tens of billions of dollars lower than the other tech giants. The years to come will tell whether Apple was wise to separate itself from the pack.
Tellingly, when asked on Thursday (Jul 31) whether he felt AI innovations like large language models might become commoditised, he declined to answer. 'That gives away some things on our strategy,' he said. That could be read as a sign Apple doesn't feel it needs to directly compete in building AI.
I think this speaks to a confidence that the iPhone will still be the de facto device of choice for AI, whether or not Apple is successful in making a competent ChatGPT of its own. Another interpretation is that Cook doesn't want to show his hand in any mergers and acquisitions negotiations, but I guess we'll see. Cook said on the call that he was 'very open' to dealmaking – we'll see what exactly he feels he needs to buy rather than build.
Frankly, you didn't need to see Apple's numbers to know it had been a great quarter – you could just listen to the tone of Cook's voice. Noticeably upbeat as he ran through his remarks, the tenor of the call was in stark contrast from last quarter, when some (myself included) wondered whether the weight of Apple's numerous challenges were starting to deplete the 64-year-old's energy reserves. Talk of succession will surely now quiet down for the foreseeable future: It's time to let Tim cook. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
29 minutes ago
- Business Times
Ninth generation Pictet family member of leading the group beyond 220 years.
[GENEVA] Striving not for size but 'to be the finest, as a wealth and asset manager known for superior returns and exceptional client experience' is what drives 46-year-old Francois Pictet, managing partner of Pictet Group. He is a ninth-generation member of a family who became associated with Pictet Group in 1841. The Geneva-headquartered organisation, which turns 220 this year, traces its roots even further back, to its founding in July 1805. Francois Pictet followed the footsteps of his father, grandfather and great-grandfather into the top echelons of the group's management. Today, Pictet Group is Switzerland's second-largest financial institution, behind UBS, and the largest privately held financial institution in Europe. Francois Pictet sits alongside his cousin, senior partner Marc Pictet, and five other managing partners at the apex of the company's management. The seven top partners – six men and one woman, all of whom are based in Geneva – are a close-knit group, who meet thrice a week, for several hours per session, to discuss strategies and investments. 'You cannot invite as managing partners people who want to decide everything and don't want to listen to others. This type of profile will not make it,' said Francois Pictet. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up He pointed out that while Pictet Group is unique in having a long association with his wider family, having the name alone does not mean guaranteed entry into the group's top leadership. In addition to the seven managing partners, Pictet Group also has 43 equity partners. New partners buy shares at book value; when partners exit, they sell their shares at book value, which has hopefully grown during their tenure. Partners adhere to the retirement age of 65. To date, Pictet Group has grown organically and not done any mergers and acquisitions. Also, the group has stayed out of business lines such as commercial banking, retail banking and investment banking. 'Why would you make an acquisition unless you want to show growth to your shareholders? In finance, growth by hiring the right people is more effective,' said Francois Pictet, adding that making acquisitions can harm the corporate culture. He likes the group's business model, which he sees as being differentiated from other financial institutions and bringing stability to the business and clients. 'Stability nowadays is in very rare supply, and I think this is a key advantage that we have,' he said. He argued that by being conservative in how Pictet Group uses its balance sheet, space is freed up to be innovative in serving clients. 'Our usage of the balance sheet is extremely conservative, we don't play with it at all,' he said. Personal journey Francois Pictet, who became a managing partner in 2022, currently leads the group's technology and operations division, as well as the private wealth management's Asian and Middle East commercial efforts. Trained in law, he said that it was 'initially not really my intention' to join the family business. He spent over a decade working for organisations including UBS, the former Credit Suisse and US private equity firm AEA Investors before joining Pictet Group in 2015. Asked if carrying the Pictet name within Pictet Group is a privilege or a burden, he admitted that 'with the family name comes the pressure as well'. He described working at Pictet Group as being at 'a place where you have your name on the door and the responsibility of not undoing the work done by eight generations before you'. Still, when the opportunity to join the group came while he was in his thirties, he said it would have been a waste not to seize it. With Pictet Group today being considerably larger than in his father's time, Francois Pictet thinks family members who want to join now or in future should spend some years outside the group to chalk some achievements before coming on board. 'It's very important for our managing partners to have seen the world out there and also proven themselves outside the firm,' he said. In the private wealth management business, Pictet Group serves clients with a net worth of five million Swiss francs (S$8 million) or more. Francois Pictet sees no reason to lower this threshold for the sake of acquiring a larger customer base. He emphasised that in the private wealth management business, much time is spent on understanding clients and their worry with money. Investment solutions then come on the back of understanding client needs. He noted this is unlike 'the brokerage model, where you start the discussion by talking about products'. 