Chinese Navy Shadowed NATO Aircraft Carrier: Report
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Chinese navy—the world's largest by hull count—monitored a French aircraft carrier earlier this year in the contested South China Sea, according to a report published on Saturday.
France is one of three European countries that have deployed aircraft carriers to waters near China since 2021 as part of the European Carrier Group Interoperability Initiative, which aims to maintain a continuous presence in the Indo-Pacific through sequential deployments.
Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment via email.
Why It Matters
China asserts sovereignty over most of the South China Sea, with claims that overlap those of neighboring countries. The East Asian power's armed forces have frequently shadowed Western militaries operating alongside regional allies and partners, such as the Philippines.
France, a NATO member state, deployed its nuclear-powered aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle last November for a five-month mission in the Indo-Pacific, where its ally, the United States, faces challenges from China as both military powers jostle for naval dominance.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Toulon, France, on November 28, 2024.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Toulon, France, on November 28, 2024.
CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU/AFP via Getty Images
Beijing has accused NATO of exceeding the geopolitical scope defined by the North Atlantic Treaty and using what it called "Eurasian security connectivity" as a pretext for maintaining a military presence in the Asia-Pacific.
What To Know
Citing a senior French naval officer at an event, the specialist outlet Naval News reported that Charles de Gaulle was monitored by a Chinese frigate as the aircraft carrier entered the Luzon Strait—a strategic waterway connecting the Philippine Sea and the South China Sea.
According to the report, the French naval strike group led by the Charles de Gaulle also encountered an unidentified Chinese aircraft carrier while operating in the South China Sea, where China maintains a "very substantial" presence of naval and coast guard vessels.
Newsweek previously reported on the Charles de Gaulle's deployment in the western Pacific, where it conducted a war game in mid-February with U.S. and Japanese aircraft carriers—USS Carl Vinson and JS Kaga, respectively—in the Philippine Sea, east of the Philippines.
Following the exercise, the French aircraft carrier participated in another war game with the Philippine military in waters of the South China Sea within the Southeast Asian country's 230-mile exclusive economic zone, before making a stopover at Subic Bay near Manila.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Subic Bay near Manila, the Philippines, on February 23, 2025.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Subic Bay near Manila, the Philippines, on February 23, 2025.
TED ALJIBE/AFP via Getty Images
While the Charles de Gaulle operated in the South China Sea, satellite imagery showed that one of China's two operational aircraft carriers, CNS Shandong, was not docked at its home port in southern China's Hainan province, suggesting a deployment in the South China Sea.
The French officer also revealed that during the Charles de Gaulle's deployment near China, no ships assigned to the naval strike group transited the Taiwan Strait, which lies between China and Taiwan—a self-governed island that Beijing has threatened to take by force.
What People Are Saying
Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang, spokesperson for China's Defense Ministry, said at a press conference on June 26: "We firmly oppose NATO using China as an excuse to 'expand eastward into the Asia-Pacific' and urge NATO to reflect on its own behaviors, change course, and contribute more to global security and stability."
Krzysztof Sliwinski, an associate professor in the Department of Government and International Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University, previously told Newsweek: "European carriers play a crucial role in maintaining open access to international waters, particularly in disputed regions such as the South China Sea. This effort challenges China's broad maritime claims and supports essential global trade routes that are important to both the U.S. and Europe."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen which European aircraft carrier will be deployed next to the Indo-Pacific following the ongoing mission of the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
22 minutes ago
As mass starvation looms in Gaza, European leaders to hold emergency meeting
The United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy will hold an emergency call on Friday to talk about the deteriorating conditions in Gaza as more than 100 aid groups warn mass starvation is fast approaching, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Thursday. "The suffering and starvation unfolding in Gaza is unspeakable and indefensible. While the situation has been grave for some time, it has reached new depths and continues to worsen. We are witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe," Starmer said. "We will discuss what we can do urgently to stop the killing and get people the food they desperately need while pulling together all the steps necessary to build a lasting peace. We all agree on the pressing need for Israel to change course and allow the aid that is desperately needed to enter Gaza without delay," Starmer said. French President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday, "It is essential to build the State of Palestine, ensure its viability, and enable it, by accepting its demilitarization and fully recognizing Israel, to contribute to the security of all in the Middle East." "There must be an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages, and massive humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza. It is also necessary to ensure the demilitarization of Hamas, secure and rebuild Gaza," Macron continued. Macron said he would make the official announcement at the U.N. in September. Starmer signaled the same British support. "We are clear that statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people. A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis," Starmer said. Israel condemned France's decision, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying, "Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became. A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel -- not to live in peace beside it. Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel." The U.S. State Department rejected the idea that Israel -- and by extension the U.S. -- is weaponizing aid to Palestinians in Gaza amid rising criticism from the United Nations and humanitarian groups. "This humanitarian conflict lies at the feet of Hamas, who could end this conflict today by releasing the hostages and laying down their arms," State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott said Thursday. Israeli government spokesman David Mencer said "there is no famine" in Gaza, in an online briefing Wednesday. Mencer blamed Hamas and called the food crisis in Gaza "a man-made shortage engineered by Hamas." Pigott touted the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation -- though its distribution sites are in limited areas in Gaza and aid groups say the supplies provided through the GHF is not nearly enough to address the crushing need. The U.N. and other aid organizations have refused to collaborate with the group, citing concerns about its transparency and political impartiality. "This is over 1000 plus since the 27th of May when the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started distributing food and people have been shot both while trying to collect food in these distribution centers where Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distributes, but also when there have been UN convoys and other aid convoys getting into Gaza and people have tried to jump on those trucks and have been shot and killed," Ajith Sunghay, from the Office of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, said. "Ultimately, what we have seen us do is deliver close to 90 million meals into Gaza during the war zone, [and] the ability to deliver that aid in a way where it is not being looted by Hamas," he said. "We want to see an end to the devastation that has taken place in Gaza. That's why we have seen this commitment to get aid to the people who need it in a way where it is not weaponized by Hamas. That commitment remains. It is a commitment from President [Donald] Trump and Secretary [of State Marco] Rubio. That is why we have supported the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation," Pigott said. Pigott said the administration was continuing to call on "other entities to step up in working through this mechanism in order to deliver aid to the people of Gaza without it being looted by Hamas." More than 1,000 people have also been killed by Israeli gunfire near aid distribution sites in Gaza, according to the United Nations. Most of those are operated by GHF, which opened its aid distribution sites on May 27. The Israel Defense Forces said in a statement earlier this month, its troops fired near crowds "in order to remove an immediate threat posed to them," though it wasn't specific. Israeli officials have long accused Hamas of seizing humanitarian goods and selling them to fund militant activity. Hamas denies those claims.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China's Stealthy Solar Exports Stay One Step Ahead of US Tariffs
(Bloomberg) -- The hum of solar panel factories in this steamy island city doesn't sound like much. But to American trade officials, it's the muffled noise of rules being bent — or broken. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom In recent months, Batam, a duty-free Indonesian enclave a short ferry ride from Singapore, has become a key waypoint in a convoluted global shuffle. Chinese solar manufacturers, facing stiff US tariffs, are quietly assembling their equipment in Indonesia and slipping their products into the American market, tariff-free. It's an elegant workaround. But it may not last long. According to Bloomberg News analysis of trade and corporate records, Indonesia's 10 biggest exporters of solar cells and panels sold $608 million worth of products to the US during the first half of 2025. Of those, Bloomberg News identified six firms in Batam where company records indicate they are ultimately owned by executives at Chinese solar companies. Those firms accounted for almost 70% of the exports to the US. Earlier in July, a coalition of US solar manufacturers, including First Solar Inc. and Mission Solar Energy, filed trade petitions against Indonesia, India and Laos. They claimed Chinese companies were gaming the system, flooding the US market with unfairly cheap goods made in the three Asian countries. This prompted the US International Trade Commission to begin an investigation into the anti-dumping and countervailing allegations.'Under President Trump, America is no longer a dumping ground for cheap imports that undermine our industries and workers,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. 