Young Europeans losing faith in democracy, poll finds
A majority from Europe's generation Z – 57% – prefer democracy to any other form of government. Rates of support varied significantly, however, reaching just 48% in Poland and only about 51-52% in Spain and France, with Germany highest at 71%.
More than one in five – 21% – would favour authoritarian rule under certain, unspecified circumstances. This was highest in Italy at 24% and lowest in Germany with 15%. In France, Spain and Poland the figure was 23%.
Nearly one in 10 across the nations said they did not care whether their government was democratic or not, while another 14% did not know or did not answer.
Thorsten Faas, a political scientist at Berlin's Free University, who worked on the study, said: 'Among people who see themselves as politically to the right of centre and feel economically disadvantaged, their support of democracy sinks to just one in three.
'Democracy is under pressure, from within and without.'
The study was carried out in April and May. More than 6,700 people between the ages of 16 and 26 in Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece and Poland responded to the ninth annual survey by the YouGov institute for the Tui Foundation, which funds projects dedicated to youth in Europe.
Forty-eight per cent worry that the democratic system in their own country is endangered, including 61% in Germany, where the economy – Europe's biggest – is ailing and the far right has made significant inroads, fuelled in part by increased backing from young voters.
The return of Donald Trump to the White House, the rise of China, and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine have shifted power away from Europe in the respondents' perception, with just 42% counting the EU among the top three global players.
Despite – or perhaps because of – Brexit, the figure was highest among Britons at 50%. Of those surveyed in the UK, 73% wanted a return to the EU, while nearly half of young Europeans (47%) sought stronger ties between the EU and Britain.
The US was seen by 83% as part of the power trio, followed by China with 75% and Russia on 57%.
Rising polarisation is also driving young Europeans to the ideological fringes along with their elders, but a notable gender divide has emerged in the process.
Nearly one in five – 19% – described themselves as politically right of centre, up from 14% in 2021, while 33% called themselves centrists, 32% as leftist and 16% without any designation.
Women in Germany, France and Italy identified as progressive in higher numbers than four years ago, while young men in Poland and Greece have grown more conservative in the same period.
Support for tougher restrictions on migration has grown across the board since 2021, to 38% from 26%.
Most young Europeans expressed hope in the EU's potential, and two in three overwhelmingly supported their country remaining in the bloc if it still was. But 39% described the EU as not particularly democratic and just 6% said their own national governments worked well, with little need for significant changes.
More than half – 53% – felt the EU was too focused on details and trivial matters. They would like the bloc to tackle the high cost of living, bolster defence against external threats and create better conditions for companies to improve the economy.
Elke Hlawatschek, the head of the Tui Foundation, said: 'The European project, which has brought us peace, freedom of movement and economic progress for decades, is seen as unwieldy.'
Greek people see the strongest need for fundamental overhaul of their political system and are most sceptical about the EU, which Faas described as rooted in enduring trauma of the eurozone debt crisis that drove their country's economy to the brink.
Despite stronger support for climate protection among young Europeans, just one in three said it should take priority over economic growth. The figure has slipped from 44% in 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Anti-woke activist applauds his ‘friends' at the New York Times for Zohran Mamdani college application ‘scoop'
Right-wing activist and self-styled 'independent journalist' Christopher Rufo lauded his 'friends at the New York Times ' this week after it was reported that the Gray Lady rushed to publish a controversial story about how Zohran Mamdani filled out his college application because it didn't want to get 'scooped' by Rufo. Just before the July 4th holiday weekend, the Times sparked outcry when the paper dropped a piece about the New York City mayoral candidate having identified himself on a 2009 application to Columbia University as both 'Asian' and 'Black or African American.' Mamdani is of Indian descent and was born in Uganda. The 33-year-old state lawmaker told the Times that while he doesn't consider himself Black, he does see himself as 'an American who was born in Africa.' He also explained that, as a 17-year-old, he was attempting to represent his complex ethnic and racial background with the limited options provided on the form. 'Most college applications don't have a box for Indian-Ugandans, so I checked multiple boxes trying to capture the fullness of my background,' Mamdani said, adding that he also wrote on the application that he was born in Uganda. 