'Our time horizon is not a quarter, not even 10 years. It is really generations with our clients,' he stressed. Francois Pictet noted that amid geopolitical fragmentation, wealthy families have become more mobile, requiring all sorts of combinations of booking and servicing centres. With its stability, he observed that Singapore has been on the rise as a booking centre for the whole of Asia for several years. Other megatrends that he sees in the private wealth management business include generational wealth transfer, the rise of Asia, the growing importance of private equity and the need to invest more in technology as well as risk and compliance. Generational wealth transfer Honora Ducatillon, head of family advisory at Pictet Wealth Management, said that with dynastic families, Pictet Group is seeing growing demand for help in crafting a family charter, as a framework for long-term success. Dynastic families are defined as those having a net worth of US$100 million or more. Typically, a family charter may cover areas such as family mission, family values, code of conduct, conflict resolution, succession in ownership and management, governance bodies, access to capital, family members, employment, ownership policy and education of family members. Ducatillon said wealthy families are evolving with trends such as longevity and the rise of the 100-year-old chief executive. Also contributing to this evolution are accelerating shifts in sociocultural values; the increase in blended families; the rise of women wealth owners, the move from top-down to collaborative governance models; and technology's role in transforming how families institutionalise wisdom across generations. Citing a McKinsey report, she noted that some US$5.8 trillion in assets will be transferred across generations in Asia-Pacific between 2023 and 2030 by wealthy families, and that many family offices report that preparing the next generation to take on wealth responsibly is a major challenge.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump is winning his trade war, but Americans will pay the price
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox All indications are that Americans will pay more for nearly all the goods they consume when the effects of all of US President Donald Trump's tariffs kick in. - Judging from the air of concession wafting across world capitals from Tokyo to Brussels, United States President Donald Trump is prevailing in his trade war. The White House is in a celebratory mood. Almost every day, press conferences and statements catalogue the many supposed benefits flowing from Mr Trump's strategy. The strategy has brought trade partners to the negotiating table, is catalysing trillions in foreign investment commitments, protecting America's strategic industries and generating billions in revenue. So much winning, in Trump-speak. If success, however, means more jobs, more trade and a stronger economy, the evidence is more suspect. All indications are that Americans will pay more for nearly all the goods they consume when the effects of all the tariffs kick in. The universal baseline tariffs of 10 per cent have already been in effect since April and will remain in place for around 100 nations with no trade deficits with the US, like Singapore and Australia. Effective from Aug 7, more than 70 nations will face 'reciprocal' tariffs , ranging from 10 to 50 per cent. The concept of reciprocity seems questionable as Mr Trump's strategy from the start has been to exert pressure on trade partners rather than strictly mirror their tariffs. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore President Tharman meets migrant workers who saved driver of car that fell into sinkhole Singapore Now flying solo, Acres CEO Kalaivanan Balakrishnan presses ahead with wildlife rescue efforts Opinion The charm – and drawbacks – of living in a time warp in Singapore Business UMS Integration becomes first SGX company with secondary listing in Malaysia Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry For those nations running a trade surplus with the US, the rate is at least 15 per cent. It is higher still for others, where geopolitics and personal vendettas sharpen the blade. Brazil, for instance, has no trade surplus with the US. Nevertheless, it has been slapped with a rate of 50 per cent at least partly because Mr Trump has an issue with the government prosecuting former president and Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro on coup charges. India, at a 25 per cent rate , also faces an unspecified penalty for its import of Russian energy and arms. The US has also caught on to transshipping, the sly rerouting of goods through lower-tariff nations. This practice now invites a 40 per cent penalty. More deals are to come, if the President wants them, according to Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in an Aug 1 TV interview. It is not clear what kind of deal will be struck with America's near peer rival . China poses a peculiar problem and the US is still alternating between confrontation and pressing for an advantage. 'Their economy and ours are like a square peg and a round hole, they don't really fit together very well,' Mr Greer said. But what is crystal clear is that America has just executed a major turn, reshaping the post-World War II economy to reflect Mr Trump's priorities of preserving American dominance in all spheres, from military might and manufacturing to energy. And the man is just six months into the job. Costs are more tangible than benefits As Mr Trump is never tired of pointing out, the threat of tariffs has persuaded the European Union and Japan to commit to investing US$600 billion (S$774 billion) and US$550 billion in the US, respectively. Combined with earlier investment commitments, including from Saudi Arabia, Mr Trump has touted the figure of US$12 trillion. Tariff revenues now make up 5 per cent of federal revenues, much higher than the historical average of 2 per cent. The figures are impressive – US$150 billion was collected in mere months, with projections of 'several hundred billions' by the year end. And American companies can now sell their goods – beef, rice, cars and other items – with zero tariffs in many more nations. Key American industries are sheltered through sectoral tariffs enacted in auto, steel, aluminium and copper industries. Pharmaceuticals and semiconductors are next in line. But plenty of fine print applies. Analysts caution that many pledges from foreign partners may be delayed, only partially fulfilled, or merely symbolic. Foreign investments in the US usually flow in tandem with dollars earned by companies from exports to the US. If tariffs penalise these exports, investing more dollars is challenging. The actual inflow of foreign investment will likely surpass the levels seen in recent years, say analysts at the Peterson Institute of International Economics (PIIE) in Washington. Just not, they add, by the large margins claimed publicly by Mr Trump. Dr Marcus Noland, an international trade economist at PIIE, found a clear example of the impact of Mr Trump's tariffs right in his own kitchen. The granola he has for breakfast is made by an American company with a plant in Ontario, Canada. Due to higher tariffs, the price of this granola has risen more than 40 per cent. 