'While the Department of Commerce conducts an anti-dumping investigation into solar panels, the administration is closely monitoring transshipment and other methods of undermining our tariffs policies.' The Trump administration hasn't released any detailed definition of what exactly constitutes a transshipment. It's also unclear whether any of these Chinese-owned Batam-based solar companies are rerouting products through Indonesia to avoid the steep US solar tariffs — which has effectively barred Chinese firms' direct access to the lucrative American market — or if the firms are genuinely producing the products in Batam to count as Indonesian Batam, the Indonesian authority managing the island economy, said it hasn't as yet received any confirmation about the start of an anti-dumping investigation. It's working closely with the central and local government to support fair and transparent international trade, BP Batam said in response to a Bloomberg News query. 'So far, partner countries have acknowledged and appreciated the role of the Indonesian government, BP Batam, and the Batam City government in navigating global trade dynamics responsibly,' it said. Indonesia's trade ministry and China's commerce ministry didn't respond to a request for comment on the allegations from the US solar industry. This would not be China's first dance around trade barriers. When Western nations slapped tariffs on Chinese solar goods over a decade ago, the country's manufacturers simply moved production — first to Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand. The strategy worked. Southeast Asian exports, often Chinese in disguise, flowed into the US tariff-free for years. By 2024, the region had become the largest solar exporter to the US. Then Washington moved to shut the loophole. First, the US Department of Commerce, under former President Joe Biden, launched an anti-dumping and countervailing probe against Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand. The year-long investigation found manufacturers were dumping cheap exports into the American market at prices lower than the cost of production. Then in April, under President Donald Trump, the four Southeast Asian nations were hit with tariffs as high as 3,521%. 'Chinese-headquartered solar companies have been cheating the system, undercutting US companies and costing American workers their livelihoods,' Tim Brightbill, co-chair of law firm Wiley's international trade practice, said in April. Brightbill is lead counsel for the Alliance for American Solar Manufacturing and Trade, the coalition of solar companies that successfully pressured the Commerce Department into launching the investigation. The April tariffs forced US buyers to reshuffle where they shop. Indonesia, not covered by the ruling, emerged as one of the biggest winners. Batam, a popular spot for cheap golf trips and long a weekend escape for Singaporeans, turned into the destination for something else: Chinese capital and solar ambitions. 'As other jurisdictions in Southeast Asia have come under increasing scrutiny, factories have continued to relocate in a cat-and-mouse fashion,' said Niclas D. Weimar, head of technology at Sinovoltaics, a Dutch-German compliance and quality assurance firm for the solar industry. Some of the biggest Chinese solar companies have landed there in the last two years, churning out solar panels straight for the US market. Indonesia exported a total $733 million in solar products to the US between January and May this year, a 350% increase from last year, according to US customs data. One example: PT Rec Solar Energy Indonesia, now the country's largest solar exporter to the US. The company sent $219 million worth of panels across the Pacific in the first half of 2025 — virtually all of its output. It began exporting from Batam in 2023, based on information from its parent NE Solar, a Cambodian company founded in 2022, according to their website. Dig a little deeper, and Cambodian companies registry shows NE Solar's previous director was Huang Yunfei, who is also the owner of a Chinese manufacturer called Huzhou Zhongdian Solar. US and Canadian trademark data show Huzhou Zhongdian Solar owns the 'NE Solar' trademark, while the Cambodian NE Solar owns the trademark in that country. NE Solar's current director is Cheng Shen, whose office address in a Cambodian registry shows is just 4 kilometers away from Huzhou Zhongdian Solar. The ties don't end there. In the first half of 2025, PT Rec imported 91% of its production materials, or $92 million worth, from Huzhou Paluo Yunpeng New Materials, a company owned by the same owners as Huzhou Zhongdian, according to Chinese business records. In other words: the factory might be in Indonesia, but the supply chain — and control — appears to be firmly to PT Rec's office in Batam went unanswered. Calls to a personal phone number listed for Cheng Shen on Cambodia's registration record went unanswered, while Bloomberg News couldn't find contact details for Huang Yunfei. Calls to Huzhou Zhongdian also went unanswered. Email inquiries sent to NE Solar and Huzhou Zhongdian were also unanswered. Companies registries in Indonesia and China also list Chinese solar firms' directors or subsidiaries as the beneficial owners of five other Batam-based companies – PT Nusa Solar Indonesia, PT Blue Sky Solar Indonesia, PT Allianz Solar Indonesia, PT Thornova Solar Indonesia and PT Msun Solar Nusa and PT Blue Sky didn't respond to requests for comment when contacted by phone, and a PT Nusa employee declined to immediately comment when reached on LinkedIn. Bloomberg News couldn't find phone numbers for the rest of the companies in public records or online. Emails sent to all five firms' listed addresses weren't responded to, while messages sent to company employees at four of the firms on LinkedIn went unanswered. Bloomberg News reporters haven't visited these factories. Together, the six Chinese-owned companies sold $419 million worth of solar cells and panels directly to America in the first half of this year, up 148% from a year ago. The surge of solar exports to the US isn't limited to