'Even though these boxes are constraining, I wanted my college application to reflect who I was.' While criticism has focused on the newsworthiness of the piece in general, with intense debate centered on the Times' framing of how Mamdani self-identified in high school as a scandal, much of the outrage has also concentrated on the main source of the story. As initially published, the Times article noted that the story revolved around documents that had been hacked from Columbia's computer systems and provided to the paper by an 'intermediary' known as Crémieux, whom they merely identified as 'an academic and an opponent of affirmative action.' Journalists and researchers of right-wing extremism, however, quickly pointed out that Crémieux is the social media pseudonym of Jordan Lasker, a purveyor of white supremacist and eugenicist views whose public identity has been known for months. Amid the growing outcry, the paper would later update its article to indicate that Crémieux 'writes often about IQ and race' while editor Patrick Healy publicly defended the decision to publish the story and grant the source anonymity. 'What matters most here is whether the information was true and factual—it was, confirmed by Mr. Mamdani; that it was independently confirmed; and that it is relevant to the public,' Healy told the Columbia Journalism Review, though he did acknowledge on social media that it was 'fair feedback' for readers to want to know more information about Crémieux. On Sunday night, Semafor Media added another wrinkle to the roiling controversy over the Times story when it reported that the paper rushed to publish the story on Thursday afternoon over concerns that Rufo would beat them. 'Two people familiar with the reporting process told Semafor that the paper was aware that other journalists were working on the admissions story, including Rufo,' Semafor noted. Rufo has risen to prominence in recent years as a crusader against critical race theory, DEI policies, and 'woke' ideology. Semafor pointed out that Rufo confirmed that he had been reporting out the story when the Times article dropped on Thursday, adding that he would follow up with additional details over the coming days on his Substack. Meanwhile, in an apparent effort to further tweak progressives and spark additional backlash against the paper over the Mamdani story, Rufo applauded the Times for its report and suggested they were on the same page. 'Bummer to get scooped, but kudos to my friends at the New York Times for being first to publish the story,' the conservative provocateur tweeted on Sunday evening. A Times spokesperson declined to comment to Semafor on whether Rufo's reporting prompted the paper to race ahead with its story, instead pointing to Healy's statement to CJR explaining his reasoning for publishing the piece. Among journalists and writers at the Times, opinions on the story have been divided, reigniting long-standing tensions between left-leaning staffers and editorial leaders. Times columnist Jamelle Bouie, for instance, has deleted several Bluesky posts in recent days criticizing the paper, including one slamming the paper for not telling 'readers if your source is a nazi,' because he said it violated the Times' social media guidelines. At the same time, senior editors at the paper appeared to be in agreement over the decision to publish the piece, while veteran Times journalists felt that the reaction to the story showed why it was worth pursuing in the first place. 'The fact that this story engendered all the conversation and debate that it has feels like all the evidence you need that this was a legit line of reporting,' a senior reporter told Semafor. As for the revelation that the paper was racing against Rufo to get the story out first, several media critics took the paper to task for seemingly being manipulated by the right-wing media ecosystem. 'Anyway if you banged out this dumb f***ing story while running out the door for the holiday weekend, in league with racist criminals, because you were worried about getting 'scooped' by Chris Rufo, what you're telling the world is that you CONSIDER YOURSELVES TO BE IN THE SAME BUSINESS AS CHRIS RUFO,' Indignity editor Tom Scocca posted on Bluesky. 'Indeed. The correct story is the manipulative stylings of Chris Rufo,' tech columnist Kara Swisher – who once hosted a podcast for the New York Times – reacted to Scocca.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Poland begins controls on borders with Germany and Lithuania
Poland has reintroduced temporary border controls with Germany and Lithuania in response to public concerns over irregular migration. The measures came into force at midnight on Sunday and will last until 5 August, in the latest example of EU governments imposing measures that are straining the fabric of the bloc's passport-free Schengen zone. There have been far-right protests in Poland and anti-immigration campaigners have claimed that Germany is sending people to Poland despite them not having originally entered Germany via Poland, in contravention of EU rules. German authorities have denied this. Poland's controls are being carried out by hundreds of extra police officers and soldiers on 52 border crossings with Germany and 13 with Lithuania. Germany introduced similar random checks on the Polish border in 2023. In May, shortly after the new government of Friedrich Merz took office, the German interior minister, Alexander Dobrindt, ordered more intensive controls which meant that asylum seekers could be turned back at the border, sparking controversy and triggering court challenges. Dobrindt has called a summit on 18 July at which regional politicians are to discuss the challenges that are putting considerable strain on the Schengen zone. Under EU regulations, temporary border controls are allowed in order to address serious threats, but they can only be kept in place for a limited time. On Monday, the Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, said his government was made up of 'supporters of … Europe without borders' but that they were operating in the interests of the entire EU. 