'Shortages and higher prices, there's no good here,' he maintains. Experts have tallied the costs. The average US tariff rate in the first quarter was 2.4 per cent, but climbed to 10 per cent in June. The latest levy announcements are set to bring that to more than 18 per cent, according to analysts at Gavekal Research. The median US household stares down an extra US$1,270 in expenses for 2025, a number projected to reach US$1,619 next year. Economic growth slowed from near 3 per cent in 2024 to about 1.2 per cent over the first half of 2025 and may be zero for the rest of the year. Some models predict wages will fall and leave scars that will stay raw for a generation. A recession now appears 'very, very likely', to quote Moody's Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, who has been warning of this outcome since Mr Trump made his 'Liberation Day' tariffs announcement in early April. Corporate bottom lines tell a similar story. Apple's June quarter results dazzled, but only because buyers rushed to beat tariffs. The 25 per cent levy on India – where the company now produces its smartphones for the US market – darkens the next quarter. Amazon says inventories are its buffer now. But the future is 'impossible to know', says its chief executive Andy Jassy as supply chains in China, where the e-commerce giant sources its vast array of products, are in the crosshairs. Manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers increasingly report paying higher prices for the goods and services they buy and are slowly beginning to raise the prices they charge their customers, says the US Chamber of Commerce. Higher tariffs will directly punish the domestic manufacturing industry given that approximately 56 per cent of US imports are composed of raw materials and intermediary and capital goods. These will especially hit the small businesses which operate on thin margins and will find it harder to absorb the tariffs. Defined as those with fewer than 500 employees, they account for over 40 per cent of the country's economic activity. Industry insiders are also sceptical of Mr Trump's push to expand access for American products. 'I don't know that we wanted zero tariffs on American goods,' said an analyst who advises American businesses operating in South-east Asia. 'The more important things are the non-tariff barriers.' Hoover Institution economist David Henderson narrowed in on the impact of tariffs on the most important actor in the US economy – the consumer. 'For some countries, notably those in the European Union, tariff rates will be lower than they were before Trump began. That is a victory. But we should be clear about whom it's a victory for,' he noted in a July 31 commentary. 'The main gainers are European consumers, and the secondary gainers are US exporters. The big losers, though, from the high US tariffs, are US consumers and producers who use the tariffed items as inputs, and the secondary losers are foreign exporters,' he said. He noted that while US consumers will pay a 19 per cent tariff rate on goods from the Philippines and Indonesia, and a 20 per cent on those from Vietnam, their consumers will pay a zero per cent tariff on imports from the US. 'Don't get me wrong. I'm glad that people in those three countries, almost all of whom are poorer than the average American, will get the benefits of one-way free trade,' he said. 'But I feel bad for Americans, who will pay higher taxes,' he said. The deals, although heralded as victories by the Trump Administration, have not been struck in the traditional way. No formal texts bind them; and there seem to be differences in how they are regarded in Washington and overseas. In his quest for a 'good' deal, nation by nation, Mr Trump may have squeezed out some advantages. But will a refusal to consider the reality of an interdependent world come back to bite America in ways not yet apparent? And no monetary or symbolic victory can be counted as a 'good deal' if it results in squandering a precious asset that took the US years to earn – global goodwill. Can America afford to arm-twist the very same countries whose help it needs in its geopolitical rivalry with China? And if tariffs continue to be applied in purely mercantilistic terms, they may have the effect of transforming America First into America Alone.
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Opec+ agrees in principle another large oil output hike: sources
OPEC+ agreed in principle to boost oil output by 548,000 barrels per day (bpd) in September, two Opec+ sources said on Sunday (Aug 3), as the group finishes unwinding its biggest tranche of production cuts amid fears of further supply disruptions from Russia. A decision is expected at a meeting scheduled to begin at 11 am GMT, amid fresh US demands for India to stop buying Russian oil as Washington seeks ways to push Moscow for a peace deal with Ukraine. Fresh European Union sanctions have also pushed Indian state refiners to suspend Russian oil purchases. Opec+, which consists of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) and its allies, pumps about half of the world's oil. It has been curtailing production for several years to support the market. But it reversed course this year to regain market share, and as US President Donald Trump demanded Opec pump more oil. Opec+ began output increases in April with a modest hike of 138,000 bpd, followed by larger hikes of 411,000 bpd in May, June and July and 548,000 bpd in August. If the group agrees to the 548,000 bpd September increase, it will have fully unwound its previous production cut of 2.2 million bpd, while allowing the United Arab Emirates to raise output by 300,000 bpd. Opec+ still has in place a separate, voluntary cut of about 1.65 million bpd from eight members and a two million bpd cut across all members, which expire at the end of 2026. Sources have said previously the group had no plans to discuss other tranches of cuts on Sunday. REUTERS