Indonesia. In Laos, which was also spared the April tariff ruling, solar exports have skyrocketed from virtually nothing in early 2024 to $717 million in the first five months of this year, US trade data showed. India went from $10 million in 2022 to $345 million this year. If the US International Trade Commission's investigation against Indonesia, Laos and India concludes there were unfair trade practices, another round of duties could soon hit. Which raises the question: where do the Chinese solar giants go next?The answer depends on how painful the new tariffs turn out to be. Indonesia has negotiated Trump down from a retaliatory tariff rate initially set at 32% in April to 19% earlier this month, making it more attractive than its neighbors, according to BNEF analyst Felix many Chinese firms aren't waiting to find April, JA Solar told Bloomberg News it was accelerating its overseas expansion while closely tracking US tariff developments. Among its bets: a new plant in Oman expected to open by the end of 2025, with a capacity of six gigawatts for cells and three gigawatts for Holding Co., another heavyweight, is going bigger. It's building a 10-gigawatt cell and module factory in Saudi Arabia, in partnership with the kingdom's sovereign wealth fund and Vision Industries. Neither company has indicated plans to sell to the US market. Still, there's no denying that Chinese solar companies will need to tread more cautiously with Trump at the helm, says Cosimo Ries, a Shanghai-based analyst at researcher Trivium China. 'If you're trying to make a long-term decision to invest, everywhere has become so unstable,' Ries said. 'Solar especially, because it's one of the most attacked industries of all.' But at least for now, the faint hums of Batam's solar factories are continuing. --Andy Lin and Ocean Hou. --With assistance from Skylar Woodhouse, Eko Listiyorini, Shadab Nazmi, Chandra Asmara, Tassia Sipahutar and Ben Otto. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How a vote targeting 'pro-China' lawmakers has split Taiwan
For most of his life, Deng Pu didn't see himself as an activist – but that changed last year. Furious at what he felt was undemocratic behaviour by Taiwan's lawmakers and overt Chinese influence in parliament, he joined thousands of others in a massive street protest. Two months ago, he signed up with a campaign group. He has never done these things before. "Previous social movements were important, but to be honest they didn't make me this angry," the 39-year-old photographer told the BBC. "We are citizens... and we need to make sure our society sticks to its democratic systems and spirit." Now, that anger is reaching a turning point. On Saturday Taiwan will hold a vote to decide whether to kick out more than two dozen lawmakers accused of being too close to China, in what has been called "dabamian", or the Great Recall. The unprecedented vote may alter the balance of political power in Taiwan. But already it has deepened political divisions, with both sides of the debate claiming to be the saviour of Taiwan's sacred democracy. It began with last January's elections, when voters chose the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) William Lai as their president, but gave the opposition the dominant presence in the parliamentary Legislative Yuan. In the following months, the main opposition party Kuomintang worked together with the smaller Taiwan People's Party and independents to block DPP bills and pass controversial pieces of legislation. This included limiting the constitutional court's powers, cutting the government's budget, and raising the threshold for holding recall votes. These moves provoked significant outrage among some Taiwanese, who saw them as stymying the DPP government while strengthening the opposition's parliamentary power. In May 2024, thousands began holding protests in what became known as the Bluebird movement, named partially after the Taipei street where many had gathered. Many in the movement believe the opposition, led by the Kuomintang which is known for its relatively friendlier position on China, is being influenced by Beijing and secretly pushing China's agenda in Taiwan's legislature. The party has denied this, but suspicion grew when a group of Kuomintang lawmakers visited China last year and were welcomed by top-ranking Chinese Communist Party official Wang Huning. Civic groups in the Bluebird movement launched petitions to oust various Kuomintang lawmakers, while Kuomintang supporters retaliated by doing the same to some DPP lawmakers. So far, petitions for 31 lawmakers' seats have received enough preliminary support to proceed with a final recall vote. All these seats are held by the Kuomintang - and if enough are successfully recalled, it could mean the DPP eventually gains the majority in the legislature. While Taiwan has held recall votes before, it has never seen so many within such a short space of time. On Saturday, citizens in 24 districts will vote on a simple yes or no question: whether they agree to boot out their legislator. Another round of voting will be held in August for the remaining recall cases. In each district, if the number of votes exceeds 25% of registered voters and more than half approve the recall, the seat will be vacated and a by-election must be held within three months. This means that voter turnout is crucial for the Great Recall's success - and it is the reason why civic groups have been relentlessly flooding social media and pounding the streets canvassing for votes. On a recent weekday night, Deng Pu and several members of his civic group stood outside a Taipei subway station. Some held up banners and chanted slogans, while others distributed paper fans and tissue packets emblazoned with the words "Let's go out together to vote" and "Say yes to the recall". Mr Deng