'We are doing this for you, for the Germans, the Dutch, the French, because it's the border of the European Union,' he said. The interior minister, Tomasz Siemoniak, said the measures were necessary to prevent irregular migration through Poland. While the controls are only meant to last for 30 days, Siemoniak added: 'If the Germans don't remove their controls, we will continue with ours too.' He said the problem had been exacerbated by the tightening of controls at the Poland-Belarus border, leading to rising numbers elsewhere. 'We are seeing a significant increase in illegal migrants crossing the border into Lithuania, Latvia and then travelling to Poland,' he said. For some time Poland has been warning against what it says is a Russian-Belarusian campaign to destabilise the EU and stoke the far right by incentivising irregular migration through the bloc's eastern borders with Belarus. Siemoniak said that just before the controls began at midnight, Polish border guards stopped an Estonian man attempting to smuggle four people, thought to be Afghan citizens, over the border. 'This is exactly the proof we need as to how necessary these controls are,' he said. Tusk said the same four people had been previously registered as attempting the illegal crossing from Belarus. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Tusk repeated his thinly veiled criticism of Germany, saying the new controls would allow the Polish authorities to scrutinise every case of a person being turned away by the German border force and pushed back into Poland. 'It will no longer be the case that anyone who has crossed the border illegally and whose documentation is incomplete or unclear will be sent to Poland from anywhere – whether from Germany or any other country,' Tusk said. In Berlin, Merz's spokesperson said: 'The protection of borders against irregular migration is an interest that Germany has, that Poland has, that our European neighbours share with us. We do not want permanent border controls.' Germany's government commissioner for Poland, Knut Abraham, described the border controls as a 'heavy burden' for the border region. 'This is not a good day for German-Polish relations,' he said. 'Intensifying controls at the German-Polish border will not be the solution to the migration problem.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Russian minister found dead hours after being sacked by Putin
Russia's transport minister killed himself hours after he was sacked by Vladimir Putin, according to state media. Roman Starovoit, the former governor of the Kursk region that was invaded by Ukrainian forces last year, was found dead in his car from a gunshot wound. Svetlana Petrenko, a spokesman for the Russian investigative committee, said 'suicide is the primary version', and added that investigators were working at the scene. Starovoit, 53, was dismissed from his position as minister of transport for unspecified reasons on Monday. Over the weekend, Ukrainian drone attacks sparked turmoil at Russian airports, with hundreds of passengers left stranded by flight cancellations. The Kremlin said the sacking was not related to a loss of confidence in the long-standing member of Putin's United Russia party. Starovoit served as governor of Kursk from 2019 to 2024, resigning over the invasion of the Ukrainian army. Alexei Smirnov, the former deputy who replaced him in the role, was arrested in April over claims of embezzlement during the construction of defences in the region. Sources told Ros Business Consulting (RBC) news, a privately owned Russian media channel, that Starovoit was also under threat of arrest as the construction began during his term. The veteran politician, who was born in Kursk, appeared to have used an award pistol to shoot himself in Odintsovo, a city in the Moscow region, RBC added. The car was found in Malevich park, sources told state-owned Izvestia. The suicide came days after Konstantin Strukov, the chief executive of Yuzhuralzoloto, Russia's third-largest gold producer, was barred from leaving the country after authorities charged him with corruption and moved to nationalise the company. Mr Strukov was on board his $50 million Bombardier jet when his departure to Turkey was halted by federal aviation authorities, the Kommersant business newspaper reported on Saturday. Pictures showed the tycoon looking at the floor as bailiffs and an official in a high-visibility jacket stood over his seat. Prosecutors have accused the 66-year-old of using his political influence to acquire lucrative mining contracts, and registering them in the name of family members. A court motion has been filed to seize his assets.