acknowledged that with several of the recall votes taking place in Kuomintang strongholds, even if they did succeed, the party could be re-elected in by-elections. Even so, the Great Recall would still be worth it, he insisted, as it was a way to "correct our democracy". Whatever the result may be, it would "send a strong signal to all the political parties you must respect the latest wishes of Taiwan's citizens." Mr Deng acknowledged that many in the Bluebird movement were DPP supporters, but denied that the civic groups were funded by the party – a theory heavily pushed by the opposition. "We don't care whether DPP wins the by-elections. What's more urgent to us is that we hope to have a normal parliament, one that is not close to China and the Chinese Communist Party." He also took issue with what he saw as a weak response from the DPP, saying: "From the first recall petition till now, the civic groups have been telling the DPP that the citizens are here and there are many of us... We are strongly calling on the DPP to join us." The DPP had initially sought to distance itself from the Great Recall. But eventually it showed its support, with Lai stressing that the DPP "must align with the power of the people" and ordering party officials to assist pro-recall groups to "protect the nation". This has inevitably fueled the opposition's accusation that the DPP has secretly engineered the Great Recall and Bluebird movement, pointing to the fact that the DPP could reap the most political gain. It not only stands a chance of winning a permanent majority in the legislature. Even if the Kuomintang eventually wins in the by-elections, the DPP would have held the majority for a few weeks, giving it enough time to push through crucial laws. Anti-recall protests organised by the Kuomintang and other opposition parties have drawn thousands. At one such rally in the New Taipei district of Banqiao last weekend, supporters showed up waving banners and chanting "No to the vote" while crossing their arms. As they took to the stage, speaker after speaker condemned the Great Recall while characterising William Lai as a fascist and authoritarian traitor of Taiwan's democracy. Large screens played videos of Lai doctored to make him look like Adolf Hitler with the words "Fuhrer Lai", as well as the slogan "Green Terror" – a reference to the DPP's party colour and the White Terror, a period of authoritarian rule and political repression under the Kuomintang. The rhetoric echoed that of Beijing, which has waded into the debate while watching from afar. Its Taiwan Affairs Office has accused Lai of "engaging in dictatorship under the guise of democracy" and "using every means possible to suppress the opposition". "The recall lawmakers were chosen by the majority of voters in their districts. If they are not good enough, they can be voted out in the next election," said rally attendee Mu Zili. "Why should we be using this evil way of getting rid of them?" The 68-year-old night shift worker insisted that the lawmakers were being targeted simply because they belonged to the Kuomintang, and that the Bluebird activists were working for the DPP. "You can't have one party take down the other one in one big recall, this is not democratic," Ms Mu said. "I side with blue," she added, referring to the Kuomintang's party colour. "But I don't oppose green. I'm here not because I support the Kuomintang, but to protect democracy." But there are also many Taiwanese who are on the fence. Watching the anti-recall rally from the sidelines was Banqiao resident Peggy Lin. Like several other bystanders the BBC spoke to, she was bewildered by the fuss over the Great Recall. "I don't know what it's about really, I haven't followed the debate at all… so I don't have an opinion," said the 43-year-old childcare worker. "I will vote after I read more into it and decide based on how I feel on that day about it." Analysts say that regardless of the outcome, the Great Recall will leave a lasting impact on Taiwan's polarised society. The political fighting has gotten nasty at times. Legislators have brawled in parliament over the political deadlock, while activists have faced doxxing and abuse. Mr Deng told the BBC that while out canvassing, he and his team mates had been assaulted or pushed around by residents opposing the vote. The vote has also not gone without scandal: officials have discovered numerous forged signatures, many of deceased voters, in recall petitions against both DPP and Kuomintang lawmakers. The vote "will cement the notion of four year terms as not a given but as conditional on performance and subject to periodic reviews. Political polarisation will likely get worse before it gets better," said Wen-ti Sung, a political scientist with the Australian National University's Taiwan Studies programme. But the Great Recall is also "creating space for renewed political activism", especially for DPP supporters, added Dr Sung, which he characterised as an overall boon to the resiliency of Taiwan's civil society. Ian Chong, a non-resident scholar with Carnegie China, said if many of the recall votes succeed, "one signal it would send to politicians in Taiwan is that they should be careful with how far they push the line in public sentiment… they can't stray too far as there would be consequences". "But if it fizzles out, then it emboldens politicians to do what they want," he noted. "It will intensify the polarisation… and it would be easy for politicians to write off the Great Recall as yet another civil society movement that doesn't get enough momentum beyond a certain part of the population." If there was a close but not conclusive result overall, however, it may mean "the Kuomintang and DPP will have to ultimately seek compromise and work together". This, added Dr Chong, "may not be a bad thing for Taiwan".
